Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

BoJo banished - Liz Truss down. Is Rishi next for the toaster? **threadbans in OP**

1211212214216217297

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,896 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    They are in dfficulty because like Eir here since its privatisation it has been asset stripped and used to generate profits for private companies. Now we have some competition in telecoms in ireland but we dont have anything near the same in electricity and gas

    The same as Rail in the UK.

    Privatisation isnt what its made out to be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    I know the answer is that they don't care, it's not their problem. Just come out and say it.

    Edit: Eskimohunt already has, of course. He also seems like a pretty unpleasant person.

    It's quite true - most people don't give a toss once they get to vent their feigned outrage on Twitter for the likes.

    All any reasonable person can do is donate to charities working with citizens in poor countries with a hope that they get to evolve more towards democracy with stronger rights as time passes by.

    Don't forget, our ancestors in Ireland, all across Europe and beyond had to live their lives with fook all rights and wealth down through history. Other regions of the world are following the path to where we are now, just different countries are at different stages of that path.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    If nobody is suggesting taking in everyone, then what is the limit? Please do enlighten me on that, cause I've never ever heard anyone who is pro-open-borders suggest anything that remotely resembles a cap on numbers!

    Also, where did I say countries should be bombed based upon the racial make up of their citizens?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,136 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    So Truss had her big conference speech. The coronation was what it would have been originally seen as. Not sure that it is being seen like that as this conference as been anything but positive and has shown the party to be deeply divided and lost in many respects.

    She didn't do terrible, pretty much in line with her level of performance in interviews etc. So it's safe to say that that is her level. She isn't doing badly, relatively, in interviews, she is just being who she is. Did the Tory party learn nothing from the very near disaster of the TM lead election campaign? That a stilted, awkward, uncomfortable performer make people uncomfortable watching them?

    That they cannot connect with people as they just seem so removed and distant? It might not be fair, but it is a trueism that leaders need to connect. TM never had it, Johson clearly did. But they have opted to go for seemingly TM MK11.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    Privatisation of Telecom Eireann was one of the biggest blunders this state ever made. The company should have been split into infrastructure and services. Infrastructure should have been merged with Eirgrid and let the services (calls/billing, etc...) float on it's own.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,059 ✭✭✭Shelga


    For the most part, you have to be present in the country, for understandable reasons- otherwise I'm sure there would be literally millions of applications.

    However, they have, or have had in the past, humanitarian admission programmes, for helping people coming from areas of extreme conflict:

    It looks like these are now only operational in three states. Has the UK ever done something similar? I think we know the answer.

    Btw, I also think Ireland should be doing more. I also understand why people have no faith that we can handle more people when we can't even provide housing for our own citizens.

    I just think people should at least acknowledge it's a very complex issue, and one that is going to worsen dramatically in the next decades with more and more climate refugees, rather than say "la la la, not my problem".

    What would you want to happen to you if you were from Afghanistan/Syria/Iran/Ukraine/Yemen, or any of the dozens of other countries facing war, drought, famine and oppression? What do you think the world community should do? Do you believe in the concept of asylum at all?

    It's not good enough to say "they landed in France, why can't they stay in France"- why should it be France's problem any more than the UK's?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,169 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Am Ireland got through that stage by sending millions of refugees abroad in the 1800s alone and sent plenty more before and after.

    We got exactly the kind of help you are now trying to deny people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    What kind of help did 1800s USA give Ireland - list all the social protections, healthcare, housing and education programmes that the Irish benefitted from directly provided for by the US government.

    If you're advocating for exactly the kind of help that Irish "refugees" got then you're effectively promoting unlimited illegal immigration and a huge swell of the black economy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,059 ✭✭✭Shelga


    Exactly, and also an added factor now is that people who are responsible for an absolutely negligible amount of climate change in regions of Africa, Asia, near the equator, etc, are having to pay the price for greenhouse gas emissions that are caused overwhelmingly by rich western countries.

    The Institute for Economics and Peace estimates that there could be 1.2 billion climate refugees by 2050. Anyone who chooses to just ignore that, is a wilfully ignorant cretin. It doesn't mean I'm saying I have all the answers or I'm some bleeding heart liberal. I'm just saying people need to look outside their own tiny borders and wake up.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,060 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Modern British Conservatism captured in a single sentence.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,969 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,169 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    You would think they would want to avoid comparisons to May but everything about that entrance reminded me of May's ABBA dance.

    In fact every attempt to portray Thatcher also just reminds me of May.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,961 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    So they have only one alternative, arrive by boat and then apply once on British soil.


    Why did you lie about Fabricant saying missiles had been thrown at him?



  • Posts: 6,045 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Exactly.

    The current rules are you turn up and claim asylum.

    Suella deVille is trying to change it so that if you turn up to claim asylum, without being there legally (which would negate the need for asylum in the first place), then you're automatically barred from applying for asylum and get carted off to a country with a brilliant track record for treating others with respect and dignity........

