Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Premier League Thread 2022-23 - mod note in OP 12/03/23

1176177179181182345

Comments

  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 58,128 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Newcastle had spent 210 million before the January window since the takeover. While it might be chump change compared to big balls Boehly they have essentially replaced their entire backline including goalkeeper and midfield along with a shiny new striker (and now they've dropped 40 million on Gordon too) so the rebuild is quite significant. That's not to take away from Howe but they have been splashing the cash make no mistake about it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,108 ✭✭✭jacool


    The "tribal bias" is currently trending very highly on twitter right now.

    Some things never change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,188 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Is that true about the united site? Probably was never removed as he was under contract



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,902 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    that 3 windows, 70million per window.

    For a PL club, in this day and age.... that is standard. and for the number of players they signed (replaced entire backline, keeper, new striker, winger, midfielder and maybe others I am not thinking of.... an average of less than 30m per player. Again, for a PL club that ain't big. And they were 19th when he took over. Howe has not enjoyed anything like the mad windows people assumed PIF were going to fund.

    Newcastle have, imo, spent an amount and brought in players that are broadly in line with what you would have expected of a PL club of their stature, prior to Saudi money.

    And key players, such as Lonstaff, Almiron, Jolinton, ASM, Wilson were there before, and have been rejuvinated under Howe.

    To go from where they were, to where they are. How they were playing to how they do now (when they want to....) is a credit to Howe. As I say, there isn't many in that squad I would take over a player at United. And I am sure many different club fans would say the same.

    I didn't mean to imply he has spent nothing, but the change in their fortunes under him, for the money spent, and the players brought in, is a credit to him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,340 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Football fans are fickle.

    Tony Adams did jail for drink driving.

    Firmino was convicted of drink driving.

    Jan Molby did jail time for dangerous driving.

    Jermaine Pennant did jail for drink driving.

    Giggs was knocking off his brothers wife for years.

    Troy Deeney did jail time for assault.

    Vinnie Jones was convicted of assault.

    Not too many fans had any significant issues with cheering on the above players.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,340 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    The website thing iirc came up a number of months ago, I dont think he was never actually removed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,902 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    i thought the same today alright - but yeah, apparently he was never removed from the squad plage - he had just been removed from some app functionality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,954 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright



    I think u'll find in football & in life people done for sexual assault are treated far more harshly

    You won't find anyone cheering on Adam Johnson or Mendy ,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,869 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    Neville & Alex Ferguson appeared in court as character witnesses for Ryan Giggs, so it's not really a surprise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,340 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Greenwood didn't get done for anything so your point as usual is utterly irrelevant.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,954 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    It could be because the club is massive so everything comes to light but a lot of united players involved in scandals with women Giggs, Rooney, Rio, Greenwood , Ronaldo, RVP ( he may have been at Arsenal at the time) to name a few



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,954 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    Ye true he didn't get done in court but everyone seen the picture & heard the voice note ,he should never play professional football again,

    Do you think he should return to the United squad ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,308 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    His brother probably won't agree but fans forgiving Giggs for that and fans forgiving assault are two very different things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,643 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    He should have his contract terminated. Everyone who heard the audio knows he's guilty, and getting off on a technicality doesn't change that. He won't play for England again, and he shouldn't play for a PL club again. Paddy Jackson and the rest wouldn't get an opportunity at an Irish side after their rape acquittal, and it ought to be the same treatment for Greenwood.

    If he tries to have a career in England, he'll get major abuse from away fans and I can see a lot of fans of clubs linked with him wanting nothing to do with him. He'll probably get a big offer from Saudi Arabia or thereabouts. There were plenty of comments from fans in that part of the world who didn't see what the fuss was about in the first place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,340 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Yes, I do. I've posted about it in the United thread so no point repeating it in here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,919 ✭✭✭✭SlickRic


    I do find the acceptance of the Chelsea spending a bit funny, if I'm honest.

    Actually, I don't want to say it's 'acceptance' per se, but the money thrown around has been dealt with in an almost jovial fashion. Not an awful lot is being made of it, other than a couple of snide remarks about FFP.

    I couldn't be further from an apologist for Newcastle or Manchester City, but if they'd have done what Chelsea have just done, the football world and it's fans would be in relative meltdown. we (me included) would be throwing all the shade in the world at the wall of morally repugnant money that is being thrown at these football clubs in the name of sportswashing, and bemoaning the lack of action against those bad, bad Saudis.

