Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Transgender man wins women's 100 yd and 400 yd freestyle races.

14142444647297

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,815 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Exemption on the gender, age or disability grounds Difference in treatment on the gender, age, or disability grounds in relation to the provision or organisation of sporting facilities or sporting events is permitted to the extent that the differences are reasonably necessary having regard to the nature of the facilities or events.


    This is presumably what would allow it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,867 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    Yep, looks like it alright. There does appear to be a sports exemption. That blows my argument out of the water.

    I wonder will it be tested in the courts in the years to come?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,137 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    It doesn't so stop with the maybe or the possibly.

    Your problem is the sports bodies are actually doing what you want and it's robbed you of something to be outraged about so you are desperately trying to create controversy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,867 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    You couldn't be further wrong.

    Yes, I do think transgender athletes shouldn't compete against biological females but I'm far from the type to get outraged.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 196 ✭✭UID0


    They can't even make FINA allow a transwoman to compete here. The FINA rules are written in such a way that the competitors are nominated by the national swimming federation, but FINA in Switzerland have, at their discretion, the suspension of any federation from FINA, and the banning of all of their athletes from any FINA endorsed competition if there is any attempt by the government or constitution of any country to circumvent their rules

    (from FINA by-laws 22_FINA-By-Laws_25_04_2022_clean.pdf)

    BL 14 AUTONOMY OF THE NATIONAL FEDERATIONS MEMBERS OF FINA When the autonomy of a NF is being, or is, compromised the FINA Executive is entitled to take any appropriate decisions in order to protect the benefits of Aquatic Sports in the Country or the Sport Country of a NF. These measures include the suspension or the expulsion from the FINA membership if the constitution, law or other regulations in force in the Country or Sport Country of the NF concerned, or any act by any governmental or other body provokes the activity of the NF or the making or expression of its will to be hampered. The procedure shall be as established in FINA C 12.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,416 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    Swim Ireland is the NGB for swimming and they are governed by Fina. Whether than pass these rules down to grassroots level remains to be seen I suppose.

    Why do female divisions exist in sport? It has nothing to do with XX on a genetic level.

    In order for "by definition" to apply, there has to be some sort of definition involved. There is no rule that says female divisions are only for biological females, that's just something you've made up. Obviously you want that to be the rule.

    They're taking a biological female's place, and that is unacceptable.

    Why is it unacceptable? What is unfair about one athlete training harder than another and reaching a higher standard?

    You still haven't explained what you mean by "taking a place".



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,815 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    There is no rule that says female divisions are only for biological females, that's just something you've made up

    Well, there is now for FINA events and international rugby events. It wasn't really necessary to make the distinction previously.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    One would expect more bodies to move on this now, whether the question is asked or not.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,815 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl



    There will be more movement, but it won't all be in the same direction



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,416 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    That's not what the FINA rule says, in fact its the complete opposite. Which is precisely my point.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If you're saying that FINA do not state that women's divisions are only for women, then the definition should be included to prevent biological males from entering.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,416 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    Yes, they do not state that, nor is that remotely their intention with this rule update. They are specifically excluding transwomen who have undergone male puberty. For obvious reasons.

    Therefore what you claimed was completely untrue. The fact you want that to be the rule is irrelevant. You also keep dodging the question on "taking a place". Just as well as it doesn't hold up well either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    Seems to be an insane amount of work with potential a lot of back and forth in courts etc, especially with them picking age 12 as the cut off when there is equally a big push in numerous countries to block people from transitioning at all until after puberty. The % of people who transition before 12 is already a small %, if anything putting in such a rule (especially if applied to all sports) could make the whole matter more problematic as it's putting an artificial time limit on a decision that should be personal and slowly walked through (early transition often primarily only involves taking hormone blockers, will that suffice for the ruling or would it require something more?)