    Like standing outside a nightclub, trying to get in

    "sorry, members only....."

    "how do I become a member?"

    "fill out a form at the desk inside"

    "right, I'll go do that so"

    "nope, to be able to come in and apply for membership, you already have to be a member. Any non-members found inside applying for membership will immediately be barred forever, bundled into a taxi and dropped off at the piggery down the road"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭Danno


    What would you want to happen to you if you were from Afghanistan/Syria/Iran/Ukraine/Yemen, or any of the dozens of other countries facing war, drought, famine and oppression? What do you think the world community should do? Do you believe in the concept of asylum at all?

    If it's war and oppression then have the world community supply the men with the means to arm and protect themselves - it's working wonderfully in Ukraine wouldn't you agree - unless you're Clare Daly or Mick Wallace that is. If it's drought and famine then donations of food supplies and perhaps other nation's army of engineers could be invited in to help build up disaster preventions and resilience programmes in these hard-done by nations. The US Army did great work in the mid-1900s in building flood defences in the southern US, for example.

    It's not good enough to say "they landed in France, why can't they stay in France"- why should it be France's problem any more than the UK's?

    Generally you'll find it's the middle classes from poorer nations that forge a way out to Europe. These folks are the types you want to keep in these poorer nations to help develop a stronger indigenous economy. Ireland knows only too well about the "brain drain".

    Perhaps alot of the professors and lecturers here could all donate a few years in these poorer nations to provide free third level education to help out?



  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I see that Eskimo disappeared once he said that. Shocking thing to say



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,961 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    "Bomb these nations into accepting g western democracy"


    So bomb them (killing how many innocent people?) Until they do as we tell them.


    What an absolutely abhorrent thing to say, another keyboard warrior wishing harm on others.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,060 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    No one is "Pro Open Borders" - That just a nonsense attempt by lots of those on the Populist Right to make this appear like it's a binary choice.

    It's not a choice between "Make them all criminals and ship them off to Rwanda" and "Just let everyone in , no checks at all".

    It's about doing the right thing.

    Should there be controls at the border? - Yes of course

    Should we treat asylum seekers with respect regardless of how they arrive? - Yes , it's shocking that this is even something that people are arguing about.

    Should we process them quickly and efficiently and either send them back to where they came from or accept them ? - Absolutely.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What's shocking is that the UK is seeking to end people crossing the channel and potentially drowning, and that's what's considered controversial.

    What the UK is doing is the right thing: stopping the migrant tide to prevent drownings.

    That, surely, is a good thing?

    If that means closing down routes for asylum, then that's what's needed. There's nothing "shocking" about that.



  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That’s not the comment that is being responded to and you know that full well



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    No, because France is not at war, and their lives are not being threatened by French nationals.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,060 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    "It's a safety issue"

    Ah , just stop it will you..

    It's beyond embarrassing at this point, Are there no knots you won't tie yourself into attempting to defend the current Tory parties basic lack of human decency?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,961 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Why did you lie about Fabricant saying missiles had been thrown at him?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,985 ✭✭✭ambro25


    The UK isn’t trying to stop the migrant tide to prevent drownings. It is merely removing still more access to whatever asylum claiming procedures are left.

    Some migrants (and at the scale of current migration flows, it absolutely is ‘some’, and not a whole lot at that) will continue to try and reach the UK by any means: they simply won’t come out of the irregular situation with an asylum claim anymore, feathering the nest of traffickers and modern slavers still further.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    She has some brass neck this Truss. Utter belief in herself and her career path. In that she's quite like Boris, whatever it takes she'll do or say.

    But just plainly unconvincing as someone fit for PM.

    The Tories have no chance whatsoever in next election with her as PM.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,896 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    At least as consumers we now have a choice of how our data and calls are delivered, if you dont like EIR there are often other ways of getting that service like mobile, satellite and virgin, unlike electricity where it only comes one way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,985 ✭✭✭ambro25


    That old canard 🙄

    So long as the UK remains a signatory to the UN Refugee Convention, which allows choice in where individuals apply for asylum, refugees do not have to apply for asylum in the first “safe” place they reach.

    If that irks you, campaign for UNRCxit. Until then, it is the law of the land.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,969 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Par for the course.

    Proves that illegal migration isn't their problem, any migration at all is.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,814 ✭✭✭joe40


    Brilliant, we will accept refugees if they come via legitimate routes. But.. there are no legitimate routes.

    A bit like the major from catch 22 who refused to see anyone in his office while he was in his office.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 710 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    you clearly think you know the answer, but don't.

    so both countries have similar schees to resettle refugees and both insist that to claim asylum you must be in the country.

    So what is the difference, other than a few miles of water called the English channel, which I would suggest is the biggest reason why there are more asylum seekers in Germany than the UK. Geography.



Advertisement