Why some people think 9/11 was an inside job

The best he can come up with is "a few guys over a weekend". lol. So thoroughly researched!

Unless you can explain how the buildings were rigged you will always appear very silly.

Cart before the horse.

 This claim is not found in textbooks because it belongs to NIST and it has already been proven that the data describing what happened that day has been manipulated.

There are no broken windows on the west side, as you can see in the GIF. During the video, pause for a seven seconds. During that time pause, there was no evidence of structural failure on every floor (there are 46 floors in total)

After that point, the second structure collapses, causing the building to collapse internally. The steel core columns below are damaged in some way must be removed, causing the building to fall now.

In addition, the collapse went through a gap in the building that measured more than 100 feet in height. That was at the bottom from corner to corner. It is unheard of to have all columns disappear in a second like that naturally. 

Despite the obvious problems with the official narrative, you are too stubborn to notice them. It is absurd that in the face of 7 seconds of collapse, none of the windows would break, no deformation of the walls, no dust, complete cuckoo land.

Essentially, the Video shows the first building on the eastside of the building collapsing inward. It is most likely a column failure underneath. There is a pause, and there is no movement for 6 to 7 seconds. After that, there is some movement. clearly, that structure had failed and could no longer bear the weight of the rest of the building. The freefall of the building has begun., 

What about the towers? How were they brought down?

You're the worst conspiracy theorist Ive ever seen. You have no theory whatsoever.

Having Mick West finally admit that truthers had valid points about column 79 we can now question how the collapse even began let alone how it ended.

As you fail to understand, NIST's best explanation is that some heat expansion of steel girders on the eastside caused it to heat to a point when came off its bracket seat, which caused other girders to displace in the same area, causing progressive collapse.

If that girder cant come of its seat as NIST claim that collapse on eastside happened in total different way.

Open that was controlled demolition of a crucial column that resulted in some cascading event all the way across to bottom.

The collapse models of NIST began with column 79. It is fascinating that evidence indicates that steel bolts, stiffner plates, and web flange plates were removed years after the final report was released. You are essentially stripping down the building for no apparent reason. Why would you do that unless you were having trouble getting the girder A2011 to pop off its seat and collapse? You gave a model that was not real world representation of the building design.

When you remove all the nails and bolts in a door handle, what is expected to remain in place? Because of this, NIST left off the steel reinforcements to prevent failure. There was clearly something wrong with their data to make them do that, but we cannot verify it since it would jeopardize national security. It is more likely that they are afraid someone in the engineering world will notice that something isn't right and question their credibility. Due to funding concerns, they do not want to be called out.

There is no truth in the later claims, and the start of the claim is even incorrect. Again dont expect debunkers question this part of course. 

I have already told you what I believe happened at Twin Towers. I think nanothermite was used to structurally weaken the steel to cause it to collapse. Fire alone was not enough to cause the steel to collapse.

Iron Microspheres. These are pure iron droplets without any impurities. No one in the mainstream has ever explained how this could be achieved. RJ Lee, just says it right, it took place at extreme temperatures. There has never been an office building fire with temperatures over 1500 degrees Celsius. The main steam study of NIST shows 900 degrees Celsius at its maximum temperature. It matters a lot to find millions of iron droplets in thick WTC tower dust. Nobody in the debunker world can explain how that came about. No one talks about this key signature found in dust as if it doesn't matter. There is very low probability that someone was lighting flint or there were millions of lighters in the room or whatever theory is put forth that explains it.

Also, we have some steel pieces that FEMA mentioned that were located at a dump. Regardless of what you call them, these steel pieces clearly show signs of evaporation or corrison. There are holes in the steel and the steel that made it up has disappeared. That's how I know firefighters and work crews were telling the truth about finding liquid steel flowing in the rubble. The runoff has got to go somewhere. Describing finding pockets of it looked like lava/ foundry. The steel melting is definately evidence that something other than fire was going on here.

Unfortunately, the mainstream media are too afraid or do not have the investigative skills to put everything together. Something as large as 9/11 had to have some shady factions within the government to stop certain people from coming out with the truth. The event seems to have been staged by a faction of US society. You cannot tell who they are in particular by looking at the evidence. It has always been my suspicion that Rumsfield was one of them, but I do not know how true that is. 

In the absence of evidence, it does. NIST study, anomalies found, international drug flight schools, Pakistani and Saudi Arabia connections, CIA cover-ups for terrorists, terrorist drills on 9/11, FBI assets reports of hijackers living with them, hijackers going to strip clubs and drinking, government official lying to the 9/11 commission under oath, Norad official lying under oath,, an endless list of weird things. 

We nearly had world war 3 last week because Zelensky government military went rogue and targeted a position in Poland to drag them in. Zelensky's military lied to him in a false flag operation. That is why the Americans told him to stop. A missile was fired west by someone in that country to cause a major event. Here I just wanted to highlight that Ukraine went off reservation here this time. Thankfully, the Biden administration knew what was going on and spoke up. 

It's a mystery to me how a anti air battery moves its radar west to stop a missile coming in from east. Why don't people in the media and debunkers seem to understand that part yet?

You have not explained how they planted the nanothermite, so, you've explained nothing.

Also where did "Mick West finally admit that truthers had valid points about column 79"?

My reasons for believing nanothermite was used here simple because don't understand why isn't my concern.

Try again. When, where, and what action formed the millions of iron droplets

How do you explain RJ Lee's claim that happened during the building fires before collapse?

No theory, just wasting time. 

On Metabunk a couple of years ago (video), one of his posters referenced what he said recently past month. I posted that image on here a couple of weeks ago. Where that thread and post is unsure now.

According to him, truthers' work on column 79 was comprehensive, and NIST left some details out.

Then he went on a tangent that would not really have mattered: collapses here and there. That's complete rubbish As Mick knows NIST theory isn't really working, he's now trying to come up with a new theory outside of NIST's work collapse.

You are free to believe whatever you want. This post had been saved by me and in the post the poster on Metabunk ( Mick debunking site) includes a quote from his video. It is claimed by the poster quoted that NIST has nothing to answer for, and Sauron uses Mick's quote to prove this is false.

I'm having trouble finding that video on Mick's page. He probably removed once people noticed the truthful comments.