    All for what will frankly be such an immensely tiny % of athletes. I still feel this is a situation that can and should be handled on a case by case standard. You are looking at 2-3 athletes max per sport per year competing on any level that requires such formal judgement (and I'm including female to male in those numbers as well), it is much less chaotic and easier for all involved to make a judgement on a one to one basis based on the athlete themselves. From what I've read on the Lia Thomas case and what sport science commentators have said in podcasts a big factor in Lia Thomas's transition is that she never stopped swimming, she stopped formally competing but she kept up an intensive swimming regiment throughout her transition period which did have an effect on her transition. This would be different to say Laural Hubbarb who stopped weightlifting in 2001 and then transitioned later in life in 2012 and didnt resume weightlifting until a number of years after transitioning in 2017. Different sports, different circumstances, different people, This is not an issue that is going to have sporting bodies making 100's of judgements per year, Trans people in general make up a small % of the population and the % of trans people who athletes is even tinier. I think we are talking 50 people in total across numerous sports and countries (and again including female to male)



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If ten people are allowed to participate in a given race, and one of those ten spots is taken by a biological male; it has displaced a place from a biological female who would otherwise have had the chance to compete in that race.

    What FINA did yesterday was a massive step in the right direction. You're right to imply that much more needs to be done, but this is a good start.

    And good to see former Olympian trans women - such as Jenner - openly supporting this, too.



  • Posts: 3,842 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    A ban on transwomen who have undergone male puberty is clearly a ban based on biology. It’s a long way from “transwomen are women”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,416 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    A transwomen who has gone through puberty is banned, one who has not is not banned, both are "biological males" as eskimohunt put it. Therefore that proves that being a biological males are not actually banned. TBH, that is really simple and it's a big odd that I had to explain it.

    Where are you pulling this "based on biology" strawman from? The ban on steroids and PEDs is also based on biology. but not relevant to the above either.

    But that's not how races are structured afaik. Fina set grade times and people who make the grade qualify. If an extra person qualifies, they have a race of 11. Exception is say, the olympics that is based on quotas, but even then the fastest people don't always qualify either.

    I haven't implied anywhere that more needs to be done. I think basing it on fairness, and performance enhancing hormones removes all the bias, politics and opinion from it. I think people who want transwomen, even with no advantages, excluded are simply being discriminatory based on their own bias. I also think that people in favour on letting trans athletes compete to be inclusive are being unfair and excluding others. I think the Fina rule is the fair middle ground based on what we current understand of sports performance - which may change.



  • Posts: 3,842 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    a ban based on puberty is a ban based on biology. It doesn’t have to be a ban on all biological males for that to be true. It’s a bit odd to have to explain this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,224 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Female only sports exists precisely because everyone knows, bar of course modern fact denying loons and fruitloops, that it is patently unfair for a females to compete against males where physiology comes into play.

    And that is ultimately based on XX chromosomes versus XY chromosomes.

    And yes there have been the very odd exception where intersex people have competed, but it holds for 99.9999% over time.

    In certain sports males and females can compete together because it usually involves the use of an animal or vehicle which levels the playing field.

    And training has fook all to do with it and only an eejit would claim otherwise.

    No matter how fooking hard Leona McGuire trains she will not be able to hit the ball as far as most decent male golfers.

    No matter how fooking hard Katie Taylor trains she won't be able to hit as hard as a decent male boxer.

    By the looks of it you know fook all about sport, male or female.

    Thing is it may look small number and inconsequential, but there are already effects being felt.

    You have young transwomen competing in highschool female sports and if they get the scholarships to colleges then females lose out.

    Then this becomes an invitation to more unsucussful males to self identify as female in order to get scholarships.

    As it is some countries do anything to win Olympic glory, if they see that trans women (just using self identify as a means) comepting in major sports they will fill their Olympic team full of trans women to compete in female events and go for guaranteed wins.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,938 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    A victory for common sense and a timely kick in the giblets for those that think shrieking the loudest automatically means they are right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    Sports Scholarships are not exclusively based on one's final position in a sport it does account for numerous other factors, it does not automatically get given to the person who came first in a race, it helps that one came first but it's not the actual prize of the race and sole factor so someone being a trans athlete and their ability to compete at a college level would be something that is factored in and arguably before that is even considered there are numerous LGBT+ scholarships, again from my understanding of scholarships (which is indeed limited) if a university could get a sports athlete in on an LGBT+ scholarship and still have the actual sport scholarship for another sport athlete no one loses out.


    As for the unsuccessful males to self identify as female for sport scholarships. I dont know, firstly it's the whole 'self identify' issue which is always this very weird myth that a man just has to say they identify as female and automatically get a pass which is very much not the case, more so in the circumstances of a scholarship where again it's not just who came first, their whole school career and other aspects are considered. It'll take a lot more then just saying one identifies as female to score a scholarship.

