Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

BoJo banished - Liz Truss down. Is Rishi next for the toaster? **threadbans in OP**

1207208210212213297

Comments

  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,060 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    I don't think that she'll get ousted by the party, at least not at first.

    At this point I think it's far more likely that she'll be forced to put the budget to a commons vote and she will lose that vote which forces her to call an election.

    Now, once a GE is called they might force her resignation, but who would want that gig?

    They'll more likely leave her there to fully carry the can for the election loss and then a new leader gets to come in with a cleanish slate in opposition.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 43,904 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I can certainly acknowledge faults in the Conservative Party, as anyone can. But the anti-CP crowd are obsessed. Literally obsessed.

    ...yet you're the only one that I'm aware of who has lied multiple times on this thread to get their point across



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,171 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Eskimo is a lover of the type of "lost it's way conservativism" you are talking about. That is until it is obvious they are gonna lose.

    One of the biggest moaners about "woke" and all that culture war sht on Boards. A defender of Anne Widdecombes homophobia and was insinuating Marcus Rashford was a paedophile for getting above his station.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Conservatism has been in crisis ever since it persisted with engaging in idoltry of Thatcherism. A perverse, empty-headed and deeply reactionary strain of conservatism that did untold damage to the social fabric of the UK and much of its pillar industries and economy.

    The twee, wandering-the-fields-in-a-wax-jacket and fiscal prudence conservatism has been entirely supplanted by reactionary and dogmatic economic libertarians who have an authoritarian streak in their back pocket for the povs when it suits them. Sprinkle some obnoxious exceptionalism and garnish with mawkish British nationalism and you have the perfect recepie for the Tories in 2022.

    They've dug their own grave politically, just a shame they have to take the rest of the country with them.



  • Posts: 710 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That is spectacularly rubbish. Even for you.

    the winter of discontent was all love and cuddles, as were the rolling power cuts, rampant inflation and seemingly endless strikes, but oh no, Thatcherism destroyed the social fabric of the UK!!

    Even Labour has to adopt Thatcherism to get elected.

    What Truss has tried to do, is introduce changes that were needed forty years ago, thinking they would still be needed today, but they aren’t.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    well, other than the recognition of where the tories have got to post brexit, culminating with this current group, I agree with none of that. But I think engaging in debate will be a waste of both of our time.

    if they regain the centre ground, as under Cameron (and Blair who was a centrist Tory in all but name) they will be electable again. But there will be some amount of bloodletting to come first



  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 78,484 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    OK, I would suggest that one or two of you back off as threadbans are incoming if this nonsense he said/she said/read my posts/this is rubbish commentary continues

    It's quite clear who are supportive of the party as it is those who are not. There is no need for this continual back and forth as no-one's views are going to change based on the sort of comments made in this thread over the past few hours



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Yep. Rishi Sunak (the richest politician in the HoC) warned that this was fairytale economics but they went ahead and voted for Truss anyway.

    It's amazing how competent he comes across by doing nothing. Hilarious, actually.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 95,805 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Chris Cornelius, the geologist who founded Cuadrilla Resources, which drilled the UK’s first modern hydraulic fracturing wells in Lancashire, told the Guardian that he believed the government’s support for it is merely a “political gesture”.


    The other stabilising event was that the UK would not be entering recession. But only because the previous month's figures were conveniently a little worse than expected.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,856 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    Is it really irrational or do people just hate them because of their entire ethos?


    If Sunak was clever he'd sit back and watch this trainwreck from safety. Why does anyone want to lead a party that is all but guaranteed to lose the next election?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,563 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    The conservative party don't even like the conservative party at the moment, half of them are boycotting the conference or attending fringe events instead of the official conference, and voters are very quickly waking up to their true colours.

    The Tories would be a nothing party if it wasn't for an extremely undemocratic electoral system. It's even a misnomer, first past the post would imply the first candidate to reach a quota, but it's really a winner by plurality, which is a ridiculous system, so ridiculous that the Tories don't even use it to select their own party leader

    The hatred of the Tories on here is far from irrational. They've been threatening the Irish peace process for the last 6 years, bribing the DUP to vote for hard Brexit which is against our interests. Their foreign minister implied starving the Irish as a way to undermine the EU, they tried to use 'Vaccine diplomacy' to put a wedge between Ireland and the EU. They have heartlessly shafted millions of our fellow European citizens who had made their lives in the UK and were treated to the 'Hostile environment' method of treating people so shittily that they discourage others from wanting to come to the UK

    The Tories deliberately antagonised pretty much the entire rest of the world. All while brutalising and impoverishing their own citizens leading to a massive expansion in food banks and the collapse of workers protections through the prevailence of zero contract hours and prohibitions on peaceful protest and kites flown about banning strikes.....So you can take the 'irrational' part of that irrational hatred and put it somewhere the sun doesn't shine

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,563 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    And yet the leave Britney alone guy actually was right, she was being unfairly villified. So the poorly grounded half arsed defenses of the CP on this thread are even more pathetic than that meme looked in hindsight.

    The Tories of 2022 are actually malelovant. They hounded out any moderates through a series of purges orchestrated by the hard right fringes of the party.

    The British public are finally figuring this out.

    image.png


    This is not the face of a PM who is anywhere near the top of her brief.but no credible Tory would be mad enough to stand for leader with the amount of excrement piled up in her in tray, so will they do the honourable thing and call a GE?

    Of course they won't because they don't care about the country they're charged with governing

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,563 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Did they actually fudge the economic statistics to hide the recession?

