Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Harry and Meghan

1467468470472473757

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,325 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Is that where that clip of the three of them siting for a photo in the snow comes from ? Is that this time period. My only thing that I remember from the queen mother dying is that one of the BBC presenters was called out for not being in black when the news broke.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 632 ✭✭✭squidgainz


    I'd say it was a games console tbf , it's a weak gotcha anyway , him being skiing if that's true and not in school when told about his great granny is a very good gotcha though. I don't remember the Oprah interview really but if they didn't say racism/racist etc I'd say it's a backtrack they feel they can get away with ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,255 ✭✭✭MOR316


    "Maybe our mother would still be here if she hadn't married Pa"

    Well, in fairness mate, either would you...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,325 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Well when my grandparents died I knew where I was. It’s kind of a moment in time. I just found the bbc news clip of the queen mothers death announcement and within two minutes the presenter that the prince of wales and William and Harry will return from a holiday in Switzerland.

    I agree it was probably a games console of some kind and a miss quote but it along with this Switzerland slip up build up a narrative.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,152 ✭✭✭✭walshb




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 632 ✭✭✭squidgainz




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,325 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    They’re a James Hewitt joke there but I can’t think of a good one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,574 ✭✭✭✭Boggles




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,353 ✭✭✭alan partridge aha


    You see H&M could have put this racism bs to bed a lot earlier. Remember Oprah's stupid face when Meghan mentioned it.

    That should have been addressed there and then or defo amended before that thing was broadcast.

    But no by not addressing it a lot of people were led to believe that some high up royals were racist. That's not right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 632 ✭✭✭squidgainz


    You don't think some are?? The British Royal family.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭ Nala Plain Conductor


    I'd suspect the X-Box thing was an N64. There was a big hyped launch around 1997. Also I think PlayStation was pretty prominent back then too. A lot of people pay surprisingly less attention to the details of such things than you'd think. I'd someone talking about their 'first iPhone' which turned out to be a HTC Hero, but 'iPhone = smartphone' in their head.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,353 ✭✭✭alan partridge aha


    Well Harry now says that some may have unconscious bias which is not the same thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,614 ✭✭✭valoren


    Have you not read some of the excerpts? It's comedy gold. Talking to bins, a toilet and the moon as well as rubbing 8 hour cream on his knob while thinking of Mummy. No wonder sales are flying. A multi book deal? Thanks Penguin. 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,325 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    I’m sure there are bit Harry doesn’t seem to think so. He thinks it’s unconscious bias, and despite the spin job they are doing now they left it out there that every senior member was.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,152 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Maybe they all are, some are, none are. They’re humans beings, like us all. All capable of being racist or whatever else. They’re trying to clearly imply it with a very vague story with no actual substance and context, and now rowing back is all that is wrong here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 632 ✭✭✭squidgainz


    I think personally they are more likely to be racist then the average human being. I agree though H & M don't seem to either have the evidence or want to use that evidence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,574 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    No. But Happy as Larry is apt here.

    Larry Finlay, managing director of Transworld Penguin Random House, said: "We always knew this book would fly but it is exceeding even our most bullish expectations.


    "As far as we know, the only books to have sold more in their first day are those starring the other Harry (Potter)."

    Chitching!!!! 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,353 ✭✭✭alan partridge aha


    Ya but that story and Kate making Meghan cry were the big stories from that "interview".

    If H&M had put that to bed at the time, then the Oprah interview would have been far less talked about.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,152 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Yes, well we know Harry has exhibited racism. That’s one we know of. And his grandfather had a few tales…

    anyway, it was a whole lotta nothing that they tried to introduce regarding skin color.

    let’s even argue the comment was true and was meant in the actual concerned/not happy/racist sense: big deal. One nameless person shows a staggering ignorance in the year 2019 to be questioning the color of a baby..