    And if they decide to transition 'just' to compete. There are easier routes for a sports scholarship. Looking at the % chances on the NCAA website % chance for most female sports scholarships is as low as their male equivalent in all sports except Ice Hockey. It'll be easier for someone who was trying for a football or basketball scholarship (less then 4%) to change to a lacrosse scholarship (more then 12%) then to put themselves through transition (going from men's basketball to women's basketball the difference is 0.6%) I think if you put it to most male athletes to choose between focusing on a different sport with an 8% increase in odds or putting themselves through fake transition for a 0.6% increase in odds. I think most will be out on the field learning lacrosse.


    As for the countries doing it for the Olympic again. Russia shows it's just easier to pump drugs into your athletes then to try for some rouse that will require the sport's international body like Fina to be on board with it. You are talking Fifa level corruption in something like Women's olympic boxing. The money is just not there.


    And again there are not that many trans athletes to begin with so I dont know any country that's going to single handedly be able to field entire olympic teams with them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 840 ✭✭✭greyday


    The beginning of the end it seems, it takes one brave group to give others strength,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,551 ✭✭✭archfi


    Oh That's the former community rep for TENI, the overbearing govt funded (until they redflagged themselves by not filing accounts for 3 years or so) transgender org that dictates everything the LGB orgs say and do and has huge outsized influence with our govt & political parties for some lunatic reason. The one that tweets incessantly about 'smashing' women who dare question anything.

    That person is simply parrotting the latest dictat from trans central in the US that has let the stupid minions know that the sports thing will never ride with the public so the new tack is to equate anything to do with racism with their political endgame. Note also, the still active conflation of people with DSD's (formerly intersex) with that endgame. That's the co-opted 'I' in the alphabet quagmire.

    That's what you're seeing right there.

    Good half decision by FINA and some headway with UCI recently, beckons a return to what the public overwhelmingly want, at least in sport.

    A thing isn't what it says it is.

    A thing is what it does.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You're probably right.

    Given the real and serious risk of backlash in recent years, I can imagine that many people and governing bodies kept their opinions private to go along with the prevailing orthodoxy.

    Now that FINA have demonstrated that, actually, things aren't that bad when you stand up for biological reality, they have more confidence to speak up - however subtly - to slowly swing the pendulum back in the direction of the way things ought to be.

    Strong words from Lord Coe: "fairness is non-negotiable".

    He's spot on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,808 ✭✭✭StrawbsM


    “I’ve always made it clear: if we ever get pushed ... to that point where we’re making a judgment about fairness or inclusion, I will always fall down on the side of fairness.” - @sebcoe 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 840 ✭✭✭greyday


    There will be categories for trans people, they will most certainly be included, just not in categories where they have an advantage that the vast majority of biological women can never have legally.

    I dont get to compete in under 12 soccer as I have an advantage of being much stronger than the vast majority of 12 year olds, its not hard to understand if people take their blinkers off.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The world's most famous transwoman (and former Olympian), Caitlyn Jenner, may have come out in favour of FINA, but she's not the only one.

    Debbie Hayton, a prominent transwoman, has defended FINA's decision too:

    So this isn't a question of trans- versus everyone else.

    We should not forget that many transwomen agree with this decision, too - and that's important to recognise. Their voice is of no less importance than trans activists.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 patsfan1286


    Don't worry, the #bekind crowd will be around shortly to scream about phobias and alleged fascists.


    Thankfully common sense seems to seeping through.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,815 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl



    It absolutely does not say the "complete opposite", the complete opposite would be one mixed gender pool. Fine, it says that transwomen who have not undergone male puberty can compete, on the face of it I see no real reason to have an issue with that (the issue of delaying and then denying natal puberty I am slightly queasy about, but know nowhere near enough about to have a strong opinion). My issue with transwomen in sport has always been about the advantage they possess.

    However, as things stand, to all intents and purposes it does say that as I believe non-pubescent transgender cases are relatively rare, though admittedly they may increase.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    Well done. You’ve completely dodged my question.

    Re your last sentence, there are generally 8 swimmers in a heat/final, if one of those is a man, he is taking the place of a female swimmer. Not that difficult to understand.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Rugby league have now moved to ban transgender players until it gets its inclusion policy worked out and Coe looking like moving athletics to the same place as FINA.

    An opinion piece on the question for sports.


    Post edited by is_that_so on


Advertisement