    Venture captialism = fine

    Oil money = bad



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,025 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    I never said Howe was not doing a good job , but the environment Ten Hag came into was a lot more toxic with higher expectations and many failures since Sir Alex , ther was huge positity in Newcastle after the Saudi takeover (before Howe arrived) - thats the facts



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,025 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    Sexual asault is a lot more serious offence than drink or dangerous driving



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,340 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Again, he was not convicted of anything. Those players I referenced all were, Giggs being the exception. I'm sure people that have had bereavements due to drunk or reckless drivers would disagree on your comment about the seriousness of the offence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,025 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    someone who is one or 2 drinks over limit , and doesnt cause a fatality or serious injury , is a far less offence than sexual assault - and I'm sure victims of sexual assault would disagree with your comment.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,340 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    I'm repeating myself at this stage so I'll just close my participation by saying MG was convicted of nothing, the case didn't even make it to trial which would indicate that the actual evidence wasn't enough to bring it to trial, never mind get a conviction.

    The notion of innocent until proven guilty is sadly just a notion alot of the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,952 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    Ok well how about would you feel if it was your daughter he did that to? We all saw the photos and heard the recording so we know what happened.

    Would you sit there and say ah sure he hasn't been convicted, he's a grand chap Mary. Not a thing wrong with him, I'll have him over for a pint later.

    Also the trial didn't proceed because she withdrew her statement. I'd imagine she's been paid off or something along those lines.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,033 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    The main witness isn't available anymore. Perhaps it hasn't made it to trial for a more sinister reason than insufficient evidence.

    To put it another way for you, would you be OK for him to date your daughter or sister?

    Save boards.ie by subscribing: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,109 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Can’t say the non-conviction changes much on my own view anyway… it’s not like criminal conviction is at all the bar by which people are generally considered to have crossed a line in their employment rights. I dare say most terminations are for offenses well short of criminal conviction.

    What is in the public domain already is imo enough to not think it correct for someone to be celebrated and rewarded at the highest levels of their profession.

    Everything about this case screams abuse and coercive control - and the way it’s panned out is exactly why it is so bloody hard for police to get convictions on these offenses.

    Subscribe to save Boards.ie from closing down: The Bad News

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 58,128 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Actually... Rather bizarrely in this case didn't the alleged victim's own father sort of support Greenwood after the social media posts. It was something I could not get my head around at the time myself.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,952 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    Yea that was extremely strange.

    Knowing a famous person/having them around the house etc meaning more to you than your own daughters welfare. Fairly sickening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,340 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    How would you feel if your son was falsely accused of something and publicly pilloried because of it?

    Maybe he is 100% guilty.

    Maybe he is 50% guilty.

    Maybe he did pay her off.

    Maybe hes innocent of any wrongdoing.

    Maybe she edited the recordings.

    Maybe she used make up / photoshop to show a cut on her lip.

    Maybe maybe maybe.

    The absolute fact of the matter is that he has not been convicted of anything and all charges have been dropped. Only him and her know what really happened.

    In this case a combination of the withdrawal of key witnesses and new material that came to light meant there was no longer a realistic prospect of conviction. In these circumstances, we are under a duty to stop the case.

    UK authorities can progress to trial even if the victim is completely uncooperative and / or doesnt wish to press charges but the evidence they had (and that all of us are working off) and presumably new evidence only they are privy to is not sufficient to go to trial. We live in a world of laws and there has to be proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Clearly, this case is not beyond reasonable doubt. Its a complex issue where there are no winners, regardless of who is telling or told the truth.

    I'm definitely bowing out of the conversation now, Ive made my thoughts on the matter clear so there is little point in rabbiting on further.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,952 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    Given what I saw and heard and if it was my son involved he'd never be welcome under my roof again. I have zero tolerance for anyone who could treat a woman/partner like that.

    I was was warned as a small child to never raise a hand to my mother or any woman and that stuck with me. My children will be raised the same way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,791 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Weirdly it seems that he broke terms of his bail numerous times by contacting her. His lawyer put through a defence saying he thought it was allowed.

    Between Greenwood, CPS and seemingly her own parents, she has been failed all round.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 552 ✭✭✭BillyHasMates


    You are right it is a fact that he won't be convicted of the offence.

    It is also a fact the pictures exist.

    It is also a fact the recording exists.

    The threshold of evidence for bringing a prosecution for these types of offences can be quite high in cases where it would appear the alleged victim doesn't want to proceed. The rights and wishes of the victim come in to play for consideration. It doesn't mean nothing happened. I would be surprised if Utd reintroduced him to the first team squad.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement