Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Machinery Photo/Discussion Thread II

1152153155157158231

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,326 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    It depends as I said virtually everything towing a cattle box is illegal now depending on size. I said the LC would be border line illegal with a 10X8. @Mooooo wanted a small Jeep capable of doing some towing but was fairly fuel efficient as well as back in the years. However he is worried about ground clearance. I take my one and out of fields. It's grand in my own farm any place else I am ultra careful.

    Anything like that is a compromise. A LC is grand if you have the work for it. But if you have high mileage outside limited towing it is a very expensive option.

    The other factor is whether you need a seated or van option while there are some seated LC out there with commercial tax they are only within certain years. Crew cabs are rough driving for long distances with rear seating very confined and limited. Another factor is CVRT versus NCT. Generally from anecdotal evidence the CVRT is much harder to pass

    If 50+% of the time there is going to be a trailer behind it then the LC is probably the answer. However if you have to compromise and towing is limited then I would pick the 2.2L RAV up until they put the BMW engines in them. Most 2L diesel RAV's have a 2T towing capacity as well with or without 4wd option.

    I have seen 14X6 tracker boxes with 6X700kg finished cattle in them add the weight of the box and you are probably not far off 6T.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 1,956 Mod ✭✭✭✭Albert Johnson


    I can't argue with any of the above and like everything it depends on what compromises the OP is willing to make. Personally I'd suffer lower fuel economy over a lot of other thing's eg towing ability, off road ability/ground clearance, cost of maintenance and reliability etc. That doesn't mean I'd buy a Sherman tank wannabe that did 5mpg but I'd rather buy a bit of extra fuel if it meant I could avail of other benefits. Even at €2 a litre then €1000 extra expenditure buys 500 litres of diesel. Take it that a lot fuel tanks are only 60-70 litre capacity then if you kept it topped up from 1/4 full you'd get 10 additional tops up for you're €1k. I understand that everyone is different but I'd rather be looking at it as opposed to for it when it came to ability, be it towing, off roading ect, of course that comes at a price but so does every other of life's compromises.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,210 ✭✭✭selectamatic


    Just get a 3.0tdi is the simplest advice. Real world mpg probably isn't that different if both auto. The auto box in them is excellent and well regarded (zf 8speed). And ya in a high spec they're the most comfortable and nicely finished crewcab of that era by a mile.


    Those 2.0 biTDI engines just aren't great. They're a disaster in the Transporter. A bit better in Amaroks for some reason apparently but I'd not take the chance.


    Bitta reading for ya




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,326 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    On a 20k miles (32km) the difference would between the RAV and the LC ( assuming (39 V 28mpg) is about 900 litres believe it or not. I have got 43mpg out of the RAV on long journey when traveling at 60 mph it boring but it about as efficient as it gets.

    When I bought the RAV it cost 7k A LC same age with lowish milage was 3-4k more for a commercial. I am not sure what the difference is at present. Tax is 400, commercial was 333 but not sure it still.is. CVRT is about twice the price of an NCT.

    All in all the difference in running cost on 20k miles taking maintenance into account would be near enough 2k/ year. Difference in vehicle cost would add about another 1k/ year at a guess.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 1,956 Mod ✭✭✭✭Albert Johnson


    You're put a good handle on the figures there as usual compared to my rough mental calculations. At €3k a year of a difference it works out at roughly €8 a day more to run the LC over the Rav, tbh I'd still pay it for the other trade offs I've listed above. However I'm far from the average punter and I don't drink, smoke or like coffee so it's all relative to what you consider a self indulgence.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,319 ✭✭✭straight


    Owned a Toyota once. Never again. Overrated crap. The reason you see so many lads driving them is down to herd mentality imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    The older ones are certaintly well ahead of competition regarding numbers surviving and resale value.

    Not sure what brands represents better value



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,818 ✭✭✭DBK1


    I told the story here before of a petrol Corolla we had back in the early 90’s. 91-CN-51 was the reg. The worst ball of scrap of a car that ever came into this yard. 3 different respected mechanics tried to sort it. It got 2 different engines and countless other parts and could not be kept going. Got rid of it for a TDI Passat and never looked back, swore there’d never be another Toyota in this yard again for as long as I live.


    I currently have a Land Cruiser and OH has a Verso 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,326 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    I have driven many different types of SUV's. The Toyota RAV is about the only workhorse in them. Similarly with the LC its away ahead of the rest of the competition. In between the Santa Fe is fairly capable I think from years 2013-2015 from what I hear. It's fuel efficiency improved significantly with that model.

