Covid vaccines - thread banned users in First Post

You said 50% will die from it... Not what the study said...

Well there's that silly childish lie again.

You've been challenged to actually show any is a shill before buzz, but you've been too cowardlyto even attempt to do so.

I will remind you that you're the one who's been mindlessly spamming links and copy and pasting crap from Twitter like a bot.

Also you have demonstrably told lies. You have just claimed that 50% of all people will die of cancer because of the vaccines/GMOs/whatever. (I assume @snowcat agrees with this claim as he's not challenged it.)

Also you've constantly copy and pasted other people's work and tried to pass it off as your own. This is a lie.

And of course you keep repeating the lie that people who disagree with you are shills.

So you tell us. Why are you lying? Why do you keep posting here when you've shown yourself and your fellow conspiracy theorists up and little more than spambots?

Lol Weird that you're demanding this answer given how you ran away from defending your definition of "Extreme Pro vaxx".

But an anti-vaxxer is someone who opposes or questions vaccines based on misinformation and ignorance.

This defines you prefectly.

You also share a lot of traits with conspiracy theorists and anti-vaxxers beyond this, like for example: Misrepresentation of people's posts, evasiveness about questions and points you can't address, a general lack of understanding of terms and science.

Now, Buzzer is an antivaxxer. How is his stance different from yours?

Why have you not at all acknowledged his posts and behaviour? I believe this is because he shares a lot of your beliefs and you don't actually see any issue with his posts.

Also, now that I've answered your question directly, clearly and in full, could you do the same with the yes or no questions I asked you in my previous post. You ignored them, which again is a common anti vaxx conspiracy theorist tactic when faced with something uncomfortable.

Here they are again for your convenience.

Are the vaccines more dangerous than any other medicine?

Are the vaccines more dangerous than has been stated by the companies producing them?

Are the vaccines more dangerous that catching the virus?

Lol You say that you want me to answer your questions, yet you ignore several of mine from my last post. Weird.

Your post here is an example of your misinformation and ignorance.

I'm referring to the vaccines in general. If you believe that one vaccine is more concerning than another, please elaborate, because you have not before.

Similarly in general which is more dangerous, the vaccines or the virus?

And it's not too soon to tell. It's been more than a year. The vaccines have undergone tons of testing and examination. Millions of doses have been administered. There's been very little to show that the vaccines are more dangerous that aany other vaccines or other medicines.

What vaccines have side effects that only show up years down the line and/or only after the 4th dose and show absolutely no signs before that point? Which vaccines have these side effects in significant numbers that outweigh the dangers of the virus?

Now, again, could you explain why you are ignoring Buzzer's claims and behaviour? Could you explain why you refuse to acknowledge the questions about it?

I think it's because you agree with a lot of what he says and have no issue with his claims.

If that's not the case, why not state it?

Lol. That whole answering questions thing didn't last very long.

No, there is no "middle ground" in the same way that there's not a middle ground between flat earthers and sane people.

Buzzer is an example of an extreme anti vaxxer. You have failed to show that there's any such thing as an " extreme pro vaxxer". If you are on the middle ground, then that puts you between extreme anti vaxxers and sane people. That makes you an anti vaxxer.

Cool. So you're ignoring his posts. Does this measure you agree they are wrong? If this is the case, please say so. It's really weird that it's taking this long for you to just state that.

Could you explain why you've been ignoring all the times you've been asked to comment on his claims and behaviour? Why didn't you just state that you believed that they were wrong?

Again, it's a common thread for conspiracy theorists to avoid commenting on each others posts because either they don't want to be honest about the extreme nature of their own beliefs, or they don't want to disagree or challenge a fellow believer.

And I've already given you my answer to your question:

An anti-vaxxer is someone who opposes or questions vaccines based on misinformation and ignorance.

So that's the reason they chose not to vaccinate their kids and are vocal about it, then yea, I'd call them anti-vaxxers.

Your attempt to use the "please think of the children" argument is a bit lame here...

Hey, why are you lying about 50% of people dying of cancer? You move from one outlandish claim to the next.

Buzzer, do you even read this **** before you repost it?

Do you just see something on twitter and then think it must be true and then post it as quickly as possible?

Cause this passage, on top of being obvious bullshit isn't even complete.