Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Premier League Thread 2022-23 - mod note in OP 12/03/23

1244245247249250345

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,882 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Their remaining fixture list is so friendly though, that they’ll almost definitely stay up and he will be seen as having been worth the risk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,324 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    It really makes no sense - Vieira had the gone through the bad run and they were still 12th. They would have been fine, all those teams below aren't suddenly going to start winning 3/4/5 games on the bounce. They are down there for a reason.

    Do Palace think they should be challenging for Europe?

    Hodgson there for 3 months and then a search for a new manager. Wonder did they always want to go a different direction in the summer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,320 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    They were only 3 points off of relegation so teams didn't need to win 3/4/5 just 1/2 because Palace looked nowhere near winning a game.

    They got lazy in their perceived mid table safety and Viera has to take some blame for that.

    Also if Fulham, Brentford and Brighton are fighting for Europe why not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,324 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    Palace are coming into a nice run of fixtures - you'd expect they'll get a few wins/draws so the teams below will have to make up the difference. There is still 6 teams between them and relegation so yeah you'd need 6 of those teams to start winning a few games to get into bother. It's unlikely, maybe 1 or 2 hit a bit of a run but all 6 won't get their act together.

    As for Europe, yeah maybe that is where Palace expected to be at for this stage under Viera but Palace being 12th in the league is not underachievement in my eyes. Especially as they had just gone through a really rough patch of fixtures and were missing their best player for most of it.

    Just doesn't feel like they needed to make that call just yet. Not sure what Roy is gonna do much different.

    Think Viera deserved his chance over the next few games at least.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,320 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I don't think 12th is an underachievement either. It's about where I would expect them but a much safer 12th.

    Viera has clearly lost the room and change for the sake of change actually does seem to work a lot of the time in soccer.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 19,923 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This is a strange post. Leaving out of the main "Conte" players signed in Kulusevski and Bentancur and forgetting he had 2 of the 5 best forwards in the league at his disposal too. Going limply out in the CL last 16 and barely in the top 4 having played more games than everyone around you is in no way good enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,350 ✭✭✭POKERKING


    You reckon? I dont have spurs down as the fourth best squad in the league so the fact their fourth is overachieving for me. Same as last year, i thought he did an excellent job to get fourth. With the money spent by city/united/liverpool/chelsea you need to be doing well to break into the top 4, add in Arsenal and Newcastle i think if conte had of got 4th this season it would have been two excellent seasons.

    I feel like he wants to win though and doesnt think 4th is winning. His downfall has been the cup performances, they should be in the fa cup semi and they shouldnt be getting knocked out of the cl by that milan team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,902 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    where would you have them? And if Liverpool and Chelsea are under achieving then surely you have to expect they would be in that 4th spot.

    City should be clear. They finished ahead of United and Arsenal last season - so why shouldn't they have gone into this season expecting or aiming to do the same again? they probably would have thought liverpool top 1/2 with City, and maybe you put Chelsea as early season favourite for 3rd. But between United, Arsenal, Newcastle and Spurs, at the start of the season why wouldn't they have thought they could finish ahead of them, again?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,350 ✭✭✭POKERKING


    United spent big in the summer on antony, casemiro and martinez after spending big last summer too. Last year i put their poor season down to OGS so with a top manager and more investment i had them as certs for top 4. I think city liverpool chelsea and united were my pre season top 4. For spurs to break into that would be a good season for them and they would be over achieving. Same for newcastle and arsenal(based on pre season), any of them finishing top 4 would make it an excellent season. Just my opinion though.

    Where would u put them? Do you think they should be higher than 4th?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,902 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Based on Chelsea and Liverpool having poor seasons, Spurs should be 4th at least. and I think given United have no striker and their start to the season, it isn't unreasonable to think United are very much beatable in a top 4 race. Kane and Son vs Rashford and Weghorst?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,882 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Only in the very short term. Gerrard at Villa an example. Results picked up immediately, but unless the replacement is actually a level above the person being shifted out, you're going to revert to type fairly quickly.


    Whereas I would have seen Vieira as exactly the calibre of manager Palace should be targeting this summer. I'm not sure a club like Palace can legitimately project to do better than him in their search. Sometimes you do get lucky, and strike gold, but that doesn't happen often.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,350 ✭✭✭POKERKING


    So par for the course then? Hes not under achieving?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,902 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    You said 4th was overacheiving. I'm saying it is what they should be expecting.

