Covid vaccines - thread banned users in First Post

It looks like it was a pseudopandemic of the needlecrafted all along:

"Published recently in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), a study led by Massachusetts-based physician-scientists leads to a disturbing discovery: individuals fully vaccinated and boosted against COVID-19 actually recover markedly more slowly from the illness and surprisingly, even remain contagious for lengthier periods of time as compared to unvaccinated persons...People that are vaccinated remain five times as contagious as those who are unvaccinated ten days after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Put another way, the vaccinated continue to transmit the disease significantly more than the unvaccinated should the data hold up across broader investigation."

From trialsitenews.com

Perhaps the sacred needlecraft is weakening people's immune systems.

From the Effects of Previous Infection and Vaccination on Symptomatic Omicron Infections

Conclusion

No discernable differences in protection against symptomatic BA.1 and BA.2 infection were seen with previous infection, vaccination, and hybrid immunity. Vaccination enhanced protection among persons who had had a previous infection. Hybrid immunity resulting from previous infection and recent booster vaccination conferred the strongest protection. (Funded by Weill Cornell Medicine–Qatar and others.)

That study?

And here's the summary:

"In this longitudinal cohort of participants, most of whom had symptomatic, nonsevere Covid-19 infection, the viral decay kinetics were similar with omicron infection and delta infection. Although vaccination has been shown to reduce the incidence of infection and the severity of disease, we did not find large differences in the median duration of viral shedding among participants who were unvaccinated, those who were vaccinated but not boosted, and those who were vaccinated and boosted.

Our results should be interpreted within the context of a small sample size, which limits precision, and the possibility of residual confounding in comparisons according to variant, vaccination status, and the time period of infection. Although culture positivity has been proposed as a possible proxy for infectiousness,5 additional studies are needed to correlate viral-culture positivity with confirmed transmission in order to inform isolation periods. Our data suggest that some persons who are infected with the omicron and delta SARS-CoV-2 variants shed culturable virus more than 5 days after symptom onset or an initial positive test."

Vaccination would appear to be good.

And to repost the conclusion of the study I found when looking for that one:

"No discernable differences in protection against symptomatic BA.1 and BA.2 infection were seen with previous infection, vaccination, and hybrid immunity. Vaccination enhanced protection among persons who had had a previous infection. Hybrid immunity resulting from previous infection and recent booster vaccination conferred the strongest protection. (Funded by Weill Cornell Medicine–Qatar and others.)"

Again, vaccines good.

There have been dozens of studies posted in this thread alone that show that the benefits of the vaccines greatly outweigh any risks.

What exactly do you require to accept these vaccines?

If that's the case, alright.

To repeat the prior question, what do you require to make you accept that these vaccines are okay?

Is your personal opinion.

We've had vaccines for centuries, mRNA tech has been around since the 70's. You as a lay-person might not know much about mRNA, but the experts do. The people who are producing the current vaccines, developing them and regulating them know that they, and their families and relatives and friends will be taking these vaccines.

Thanks to vaccines we've eliminated Smallpox, a disease that killed an estimated 300 million people in the 20th century alone. At the same time, incredibly an anti-vaccination movement started against that Smallpox vaccine, can you believe that, spreading irrational fear of that vaccine, one that had saved millions of lives.

Sound familiar?

Nothing has changed, it's the same "I'm just concerned" arguments, verbatim, the same incredulous talking points, the same toolbox of denial. That's not a coincidence. These types of views are less to do with the vaccines themselves and more with what they represent. It's rooted in a deep-set paranoia of authority and an irrational distrust of expertise. Any psychologist can tell you that straight off the bat.

Never cross your mind why you are surrounded by posters who believe the "NWO" control the world, that NASA has faked all space flight, that the pandemic was "pre-planned" in these threads?

All of the above "concerned" about a handful of deaths, but unconcerned about 6.5 million deaths, and it never strikes you as a tad odd?

If not, then you're in the right place for your opinions.

Its amazing people cant use their own judgment on the effect of a drug or not without been asked for expert proof. Ill skip until i see long term data on male and female fertility. Expert proof takes time and experimentation which we are in the middle of. We will see how it goes. Again hopefully everything works out ok.

Yes but we are seeing effects. Thats the concerning point.

https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/netherlands-study-mrna-vaccines-correlated-with-excess-deaths-13865747