Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Merits of Slowing down the easy days

2

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,767 ✭✭✭✭Murph_D


    Haha. You’re a gas man. Not sure this qualifies at all as a ‘debate’. Pasting a quote from a coach (even one as distinguished as Canova) is not ‘science’. You haven’t responded at all to the article I linked, which argues (backed by research) that lactate is gone after a couple of hours.

    And nothing above was ‘debunked’. But you sure put me in my place! Well done and enjoy your running. I won’t be ‘debating’ this point any more. 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭Taxes


    I think you are greatly underestimating Renato Canovas practical background as a sports scientist.

    "You haven’t responded at all to the article I linked, which argues (backed by research) that lactate is gone after a couple of hours".

    Again, nothing in that study suggests lactate is totally cleared a couple of hours after a prolonged period of exertion. Fact-check, anyone following this thread, click the link to the study provided, use ctrl F on your keyboard and type in "two hours" or "2 hours" or "120 minutes", your search will not yield anything and will save you a lot of bother of actually reading the article.

    You must not be reading it correctly. The word ‘disappearance’ in that study is used to describe the rate of lactate clearance DURING periods of intense exertion, not AFTER, and is compared to rates to lactate ‘appearance’ or 'build-up' during the same period of exertion. As I've stated there will always be elevated levels of residual lactate the following day after an intense workout.

    Yes, your statements were indeed debunked. Reread the earlier posts, anyone with a sound mind will be able to determine this for themselves. For example, you state that it’s not viable to do a V02 max session based on HR(silly statement), I’ve described how it can be used as such.

    You thought I was arrogant in my comments and thought you spotted flaws in my logic, which is why you responded. You have 'debated unsuccessfully.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10 Fahim


    Interesting discussion. I agree with you that it's important to run slow on easy days but both you and Renato are wrong about lactate. Renato's a great coach but he gets a lot wrong😉 When we're working hard, we need to create lots of ATP but we can't get in enough oxygen to so. In the past, we believed that this caused us to create lactic acid, which produced lactate and the lactate released hydrogen ions. We also thought that the hydrogen ions made the muscles acidic, but this definitely is not the case. Pyruvate isn't the end product of glycolysis. The end product of glycolysis is lactate. There is no lactic acid. Lactate, however, hoovers up hydrogen ions. Lactate acts as a buffer and helps.Lactate is not bad.Lactate facilitates increased activity and intensity. Easy runs don't clear lactate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭Taxes


    Okay I’m open to learning. Post the peer reviewed studies that support your assertions now please and I will assess same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10 Fahim


    Note: According to Gert et al. 1981; Stanley et al 1985; Richardson et al. 1998; Park et al. 2015, lactate production occurs in aerobic tissues and organs. What this means is that lactate is a major energy source and not something bad that needs to be cleared after hard workouts. It's most likely that what you're talking about is CPK in the blood.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭Taxes


    Paste links to the entire studies if you can.

    Easy running converts lactate back into energy after a hard session and reduces the level of hydrogen concentration in the blood.

    So, Easy running does reduce the level of lactate in the blood through this cycle.

    Everyone gets ‘things’ wrong but saying Renato Canova gets a lot of things wrong is like me saying Jurgen Klopp got the tactics wrong against Real Madrid in the champions league final last May. My comments don’t have much credibility as I haven’t achieved anything significant in the sport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10 Fahim


    I can't post links but if you look up Lactate in contemporary biology: a phoenix risen you'll have plenty of top quality reading on the subject.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10 Fahim


    Renato isn't a physiologist/scientist (nor am I) and he definitely gets a lot wrong (so do I). He's a great coach and we'll remember him as the greatest groundbreaker. Right now, there are many better coaches, I hasten to add, influenced by Renato's work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭Taxes


    Okay, so easy running lowers levels residual lactate and hydrogen concentration in the blood after a tough session by reconverting it back into energy.

    Therefore, one of the primary benefits of running 'easy' in recovery days to facilitate this cycle and the adaption process.

    This is true.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10 Fahim


    No. Easy running doesn't lower residual lactate levels and hydrogen concentration in the blood after a tough session. That's the old science. If you read Lactate in contemporary biology: a phoenix risen you'll see. Even if you just read the summary, you'll get it. It's very complicated and lots of scientists are now changing their previous beliefs on this subject. Regardless, recovery runs have a big part to play in adaptations.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭Taxes


    I'm sorry but you are wrong, as I said previously, I'm open to learning but here are the facts:

    The old science was that lactic acid was thought to be responsible for the muscle fatigue during bouts of intense physical exertion. The new science is that lactate is an energy source, but, as lactate is produced, so are hydrogen ions, this causes the muscle fatigue felt during bouts of intense physical exertion, a by-product of lower blood PH levels.