    "the fact their fourth is overachieving for me"



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,758 Mod ✭✭✭✭DM_7


    Spurs went from Poch to short term managers and a disjointed player recruitment.

    They have not spent as much some others but since 2019 Champions League final they added a huge number of players - many are gone or not featuring, others have poor form and overall last weekends team and squad lacked depth. Having Kane and Son has been the main driver of performance over any great coaching or running of the club

    Players signed since 2019:

    Ndombele (at Napoli on loan)

    Lo Celso (at Villareal on loan)

    Bergwijn (now at Ajax)

    Sessegnon (injured)

    Clarke (now at Sunderland)

    Regulion (at Atletico on loan)

    Doherty (was released)

    Hojberg

    Rodon (on loan at Rennes)

    Gil (on loan at Sevilla)

    Royal

    Bentancur (cruciate)

    Sarr (1 start in league this season)

    Kulusevski

    Romero

    Richarlison (0 league goals this season)

    Bissouma (8 league starts this season)

    Udogie (Udinese on loan)

    Spence (on loan to Rennes)

    Porro

    Danjuma (0 league starts)

    Perisic

    Lenglet

    Forster

    That level of recruitment is not reflected in their team. But they are not a alone, because of the income of premier league clubs, once you stay in the league, all sins and waste of money on fees and wages are easily forgotten. A vast range of clubs have spent poorly in terms of return based on player development and have treated player costs as a stock expense rather than a club investment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,869 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    I think you're off there naming the club that you have when comparing the spend. Spurs actually have the 4th highest gross spend over the last 3 seasons.

    And that is not even including the creative accounting that they have employed with the loans of Kulu, Pedro Porro & Danjuma. Kulu & Porro are obligations to buy with a further €45m + €35m outlay to be factored in.

    When those obligations are factored in, Spurs have the 3rd highest gross spend. If Danjuma is made permanent, they have the 2nd highest gross spend.

    image.png

    Of course, the Man City numbers should be taken with a pinch of salt too.

    As others have mentioned, Spurs already had a strong base to work with. They had Kane & Son and had the majority of a squad that was qualifying for the Champions League consistently.


    If you want to go back to the summer after they were in the CL final, it still shows that they are consistently spending the big money and have vastly outspent some other clubs.

    image.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,350 ✭✭✭POKERKING


    I was just asking the question because the post I replied to said he was under achieving.


    So you think hes achieving what hes expected to achieve, i think hes over achieving and rebel thinks hes over achieving.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,902 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    well one of us is right!

    And I think he is getting fired for more than just league position - I don't think league position is really the issue.

    Performance, play style, CL limp exit and the fact he has made it clear nearly all season that he doesn't want to be there, doesn't rate anyone and just seems to hate everyone around him are the bigger issues imo. He has had times where he has bigged the players up, and the project, but he has clearly been in PLEASE JUST SACK ME mode of late, like Jose was at Man United.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 23,562 Mod ✭✭✭✭Kiith


    Anyone who has watched Spurs this year can see why he's getting sacked. He sets us up terribly, is unbelievably stubborn with his tactics, and then goes off on constant rants about everyone but himself. Yeah we have some stinking players in the squad, but he is to blame for the style of football, and that style shockingly bad to watch.

    I don't know that i've ever seen as many disillusioned fans as we have right now. He'd already lost most of the by the CL exit (bringing on Davinson Sanchez for Kulu while 1 down in a CL knockout game? **** sake 😣), and he's definitely lost the dressing room now.

    He has to go. And the sooner the better imo.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,758 Mod ✭✭✭✭DM_7




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,110 ✭✭✭jacool


    Crystal Palace may be playing the long game here.

    Dump Vieira now and bring in Hodgson in the short term, while waiting for Chelsea to fire Potter in the summer.

    Potter will be settled in London and not looking to move too far.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,869 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Nice thinking with the Potter one, but with all respect to Palace, I think Potter would command a higher club than Palace if he were to move on. Maybe a Leicester, Everton type club - 'sleeping giant' if you want. Underperforming in various different ways. Spurs perhaps, or West Ham if they stay up and both also have the London aspect.

    On Palace, maybe they expected Vieira do have them cemented in 10th and higher perhaps. There was a decent outlay when he came in, albeit needed as they released a lot of players. There are some very good players there in Olise, Eze & Guelhi. Edouard is good for that level too. A nice base to work with.

