Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

General British politics discussion thread

1291292294296297562

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,466 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    This isn't accurate.

    It's true that some Jewish people have now assimilated into Western life in Western Europe partly due to the Holocaust and the sense of guilt Jews (mistakingly) had for not integrating better prior to WW2. Jews since 1945 have been taught to assimilate so as not create trouble for themselves.

    But Jewish people come in many forms and ethnic backgrounds. Middle Eastern/North African Jews are easily identifiable as are the large Orthodox Jewish community.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,482 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Look, I am not an apologist for racism in any form.

    I am merely saying Diane Abbott probably has experienced more than a fair share of racism, objectification, misogyny, plus many other forms of prejudice.

    That should qualify her for a bit of slack. She also did not pick her words very well, which is another basis for another form of prejudice from which she may suffer. I remember her being mercilessly pilloried for a lack of numeracy of some matter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,466 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    For all these prejudices she has had an enormously successful political career. She's a London MP. London is a vast multi cultural area where people don't even know their next door neighbour. People in London don't care about race or gender or anything.

    This isn't the first stupid thing Abbot has said. She has a long track record of stupidity and uselessness.

    Despite retracting her comments, I suspect it is what she actually believes. The racism black people suffer (In America seemingly because she referenced what happened in America) is the only form of racism. The black victim complex at play which comes from American culture. Let's hope it doesn't come in here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,174 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    If it had been a rushed tweet or offhanded comment on radio/tv sure she could get some slack for the reasons you stated but she sat down and thought about the words she put into this letter and then chose to send it and the excuse that it was a first draft is garbage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,155 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Another stupid comment. One black person being successful does not mean their isn't racism and clearly her constituents were happy enough with her.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,482 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I think there is plenty of evidence of racism against black people in the UK, and their is plenty of evidence of misogyny against UK female politicians.

    It is quite obvious that Diane Abbott has suffered from both.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,466 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,218 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    As pointed out, people could ride any where legally on the bus in Britain.


    You are whatabouting American history so as to excuse Holocaust denial and anti Semitism.


    One of the largest Jewish communities in Europe live in her constituency, they have to organize patrols to protect themselves from attacks. Imagine that.


    You won't see Abbott or the local labour activists helping at that.


    Abbott isn't that sharp a communicator. There is a consistent effort to minimize the Holocaust from many on the Left today. They know denial is a dead end. So just reducing it to just one of these things in history is the current tactic.


    No Jewish person would argue that losing 40% of their global population trumps sitting at the back of the bus. It's unedifying and the reverse pity Olympics shouldn't be done.


    My point is that it's not a pity contest, 2 wrongs are still 2 wrongs. Don't get distracted from that point by disputing how many died in the Holocaust, wrongly killed, with no justification.


    Can you not accept that a lot of people view it that way?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,218 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    It is also in keeping with her long standing views.


    If it was a dumb tweet, out of character it would not be the story it is.


    It's entirely in character.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,836 ✭✭✭rock22


    I'm quoting from her letter. And her letter was in response to an article by Tomiwa Owolade . SO nothing about my experience. ( I can only assume you hand't read the letter, or you would know that)

    The article was about a report of groups reporting if they have experienced racial abuse in the UK. And a higher percentage of Jewish and Irish people say they have in comparison to African or Asian peoples. So either most racial abuse in the UK is directed at Jewish and Irish people rather than Black and Asian peoples or they are better at reporting it.

    Diane Abbot was right to highlight this . I cannot see anything in her letter that is in any way questionable. There is nothing anti Irish or anti-Semitic about her views expressed in that letter.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,138 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Yes, I think it's more that she worded the letter very clumsily and didn't fully think through what she was saying. She was referring to 'visible' racism where a person is instantly targeted because of their skin colour - but was forgetting that other forms of racism can be just as insidious once we take the skin colour aspect out of things (people's accent or their religion or ethnic background or whatever).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,097 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Are the Irish or Jewish a different race to say the the majority WASP in the UK? If not, can prejudice against them be described as racism? I always thought we were just different ethnics groups further confusion caused by travellers in Ireland being described as a different ethnic group to Non-traveler Irish.

    Abbott is only right in that prejudice against the Irish or say Catholics in Northern Ireland before the troubles would not be instantaneous but only would happen once accents were heard or backgrounds/religion were identified.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,138 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I think what causes confusion is skin colour and physical appearance i.e. anyone black or Asian will instantly look different to a white Caucasian. But it seems to be generally accepted that white people can be the victims of 'racism' by other white people if they are being singled out for their ethnicity i.e. an Irish or Jewish person could definitely be on the receiving end of racism if they are being discriminated against for their background.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,482 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I think ^^ that is what she meant. Pity she did not say it like that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,466 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    She didn't say anything about Asian people.

    I suspect they also don't feature on her definition of racism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,155 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The "red head" quote is stupid though. It's like something some ejit on Twitter would come up with.

    The report wasn't that simple either as it asked people across multiple areas like schools, housing, work. A lot of it made sense based on the different ways the various groups engage with society.

    For instance "white Irish" is high in employment probably because that's how most of us engage with society there. Also low with police because obviously it's not as easy to see our irishness. There is also no timeframe as to when the racism occurred (most participants were between 18-65yo) so there are lots of the older Irish in there who probably got it way worse than you would now.

    It does have some problems though like "have you experienced some form of racist assault" like can I put in the time a guy in a pub called me Paddy when he went to hit me (the incident was not because of my nationality but Paddy popped up a lot as soon as I had issues with English people)

    It was a very interesting study and her response was wrong (not specifically anti-Semitic) but conversations about racism should never be dragged into Lethal Weapon scar comparing territory.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,466 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Video too online of Abbot saying that Chairman Mao on balance did more good than harm.

    This crackpot is not a serious person.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,155 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Yes they are by the definition of race. There is still a fair bit of Punch cartoon mentality around the Irish in Britain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,155 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,466 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,851 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Separatly to the Abbot news, I note that JRM and Frost have co-written an article saying how National Conservatism could be a solution...

    Aside from the headline implying that what has been done is not a path to Brexit posperity, people appear to be asking what is National Conservatism.

    The closest explanation for it that I have read online is from reducing the term to "Nat C"!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,339 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    JRM has been the Minister for Brexit prosperity and has come up with feck all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,138 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    This 'national conservatism' thing appears to be some form of far right / right wing populist ideology - it seems nearly every 'far right' party in Europe subscribes to the idea. Good wiki article on it here:




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,155 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Well putting "national" at the start of your ideology is being savagely historically naive or just being provocative. And Mogg ain't historically naive.

    Wikipedia lists Fianna Fail as National Conservatives 🤣



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,958 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    2 public schoolboys who've never lived in the real world. I'm noticing a theme to this National Conservatism thing.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Posts: 542 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    An exercise in circling the wagons.

    He may have been brusque and rude but the upper echelons of the public service are cocooned in their own universe. Just look at Robert Watt-arrogance personified. He's driven and meticulous, perhaps not the nicest guy but he wanted results and he has a reputation for 15 hour days in the office.

    Unfortunately the report is proof that the permanent government in the UK an subvert the democratically elected government.

    A bad day for the UK, and here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,138 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Though it's hard for these guys to even dismiss the links with early to mid 1930s fascism. Early national socialism barely even mentioned the Jewish question and was all about the stuff that the modern guys love : right wing nationalism, law and order, anti-immigration, 'traditional family values', preserving the culture of the nation etc (like an evening with GB News on speed).



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,482 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    In this National Conservatism related to National Socialism?

    Hmmm - I wonder where this will lead the nasty party - The Tories.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,138 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I notice that it is more a faction of the Tories that are on board rather than the entire party - ERG types mainly. Not a surprise though that someone like Frosty would be on board....he seems a genuinely strange individual.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,482 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Has the likes of Mogg and his fellow toffs not done enough damage with their mad project - Brexit - without heading down a fascist route?

    Exporting refugees to Ruanda with absolutely no right to return is bad enough. However, there is no way for any refugee, no matter how well qualified in escaping from appalling war torn regions like Syria or Yemen, of being able to get access to the UK by legal means. There just is not.

    Of course, Russian oligarchs have no problem bringing their stolen roubles into London to buy gracious homes, sending their children to learn English (with the right accent) at expensive boarding schools. Even, with a few generous contributions to the ruling Tory Party they might, just might, get a seat in the House of Lords.

    They have introduce voter suppression measures with ID requirements that favours Tory voters. Also, given police extra powers to suppress protests that are against the Government.

    What a corrupt and nasty place the Tories have constructed for their chums.



Advertisement