Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The current hospital / A&E crisis

Options
11011131516

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,616 ✭✭✭maninasia


    That's not my point either.

    Blah blah you do it blah blah isn't worth arguing with.


    Apart from being lots of stressful jobs out there to choose from , for healthcare being a GP would be on the lower scale of stress and lifestyle adjustments. That's my point.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,237 ✭✭✭✭Dav010




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,616 ✭✭✭maninasia


    Doesn't matter, anybody can tell the difference between a hospital shift job and non shift non weekend work job.

    Not complicated.

    Why do I need experience to have common sense.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,237 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Because you have no insight into either position, is the obvious answer.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,616 ✭✭✭maninasia


    I do have a very obvious insight.


    GPs generally don't do shift work,weekends evenings.


    Does it sound as difficult as working in Hospitals ?


    What are you trying to say lol. Make sense man.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,237 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Are you speaking from experience, have you worked in either/both an Hospital/GP Clinic?

    I might think I know what it is like working in IT, but as my experience is limited to working in Hospitals and health Clinics, I know that even though I occasionally sit at a computer, I really don’t have any insight into what being an IT worker is like.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭Anita Blow


    I'm a hospital doctor.

    Although GP may not have the physicality of a hospital job, it certainly has volume of patients and a much greater degree of clinical risk.

    Many of us in hospital medicine would have great difficulty dealing with the level of risk that a GP handles on a daily basis (Wide-variety of clinical presentations across almost all specialities with limited access to diagnostics upon which they can make their initial diagnosis & management plan).


    GPs also do engage in weekends/evenings/nights as most are required to partake in their local out-of-hours service



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,218 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Your reply got me thinking.

    Do you think more GPs are referring patients to A&E in greater numbers as the years pass, as a means of 'covering their asses' in case anything is missed or misdiagnosed?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,034 ✭✭✭Swaine


    Too many hypochondriacs with medical cards clogging up A&Es. Should be a flat €100 for EVERYONE to be paid immediatly at reception.

    This would slash numbers significantly.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭Anita Blow


    I think it's probably multi-factorial and not out of any malice/laziness despite what the public seems to think about General Practice.

    1) GP caseloads have ballooned to unsustainable levels due to inadequate supply of new doctors and addition of free GP care for paediatrics. This is the cause of people not getting an appointment with GP for ages. Appointment times reduce to try get as many people seen in a reasonable timeframe, but that means less time to spend with the patient and as a result a GP may be afraid of missing something & send to ED to be sure.

    2) Patient expectations have increased that a diagnosis is correct and immediate. Consequently GP practice has become more litigious and this leads doctors to practice defensively. Eg- I'm 99% sure this is a benign chest infection but I'd feel more reassured if i had a chest x-ray to outrule a focal pneumonia

    3) Medicine has become more complex than what it was in the 00s & 90s. There's a greater reliance on bloods & imaging to make a more accurate diagnosis, which GPs don't currently have access to. They must triage what could potentially be severe from benign without any diagnostics. The problem that the public don't often understand is that what's sometimes severe presents benignly and what's benign presents severely. Eg- The kid with 5 days fever >40c & headache is an ear infection, the kid who walks in with a week's cough but no fever is a severe pneumonia needing IVs. In a hospital I can do bloods and imaging to reassure myself that the ear infection likely isn't meningitis, or that the cough is likely viral. A GP however has to make that initial decision blind, and has to do it about 20 times over in the day with all their patients. It's a level of risk that the public don't fully appreciate.

    Ultimately I think GPs are scapegoated. In a normally functioning system a GP should be able to refer to ED if they want a second opinion about something acute or want more investigation to reassure both doctor and patient. It's no different to me calling cardiology to read an ECG if I'm unsure about it.

    Obviously community access to diagnostics would help a lot but would need centralisation of practices and a lot of investment



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,175 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    @Anita Blow

    thanks for that post.

    Is there any way some blood analysis and imaging could be decentralised to the GP practice level?

    Are there machine that exist for such a volume of patients?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭Anita Blow


    There isn't.