    After a hard session and through easy running, lactate is reconverted back into energy through what is known as the Cori cycle.

    Technical description of the Cori cycle:

    "The Cori cycle, also known as the lactic acid cycle, is the metabolic pathway where lactate that is produced through anaerobic glycolysis is converted into glucose in the liver, and is then returned to the muscle where it can be metabolized into lactate "

    Therefore, one of the primary benefits of running 'easy' in recovery days to facilitate this cycle and the adaption process.

    Anyone following this thread should google search 'Cori Cycle' and determine for themselves if the process is still widely accepted by the scientific community.

    It's not really that complicated. You tried to make it more complicated than it was by including some scientific buzzwords with no definitions for those less initiated. As Alberto Einstein once said, if you can't explain something in simple terms, you simply don't understand it yourself ;)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 90 ✭✭bike2wkr


    Very easy runs for recovery and v fast sessions work for some distance runners. I have seen that not everyone responds the same way though to this and you do need to mix it up. Working in Zone 2 and zone 3 as well for some runs below your LT or in and around the LT does produce a great training stimulus (produces more ATP which previous poster mentioned there). It raises your Lactate threshold - and builds you up with out as much fatigue you get from doing hard sessions/,recov runs all the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭Taxes


    A LT run is a ‘hard’ run and I’d consider it a quality run for any athlete whom I’d prescribe it for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10 Fahim




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10 Fahim


    Based on your understanding of lactate, hydrogen ions, and 'The Cori cycle' this will prove enlightening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭Taxes


    Oh, hi Fahim, are you just back from lecturing Renata Canova, correcting him on his errors, and teaching him the latest sports pseudo-science that will enable him to coach the first male athlete to break the magic 2-hour marathon barrier in open competition?

    I don’t feel like I need to answer, as it is clear to me that an individual who asks such questions has no practical experience in performing or coaching at a decent level in endurance running.

    This will be my last post.

    Anyone who would like to shoot me a message, please do so. I love talking training.

    Below are the progressions of two runners I’ve coached over the past 9 months. The other is mine.

    Athlete 1 - 9 months training, 3 races.

    18.47- 17.43- 17.06 5km. Another 12 months training and with some luck with injuries, this athlete will run 15.40 5km.

    Athlete 2 - 9 months training, 3 races

    17.57, 17.34, 16.54. Another 12 months and with some luck with injuries, this athlete will run a sub 16 minute 5 km

    Myself- 10 km, 3 races.

    34.34, 33.10 (tough course), 31.56. I didn't run a 5km but based on the athletes that I beat in the 10km races, I was probably in 14.59 5km shape on a fast course with good competition. I did this off zero hard speed workouts and zero specific V02 max workouts. With a little tweaking, I should be able to run sub 31 min 10km and close to 14.30 5km, in time and if family commitments allow it.

    Not bad for a man that has an inaccurate understanding of LT and the cori cycle 🤣🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10 Fahim


    Impressive coaching. I always admire coaches who help people improve. If you want Renato's number, DM me and I'll pass it on. But be warned, he doesn't do WhatsApp and he's deaf in his left ear. If only you knew the irony of...and Renato.


    Quick tip: work off referrals. Let your clients do the talking for you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭Taxes


    Thanks Fahim.

    I admire Renato and I have learned a lot from his teachings, as I have other mentors.

    I'm not interested in obtaining clients but would gladly point athletes in the right direction, if asked, and for no charge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,230 ✭✭✭Marty Bird


    Very impressive results, what type of plan do you cover?

    🌞6.02kWp⚡️3.01kWp South/East⚡️3.01kWp West



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 784 ✭✭✭daydorunrun


    Interesting 'discussion', Just wondering Taxes, do you sometimes refer to yourself as 'The Running Master'? there is something familiar about your posting style which reminds me of a running guru who used to post around here.

    “You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try.” Homer.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭Taxes


    Unless ‘the running master’, as you refer to him, is a also a tax consultant by trade, then the answer is no.

    If you’d like to refer to me as the running master then there is nothing I can do about this, although I dislike the term.

    I am a both a teacher and a student of the game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,906 ✭✭✭Ceepo


    You seem to be very knowledgeable on the subject,, might I ask you a question.

    How long would you normally expect to see lactate levels elevated for before returning to base levels after a hard session ( LT or interval)?

    "The purpose of running slow is to reduce the level of blood/lactate in your muscles after quality sessions to less than 1mmol/l."

    Why 1 mmol/l?

    "This cannot be achieved naturally, for example, through resting as opposed to running easily."