    Finish wise inside the RAV back 2010-2014 is poor enough however you have to factor in by that stage that model was around ten years with only minor face lifts. I was in Donegal at the football match last weekend with it. Needed to overtake once or twice and 2.2L engine has rakes of power. You can plod away at 60mph at a little under 2k revs.

    The LC is rated the best 4WD world wide. If you go on a jungle, outback or other excursions on holidays it invariably a LC you will be put in 9 times out of 10 and some of them will be heading for thirsty years old. We travelled Fraiser Island in Australia four years ago in one. The only small SUV I saw there was the RAV.

    It was interesting because you would see the camper Vans going up.the motorway towing a RAV on a fixed towing bar with the bikes on the back of the camper.

    From about 2015 on they are not as reliable due to Toyota not making some of there own engine's.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Years ago a local toppart stores man used to remark that if he was relying on Toyota or Honda to make a living he'd have been broke many times over.

    VW & Audi was the majority of his business



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,818 ✭✭✭DBK1


    I’d be with you Albert, better to be looking at it than looking for it. €8 a day is small money for the comfort of the LC over any of the smaller SUV’s but in real world terms it would be far less than that.

    The day you do buy 4 or 5 reasonable stores you’ll bring them all in the one run behind the LC with a 12x6 whereas with the SUV and 10x5 you’ve to make 2 trips, your €8 is well gone then for that day and plenty more along with it. If you’re regularly pulling full 2 ton loads with the SUV’s there’ll be a significant drop in the 40 mpg figure, I’d safely say it’ll be closer to 30 than 40, and your maintenance bills will see a rise too as shocks, bushings, drop links etc will all need to be far more regularly changed as they wouldn’t be designed for constant towing. I’d imagine for someone like yourself doing daily mart trips with trailers a rav or suv would have you broke by now as they wouldn’t stick the pace.

    It’s horses for courses, if you’re doing only a limited amount of towing, or when you are at the mart you’re only buying weanlings, calves or maybe stores 2 or 3 at a time the suv type and 10x5 will be fine.

    If you’re fattening stock and do your own factory runs or are regularly buying forward stores at marts then the LC or any of the bigger type jeeps is the only option to go for.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 1,956 Mod ✭✭✭✭Albert Johnson


    That's it in a nutshell and it's hard to put a price on reliability/comfort. Granted the last Toyota I owned broke my heart and pocket combined so I never was as happy to see the back of anything in all my life. I changed to pickups after that and I actually enjoy running them as weird as that may sound. Yes there not particularly fuel efficient, the ride quality isn't superb and there a bit harder parked about town but when it comes to ability to do what needs to be done I've not been left wanting.

    I try to run fairly fresh equipment when it comes to towing be it either the vehicle or trailer and keep it maintained. When you come to a hill fully loaded (within the relevant weight limits of course), give it a bit of shoe and the whole rig sails out over the top of it with ease I can't help thinking I often spent €8 or whatever it is in worse way's.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,326 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    8/ day may seem small but to put it in context running costs go from probably 120/ week to 180/ week. 3 k is the cost of an average family holiday.

    For normal driving into and out of work you are probably putting 120 instead of 80 per week into the jeep. When it comes to servicing, CVRT v NCT, tyres repairs etc it probably another 50-150 depending on the circumstances.

    When you buy it you need to find the price of another holiday. There is a huge difference between 20k miles and 8-10 k miles that some lads do messing around with a jeep.

    Some Civils companies that do the big road jobs used to always allow there workers that were travelling fill the vehicle they had out of a diesel tank on site. Before the last recession a lot of these lads had large jeeps LC, Hiluxes, Mitsubishi's Izuzu's etc. On a Friday there was always a que to the diesel tank as lads filled up for the weekend and monday was similar when lads arrived back

    When the recession hit on a new contract the rules changed staff were given a fuel allowance and a card. The Jeeps disappeared within six months I am told replaced by small vans and lads even met and shared journeys.

    You will put 4X500 kg stores, 5X400 or 7 300 kgs in a 10X5 box or 3X700 kg finished cattle and you will not be beating **** out of them at that

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,826 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    When it comes to servicing, CVRT v NCT, tyres repairs etc it probably another 50-150 depending on the circumstances.

    Can't agree here Bass, the service costs on a car thats been used as a jeep, (certaintly for towing and field work), will be higher.

    Subsequently, a car thats been used as a farm jeep is worthless come selling time, where as a jeep that's been used as a jeep will be worth what it always was.

    The depreciation of the car won't be long cancelling out the savings in diesel



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,818 ✭✭✭DBK1


    As was already pointed out the €8 per day won’t be that every day. The days you are actually pulling full trailers the smaller jeeps will be costing you more as you’ll be doing extra runs and you certainly won’t be getting the 40mpg you get when they’re not towing.

