Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland v South Africa Virgin media 17:30

1910111214

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,555 ✭✭✭✭AckwelFoley


    I watched the game on the South African Super Sport channel. I tend to do this when ireland play to see what the other side are saying.


    Sky New Zealand provided ireland for their win and team progression over the few years after the series win.


    South African pundits, complained for 15 mins solid about the ref. The actually complained about the ref before the game started which frankly shows the mindset



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I, for one, am really enjoying how salty and bitter the South Africans have been the past few days. It shows how we've really elevated ourselves to a higher level where they're fearful of us as opposed to just thinking of us as plucky underdogs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,964 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Kolbe isnt getting cited, rassies whinging likely have made WR gun shy and dont want to give him more ammo for bias complaints. Both of them deserve a citing for that spear tackle.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,065 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    We beat them more often than not going back over 10 years. We've never been afraid or overawed by SA.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,042 ✭✭✭ersatz


    If it starts to have an effect on how refs approach games involving SA because of the fear that Rassie will target them, and or if it dissuades WR from penalizing SA or citing players then it's bad news for rugby as it will basically force other coaches to follow suit. To me this is a potential arms race and WR should really sort it out by throwing the book at Rassie and go after the SA union to get it under control.

    The fish rots from the head.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,042 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Looking back over that game and the twitter thread above it’s interesting that SA marshalled Sexton so well, their line speed was accurate, fast and very effective. JS had 12 tackles which were often big lads coming at him. There were a few wayward passes too and at least one long one out to the wing that went to ground and was eventually gathered by Hansen. It didn’t work out for SA but it definitely disrupted out game successsfully, 2 tries is a relatively poor return for this Irish team these days. This match really was a defensive masterclass from Ireland, the fact that SA got nowhere with their maul while we mauled in a try says it all. Hats off to poc and the forwards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,998 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Be interesting to see how we build around that. The space was there to be exploited, if those passes had stuck.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,042 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Interesting too that Sexton didn’t chip over that rush defence, even to give them pause.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 336 ✭✭Rugbymad2020


    Ireland would be more worried than SA.3 illegal moves to score tries from and played against a team with no specialist 10 or fullback and just got over the line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,535 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Good point, but in times gone by, Ireland have often struggled to put away second tier countries so it's good to see that's no longer an issue.

    Hopefully get a decent hit out against Fiji this weekend.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,065 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Ah, Rassie is back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    For Kolbe or PTSD to be cited, it would need to have reached the threshold for a red. Hansen would have needed to land on his head or neck. He didn’t, his shoulder hit the ground, guided by his arms. There’s no conspiracy or effect by Rassie there. He just didn’t reach the criteria to be cited.

    I thought at the time the card should have gone to PTSD but it still would have been yellow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,964 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    The only reason he landed on his shoulder was because Hansen moved, the players involved in the tackle took no care, the intent behind the tackle should be whats punished not the result which in this case was nowhere near as bad as it could have been which was solely down to Hansens ability to not allow his neck be snapped.

    I know the way the card and citing system works is mainly the problem here but its no less annoying that 2 players get away with such dreadful actions.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah, but I actually think it will have a counterproductive impact. If I was a ref, this stuff would completely p*** me off.

    World Rugby need to step up and be sharper on this stuff; Erasmus should be sanctioned for that tweet after the weekend, considering this is his first game back after doing essentially (a larger version of) the same thing previously.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 336 ✭✭Rugbymad2020


    U talk about intent?what about sexton around the neck?or Hansen taking a player out in the air when not contesting the ball at all?that’s all intent.anyway little things like that get missed all the time.what I think is worse is when a game is decided by bad reffing.one maybe two tries where forward passes,kicking the ball out resulting in a try when the other team got penalized for that only a few minutes earlier.was a good game otherwise and like I said SA wouldn’t be too worried.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I agree. As long as Joel Jutge is clear that he has his referees’ backs, I think it will be counterproductive. It’s human nature to push back against this kind of stuff



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,636 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I don't think the pass for Hansen's try was in any way definitively forward, and I don't think bad reffing decided the game. I think Ireland did really well against some, eh, let's say Big Bokkes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 336 ✭✭Rugbymad2020


    Hence I said maybe two weee forward,one was 100% forward by sexton and the Porter one was borderline but not 100%.that’s still two tries that should not have stood?anyway I’m not here to be biased but anyone looking at the game as a neutral will agree.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Hansen taking a player out in the air? If you're talking to the incident in the first half after a cross field kick, he tackles the guy in the air, and then goes literally out of his way to ensure he brings him back to the ground safely - which is pretty much the exact opposite of what PSDT and Kolbe did with him. It was a penalty and was rightly penalised.

    The Porter to Bealham pop clearly wasn't forward, it was just skewed by the angle. Murray Kinsella has a clip on his social media which clearly shows this.

    Sheehan's boot strikes the ball while he was in the act of being neck-rolled by Kolisi - it was a completely different incident from the clear and deliberate strike through on the ball (which happened at the very end of the game, not a few minutes later).

    If SA aren't too worried, they're certainly doing enough whining and complaining to make you think otherwise.



  • Subscribers Posts: 42,970 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 336 ✭✭Rugbymad2020


    That just shows what a muppet u are if u can’t look at it without ur green glasses on.



  • Subscribers Posts: 42,970 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,636 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    ...I’m not here to be biased but anyone looking at the game as a neutral will agree.

    But you're not exactly neutral either; you're a SA fan, right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,978 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    you might say he's looking through green glasses



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,636 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Some belated thoughts on that:

    • Must be one of the most physical test matches I've seen in awhile (the first half in particular). We weathered the storm, lost 3 starters and still improved in the 2nd half. Quality.
    • To get a try from a lineout maul against that pack is no mean feat. Huge credit to VDF for the finish as well.
    • Hansen's try was class as well; we seem to be really trying to attack on turnover ball and keeping the ball alive (which is at the point the defence is at it's most unstructured).
    • Great to be scoring very different types of tries; defence's will have to respect our maul and our attack thru the backs. (And the handling of some of the forwards in phase play is really excellent).
    • Felt sorry for McCloskey; was going really well and could be another option for us. JOB excellent when he came on.
    • Also thought it was Murray's best game in awhile. He clearly doesn't bring the same zip as JGP, but on this showing still has something to offer. (Incidentally, as an aside, I think JGP's box kicking has improved; the one in the lead up to the try was excellent).
    • The back-row were all exceptional. There may have been a worry pre-game they were under-powered against their counterparts (especially with Beirne in the 2nd row too), but they didn't take a backwards step. Doris MOTM for me.
    • Hansen got the try, but overall I thought he was excellent. I think there was a spell where Johnny was down injured and he stepped in as the main player-maker. He's making himself pretty central to how we play.
    • Bealham has become a quality back-up to Furlong. The cover on the LH side is now a much bigger worry.
    • James Ryan put himself about, but thought he was very lucky with a few of his ruck entries. You play to the line the ref dictates, but I fear it could come back to bite us at some point.
    • I think it was the scrum penalty Bealham won where the 2 prop's went down on their heads gave me pause about how dangerous any scrum can be. We complain about speed of re-sets (and it is a problem) but it's definitely understandable when you think of the safety aspect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,964 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Hansen went out of his way to bring him down safely, the intent was to make sure he landed as safely as possible. Kolbe and PSTD showed no such intent they didnt care they were dropping a player on his head.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,518 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Utterly delicious that the poster doesn't have the self awareness to see the irony in this post.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,535 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Agree with all of this.

    Hansen has been an incredible find, just a really talented footballer. Still a little question mark over his defence but think he's entitled to consider himself a starting player now.

    For all the shyte talked about Murray in the build up, he was really, really good and it didn't come out of the blue either. He will continue to be a viable option up to the RWC.

    On the slightly negative side, I thought Baloucoune found himself at sea once or twice. I know this was his first big test match but I don't think he grabbed his opportunity, not compared to McCloskey or JOB.

    Hasn't really been mentioned but I thought Cian Healy did absolutely fine when he came on. (If he'd had to do it after 20 minutes, that might have been a different story.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 336 ✭✭Rugbymad2020




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Oh look context that’s ignores context. How wonderful.

    I could always respond with the fact that the team that won did so despite starting with their 3rd choice 12 who was injured and replaced early on by a winger/FB on debut who played 13. Despite playing most of the game with a 9 who was playing his first game of the season. Despite missing at least 3 back three players, if not 4 ahead of kick off and having a FB also playing his first game of the season. Despite losing the best TH in the world at half time. And all that without going into the numerous officiating errors that helped SA as well, including a yellow that should technically have been a red.

    I could say that. Or I could point to how SA have poor attacking structures and have routinely struggled to turn pressure into points, particularly into tries, for some time now. And suggest that maybe, just maybe, SAs focus should be on themselves and getting themselves better. Bitter whinging is neither dignified nor constructive. I mean I’m enjoying it, so by all means continue. But it isn’t achieving anything other than amusing others.



Advertisement