Advertisement
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Remap and Insurance

13

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,248 ✭✭✭omega man


    Yeah I even went through an AXA branch rather than their call centre but “underwriting” said no. I’ve appealed but not holding my breath. So frustrating.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,327 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    I would imagine it’s a red flag to them if someone improves the brakes because it suggests they will be driving hard. It is ridiculous when you consider that better brakes make for better braking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,851 ✭✭✭pah




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,248 ✭✭✭omega man


    Yeah I wouldn’t let it go! Underwriting rejected my appeal but I didn’t accept that either (complete lack of any reasonable explanation) and second time around they allowed the mods with no additional premium. The local AXA branch manager was helpful in fairness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,851 ✭✭✭pah


    I've just emailed AXA underwriting to make my case for a 2012 F11 535i with a stage 1 remap, software only. We shall see 🤞



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,034 ✭✭✭HBC08




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 245 ✭✭LasersGoPewPew


    Hypothetically speaking, what would happen if one was involved in a road traffic incident and the vehicle involved was remapped by the previous owner unbeknownst to the current owner, in this case would the current owners insurance be invalidated if an assessor actually checked ECU for any modifications?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,034 ✭✭✭HBC08


    Good question.

    I imagine the current owner would be held responsible.

    Otherwise whats to stop anybody claiming the car was remapped before they bought it or they didn't know it was remapped?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭djan


    I wonder if there's a way to see at what point the remap was done through the ECU? It's not really feasible to know of previous owners' modifications on a car as it can be a huge amount of things which could technically void cover.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,733 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    I assume that the insurance companies apparently checking the ECU have the factory maps for every make and model of car to compare the maps on the ECU to?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,328 ✭✭✭✭User1998


    There was a poster here a while ago working in the industry who said they never check for modifications



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,195 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hellrazer


    Yep -In 29 years Ive never had an assessor plug a diagnostic into any insurance claimed car and check for remapping.

    They will however look at visible mods that look dodgy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 737 ✭✭✭murphthesmurf


    This makes sense, it would take some amount of proficiency to be able to compare engine Maps. To understand what it all means and what differences to be looking for. Even if they were suspicious and determined to look into it, it would most likely be the job of a third party who knows what they're doing. Said third party is going to be costly and possibly turn up nothing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,325 ✭✭✭kirving


    It is absolutely trivial for a manufacturer to check if a car has been mapped or not. For any car connected to the internet (read: any car approved from April 2018), it could likely even be done remotely. Last time I dropped into BMW for a service, my car had already autonomously notified BMW of a fault with a control module.

    I was speaking to someone yesterday who clocked their car to keep inside a warranty period (which is much less invasive than a map) , and the manufacturer told them over the phone not to bother coming in as it wouldn't be covered.

    The reason that insurance companies are more interested in visual modifications than software, is likely that it's difficult for them to prove if the owner knew that the car's software had been modified, and even if they did, whether of not that contributed to the collision.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,733 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    What happens if you buy a mapped car and get it remapped back to the factory map? What happens if you map your car to be more efficient and less powerful? What happens if you change modes on your car which can change the engine mapping?

    It's trivial for the manufacturer to check as they have all the proprietary software but not insurance companies. Do insurance companies have the proprietary software of all car manufacture's that sell in Ireland, I very much doubt it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,308 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    All it takes is a couple of seconds to see a ECU has been tampered with. Checksum or a dedicated part in ECU that says tampered with: True etc...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭djan


    People really underestimate the ease of detecting a remap. It would be easy money for dealers to do this for insurers on all but the smallest of claims as its super quick and doesn't require trained tech to plug in. Also, once a car has been remapped in any way (regardless of power or consumption goals) it will forever be flagged in ECU even if put back to standard.

    I do wonder if its possible to read dates at which maps were changed which could put to bed to bed the "previous owner put it on" argument.

    Has anyone ever had a map done, declared it and received a decent quote in Ireland?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,851 ✭✭✭pah


    I phoned around in relation to my post above and was getting quotes 2k+ with the remap 🙄 450 - 600 without 42 yrs old claims free forever with an is250 currently.

    Still waiting to hear back from underwriting. I'm in a position where everything has to be above board.

    I also have no problem getting a quote in the same 600 ballpark for a c63 AMG that's 6.2 V8 450 brake 🤷🏻‍♂️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭djan


    It is mad how a remap in Ireland makes it near impossible to insure compared to the UK where its if anything an extra 10% or so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 737 ✭✭✭murphthesmurf


    Manufacturers don't carry out insurance assessments. For an insurer to have cars ECU checked by manufacturers would be very expensive.

    A manufacturer can log into their car and check things like service intervals, fault logs, mileage etc. They can also see software version to check it has the latest software version. A remap does not change the software itself, but rather the perimeters within it. Theoretically manufacturers could check this remotely too, but unlikely do.

    Insurance assessors are not qualified technicians and so I doubt they are allowed to plug anything into a car. They are there to assess damage, viability of repair and potential cost. They will do a quick visual check for modifications, doubt it goes any further than that.