    I would also be interested in your views on the study, which seems to contradict your above statements.

    Conclusion for anyone who doesn't want to read the whole study.

    "Our results demonstrate that active recovery after strenuous aerobic exercise leads to a faster clearance of accumulated blood lactate than passive recovery, and that the rate of blood lactate clearance depends on the exercise intensity of the active recovery, with peak lactate clearance rates occurring at intensities close to lactate threshold. This was observed by measuring blood lactate clearance during active and passive recovery ranging from 0 to 100% of the individual lactate threshold. Active recovery intensities at 80–100% of lactate threshold were more beneficial than exercise intensities at 60% of lactate threshold or below, and this dose–response relationship also existed during active recovery at 60%, 40%, and 0% (passive recovery) of lactate threshold. Thus, after a strenuous high-intensity aerobic exercise bout at an intensity close to [Vdot]O2max, the fastest lactate clearance is achieved by active recovery at an exercise intensity close to or just below the individual lactate threshold."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,005 ✭✭✭Unknownability


    That's exactly what I thought. Probably 3 or 4 usernames ago for me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭Taxes



    ”80% to 100%” of LT threshold, that’s quite a wide range, I’m sure you’ll agree.

    That’s 6-7.30 per mile for an athlete with a 6min/mile LT threshold. Good luck trying to recover from a hard session running at 100% of your LT. You won’t stay healthy for long.

    Use your head grasshopper. The study states ‘faster’ lactate threshold clearance running at 80-100% of LT, so more efficient but, not more effective and definitely not as safe as passive recovery.

    Maybe very experienced runners could recover at the lower end of that range ie 7.30 per mile at a LT of 6min mile but why risk it?

    Take it easier, relax, run at 60-80% of LT on your recovery days, your muscles will thank you for it, you’ll stay healthy. You’ll be mentally fresher for your tougher sessions when they come round, keeping the enjoyment of running. .You’ll improve the quality of your harder sessions, you’ll progress faster, you’ll race harder.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,906 ✭✭✭Ceepo


    I'm not sure why you need to address me as grasshopper?

    Just on the study. It didn't say to run All your easy runs at that pace. It said lactate was cleared faster at that pace. So for example you could do some of your cool down work at that pace to clear lactate quicker, rather that a much slower pace which would end up having someone running longer to clear the lactate.

    The point still stands that it conflicts with your previous statement.

    Just to point out you said "This cannot be achieved naturally, for example, through resting as opposed to running easily." the study found that lactate reduce passively all be it at a slower rate.

    Also why "less 1mmol/l number? Why. Not 1.25 or 1.50?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10 Fahim


    Trust me, Taxes is not the The Running Master. I had dinner tonight with John (The Running Master) and coach John Ewoi. Coach Stazza is over here in my homeland, Kenya. He's running a course for coaches and I'm on the course along with several 'world famous' coaches and new coaches. I told John about the thread and he just laughed. He read it and said, I bet people think I'm Taxes (the stupid people).Tomorrow, he's with us and Coach John Ewoi at the Kipchoge stadium. The mods can check my ip address.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10 Fahim


    John said that Taxes is trying to imitate him as he uses the word Grasshopper for some of his clients.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,767 ✭✭✭✭Murph_D


    "Grasshopper, seek first to know your own journey’s beginning and end... But in this seeking, know patience."

    Showing my age here!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭Taxes


    Sorry for calling you grasshopper as it has offended you.

    Your first paragraph paraphrased the key points made in my reply. It’s more efficient(quicker) but not more effective( a longer run at a slower pace the following day would be as effective) in clearing lactate. I also added that it is a much safer method to reduce lactate following a tough workout. Doing a LT run at 80-100% of LT after a V02 max session is not advisable, increases the risk of injury, muscle fatigue/ physical and mental staleness.

    Also how long does it take, running at 80-100% LT after a run to completely clear the lactate, I didn’t see a guide.

    In conclusion, like I said it’s more efficient but not more effective and definitely not more practical.

    All of my points are valid.

    For an endurance athlete, the residual levels lactate in the blood the day after a LT workout would be elevated. Very likely 1.6-2 mmol. Running easy in the recovery days will lower the lactate between 0.5-1 mmol. So this is this is why I used 1mmol, as a proxy.

    No, resting the next day would not bring the lactate down to baseline levels. In days two and three post-workout, likely yes. So lactate levels cannot be reduced to baseline the day following a hard session, by resting.


    This will be my last post folks, enjoy your running. Train hard but train smart and I hope you obtain many PBs.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,767 ✭✭✭✭Murph_D


    “But how will we find our way in the darkness, Master Po, without your light to guide us?”



Advertisement