Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Liverpool FC Team Talk, Gossip, Rumours 2024/25

1137713781380138213832743

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,953 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    Robbo's cameo last night showed everyone what exactly what is wrong ,

    As soon as he came on the tempo raised because of his intensity , its just so obvious that is what we are missing, Look at our best game this season City at home we had it in droves & they struggled, Once we lose it WE struggle,

    Our midfield needs new legs its really that simple, Diaz & Jota are also two big misses because they both bring that intensity & a bit of nasty niggles , We need legs & aggression ,

    Mo used to be one of the few in our starting 11 who wasn't that aggressive but he almost rode the coat tales of the likes of Mane ,Jota, Diaz & would remain cold & calm for when chances presented themselves in chaos , he seems a bit lost at the moment,

    I think Jurgen knows what is missing its just hard for him to get it out of what's available , He made point of getting of f his seat to cheer Bajcetic for that press & tackle at the end of the last home game ,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,818 ✭✭✭brevity


    If the players cannot play that pressure game due to age or injuries, then it's upto the coaching staff to set the tactics accordingly.

    I believe a lot of the players have had every ounce squeezed out of them mentally and physically and they haven't had adequate players to cover for them. Specifically the midfield. It has really done serious damage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,707 ✭✭✭Talisman


    This is Klopp's first attempt to rebuild his own team. At Dortmund he stepped down when faced with similar issues and the team had finished 7th in the league. The failure to bring in a midfielder to rejuvenate the team in the past two years rests with Klopp and Ljinders.



  • Posts: 14,708 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Liverpool have now conceded more goals than Everton, and the same number as West Ham who occupy 16th and 17th places in the league, and our GK is the best performing member of the team. Worrying times if that isn’t addressed very quickly, we could be hockeyed by RM and fail to even qualify for Europe next season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,119 ✭✭✭✭Cartman78


    Well Everton are doing their very best to overtake us on goals conceded



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,488 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    Joyce has an article in the Times today. Main points below are taken from Reddit.

    - Liverpool are wide open. Conceding 51 big chances so far this season - 3 per game. 3rd worst in the prem behind Leeds and Fulham at 55 and 54 respectively. Arsenal have conceded 19

    - Compared to this point last season, Liverpool have conceded 30 more big chances - the high line isnt as effective

    - The press has been wound down by Klopp. Perhaps because of a belief that the team could not sustain it all season after the last campaign

    - Liverpool's prem rankings for sprints, distance covered and high-speed runs are all down

    - It may be a tactical choice, by pressing less, there is more space for Nunez and Salah to make runs

    - Liverpool are unclinical. They have the most big chances in the league, coupled with the lowest conversion rate. Behind Everton in 19th (28% vs 27.6%)

    - Klopp has misplaced trust in his midfield options (highlighted by the rant in August about how great the midfield was) with the complaint of them being injury prone and ageing ringing true

    - With only Thiago signed as a permanent midfielder in 4 years, an overhaul is needed - Nunes is being tracked but for summer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 806 ✭✭✭RonanG86


    Klopp was interested in both Tchouameni and Konrad Laimer in the summer, but Tchouameni preferred Real Madrid and Laimer wants to join Bayern and is expected to agree a deal to do exactly that when his RBL contract ends.

    Whether he chose not to pursue alternatives cos he didn't like the available options, or we didn't have the money to after signing Nunez (seems unlikely we'd have gone in with just Jota, Diaz, Salah & Bobby had we signed someone like Tchouameni. Although there could've been a cheaper forward option if our big signing was a midfielder instead of Nunez), we won't know for sure, but despite his public pronouncements and what Paul Joyce thinks, it's clear Klopp was looking for a midfielder in the summer.

    As for Gapko, I suspect a combination of a long term injury to Diaz and the possibility that Man U would come in made us move now rather than in the summer. Much as we did with Diaz last year.

    At this point, on the assumption we can't get [insert your £80m midfielder of choice here] in the Jan window, I'd try and sign McKennie from Juventus. They are apparently willing to listen to offers on him, and he looks to have a bit of ability, drive and energy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,690 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    Going for Nunes in the summer for some big fee would be beyond annoying given how closely we were linked to him just before he signed for Wolves. Could've had him already in, settled, and playing if we'd just acted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,707 ✭✭✭Talisman



    I think that's a failure of the transfer committee setup. If the manager decides a player isn't needed for a position then there is no signing until they change their opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,657 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    A big hatchet job on Ljinders here. The first time that a real journo has done a piece on him, after Carra spoke about him and how much influence he has on Monday night.


    Some interesting points here;

    • Ljinders & Klopp declined Nkunku last summer (there has been some talk of others being in the same boat as this too)
    • Three of the four big signings that Liverpool have made in the past two seasons – Díaz, Darwin Núñez and now Gakpo – have been advocated by Lijnders. Matheus Nunes is another Lijnders recommendation.
    • Lijnders, 39, regularly takes first-team sessions


    Did Ward, and possibly Graham, leave because of how much influence Ljinders was having in terms of recruitment and style of play?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,218 ✭✭✭jones


    Is Klopp too loyal with players? Loyalty is a good thing in general but there are times when a manager needs to be ruthless. Think of Ferguson in his pomp etc it's like Klopp is just too pally with the players at times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,488 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    I'd say they are fishing for someone to blame.

    To me it's not just anyone but quite a few. Going back to summer two years ago Klopp was saying we didn't need a midfielder, then the same again this summer. If he keeps saying it then maybe he actually believed it.

    Coaching staff have to take some responsibility for the change in style of play which is exposing the shortfall in midfield, allowing the defence to be ran at far more often and taking our attackers and threat further from goal.

    Medical staff and fitness staff need to do better in having players ready to play and in top condition.

    Recruitment staff need to do better in convincing Klopp that the players picked as potential purchases are the correct options for the club and press the issue of needing to have adequate backups.

    FSG haven't done much wrong, they've done what they've said from day one and I don't expect them to put their own money into the club to fund transfers. The ones running the club (Hogan et al) need to free up some funds if available assuming our wages haven't affected purchasing to much.

    I'd also like to point out that if we hadn't signed Gakpo we'd be stuck with just Nunez and Salah until Diaz and Jota return given Bobby is breaking down more often. I have 0 issue signing him as we did actually need a body up top to help out. We have the numbers in midfield (which Klopp keeps saying) but now we need someone with quality to slot in in January as well and then another one in the summer and the following January. Those new first team starters then leave you with Thiago, New, New and that lets Fabhino rediscover his form, Henderson to be managed better, Elliot, Carvahlo and Bajcetic to develop. Milner could be kept around as a stop gap and to help young players.


    Edit: obviously the players have to have a look at themselves as well considering that they have performed poorly in the main this season as well.

    Post edited by TitianGerm on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,953 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    i don't understand the Pep hate,

    Look what we have achieved with him as our number 2 even up to the last day of last season , mental how all of a sudden its his fault ,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,657 ✭✭✭✭Fitz*


    I think it started in the summer with the book stuff. And the irony with it being called 'Intensity' when that is now the very thing we lack.

    Personally, I don't mind the book.


    I do have an issue with having a major influence over recruitment. He is the assistant to the head coach. His job is coaching, not player recruitment. And I've said the same about Klopp having too much say in that area too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,463 ✭✭✭dogbert27


    If we're supposed to be agreeing a deal for Nunes for the summer and we are supposed to also be chasing Bellingham in the summer then we are not going to signing a midfielder this window.

    Unless the talk of the Nunes deal is a smokescreen for bringing someone in under the radar.

    Who is a realistic midfielder that can be bought this transfer window?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,735 ✭✭✭mormank


    Honestly we could do alot worse than Douglas Luiz of Villa. Only 24 and can cover the 6 and the 8 position, would surely be happy enough starting most games but not all unless he excels and is in his last 6 months of his contract so shouldnt take much out of the fund for another new mid in the summer.

    Not to mention you can never have enough Brazilians in the team. I'd be happy enough even with him or someone of that ilk as I fear we just won't get any midfielder this window tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,953 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    |Reports VVD is set for a few weeks out with his Hammy ,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,690 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    He would’ve been a good target last summer, but just signed a new long term deal in October so he’s out as an option now I’d say.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,696 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Definitely interesting and makes some sense but still feels like a witch hunt on Pep.

    I don't like the idea of a number 2 having so much influence on the transfer strategy, coach the team leave transfers to the recruitment team. I don't even like Klopp having an increasing influence, we were doing quite well as things were.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,849 ✭✭✭✭Osmosis Jones


    The Pep stuff feels like such a scapegoat to me, the last time we were this bad we had journos claiming that all of our success came from Buvac and we'd never be good without him. I'm not sure how much anyone not involved with the coaching staff actually knows about how they function.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,488 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,885 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    He hasn't been the same all season a spell on the side lines was needed just not being injured as the other 2 CB are injury prone

    ******



  • Administrators Posts: 55,084 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Yea exactly, nobody knows this stuff.

    I doubt there is a cookie cutter definition of what an assistant manager does, cause I would bet it varies depending on the skillset of the assistant and the skill set of the manager.

    Assistant manager is a very senior position at the club, would it really be an issue if they have an input into signings? Not really, IMO. And an assistant manager regularly taking training sessions seems like something that would be totally normal to me.

    The assistant isn't there to put out the cones before training and pick them up again after.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,463 ✭✭✭dogbert27


    Yeah, didn't Ferguson have Kidd, Phelan and Queiroz doing the training sessions?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,681 ✭✭✭✭SlickRic


    The issues aren't difficult to diagnose.

    We know Klopp's philosophy is taxing. We know one of his strengths is his loyalty, as it helps bring more out of players than most managers could. But it is also a weakness as he routinely shows faith for a little too long.

    Sir Alex Ferguson used to always refresh his teams with one or 2 players in order to keep things fresh. We simply haven't done that in the engine room of the team. the midfield has been run into the ground, and the decision makers aren't helping them. the legs aren't there. we are simply being run through. we thought we could replace Gini with Thiago. i love Thiago, and he's tenacious, but he doesn't do what Gini does. he does things Gini couldn't dream of doing, but what Gini did, we've found out, is irreplaceable. he was insanely fit, he was never injured, he was incredibly disciplined positionally, and had an almost unique ability to rarely lose the ball under pressure. We gained elite passing ability and line breaking passing, but lost defensive solidity in transition. we lost the ability to suffocate.

    Klopp and his team took a gamble that Thiago's unique qualities would break games that we struggled to break in search of these ungodly points totals. but we've lost too much structural stability. the use of Elliott in there is turning out to be folly. he just isn't that cog, and it's unfair to him. Jones could be that cog, but he's seemingly believed some of his own hype, can't get fit, and is now another guy. Milner is done at this level, other than being a backup RB.

    fix the legs in the engine room, and you solve an awful lot. you won't have runners freely running at our defence. you won't have opposing players have time to get their head up and pick out passes in behind. you'll also retain possession higher up the pitch, and get your best creative outlets (Trent and Robbo) back to where they're supposed to be.

    but these owners are negligent and/or Klopp is too loyal. so I don't think we're getting anyone in January. and that means the season will be effectively over.

    Post edited by SlickRic on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,463 ✭✭✭dogbert27


    Would a 4-2-3-1 formation work for us? A bit more defensive cover than the 4-3-3 is providing

    4 - TAA, Konate (with VVD injury), Matip, Robertson

    2 - Henderson and Fabinho

    3 - Salah right, Thiago middle and Gakpo on the left

    1- Nunez



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,286 ✭✭✭Glico Man


    So we've a forward injury crisis alongside the 2 lads misfiring (hopefully, surely Gakpo will ease that at least), a midfield crisis and now we're going for defensive crisis 2: electric boogaloo.

    Only thing that could make this worse is if Alisson gets injured.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,084 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    4-2-3-1 with Thiago in the 3 would just play exactly the same as our 4-3-3.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,463 ✭✭✭dogbert27


    Yeah I was thinking of putting him in the 2 beside Fabinho.

    In the 3 then with the current uninjured players who would you pick?

    Salah in the middle and Elliot on the right?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,953 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    The 2 doesn't work anymore two much ground to cover with attacking full backs, When its 4 3 3 , the two LCM & RCM get through a hell of a lot of work closing down on the sides of the pitch that goes unnoticed, Why we are suffering at the minute as ours don't have the legs

    Chelsea played a 2 man base a lot but that was with 3 CB's so one of the CB's could take up the left over spaces, which ever side it appears

    Watch City on the ball they play 3 2 4 1 , Ake Akanj Stones as the 3 CB & Lewis pushes in beside Rodri ,something Zincenko used to do as the LB before , Actully since he singed for Arsenal they do it Gabreil , Saliba ,Whyte as CB's & Zincenko pushes in beside Partey , helps you outnumber sides & the 3 CB's give coverage in the wide area's

    So basically in football now the double pivot won't work in front of 2 CBs if you want attacking full backs, there's two much space to cover,

    Just to expand a few times we have gone with a double pivot against City but we actually played more of 4 4 2 again to help wide,



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement