Covid vaccines - thread banned users in First Post

Politicians don't have to be in on it at all. Only the ruling class (elites) at the very top (who effectively own all of those pharmaceutical companies through majority shareholdings with Vanguard and Blackrock). As far as politicians are concerned, they're just encouraging people to take a vaccine for a virus. It's irrelevant what they think.

That same ruling class continually state the carrying capacity of the planet is 1-2B. If they can't make moves to get back to this figure through transparent policy, then how will they achieve it?

Politicians and the ruling class don't care about you, btw, if that's what you're trying to infer by "people for vote for them". You're considered a useless eater, lol.

It doesn't matter what you think re: population numbers, either. The ones who make the decisions have decided the carrying capacity is 1-2B.

By "ruling class", I'm simply referring to the wealthiest people and families in the world who exert significant influence over our governments. The WEF would be the lower end of the ladder, of which most PM's (including our own) are members.

You're a pleb in the eyes of these people. And these people have decided they want the population back down towards 1B.

Sounds like you took the vaccine, so I understand why you're so defensive. No need to be getting mad at me, though; I don't make the decisions.

Getting "support" on here is irrelevant to me. Why would I care about that? Why would you care about getting "support" from anons?

I enjoy life just fine, thanks. I never took any injections, whereas you probably did. You're like most people in that you cannot accept that the world is overpopulated. Any suggestion to lower birthrates for a few generations, along with consumption levels, triggers you into a defensive outburst.

Again, it doesn't particularly matter what you or I think. We don't make the decisions. Let's hope the folks who do make the macro decisions, didn't use the "pandemic" as an opportunity to tackle what they refer to as "significant overpopulation".

I'd consider Covid to be an outbreak, as opposed to a "pandemic". If it wasn't for the media and people wearing masks, let's be honest, you would of never known there was a "pandemic".

As I said earlier, if the event was used as an opportunity, a certain percentage of people would of been injected with some sort of slow-kill. I know there's a lot of "died suddenly" events recently, but probably more something that erodes down the immune system over time. You can't have everyone injected dying within a year of the shot, lol. Then, of course, sterilisation elements for the young. Take years off the older adults, sterilise the young. It's not complicated.

None of you have answered the question: If the world is deemed overpopulated by 75 - 90%, outside of single or no-child policies, how can the number be reduced back down towards supposed carrying capacity?

Well, isn't their belief that carbon is the biggest contributor to climate change, which in turn is the biggest threat to the planet?

Less people = less carbon and less stress on the planet

8B people aren't "needed" on Earth, either; let's be honest. Especially with the continuing rapid advances in AI, automation, robotics etc.

Long winded way of saying: the best way to deliver a slow-kill or sterilisation elements is through injection. Your "vaccine" was an injection, right?

I see #pfertility has been trending on Twitter.

Project Veritas recorded a guy from Pfizer talking about fertility concerns around the vaxx. Has been viewed over 10m times in last week, apparently. Interesting. 5min clip:

I never said anything about Elon Musk, specifically.

They're making big moves away from oil to electric and renewables, as per the green agenda and sustainability goals. As previously mentioned, AI and robotics = less people required. Why keep billions around that will be surplus to requirements? Doesn't make much sense.

Club of Rome are a Rockefeller think-tank. Dennis Meadows, author of Limits To Growth (framework for Agenda 21 and Sustainability Goals) concluded that the carrying capacity of the planet is 1-2B. He also gave a talk at the Smithsonian a few years back where he said we were now actually past the point of "sustainability goals" being enough.

What me and you think is largely irrelevant. The question is whether these people saw it necessary to act on such an "emergency". If so, injecting most of the population with a slow-kill and sterilisation was the perfect way to address it.

Further, there is a pension ticking time bomb being continually kicked down the road. The ECB and others have repeatedly said this over the years. Reducing that age cohort would be one way to alleviate the problem.

Anyway, it's an interesting (albeit grim) theory. Time will tell. I've got to get off; thanks for engaging in good faith.