    When someone presents with infection we may do a couple of tests to assess not just the infection itself but the patient's overall health in the context of that infection. For example if a GP sends in a kid with a vomiting & fever, and they've dipsticked their urine and confirmed a UTI I might do a full blood count and CRP to help me differentiate is it likely to be kidney (more severe) or bladder (less severe), and I might do a U&E to tell me if they're dehydrated. It might be that the infection bloods show it's not severe, but that the U&E tells me they're quite dehydrated in which case I'd admit for IV fluids even despite a seemingly small infection. If it does look like a severe infection, I would take a blood culture to exclude sepsis which needs to be incubated in a lab for 36h.

    Our infection blood tests also help us determine whether an infection is more likely to be bacterial (more severe) or viral. These however are lab blood tests that don't have a point-of-care machine that could be used in a general practice.



  • Registered Users Posts: 33,218 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    @Anita Blow

    Just reading a couple of your last posts, really does show what a hard job GPs have, and perhaps why many might have doubts about patients?

    I know many GPs get crucified on social media by folk who basically think they are their own private doctor. Some of the abuse I have read about doctors or their staff is way OTT.

    I do feel they are in a lose-lose situation these days.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭Anita Blow


    I've worked in emergency departments and feel very lucky to be able to do bloods or imaging to reassure myself about a clinical decision or guide my management, or to be able to pick up a phone and speak to a specialist team for advice. Even if ED is backed out the door I don't begrudge a decision made by a GP to refer- they're making the best decision based on the information available to them at the time.

    I know most would be glad to access community investigations to save referring, but to do this we need infrastructure and we also need far more GPs. Taking bloods from a kid for example would require an additional nurse to help and can take up to 20-25 min which means less people that can be seen in that day.



  • Registered Users Posts: 862 ✭✭✭redlough


    You have zero experience of the job so you have no idea if it is stressful or not.

    The one person speaking from actual experience would seem to disagree with you as well.





  • Plenty of people end up with missed or delayed diagnoses that don’t seem to unduly concern GPs. My late mother used to say “as long as you tell the doctor what you think is wrong, they are ok”. She was extremely astute, had to use devious means to obtain the Vitamin B12 & thyroid tests to get the diagnoses she suspected. She ended up adding to the blood requests, which yielded the diagnoses. But one funny typo she made was FSH which caused a great giggle when going back to get the results! She was 84 at the time 😂 From then on I gave her quarterly IM cyanocobalamin.





  • Some GPs are great, some not so. They very much differ in the amount of interest they appear to take in their job. Same with nurses, care assistants, etc. People differ in their approach to work. Many people are square pegs in round holes career-wise. Because mammy & daddy would afford to send daughter/son to medicine & they got the points doesn’t automatically make them suitable material for the role. My own GP is lovely and caring, always feel the better for seeing him, but avoid two of the others in the practice at all costs for very good reason.



  • Registered Users Posts: 105 ✭✭yaknowski


    In a large Dublin A&E yest where not a wink of sleep was had due to some prisoner wailing for food. 4 Gardai there all night, minding 2 clowns.

    Then a well-heeled, well-spoken lady also screaming harassment at one of the workers for not letting her visit her ma in A&E. Garda could have easily told her to jog on but didn't.

    Seems to be a lot of internal politicking going on earwigging on convos. Surgeon who accepted me was explaining to a Junior lad about how to play the game as the CT team didn't want to take me on. So he had to convince them in a roundabout way by leaving vagueness that might prompt them to cover their own asses.


    Seems like it's fucked from every which way.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,829 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Of course there is internal politicking. Has anyone here working in any company that doesn't have internal disagreements and shitfights?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,557 ✭✭✭Breezy_


    Undersubscribed - assuming it was then why? To many points in leaving cert or what was the artifically created barrier that the genuises put in place to keep the number down and salary up??? Every single problem we have is deliberate cuz someone is gaining financially. Mostly. And a sprinkling of stupidity.

    ICGP say 1800 - 2000 GPs needed and thats not possible and they've no plan to get there.

    ICGP hoping to be able to train 350 new GPs per year by 2026. (Real figure half that? Who knows) 700 current GPs due to retire in the next decade. To little to late buckos. They were told in 2002 this was coming and look it where we are.

    Hoping to get 100 south African doctors in by end of year. (Real figure closer to 10 or 0.)