    There's a good docu-series on Channel 4 about the Palace academy that is worth checking out too. They are a good club, and along with Brighton & Brentford, seem to be doing a lot of good local work with fans too to have a real community spirit around the football and get more young people involved. I know a lot of Liverpool fans that always credit Palace fans whenever Liverpool play away at Selhurst Park.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,188 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    No denying Liverpool's recruitment was insanely good but it all didn't happen over night and Conte is there 18 months, Klopp didn't get a single player the 1st season and the following season brought in Mane (37m), Gini (20m) and Matip (free), not exactly big money.

    Conte is simply unwilling to build a team just feels entitled to immediate success and throws the toys out if its not working. We all knew it was going to end in tears I'm just surprised it took this long.

    Off the top of my head Conte got Richarlison, Romero, Kulveski, Bentancur, Emerson Royal. Not bad for a season and a bit.

    It's Conte's own expectations are unrealistic, he's in 4th, they got 4th last season, so I actually agree he was doing a good job but its not enough for him and made the dressing room toxic. He has an inability to look at the bigger picture.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,320 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Depends on how loyal Potter is to Brighton. He was only there for a few years but it was a very influential part of his career.

    Saw Liverpool play there in one of the cups and was pretty impressed with the Liverpool fans for what was an early round cup game. They were much more lively than the other few away fans I've seen.

    I suppose because they are a smaller club you don't get the same animosity in Selhurst. It's noisy but rarely vicious.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,869 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    A very common comment is that the Palace fans prefer to support their own team, sing about their own team and celebrate their own team, rather than the typical 'is this a library', 'feed the scousers', etc etc that are very common. Basically just singing about the opposition every time. None of the jack the lad type stuff, hold me back etc before and after the games either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,109 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    League position is one part of the story, but it's not the whole story. Like Ole getting 2nd in 20/21, it can lead you to ignore the more tangible aspects of what is happening within the club. By definition, going purely off the league table means judging yourself based on everyone else's performances, rather than your own.

    Being in 4th this season (which they likely won't be for much longer), is entirely a consequence of other club's failures. You say 'with the money spent by Liverpool and Chelsea you need to be doing well to break into the top 4' - but Liverpool and Chelsea this season have literally proven that not to be the case. If other teams are having absolutely horrendous seasons, then you don't get to pat yourself on the back too much for being above them. Which of course is why their own fans have been calling for him to be sacked for weeks - they're actually watching the performances and seeing the problems.

    The bottom line is that in the 28 league games he managed last season, they got more points and better performances than in the 28 league games he's managed this season. They spent a lot of money, and he had a full pre-season to work with his team, so it's a fair expectation that they would build on what they did last year and improve further. Instead, they're playing worse, everyone is unhappy, and they've got less points. They've gone backwards. He himself literally achieved more with this team a year ago - that's why i would say he's underachieving now with a better squad.

    Subscribe to save Boards.ie from closing down: The Bad News

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,361 ✭✭✭✭retalivity


    Soccer AM to end this season after 28 years. Caught it before christmas for the first time in ages and it was dire, Jimmy Bullard is a really unlikeable chap.

    The 4hr saturday morning marathons in the late 90s/early 00s were gold.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,278 ✭✭✭✭OmegaGene


    maybe we just got old lol but last time i watched it i could last more than five minutes, absolute dire

    The internet isn’t for everyone



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 742 ✭✭✭al87987


    That's a real shame about Soccer AM, I actually thought Bullard did a great job in reviving the whole thing, seems incredible to think now that they never had a football player as a presenter before.

    It opened up the format a hell of a lot more to actual football and they thankfully got rid of dance offs and Soccerettes etc that they had before and managed to cut the show in half runtime-wise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,342 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Soccer Am was great for a while, pre social media before every twat with an opinion can have a YouTube channel or podcast or before we had the likes of Michah et al on for being banter merchants, it was a place for a bit of fun around the game.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,388 ✭✭✭UsBus


    It's sad to see it decline the way it has. The banter on it 20-25 years ago was unmissable on a Saturday morning. Imagine Lovejoy was interviewing Soccerettes and the slagging around it. Some seriously funny moments on it, Lovejoy showing his mySpace clips; John Fendley's 'Barry' character & Sheephead's weather report; and the Danceoff!!!!

    The problem over the past few years is there is zero banter allowed. I watched it a couple of weeks ago. Two 'newer additions' to the football challenge in the car park were roaring and screaming throughout the challenge, it was chronic to listen too. Felt as though they were forced upon the cast rather than them creating football comedy moments. The comments about it online were not surprising..



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement