Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

BoJo banished - Liz Truss down. Is Rishi next for the toaster? **threadbans in OP**

14849515354297

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The difference is, in the Irish system partygate would never have seen the light of day.

    the coalition partners would t bring the government down, because they all know they will get fucked out of it at the next election.

    what the duck is a minority majority? The Tories have a sizeable majority last I looked.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,679 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Minority majority = 43% of the vote but over 50% of the seats. In fact in 2019 43% got the Tories an 80 seat majority which is a minority majority.

    As for partygate you are gonna have to try someone else for your rabbithole.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    They want you to get sucked into a rabbit hole about how Johnson securing a thumping majority is somehow illegitimate. Barking on about percentages and fluid concepts of fairness and all that rubbish.

    They're wrong, and cannot accept that the UK population voted in overwhelming number for a Conservative majority after the shambles they manufactured by refusing to allow the Brexit vote to be implemented.

    And perhaps even more frustrating for them, Johnson is likely to win a confidence vote and stay on as Prime Minister.

    Many on the hard-left are motivated by hatred and dislike of others with whom they disagree, most particularly Conservative politicians. A cursory survey of this thread demonstrates precisely that; an incessant hatred of their political opponents. This is unhealthy stuff, it really is.

    That's part of the reason why the UK population gave Johnson the majority he needed; and it's why hard-left socialist rubbish was wholesale rejected by exactly the same people.

    But they cannot accept it, so they waffle on about percentages and irrelevant nonsense like that as a way to somehow legitimise the opposition that were already rejected by the UK electorate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,019 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    Who here has said they don’t except the will of the British people at the last British election ? Who’s they exactly that you talk about. The shambles of Brexit(and let’s be honest it has been) is due to the British public voting on something that they and the politicians advocating for it hadn’t a clue what would happen, and given how much of a mess it is six years on proves that the Brexit referendum was a badly thought out knee jerk reaction to placate the ERG wing of the conservatives.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,947 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    You can argue against facts all you want but there is no question across anyone who knows what they are talking about that PR-STV is one of if not the most representative way of electing a government. You claim its about big parties clinging onto power and yet its the one voting system thats gives the biggest chance to smaller parties and independents. FPtP makes it virtually impossible for smaller parties and independents to get elected. Take UKIP in the 2015 UK general election, they received 12.6% of all votes and yet won no seats, that would not happen under PR-STV. Conversely look at how well they and the Brexit party did in EU elections run under PR-STV they always won a ton of seats.

    If you really want to understand the differences watch the best explainers out there on FPtP

    and STV




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,947 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    LOL "hard left" firstly Labour in the UK are not hard left, thanks to FPtP the UK doesnt have a viable hard left party like most other modern democracies.

    Secondly calling me hard left because I dont like the Tories in the UK is absurd, check my post history if you want, ive long supported FG and regularly disagree and make fun of the likes of SF, PBP and Solidarity if that's still what they are even calling themselves.

    The difference however is I dont think FG are flawless and can do no wrong like you seem to with Boris and the tories.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,719 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Labour aren't even kinda left any more. Never mind "hard".

    🤣



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Labour are currently entrenched in a bitter civil war over how to define a woman; Stella Creasy on the one hand, and Annaliese Dodds on the other. Hah, even Keir Starmer himself refuses to voice which side of the fence he's on. The party is a joke and a laughing stock. No wonder the British public overwhelmingly rejected this stupidity at the General Election.

    Oh yeah, this is the party that concerns itself with ordinary, working people and their interests? Really!?

    You don't see the Conservative party or indeed Boris Johnson tying themselves up in knots over arrant nonsense like this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,719 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    You don't see the Conservative party or indeed Boris Johnson tying themselves up in knots over arrant nonsense like this.

    They just tie themselves up in other nonsense instead.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That may well be true, but it doesn't sink to the gutter level of intellectual vacuousness that we see with the Labour Party.

    Left-wing politics is dominated by the middle class and entitled students having dopey debates about non-existent issues, certainly not issues that the ordinary working class think about; a sick combination of the politics of hate and envy and division. Whilst the Labour Party is tearing itself asunder with these manufactured debates, the Conservative Party is stepping up to listen to those same working class people that the Labour Party have thrown under the bus.

    The LP threw the Red Wall under the bus with Brexit. They're throwing them under the bus with these dopey debates that don't affect them. And they'll continue to haemorrhage support if they continue along this ridiculous trajectory.

    As I said earlier, the Labour Party is a joke and a laughing stock. 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,052 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    The Tories have thrown the entire UK under the bus. The Tories have now thrown the GE result aside to argue that the deal they campaigned on is actually not what the people want and they will decide what it should be.

    Labour lost the red wall seats because they said they would lok to continue negotiations with the EU, the Tories claimed they had an oven ready deal. The LP have been proved to be completely correct and now the line the Tories are running with is only they can renegotiate with the EU!

    In terms of dopey debates. It is the Tories that continually go on about Culture wars and woke. The LP are busy calling for help for the Cost of Living crisis, windfall tax, which belated the Tories finally accepted but of course made so many provisions that it is little more than PR.

    Currently the LP are 10/11 points clear in the polls. The Tories lost 500 seats in the local elections. If LP are a laughing stock then serious questions need to be asked of Johnson as to why they are not only gaining ground but are looking more and more likely to win to the next election.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Labour will hoover up support as long as the Partygate stuff is going on. It's a temporary reaction.

    But at a GE, when Starmer and all those dopey debates surface - as I'm sure they will - the British people will choose to opt for the Conservatives.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,052 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Ah ok, so it's simply partygate that is the problem. This of course is despite the Tories continually telling everyone that people have moved on?