    2030 and the story is gonna be the same as it is now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,540 ✭✭✭Martina1991


    I'm a Medical Scientist myself working in a hospital laboratory and the vast majority of our work comes from GP practices.

    All of our GP workload is done and processed on the day the sample is taken. On our busiest days (Tuesdays and Wednesdays) some work may be left over, but all GP samples are processed and reported within 24 hours of the sample arriving to the laboratory. A lot of people who have samples (blood, urine, swabs, faeces etc) taken at GP practices are probably told to call or come back in a week or more for the results, but in reality they are done long before that.

    We often have to phone GPs to notify them of very abnormal results that need immediate attention. If it is after 5pm, we call the out of hours GP service with all patient details and they contact the patient and tell them to come to ED.

    I am just giving my experience from our hospital. Some of the bigger hospitals in Dublin, Cork, Galway may have longer turnaround times, but many of the smaller hospitals would be the same.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,237 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Undersubscribed as in qualified Drs did not wish to apply to specialise as GPs. The unfilled places, which is not as assumption, you can look it up, are not dependent on leaving cert points as entry to a GP scheme occurs after graduation, not after secondary school. There are currently just under 1000 Drs in the GP training scheme at the moment, 285 were taken in this year, again, these figures are available to view if you look them up. There are currently 25% more inhabitants in Ireland since 2002, the highest population since The Famine, I doubt anyone envisaged such growth 20 yrs ago.

    In relation to points, this has always been mentioned as an issue with intake into health care courses, the points are so high that Universities are getting book smart students rather than students suitable to be Drs, it was one of the reasons why the HPAT was introduced. It is not ideal that LC results alone decide whether a student gains entry, but for now it is possibly the best indicator of whether a 19yr old will be able to complete the 6 yrs of extensive learning that it takes to graduate as a Dr. Entry requirements/points apply to most undergraduate courses, it is understandable why the requirement for a course like medicine would be among the highest given it’s popularity with top students. It is also worth baring in mind that there is now a graduate entry option into medicine in UL, so LC points is now not the only means by which people who wish to become Drs can gain entry to medicine.

    When you say gaining financially, who are you referring to? The ICGP, who are responsible for training GPs are trying to increase the numbers on their schemes to meet demand, working GPs are buckling under the pressure, most have closed their lists to new patients because they are at their limit, there are Practices advertising GP jobs who have not received any applications, many can’t retire or sell their Practices because there is no one to take their place. The IMO are warning the government that GP levels are dangerously low and that Drs are emigrating rather than staying to work as GPs. I’m struggling to see who you think is gaining financially from this situation.

    The Government chose to expand the med card scheme and GP care for children and are ploughing vast amounts of money into the Health system, if they wanted to save money they would cut back med cards and have patients pay for GP visits, not expand it. I don’t see how limiting GPs helps the State financially, and certainly problems with healthcare are going to be a major issue at the next election so it is in TDs best financial interest to try and improve access, not hinder it if they want to try and keep their jobs.

    Post edited by Dav010 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 81,773 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    47 patients perfectly well on wards over 6 months to be released from a hospital bed (€878 per night x 182.5 = €160k per patient), it's a good job money pissed up against the wall is standard practice in the HSE, €7.5 million up the Swan E.




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭Anita Blow


    GP training spots are at their current number due to a number of reasons- the primary one being government funding. It’s the department of health that that decides how many training placements in each of the schemes it will fund and this will be mapped to long-term workforce planning (will there be a GP job at the end of the scheme to fill). That is the primary limitation.

    Other factors to consider is training infrastructure- you need to find teams to place these new training spots on and appropriate training sites. It’s generally up to the HSE and training bodies to make sure there’s adequate trainee supervision and a balance of trainees and skill mix in a team.


    The problem with GP training as with most training in Ireland is that there’s no long-term workforce planning so the HSE/DoH either doesn’t know or is will fully ignorant to the staffing needs of the health service going forward and how it will achieve that



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,614 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Those patients are not " well enough " to go home though ..that is the point. They need step down care . In hospitals that have been systematically closed or cutback over the years .

    They certainly don't need all the funding that it costs to keep a patient in a busy general hospital , but funding is still necessary for appropriate care elsewhere in the community.

    That report also states 6000, not in hospital , are waiting for homecare . A system that has been decimated over years and years of cutbacks and ignored by politicians who refuse to move Slaintecare forward.

    Where are these people? Are they home with their families struggling to manage and ending up readmitted due to lack of appropriate care in the community ?

    Are they unnecessarily taking up a nursing home bed ? So many would be happier and managed just as well at home if adequate home care packages were available.

    Slaintecare addresses better community care and chronic disease management ..in the community . Thus relieving pressure on hospitals and allowing them to do what they should be doing .



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,557 ✭✭✭Breezy_


    THE 'cap' on admission by Irish students to medical schools has been in place since 1979 and should be lifted, says a TCD academic.

    She said that the intake into other university areas such as commerce, the humanities, computing and science has more than doubled since then but medicine has remained at around 305 places for Irish students.

    There are also restrictive entry policies for other medical areas such as psychology, physiotherapy, and pharmacy says Dr Evelyn Mahon, a sociology lecturer.

    "It is no coincidence that the points to these courses remain very high. Quite simply, the supply of places has not responded to the demand," she said in a paper for the Convocation of the National University of Ireland.

    Education Minister Noel Dempsey has decided that medicine and related courses will be offered at post-graduate level only in future - applicants will need a degree qualification before they can apply.

    But Dr Mahon says an extension of places in medical schools would be more appropriate, given the fact that there is already a capacity for an increased intake.

    "It may mean using some of the spare capacity in science but a long alternative route would not satisfy the needs of students who wish to do medicine. If anything it could give them false expectations. An increase in places (at undergraduate level) would bring about a reduction in the points."


    Dr Mahon said that extending the number of places in medical school risks increases in the number of doctors with a consequent reduction in income possibly, though not necessarily.

    "This would in itself bring about a better lifestyle for doctors whose present hours of work are horrendous and it would begin to generate greater equality in society," she added.

    She pointed out that although the medical profession had long been a very powerful one, it was interesting that there has been little debate on whether the numbers admitted to medicine should be increased.

    This was 2003. 20 years later the cap still exists. I like that last 3 paragraph. Vested money grabbing interests, sprinkled with stupidity. Like I said. And now people are actually dying. And the only way to fix is bring in African folks who they hope the threat of violence back home will be enough to keep them here. And sure as their is sh1te in a goose, some of these won't even be doctors and they'll be let loose. Watch. No shortage of struck off lads from other countries here already making mistakes. We're nearly at the point you could give me a white coat and google.

    15 years ago I was watching prime time or the like and the Department of Health top cat was asked why their was a cardiologist shortage and he started Stuttering....6.5 billion people on the planet back then. These aren't special jobs/special people, any amount of people out there to do it. Top cat was the problem.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭Anita Blow


    That article is referencing medical school places, not training scheme posts. Since 2003 three new graduate programs have commenced in addition to the existing undergraduate programs and consequently today 50% of medical graduates are graduate-entry so numbers have increased dramatically.

    We train plenty of doctors to medical school level, the limiting factor is intern posts and subsequent training posts. No point in increasing medical school posts if we have no training schemes to put them into. At present for example there’s a 6:1 competition ratio for surgery which means that there isn’t a training spot for 80% of applicants to the scheme.

    Again the limiting factor here is primarily government funding



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,557 ✭✭✭Breezy_




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,933 ✭✭✭Anita Blow


    That’s not the training infrastructure im talking about. Each training post needs to be attached to a medical team, consultant supervisor and in the case of GP needs a GP trainer for the final two years of the scheme. Lack of investment in physical infrastructure (hospitals) and staff (trainers and medical teams) mean that this is still lacking. We need more medical teams and more consultants to be able to facilitate an increase in training numbers for any speciality.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Its actually pathetic to listen to the FFG ministers this week trotting out the same old excuses over and over. They must have a laminated sheet with what they are allowed say. They wont answer any direct questions. All the experts are saying that hospitals are running at a very high capacity throughout the year and cannot handle any surge whatsoever without resorting to trolleys. The solution is simple and all the experts agree - more beds, more staff. These ministers are embarrassing themselves with their guff. They were warned about this in July and did SFA. It will happen again next winter, guaranteed.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



Advertisement