Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all, we have some important news to share. Please follow the link here to find out more!

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058419143/important-news/p1?new=1

"Green" policies are destroying this country

15795805825845851120

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,539 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    I must have been asleep, what taxes are you on about? the carbon tax is hardly killing people, i said it's 200 quid a year or something



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    The future looks green, nope feckin eyesight playing tricks. It's black...

    Screenshot_20221129_182727_Twitter.jpg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,162 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Can we make this a sticky so we don’t have to keep explaining this point to the green acolytes? Mods?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,266 ✭✭✭ginger22


    But shure that is not relevant to the consumer. I have 2 different electricity suppliers in 2 businesses and one is claiming that all their electricity is from renewable sources yet they are 3 cents a unit more expensive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,589 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    The Greens will not be getting my vote. I'm fed up paying for their whims.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,543 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Source? Ideally, something better than dumping a random tweet.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Another subsidy for the "hard pressed motorist" driving around 5 figure motors to save them 10 cents

    At least the money didn't come from the Transport budget. FF had to stump for it from the DPER budget



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,278 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Sure can

    These are just two sources, there's many more out there. Take moving from cooking with wood and charcoal in India to replacing it with bottled gas. This has saved millions of people alone, manly women actually who used to spend hours standing over fires cooking meals.


    It goes without saying that the planet will be fine even with higher CO2, heck, it's been through far worse in it's 4 billion years or so. We might struggle a bit but the planet will be just fine.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,543 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Where does it say this was down to fossil fuels?

    And the part where the planet will be fine? How will people fare when the land becomes infertile due to climate change?

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Blame marginal pricing and gas for that. There are plans to remove gas from marginal pricing though, when that happens you'll see gas join oil & coal in falling through the floor in usage as it'll price itself out of the market

    Marginal pricing method (also known as a ‘pay-as-clear’ market), the EU electricity market is based on (more specifically, in the day-ahead auction and balancing energy markets), means that everybody receives the same price for electricity at wholesale level.

    The key feature of this method is that the price is set by the marginal cost (i.e. the cost of producing one more MWh of electricity).

    Producers are put on the market in merit order starting with the least costly up to the most expensive power plant.

    The last plant needed to meet the demand within the time frame in question sets the price and all producers are paid the same price (provided their bid comes under the final clearing price).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,278 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    It's right there in those articles. Increased industrial output, electrification of households, etc etc. If you are really interested you could check out the generation fuel mix used in both India and China during the time periods mentioned to see just how large a role fossil fuels played. Here's a hint, it wasn't wind or solar.

    You'll need to show me where the planet is becoming infertile and killing off all life on earth.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Posts: 542 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Walking and cycling infrastructure.....ever tried walking and cycling in the incessant rain which falls along the west of the country for much of the year?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,775 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande



    This period of madness only ends with the dissolution of the EU. It is not just about the Green TDs. With the exception of some independents, the rest of the body politic in Ireland has signed on to Green politics. Irish politicians have to walk the line between the multinationals (i.e. the golden goose) and the EU (i.e. Germany) and bring the public that voted for them into line. We saw this explicitly with the EU treaties (Lisbon & Nice) that were initially rejected, rather than accept the result, Brussels demanded that we vote the way they wanted, Irish politicians rolled up their sleeves aka "best boys in Europe" and got to work to make it happen. You can see this in the recent behavior of Michael Martin looking to raise his profile for the future, on the back of Green politics. The EU under Ursula von der Leyen and Frans Timmermans leadership are obsessed with their EU Green new deal. Even in Britain, the aborted government of prime minister Liz Truss tried to roll back, under prime minister Sunak quickly reversed that. The ex-prime ministers father Stanley Johnson is fully onboard with the Malthusian aspects of green policies. The zeitgeist will pass eventually.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    In other news, these graphs illustrate other fine examples of "correlation does not equal causation"

    image.png image.png image.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,942 ✭✭✭?Cee?view


    If I could Thank this post 100 times I would. Absolute nail on the head.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,278 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Are you honestly trying to argue that the use of fossil fuels to give cheap energy hasn't improved the living standards of 100's of millions of people? Seriously, it's not a hill I'd choose to die on but each to their own.

    There's a genuine debate to be had about how we replace the old methods, ie fossil fuels, with newer cleaner technologies. That should include economic, technical, and feasible options IMO. The simple fact is that we don't have the technology available to fully replace fossil fuels and won't for some time either as discussed already.

    Should we demand poor nations just stop using fossil fuels? To me that's a reprehensible stance to take but one that is gaining more traction.


    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,278 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Or maybe we can use the same mental model when comparing these graphs. Remember correlation does not equal causation.

    SmartSelect_20221129-193726_Samsung Internet.jpg


    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,717 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    They are cutting them now as they always did, but from what I have seen not often enough.

    They would most likely look better if they were cut as previous with billhooks, but that would most likely cost much more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,775 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    It has been explained to you previously why LCOE is irrelevant to what you pay when you consume electricity. To reiterate points previously made, the LCOE metric assumes that wind and solar generators are essentially the same thing as dispatchable gas and coal powered generation.

    Your nonsense assumes renewables operators can just build about the same amount of nameplate capacity, and everything will work out just fine. In fact a predominantly wind/solar system requires vastly more infrastructure to make a fully functioning reliable grid: some combination of 5 times overbuild of generators, vastly more transmission lines, and a month of battery storage. This infrastructure easily multiplies the cost of electricity to the consumer by a factor of 10 or more. Nobody knows, because there is no functioning project from which reasonably precise costs can be extrapolated. There never will be such a demonstration project, because the costs are so enormous that it can never be done economically.

    The reason massive "excess" wind and solar capacity has to be installed is to try deal with days of light wind and heavy clouds. Then for the completely calm nights and overcast winter days when the wind and solar sources produce nothing or next to nothing, nearly the entire fleet of fossil fuel plants have to be maintained and ready to go, even though those sources end up being idle much of the time. (Germany over the past decade has been shutting down its nuclear power plants, it has been building additional coal plants to back up its renewables.) There is more cost, some means has to be found to deal with the surges of available electricity when the wind and sun suddenly blow and shine together at full strength at the same time. 

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    image.png

    Nuclear V Wind - Like Fermanagh hurling Kilkenny really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,717 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    From that you should have no problem telling us how much the E.S.B. plan is going to cost, so why have you been so shy about divulging ?

    Because you do not have a clue or because if you do and state it you would be laughed out of the place ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    You pay your taxes here? Do you live rural and have to drive to practically everywhere since there is minimal or zero public transport? Further exacerbated by a state that has been shutting down services in the regions and obliging people to travel. Do you heat your house by oil or coal? Carbon taxes may only cost urban dwellers little but cost rural folk a deal more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,278 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    I've shown you that it does. You not believing the world bank or the UN is on you.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,278 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    It's almost like gas is the backbone of energy production across Europe.

    Makes the decision to now pay for Russian gas through Azerbaijan and pay a premium for it all the more daft.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    What party likes losing seats? As for the bulbs, there was a good market for a long while for people looking for the old ones. And lots of complaints about the extra costs and lack of promised longevity in the newer models. Remember being told they would last decades?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,717 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    What a load of flannel from you yet again on marginal pricing.

    If renewables are so cheap then why not just scrap the marginal pricing policy and let renewables compete on price ?

    But then you know the answer to that don`t you! Or at least you should it`s been explained to you often enough even though you still choose to ignore it. It`s even pointed out in your own post from the section governing it you posted had you bothered to read it.

    Marginal pricing has not reduced the price of electricity by a single cent. Renewable energy companies have been creaming it getting paid the same rate as gas and racking up massive profits. Now rather than doing what they were supposedly to do, scrap the policy, the E.U. have moved it on to either coal or oil where these companies will be paid at the rate of whichever is the most expensive, even if oil or coal only constitutes as little as a few percent of the total.

    Marginal pricing is a scam. It has not or will ever reduce the price of electricity. It is there to ensure renewable energy companies make loads of money to invest in more renewables, to make further loads of money, all at the expense of the ordinary household consumer who are funding the scam. For all intents and purposes it`s nothing more than a pyramid scheme.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,775 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande


    Fertiliser derived from fossil fuels is used to bring marginal land into production. The lack of fertiliser changes the economics of farming i.e. what crops can be grown and where. Weather patterns do affect yield from year to year, food price rises from bad harvest from Russia in 2011 was the catalyst for the Arab Spring in 2012. There is no evidence that climate change has been causing yields to fall globally in the past decades, they have been rising.

    The greatest rise in living standards globally has been since the collapse of communism at the end of the 80s. That improvement is in lockstep with global energy consumption. The 2008 economic crisis shows as a dip in energy consumption. When people more from subsistence living they will consume more energy.

    image.png


    If you want to know why energy made the difference, I recommend you watch this presentation by Dr Hans Rosling (RIP). If you have not seen it already it is 10 minutes well spent.

    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



Advertisement