Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Queen Elizabeth II dies

1102104106107108

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,073 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    The laws in Scotland and the UK etc. are not the same. So what were they actually arrested for. AFAIK they weren't all arrested under (or for) the same reasons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Nobody said there was thousands arrested.

    But there was person that gleefully leapt to the defence of the arrests, and that was you, and you'll be made own it.

    As I said, fire-up your search engine yourself. It's nobodies job to keep an ignorant informed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Never said they were the same. But the arrests made, overwhelmingly will be found to be unlawful. North and South of Hadrian's wall.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,814 ✭✭✭jacool


    31-19 versus 41-17 bit of a difference there, double, in fact



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,073 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    They have a get out clause legally as I understand it.

    Ultimately they achieved their aim. Removed the protest/potential disturbance the protesters got media exposure.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,445 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Not true I am neither a monarchist or stereotypical Irish Republican.

    But I can see the inferiority complex that has come out in Irish people on boards.ie. It messes with their mind that the Royal monarchy is so popular to the vast majority of British people.

    They seem to view any statement of that fact as ‘cap doffing’. As their own historical Irish inferiority complex rises.

    I mean their are plenty of things that are popular that I can’t get my head around from Morrissey the singer to Marty Morrisey the broadcaster. But I don’t rant and rave about it and take it as a personal affront.

    Believe it or not a Royal family can be popular and viewed as an identity.

    Obviously There are a small minority who are anti and vocal.

    Such as this man in Wales :

    But what struck me was not his comments, but how the rest of the crowd were unhappy with him. By attacking Charles, the man was attacking their identity.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,049 ✭✭✭Montage of Feck


    The queen is dead, I wonder will life ever be sane again?

    🙈🙉🙊



  • Posts: 710 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    it appears that the woman arrested in Scotland was arrested for her behaviour and not the sign.

    She is part of this organisation.

    there was a young man who shouted abuse at Prince Andrew. Shouting personal abuse in public is a no no, but I guess you consider that to be ok as it was a Royal It looks like he was arrested along with a 50 your old guy who they may have had an altercation with.

    and there was a guy arrested in Oxford, but then de-arrested so not charged.

    Of those three arrests, only one person was holding up an anti monarchy banner and she wasn't arrested for it, but for her actions.

    I still can't find all these others you keep talking about, maybe my google is broken.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,073 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    In my mind, the British are welcome to their monarchy and all concomitant pecidillos that surround it. No problems there and I've said as much in this thread.

    The problems emerge when you have oddballs in this thread who try to enforce their twee solemnity on the thread and come after posters cracking benign jokes about the royal family or even simple critical commentary.

    As I said, we have one user who is high as a badger that is aggressively trying to bully posters. He came after me a few days ago - I don't know has the penny dropped with him yet, but he came after the wrong poster.

    And like, clockwork, I just got a notification that he replied to me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,445 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    You are just getting yourself worked up for nothing. It is a lovely day. Go for walk don’t be getting het up about posters it is not healthy. But you seem to bring some of it on yourself in fairness. With statements which have been questioned, but not answered properly.

    If you want to live a long life good medical attention as the Royal family receives helps. But in general the success to a long life is not to get worried/angry by inconsequential distant events or people. You end up burdening yourself pointlessly.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Regrettably I'm at my desk on a slow day at work.

    But, I'm not worked up in the least. I take a somewhat perverse pleasure in giving posters like the one referred to pause for thought before they hit the 'post comment button'.

    As my infraction record on the forum will attest to. I've never regretted dragging eye-twitchers and bullies into deep waters. I'm doing the board a service to be honest, and honestly, a service to the person I'm interacting with though the might not recognise it at the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,566 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    It a very ambiguous situation that some Irish people find themselves in.

    They really struggle to accept certain things about Britain like the popularity of the royal family and the popularity of Britain itself abroad and the esteem it is held in in many countries.

    They sneer at the concept of Commonwealth or the special relationship between the US and UK, which are very real and beneficial entities to all involved.

    You will see similar in a few months at the world cup, any victory by England will have will be belittled and any loss over hyped.

    And there will be the inevitable sneering at the English public about the support they show in their team.

    But at the same time, the very same Irish people cannot get enough of British sports, media, music, fashion, entertainment etc etc.

    And while consuming that media they cannot see that the coverage of events like the death of the queen is for the consumption of the British people, not them, not anyone else.

    It must be really difficult to live like that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,867 ✭✭✭StrawbsM


    67 people arrested in London yesterday by 5pm. It doesn’t break down what any of the arrests were for so could be pickpockets, burglars, drunk drivers or all funeral related. I haven’t a clue. Don’t know whether these were arrests for the entire met police area or just within the funeral locations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,016 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I think you can point out the absurdity of monarchy without it being related to current feelings on the British or the history of anglo Irish relations. Undoubtedly the monarchy is very popular in the UK as it is still in alot of other countries- it survives because so many people buy in to the fantasy that an individual or institution can represent the nation. That someone is born for that position, like the queen had a destiny to be the queen.