    So you think people are making political decisions based on whether Johnson had some cake, but talking about peoples rights and other issues are a massive turn off?

    People are turning against Johnson because, as you admit yourself in terms of immigration, he is proving to be completely incapable of doing his job. His own party are openly talking about getting rid of him. No longer defending him, but rather making the case that somebody else might be even worse.

    The big problem of the Tories is that they are out of ideas. They have no clue how to deal with the rising inflation, impact of Brexit, etc. They have seemingly no idea on how to make things better for people and thus they are facing into the next election with almost nothing to offer.

    LP may also have nothing to offer, but as with Johnson, people are willing to go with anybody that says that they can make it better. And Johnson, and the Tories cannot make that promise as it is on their watch that the problems arose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,408 ✭✭✭HalloweenJack


    I really would love to know how Brexit is Labour's fault. The Tories promised a Brexit referendum if they won the 2015 election, they set the agenda then when it pased they had to run with it. All the implementation of Brexit has been under a Tory government (which has been in power since 2010) so I really would love to know how anyone could feel that Labour 'threw the Red Wall under the bus with Brexit'.

    Debating different opinions is one thing but that is such a leap that i struggle to see the basis for it.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    "Labour may also have nothing to offer".

    Well, if the choice is between internecine warfare within the Labour Party over the definition of womanhood, and the Conservative Party; I think I'll go with the latter, especially if, as you say, Labour has nothing to offer anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,913 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    @Leroy42

    Labour lost the red wall seats because they said they would lok to continue negotiations with the EU, the Tories claimed they had an oven ready deal. The LP have been proved to be completely correct and now the line the Tories are running with is only they can renegotiate with the EU!

    Labour's 2019 position on Brexit was a commitment-free fudge, and the fence-sitting between the northern Leavers and the Remainder youth made him a (no pun intended) sitting duck. Ok in 2017 but not 2019.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The 2019 GE was about the utter destruction of the Labour Party, right through the heart of its own lands and beyond.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,052 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Remind me what was the Tories position in 2019, and compare that to what it is today?

    Tories, and only the Tories, have made a complete and utter mess of Brexit. While it was always a bad idea, they have managed to to obtain the worst possible outcome. Effectively the Tories were, just like Brexit itself, elected on a lie. "Get Brexit done' and "oven ready deal'. Neither of which were true or have been caried out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,052 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    The recent Local elections and current opinion polls would suggest that the LP is very far from utter destruction. So far from utter destruction are they that the Tories party are not inacting LP ideas such as the Winndfall tax.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 505 ✭✭✭zanador


    If you think this is hard left you may want to go and have a read. This is liberal politics not socialist ones.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,947 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Cue Sunaks line that its definitely not a windfall tax but an energy profits levy on windfaLL profits that are being taxed by the levy........



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,514 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    the only thing the british public overwhelmingly rejected is the tories, actually.

    57% of the people voted for non-tory parties, the problem being that the vote was splitbetween multiple parties.

    the only majority the tories got was a minority majority, a minority of people who didn't split parties and voted for the same party meaning it was able to get into power because it got a majority of seats via a minority of the vote.

    realistically the only reason for that was the brexit vote, anything else was essentially an irrelevance amplified by the hard and far right pretending they were issues when they weren't issues.

    brexit and the funny man off the telly AKA borris carried the win, and yes a small bit of people liking being shafted by british conservatism.

    but just like trump, people are realising what they voted for, it was a bad blip but one with very serious consequences which may not be so easy to undo.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,947 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Labour are in a civil war as you call it thanks to FPtP because if the left of the party seperated from the centre of the party, as naturally should have happened years ago to create 2 seperate parties, the Tories would run away with election victories for the forseeable future thanks to FPtP. Its the same reason May had to endure similar party infighting during Brexit negotiations to hold together the centre and the right of the party aka the ERG because if she allowed the party to split they would lose to Labour for the forseeable future again thanks to FPtP.

    If the UK had PR-STV both parties could naturally split as they obviously badly need to and stop trying to be these massive overfilled tents for everyone on the left and everyone on the right while they ultimately spend more time fighting about what their party stands for, which both parties are absolutely guilty of, instead of trying to fix what is becoming more and more a clusterfvck of a country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,838 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    So the British public overwhelmingly rejected the Tories on 43% of the vote but not, say, UKIP on 0.07% of the vote...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,679 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Its Labours fault because they were too useless to stop the Tories.

    Oh also. Starmer is useless (until the curry thing when suddenly it would be a huge blow if he left)

    Labour are tearing each other apart so can't mount a challenge.

    It's the same copied and pasted off the right wing echo chamber bllsht we have been hearing for a few years now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,679 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    There are posters on Boards so up the wholes of right wing US media that they actually think FG, FF and RTE and the Irish "MSM" is all left wing.

    They can't do any critical thinking so just copy the phrases and change the parties.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,514 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    to be honest i completely forgot about UKIP they were such a joke party and irrelevance ultimately dispite their cult fans trying to swamp everywhere.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Labour has hard left elements, but are generally centre/left whereas the Tories have a hard right, but are generally centre/right.

    thats what you get with FPTP, different elements within a party that form their manifesto and if when elected, they enact that manifesto.

    unlike pr-stv which leaves all that manifesto building until the parties form a coalition, so people have no idea what they are voting for.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,679 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    That's true representative democracy. Everyone gits bits of what they want instead of a single party with 40% of the vote running riot for 4 or 5 years.

    As much as it pains me to say it the likes of UKIP deserved seats in parliament for the amount of votes they got.



Advertisement