    That would be tragic in the extreme. They've been trying to say ' yeah it's a recession but it's a shallow one'if they fudge the monthly stats it's only storing up a deeper drop next month, which kills their shallow recession narrative

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,785 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Exactly . That is my position as well. Like looking at it from a dispassionate distance and thanking our stars that although we are certainly not perfect , we at least live in a republic with proportional representation voting system .

    I wonder how different that country would be if they ditched their monarchy and class system that allows this excess of privilege and power to some , and shared even a portion of that wealth to levelling up and education, health , and growth of industry and jobs , a bit like they had post WW 2 to some extent except with a monarchy who made an effort to be supportive instead of just celebrities.

    Help keep Boards going , subscribe or donate if you can.

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,178 ✭✭✭✭retalivity


    They way they are going, they could be gone by the time next months figures are out. Will be someone elses problem then.

    Post edited by retalivity on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,563 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Yeah, this is another thing. They'll leave with the place in tatters, labour will take over, and then they, with their private right wing media empires, will blame Labour for the mess they created even as Labour do everything they can to undo the damage the Tories caused, hoping that the public will be gaslighted and the Tories can swoop I'm at the next election to repeat the cycle all over again.

    For me, Electoral reform to move to a transferrable vote should be item 1 on the agenda on day 1 of Starters term as PM

    Unfortunately I don't think they'll do it

    There are a lot of reforms that are needed. A new human rights bill should be drafted and put forward in a referendum to stop the Tories from dismantling workers rights and the rights to protest and engage in freedom of speech etc

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Posts: 710 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Put in human rights bills that already exist?

    whybwould someone do that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,896 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    Its quickly looking like a return of Boris would be an improvement.


    This policy really takes the biscuit. Its giving energy companies carte blanche for price increases and telling consumers that the all you can eat buffet is open for the next two years, leave all your lights on till 2024.

    I wonder do the brits realize they will all ultimately pay for it anyway!



  • Posts: 710 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I thought a price cap was what the opposition parties wanted?

    now it should be scrapped because it will cost too much?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,972 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Whichever brainless, hopelessly corrupt demagogue takes over doesn't matter at this point. Winter is going to devastate large portions of this country and all they care about is handouts for their billionaire pals.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,885 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    if the cost were covered by windfall profits taxes on the oil companies, for example, then it's "essentially" money recycling. Oil company makes extra profits selling energy at a high price, but consumer doesn't pay anything over the price cap - that's handled by the energy company getting back the money they contribute via windfall profits tax to the government's coffers.

    But, His Majesty's Government hasn't announced any sources for the costs over the price cap, no tax rises for example. They're proposing to borrow the money without identifying any new revenue streams to pay for it.

    So, I don't believe anyone's asking for the cap to be scrapped - just HMG's proposed implementation.



  • Posts: 710 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    When Kier Starmer proposed keeping the cap at £1971 per year, his windfall tax would create £8bn in revenue he claimed. So if a cap of £2500 would cost £80bn then a windfall tax isn’t going to make much difference.

    and how would this windfall tax work? There are a lot of people talking about it, but who decides how much profit a private company is allowed to make? Does it mean going through the books of every energy company and telling them that they have made too much money, or is it an increase in tax based on the gas price, in which case for a lot of companies, that is simply costs being passed on and not an increase in profits.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,563 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    To undo the damage the Tories did by restricting the right to protest in the policing and crime bill this year, to add in workers rights to roll back the era of zero hours contracts, to protect the NHS by enshrining a right to healthcare free at the point of service, to protect the rights of workers to engage in industrial action...

    Basically to undo the damage the Tories have done.

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,563 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    The opposition's plan was to fund a price cap with a windfall tax. Truss wants the energy companies to continue to make these enormous profits and to load it all onto the increasingly expensive national debt

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,896 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    A price cap is only putting off the payment temporarily, it doesnt curb rate hikes and does the opposite of promoting conservation.


    Their plan might give houses short term security but they will end up paying in the long run.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,885 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    So, you agree, the issue is one of implementation and no one is saying, "No price cap! No price cap!"

    As for how it's implemented, neither you nor I have seen any proposals from HMG on how to pay for the price cap, because there aren't any and it will be expensive. It's easy to criticize Labour's proposal on paying for it, they've made one. Probably their windfall profits tax isn't high enough then.

    And, yeah, choosing tax rates does require some analysis; HMG has lots of civil servants and lots of computers and can hire smart people (in theory) to do that analysis. Kind of thing the OBR does I believe, but wasn't done prior to announcing the mini-budget.



  • Posts: 710 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    the right to protest hasn’t been restricted. That is hyperbole.

    many workers enjoy zero hours contracts. Removing that sounds wonderful, unless of course you are an Uber driver or a Deliveroo rider.

    not sure if you’ve read the news, but it looks pretty much like the right to industrial action is alive and well, which unfortunately means I can’t go to watch my team this Saturday, but such is life.

    when has the NHS ever been anything but free at the pint of use? When has it ever been suggested it should cease?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,563 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    I think as long as they have a majority they might still be able to find a way to make things even worse depending on who replaces Truss. If the Tories only care about getting re-elected, then they have 2 years to break democracy even further

    Truss is too thick to accomplish this, but Michael Gove (for example) is positioning himself as a 'reasonable' Tory over the last few months.

    Anyone associated with the ERG is a legitimate threat to what remains of British democracy

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Posts: 710 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The only option as you see it then, is for governments to take a step back and do nothing.

    hopefully that doesn’t happen, as I for one will need the €600 due over the winter.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,896 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    There is also the issue that surely they can only apply the tax law as it currently stands, surely you cant change current tax law and then apply it retrospectively to previous profits or discriminately to one sector.

    A change in tax like a windfall tax would have to be drafted approved and implemented for a future date.



Advertisement