    It reeks of a complete nonsense to me. Pasty white Harry and slightly tanned Meghan, dating for a few years, married and expecting the beautiful gift of a baby, and someone is concerned about its colouring.. beyond bull



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,614 ✭✭✭valoren


    I can't help but read the excerpts using Gordon Ramseys intonation. Harry reading the audio book sounds so similar. I might get a copy and read it using that intonation. I thought it would be a banal tome but it is absolute cringe. Whatever formula they've hit on with this it just works brilliantly and deserves to be a money spinner. Like the literary form of a Christopher Guest movie or The Room in a so-bad-but-thinks-its-good way.

    Post edited by valoren on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,954 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Something so important and significant as that occasion in your life...not good and discredits the book as you start to question, what else is stated as fact, but with such inaccuracy.

    He's having a laugh. Book should be filed under "fiction"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,923 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    One solitary factual error in a 400 page memoir (unearthed by our friends in GB News) doesn't strike me as particularly significant. If ten or fifteen of them show up in the same book, that would be a different matter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,160 ✭✭✭sporina


    yeah - he's not well.. I dunno.. tis a glass box he shud be in.. and studied.. v v bizarre



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,391 ✭✭✭Be right back


    Or if she hadn't got into the car with a drunk driver or even put on her seat belt 🤔.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,391 ✭✭✭Be right back


    Tongue firmly in cheek.

    Screenshot_20230110-205601_Instagram.jpg




  • Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭ Nala Plain Conductor


    I suppose from his point of view his life has been a one endless tabloid story - he’s just leaning into it and actually writing it now.

    It’s an an utterly insane system. I don’t think monarchy has any place in the 21st century, but those guys have been brought up in a more extreme set of circumstances than the most bizarre Hollywood child actor.

    The way his mother was bounced around by the institution and by the press has got to leave deep scars. No matter what you think of the concept of monarchy or the wealth, she was a 19 year old proposed to by an incredibly powerful and privileged 33 year old, who in hindsight probably didn’t even like her very much. It’s creepy and I can entirely see why the relationship is odd and that he probably despises his step mother and it must be quite weird to be part of an institution that behaved like that too. Then he got a very similar thing kicking off with his wife … You can see why he doesn’t give a feck about protocol or the institution, particularly now that the granny and grandad are gone.

    His granny might as well have been Santa Claus she was so well known and revered. She wasn’t even like a real person - just a symbol.

    If anything, he seems surprisingly normal, all things considered.

    If he speeds up the scale back of British monarchy, he’ll have done the UK a huge favour and it might finally snap out of the medieval magic princess nonsense that it gets lost in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,923 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The most interesting aspect for me is that it has exposed the relationship between the monarchy and the right wing conservative press. The former is pretty much depending on the latter for its existence and prominence in UK public life. Someone breaking ranks from within the RF and drawing close attention to it was always going to be met with rage by the tabloids. Note how they always skirt around his specific criticisms of the press when they attack him.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Posts: 1,338 ✭✭✭ Nala Plain Conductor


    Yeah that’s pretty shocking how they close ranks and pile on. They he tabloid press over there is an utter pox on society. It’s not news media at all. It’s like the worst of Twitter, just in ink.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,152 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    I think you’re grossly overstating the RFs influence and impact on Britain’s daily workings.

    Vast vast majority British people are just getting on with their lives as normal. The RF are really just their own symbol of tradition.

    The modern RF are just a working family serving Britain. Nothing more than an employee/employer type family really, that generates interest and money for Britain.

    They have no power whatsoever. It’s all just symbolism. Britain are just another democracy that lives by their people deciding how they live.

    There are many many people in Britain who would vote no to abolishing the monarchy. You’re posting as if a scale back/abolition is what is needed. Needed for what, exactly?

    I see it, today as a benign and harmless family that are just a symbol for Britain. And if British people are happy to see them continue to work and exist, best luck to them.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 632 ✭✭✭squidgainz


    Yeah I think their symbiotic relationship was always reasonably well known but Harry and Meghan have really shone a light on that. Camilla and Jeremy helped too hahah.



Advertisement