Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Transgender man wins women's 100 yd and 400 yd freestyle races.

15152545657297

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    No.

    The point is that her times decreased after transition.

    People are banging on about a biological male can beat a biological female and ignoring the affect of hormone reducing/increasing drugs on a trans athletes.

    This discussion is not about a 100% biological male (taking no hormones that we know of) competing against a 100% female athlete (ditto with the hormones).


    It is about trans athletes - specifically trans women - who experience changes in their bodies due to hormones.

    It is accepted that by taking testosterone a trans man can compete against biological men. The hormone he is taking acts as a leveller in terms of performance. Yet, it is disputed that blocking testosterone also affects a trans woman's performance to the extent that she no longer performs as if she was 100% male (in hormonal terms). That's having your cake and eating it.

    Either hormone levels affect performance or they do not.

    Thomas' is slower after transition. She gets beaten by biological women. She is, at best, average in elite terms.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 840 ✭✭✭greyday


    Just because you say it does not mean its true like an awful lot of other stuff you say, who accepts exactly and what studies have been done to show a trans man taking drugs can compete against an elite level biological male athlete, they may close the gap but compete I will believe when I see it.

    There have been many women athletes that have taken drugs and still not get close to elite mens level, Sonya O Sullivan was cost a gold because of one, Michelle Smiths times were no where near the mens level.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,967 ✭✭✭✭Rothko


    Not only is it ridiculous but it's also incredibly insulting towards women.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,050 ✭✭✭Girly Gal


    Her times did decrease after transition, I don't think anyone actually seriously disputes this, and it's clear that biological females can beat her, several already have. The point is she is now competing at a higher level as a female than she was as a male. Her times are within the elite level for women now, whereas when she competed as a male her times were not considered elite, but, in the next level below. As a male she was highly unlikely to qualify for the Olympics, as a female her times would give her a chance of qualifying up until the recent rule change. I have never said biological females can't beat transwomen, I've actually said the opposite in an earlier post, but, in the Lia Thomas case it does look like she retains an advantage which allows her compete with elite women

    Post edited by Girly Gal on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,677 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    It is accepted that by taking testosterone a trans man can compete against biological men. The hormone he is taking acts as a leveller in terms of performance.

    that's where you've gone wrong.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,583 ✭✭✭J.O. Farmer


    It's accepted that the testosterone doesn't give trans men an unfair advantage. There's a difference.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    But the opposite is applicable?

    Thomas’ best time in the 200 freestyle ended up being her 1:41.93 mark from the Zippy Invitational in December. That effort ultimately ended up 3.76% slower than her best time before her transition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,583 ✭✭✭J.O. Farmer


    Yes but testosterone isn't the only difference between men and women but you don't understand any of this.

    If you really want to go into it trans men are at an unfair disadvantage but I don't see anyone advocating for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    They're being advocated for. Trans men are being swept up in the ban against transgender athletes push. They aren't just kicking the trans women with an alleged biological-superiority out of the womens divisions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,583 ✭✭✭J.O. Farmer


    Well at least they're all being treated equally then.

    I still don't see anyone saying it is unfair on trans men having to compete against biological males. That's advocating for them to compete against biological males.

    There's quite a bit of evidence to support the alleged biological superiority but you can't understand it given you believe men have no biological superiority in physical sports.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,337 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    I asked already but if changing the testosterone level is actually an equaliser where are the transmen competing at the highest levels of their sports?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,859 ✭✭✭plodder


    Men and women are different. The idea that sex isn't binary (female and male) because there is a small number of people who are exceptions to that rule, is like saying humans aren't bipedal (don't have two legs), because some humans have a leg amputated, or they were born without a leg. They are exceptions to the rule, but they don't change the rule.

    Transgender people aren't exceptions to the sex rule. Some people with DSDs might be, but transgender people generally aren't. Sex is different from gender. Why is this controversial? Sex matters for top level sport, but gender is what matters for every day life. They need to be treated differently in some situations but not all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,671 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    When they succeeded in convincing the IOC to change the guidelines so transgender athletes could compete at the Olympics without undergoing surgery -

    https://www.thecut.com/2016/01/chris-mosier-transgender-athletes-olympics.html

    They’re making sponsorship and advertising deals with Nike -

    https://www.esquire.com/style/mens-fashion/news/a47461/nike-transgender-athlete-ad/

    And more recently, they’re writing articles for the Guardian newspaper about transgender athletes participation in sports, their only demand being fairness -

    https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jun/29/sports-trans-participation-transgender-women-swimming

    As well as running an organisation dedicated to transgender athletes participation in sports -

    https://www.transathlete.com/


    No wonder you never hear from them - too busy 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,067 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    It's well accepted that testosterone levels are only one of the reasons that's men typically outperform women in sports.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,677 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure




  • Posts: 6,775 [Deleted User]


    It doesn't matter what testosterone level anyone has.