    I may be wrong, I don't work in the industry.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 737 ✭✭✭murphthesmurf


    Easy money for dealers, expensive for insurers. Adding to the cost of every claim that comes in.

    It would almost certainly require a trained tech, insurers or main dealers aren't going to allow just anyone plug equipment into a cars brain. If a car is repaired but then has a fault, the blame will be passed to the unqualified person that was plugging things into it.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,195 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hellrazer


    Actually a lot of assessors I deal with are fully qualified mechanics who have changed careers by doing the Automotive Engineers Assessors course - 2 year part time course in TU.

    IAEA (Institute of Automotive assessors) requires a qualification to be an insurance assessor-The TU course and to get accepted to the Assessors course you need a technical qualification ie mechanic or engineer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,325 ✭✭✭kirving


    I work for a company who make automotive electronics, it its absolutely trivial for the manufacturer to read basically any parameter from any device in a modern car. Your commercially available OB2 reader might just tell you the software version, but it's absolutely possible to read specific parameters from most if not all networked devices. A simple checksum is commonly used to save time on production lines however.

    Below are two examples which I happen to have seen. The BMW version is for sure more aimed at car blackbox (telematics) providers so they don't actually have to install a physical device in a car which natively has it's own recorder / GPS, but the point remains that insurance companies have access to such data on request.

    They likely don't check because of the cost as you say, but also the difficulty in proving that the owner knew about the map. Far easier to deny a claim due to visual mods as said.


    Out of interest...

    https://az685612.vo.msecnd.net/pdfs/3b2dc914ca807879995b3bd1e01a75305a73fb2c/S40_owners_manual_MY12_EN_tp14006.pdf

    image.png

    https://bmw-cardata.bmwgroup.com/thirdparty/public/car-data/technical-configuration/api-documentation

    image.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭djan


    Easy money for dealers as all they have to do is plug in and do a checksum of data. Not expensive for insurers as even if the dealer were to charge full whack diagnostic fee (+-150EUR) that is very little in claims where potential hundreds of thousand euro are at stake. Insurance company brings car to dealer, they plug in and within 5 odd minutes they have result which can then be used to invalidate claim.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,328 ✭✭✭✭User1998


    I’d imagine that even if it was possible for an insurance assessor to plug some sort of scanner into an OBD port and see a remap, it doesn’t mean that it would hold up in a court of law as a reason to deny you insurance cover. Surely they would need the manufacturer to inspect the car and provide official confirmation that the car had been tampered with.

    The post above could probably be used as evidence but even still I doubt a manufacturer that already has a service waiting list of up to 6 months is going to set up a special department just for insurance assessors.

    And even still there is the argument that the owner of the car might not have even known about the remap.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,851 ✭✭✭pah


    They won't cover anything that impacts the safety or performance of the vehicle. Bit Irish but hardly surprising. Shows a real lack of knowledge and understanding of what's involved IMO 🤷🏻‍♂️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,260 ✭✭✭zg3409


    Agreed..I expect in terms of a death or serious injury, particularly if a part on the car failed then the manufacturer and insurer would be very interested in any data. I know of one van and while at the dealer the technician showed the screen where the vehicle had logged the time and date that the vehicle had ever gone it's fastest speed. As in years later it logged the max ever speed and date. We had a log of all van drivers so we could have traced who was driving on that date.

    I remember in the case of a school bus that crashed in roadworks there was a big investigation. The manufacturer determined there was welding repair on the rear wheels that was DIY that failed. They also determined that the bulb for the ABS fault was removed and that the ABS system was not working. That was not a "visual check" but a diagnostics and disassembly and checking bulb holder. So it depends on the seriousness of the incident and if a manufacturer might be blamed for a mechanical fault. The driver was then blaming the abs system not driver error as the cause etc.


    You may get away with remapping 99.99% of the time for insurance claims. As said dealers engine warranty will soon pick up a remap voiding manufacturer warranty on engine.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,195 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hellrazer


    They are 2 different cases. The one with the axle coming away was in Offaly and the one with the abs was in Navan.


    I remember that case with the ABS bus well because it was hammered into us to make sure all systems were checked on servicing. But it wasnt a diagnostic check that found the issue with the ABS. The wires / sensors were visibly disconnected from the ABS system and had been cable tied to the chassis. The bulb had been removed previously. Probably at the sames time the wires were disconnected. So it wasnt a diagnostic check that found it - it was actually a visible inspection.

    When the assessor found the wires disconnected he looked at the bulb which wasnt working and had been removed.

    In this case he didnt even need to do a diagnostic check because the idiots that disconnected the wires didnt even try to disguise it - they just left them loose.

    They got fined a few million for negligence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,446 ✭✭✭Wailin


    I'm guessing that was the one up for sale on donedeal? Can't be too many 2012 F11 535i's about!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,997 ✭✭✭djan


    Wonder how that went... Great engine even when stock!



Advertisement