    Anyway I hope Charles lives for a few years now, he waited so long to get the job- will be interesting if the toxic media over there that have mocked him for a lot of his life are more charitable in their coverage of him now.



  • Posts: 13,753 ✭✭✭✭ Terry High Motorcyclist




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,913 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The Brits got lucky with Elizabeth. She was young, good looking and vivacious when she became Queen, as well as being hard working and taking the role seriously.

    Apparently Churchill had major reservations about her but as soon as she settled into the job, he realised she was absolutely perfect for it.

    Did she become bigger than the monarchy itself? It's quite possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,139 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Well, if you read it you would have seen I never said anyone had to like/love or even respect the monarchy....you missed my point completely, which was to do with deliberate baiting/antagonizing those who are mourning and those who do want their monarchy etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,016 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I dont think she was bigger thqman the monarchy. She is quite similar to Queen Victoria in that a few years most people will struggle to think of anything substantial she did and the detractors will blame her for bad things she had no control over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,073 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    ...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,073 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    Two of you in it in Fairness.

    Obviously not everyone was reasonable as the mods had to step in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,913 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I wouldn't necessarily agree. I think her main achievement is that she kept the monarchy popular for the 70 years of her reign. It could easily have started to go out of fashion from the 1960s onwards (and this might well have happened with a very boring or unpopular monarch). The fact that her funeral was a big an event of that of Victoria and George VI (perhaps even bigger) is a testament to how she kept it relevant.



  • Posts: 6,246 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Tell us,what age was he when 1st started going out



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,016 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Is that not the default achievement of every good monarch that has ever existed? Unfortinately all the great monarchs of england/uk either won wars, introduced important laws, or staved off the island from invasion. Constitunional monarchs are a say-nothing do-nothing crowd and cant compare.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,913 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    For sure, but I think the modernisation of society and the emergence of things like television and subsequently the internet would have posed unique risks to something like the monarchy. The institution is very archaic and old fashioned and rooted in the past and modernity was always going to be a big challenge to it.

    Apparently, Elizabeth in 1953 said something like "I cannot be an old fashioned queen and lead you into battle, but I can still try and serve you in other ways". She understood instinctively that the role of the monarch and the royal family was changing and she would have to adapt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,016 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    The Royals have become celebrities now, who do local charity work and dress very conservatively 😀. Without power the queen and all future monarchs lack greatness, basically because they just exist to maintain the status quo and can never take risks. They are like the trophy wife married to the british public.



  • Posts: 710 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I don't think there is any actual clearly defined path and the road to becoming a republic is a long and complicated one (which is why, many people like myself, don't see the benefit in going down it), but if Parliament voted for it to happen, then it will happen.

    It could get messy, the Monarch could argue that they refuse to give the bill Royal Assent, but Parliament could vote to end the need for Royal Assent. There is also the question of the military having sworn allegiance to the monarch, but then we are talking English civil war part four and I'm sure the big statue of Cromwell outside Westminster is a good enough reminder to the King what happened at the end of Civil War part two.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,073 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    I see the Journal has a poll about how many Journal readers watched any of it.


    Over a third, 36.7% didn't watch any of it. So about half didn't watch it, or just caught on news bulletins. 55%.

    I'm not sure how that compares to other events.



  • Posts: 634 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So apparently people (Irish people) included have an inferiority complex if they don’t worship the royals? My word biggest load of crap I have ever read.

    Worshipping royalty is literally admitting you’re inferior purely because of birth and nothing more so the only people with inferiority complexes are those who have spent every minute of the day this past 10 days on here debasing themselves for a family who don’t know you from their arse to their elbow and who you don’t know personally whatsoever.

    What is also obvious is how anyone in the UK who isn’t in full worship mode and says something that isn’t positive about the royals is made in to a pariah.

    High society and celebrities in the UK suck up to the royals to get a knighthood to further themselves up the ladder, it’s the only reason the honour lists exists as its favourable to the royal family and the media is complicit in propping this up. And lots love the royals because it harks back to time when britianna ruled the waves. Thankfully no more.

    This is magnified by harry and Megan who I couldn’t give a shite about. They were hounded and criticised unbelievably because they were critical of the R.F. When you compare the media campaign against them compared to Andrew who went and stayed in a convicted peados house(who in their right mind would do that?) and paid millions to an accuser. That’s sick yet he got a far easier time because he simply never said anything bad about the royals.

    I’m glad Ireland is away from the circus. No doubt the usually band of saddos will be triggered on here.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,073 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Where did you get inferiority complex from?



Advertisement