    Biological men don't belong in a biological women's competition, full stop. End of story. Period.

    As long as it's called a women's competition, no biological male should compete.

    And to reduce women to testosterone percentages and data is quite frankly insulting to women.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    No need to ask here as google is your friend.

    Unless you are asking here as you assume that no trans man has ever been selected to compete against biological men at elite level. Isn't there a saying about assuming making an ass ...?

    We could ask Chris Mosier.


    Or since Lia Thomas kicked off this who thing how about Schuyler Miwon Hong Bailar, who "took a man's spot" on the Harvard swim team competing at the NCAA?

    Granted there aren't many elite trans men athletes - or trans women for that matter.

    But then there aren't (despite the hysteria) that many trans gender people (studies put it as between 0.05 - 0.07% of the population) - of that group how many have the capability to be an elite athlete?

    Less than 1% of the overall population play sports professionally, the figure for those who have the capabilities to be considered 'elite' is hard to pin down but research into US college athletes indicates it's 0.4%


    So - 0.4% of 1% of the general population have what it takes to become an elite athlete (doesn't mean they will, there are other factors).

    Trans gender people account for 0.05 to 0.07% of the over all population - meaning 0.4% of 0.05-0.07% of the 1 % of the population who are professional sports people could potentially be considered potentially elite.

    78m is 1% of Global population (incl babies, children, elderly). 0.07% of that is 54600. 0.4% of that is 208.

    Seems to me it's amazing there any trans athlete given those figures.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,677 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    the figure for those who have the capabilities to be considered 'elite' is hard to pin down but research into US college athletes indicates it's 0.4%

    You're making the assumption that this should hold for trans women competing against biological women as well. That's a big assumption



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,067 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    There are very few Trans athletes in a very small pool of athletes.

    It's becoming a story because the disparity between male and female athletes in power and speed events is so stark.


    So a boy who was never a contender against other 16 or 17 year old boys is barnstorming it against women. A school boy sprinter can be an Olympic record holder as a female.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,891 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Rubbish.

    What advanyage does a Trans Woman have over a Woman. She had testosterone in her you say. Ever think that maybe she we did not want that.

    Also as we take oestrogen we lose muscle mass and gain fat as well as still having to carry around a skeleton formed from testosterone unless we has started transition in the early 10s or younger before testosterone had any major effects.

    So a Trans woman competing in any female sport is at a major disadvantage straight away as they have heavier bones to carry around and less muscles than they had to do it.

    So yes they should be aloud compete in Wonans sports and no there is no need for a third category. That is just discrimination and stupid too.

    If the trans women was never really a man in otherwords started to transition at 13 or 15 then they never experienced the effects of testosterone and are the lucky ones and should be able to compete in female sports too as they are females be it as girls or as Women of they are over 18 when they are competing.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,067 ✭✭✭✭Danzy



    Both sides of the argument will thank this post. (Akmc one above.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Seems some people still don't accept that hormones affect performance... or chose to ignore it in order to make an irrelevant point about biological males competing against biological females with nary a trans person in sight.

    Maybe start a thread on that eh?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,218 ✭✭✭✭Bannasidhe


    Show me how a tiny percentage of the population who could potentially be a trans woman athlete are a threat to women's sports.

    Or are you simply assuming with zero evidence?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,067 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    There are a whole sweet of factors affecting performance, hormones just being one.


    The difference in fast twitch fibres, endocrine system, cardiovascular etc


    What your hormone levels are at when you are competing or training is only a part of it.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,337 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    No there are but not as many and not at the highest level either.

    There's also a pattern for the transwomen in that when they were men they ok but when they transitioned became very good. This is because of the male advantage that the transition process doesn't fully remove. For Mosier he didn't get an improvement in performance, he either stayed the same or roughly decreased.

    Post edited by CatFromHue on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    The IOC doesn't set rules in different sports. It will eventually come down to individual bodies and more of them are gravitating towards that open category option. It is a nod to the fairness approach and TBF the science is still very incomplete on all of this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,967 ✭✭✭✭Rothko


    One of the dumbest comments I've ever seen on this site.



  • Posts: 1,824 [Deleted User]



    Yep, thinking that you can come up with some kind of formula - take your hormones for 6 months etc - for making a man perform at exactly the same level as an equivalent woman is just absurd. It's like trying to come up with a ballast (weight) handicap that allows a motorcycle to enter a horse race.

    It's a stupid thing to even attempt, it's scientific quackery. A man on hormones is still a man and has no place in a womans sporting event.



  • Posts: 6,775 [Deleted User]


    Moreover, if a person simply has to reduce their testosterone level to enter women's sport, then there's nothing theoretically wrong with a man (not a trans woman) dropping his testosterone levels to enter the competition. In theory, there can be no objection to that (if you believe that participating in sport can be reduced to testosterone %s).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 712 ✭✭✭mjsc1970




Advertisement