    The servicing, tyres, repairs etc will also be at least the same and probably a lot more on the smaller jeeps as they’re not designed for that constant towing that the bigger jeeps are.

    Also depreciation will be far less on an LC than a RAV. A RAV, or any of the SUV’s are basically cars just rose up a bit higher! One that’s used for towing all the time will be wore out and worth nothing when you want to sell it on, the bigger jeeps don’t depreciate as much at all as they are doing what they are designed to do and not being over worked. In the current times land cruisers are increasing in value as the years go by, never mind decreasing.

    When all is said and done your running costs will be very similar with both outfits as the positives on one system cancel out the negatives on the other, the only difference being you’ve far more comfort with the bigger jeeps.

    Obviously if a lad is doing 20k miles a year and only 1k miles of that is towing a trailer then yes he doesn’t need a jeep at all, be it a rav or an LC, but if you’re doing any reasonable amount of towing then there’s no competition really.


    Edit to add; I see Fintan got there before me with the same point, just in a much shorter description of it 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,193 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    None of the newer RAVs will be in tis conversation in a few years due to them all being hybrid yokes now



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 1,956 Mod ✭✭✭✭Albert Johnson


    "You will put 4X500 kg stores, 5X400 or 7 300 kgs in a 10X5 box or 3X700 kg finished cattle and you will not be beating **** out of them."

    I've never managed to put 3x700 cattle into a 10x5, I doubt you'd put 4x500 stores on without a fair bit of persuasion either. You'll carry them in a 10x6 but 5 foot is narrow for putting biggish cattle in as they can't stand crossways. I put 6x500 stores in my 12x6 Porter once (on a private road of course) and I struggle to see how you'd put 4 of them on a 10x5.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,319 ✭✭✭straight


    RAV4 powered by the 2.2-litre diesel engine has a maximum (braked trailer) capacity of 2,000kg with a manual gearbox, or 2,240kg with an automatic. I wouldn't like to be the guard trying to explain this to Bass. 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 222 ✭✭Jim Simmental


    Any one know if this style of a bale trailer


    https://www.donedeal.ie/view/31732603

    New 6 bale trailer


    can be loaded and unloaded with a standard bale handler like these ones


    https://www.donedeal.ie/view/30608886

    Nugent Bale Handlers


    ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,193 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Yeah they can. Much handier with hydraulic top link too



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,522 ✭✭✭hopeso


    Generally speaking, yes.....However the one in your link has support straps fitted between the arms. You don't generally see them fitted, and unless the bale handler can fit outside the two arms on the trailer they might make loading or unloading more difficult.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 222 ✭✭Jim Simmental


    Thanks hopeso


    the one I’m looking at doesn’t have support straps


    i see what your saying the bars on those trailers should be closer together, so you can just drop your bale and drive out



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,522 ✭✭✭hopeso


    It was probably designed for loading with a spike.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,954 ✭✭✭stanflt


    Few days away

    4E2CB25D-408A-429C-8B3B-6466FD0E2011.jpeg EFAC7FD0-3D55-476C-B774-04519EA72861.jpeg 3C0F5C50-68EF-451F-9817-03FD21D51122.jpeg 4F3663FB-083F-4333-951E-DB7FE5E9E2FB.jpeg CEB37147-F7E4-4B7B-B8A7-CB92ADD9F69D.jpeg 358FECEE-A7FD-49D0-8EB7-E7A623AAD564.jpeg D6C62086-5A54-4006-800D-A4777B119E9C.jpeg 2096145B-4DE7-433C-96ED-CD9CE45CA77D.jpeg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,500 ✭✭✭bogman_bass


    Whats Austria like this time of year?

    Where did you fly into?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,954 ✭✭✭stanflt


    Flew into Vienna- absolutely incredible country - vast level landscape then rolling mountains and not a ditch to be seen- weather was dry and sunny- no snow to be seen



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,820 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    You'd wonder are the Russia backed agri attackers as prominent in Austria? The only saving grace may be it's supposed to be a predominently Organic system out there.

    I could see Duncan Stewart declaring it a country to aspire to with no ditches.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,954 ✭✭✭stanflt


    Very little organic out there tbh- cattle housed all year- huge output from cows- nobody attacking farmers in the media and the feelings from farmers there is that the Irish are getting a raw deal- they feel that there are too many politicians in ireland- too many back handers which are pushing opinions



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,500 ✭✭✭bogman_bass


    Been around a good number of years now.

    i always fancied the idea of it. For the amount of tractor work I do versus the loader it would be grand for me



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,534 ✭✭✭Suckler


    I posted this one before - I'd want to see a bit more western market testing but if I won the lotto, I might've taken a flier at it.



Advertisement