Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

BoJo banished - Liz Truss down. Is Rishi next for the toaster? **threadbans in OP**

13637394142297

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,982 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The almost definite Wakefield by-election in late May/June, which will almost definitely go back to Labour, could be a point for the knives to come back out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,078 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I cant believe we are still talking about the legal ways he can be forced to step down. I mean surely you walk away yourself after such a horrible crime.

    Wakefield's Tory win was a Brexit vote so I can't see them keeping it. Johnson's "one rule for the rich boys" won't look too good in a working class city either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,577 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Ultimately whether Johnson - or any other PM - has to resign is not up to them. It's up to the party.

    As has been much discussed, the Tory party has a formal process for removing party leaders. So far as I know it has never been operated to remove a party leader. And yet party leaders have frequently been removed, by having senior figures point out to them the necessity for resignation in terms which they could not ignore. That's how Margaret Thatcher was removed and, if such a system can work to remove her, it can work to remove anyone. Other party leaders who were persuaded to resign when they didn't want to, with a formal vote being necessary to force them out, include Theresa May.

    So, Johnson can't simply decide not to resign. He has to continually persuade his party to stomach that decision. The fact that he has been able to do so up to now does not necessarily mean that he can continue to do so indefinitely.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,925 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    The BBC claims he resigned but to me the removal of IDS in 2003 looks more like a sacking.



  • Posts: 1,877 [Deleted User]


    I'd agree, I don't think anyone can say with a degree certainty that they know what's going to happen, or not going happen, because this is unprecedented. Any other PM would have resigned months ago. There is probably going to be 3 more fines, Gray's report is finally going to come out, a kicking in the local elections, a by-election and the Evgeny Lebedev dossier being released. The Tory party might be able to stomach all this or there might be a tipping point. It kind of reminds me of the end of the Bertie Ahern era. The faithful out defending the indefensible right up until his secretary was grilled by the Mahon Tribunal, then all of a sudden he was gone.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,905 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Three more fines (at least) reported here

    Interesting bit:


    Some Tories have expressed concern that Johnson’s strategy has been to downplay the significance of the event for which he was fined – a short birthday gathering in the cabinet room. “It’s been a terrible comms blunder for MPs to be briefed that the event only lasted 10 minutes and that the PM has been unfairly maligned,” one Tory source said.

    Presumably the problem being he'll have to come with some other excuse(s) for the other gatherings which lasted much longer....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,090 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    He's build such a reputation as a gobshyte, and the opposition portray him as such a gobshyte, they he's just going to play the gobshyte and genuinely stand up and stick to the story that he didn't know he was at a party. Nobody will believe it, but he's built up enough deny ability through being portrayed as a gobshyte for so long, that his peoppel will go along with it. The time between all the elements means the impact is softened. The emergence of the news at first, the Sue Gray report being neutered by the police investigation, the Sue Gray report being neutered again by purdah before the local elections. It all drags it out and spreads the anger instead of it coming in one big spike.

    The Lebedev issue might be a bigger stor and I think they have ot release thst by the end of April which is a week before the local elections. And coupled with a poor showing in the local elections, he could be in trouble.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,291 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    I don't think anyone really thought he was going to resign voluntarily.

    It was always a conversation about what would cause him to be pushed out

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,090 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    It's not as simple as him resigning out of honour or the party pushing him. It's an interplay between him and the party. There was a time when it would be a given that the PM would resign, but Johnson lowers the bar everywhere he goes. He lowers the bar for himself and for those around him.

    Listening to Rory Stewart on being invited to Lebedev's Castle in Lake Como, was instructive on how Johnson lowers the bar. Stewart was a foreign minister under Johnson as Secretary of State and Stewart presumed it was a joke that anyone would accept an invitation to the castle of a son of a KGB agent. But Johnson went, and he was fine with other ministers going.

    So it's not as simple as jumping or being pushed. There's a negotiation between the pumper and the pushers. Johnson's appeal to his people (both in cabinet and on the street) is that he never asks them to be better. That's massive unspoken appeal to him. Another PM would be gone already. Cameron resigned because he lost Brexit. Johnson survives.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,803 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Speaker of the House has said he'll allow a vote on an investigation into whether Boris Johnson misled Parliament.

    I'm assuming it has to go to a vote in the House as he can't just start an investigation himself. Either way it'll definitely start making Tories have to properly show whether they back Johnson or not.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,803 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    BJ is also due to address the House at 4:30 today. Presumably trying to get it out of the way before PMQs tomorrow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,917 ✭✭✭cml387


    It's particularly ironic that the argument being used to Keep Johnstone is that "there is a war on"

    In that case Chamberlain should have continued in office (ok he would have died soo after anyway but you see my point).



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,101 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    It's ironic, sure. Johnson is purportedly a historian to boot.

    This is what they've reduced themselves to. They're just a group of immoral parasites unable to comprehend that the rules apply to them.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,086 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Is there any doubt that they back Johnson? If there is a vote they of course will back him



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,101 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    No. Too many of them owe their seats directly to him. The next litmus test will be the local elections on the 5th May.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,803 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Agreed. Even if they somehow did vote to investigate, the Committee that would investigate is mostly Tories, and then any measures they find would have to be voted on by the House again.

    But with Local Elections coming up, it's going to force all Tories to put their names down in support of Johnson, and that could be used against them in future. In the next General Election, it's still going to be a huge point used against them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,771 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Id say as well the people of Wakefield are thinking that the first time in 90 years that they vote in a Tory MP he turns out to be a paedo, its back to Labour for us. The latest is the Tories are trying to get Lord Frost to run in the by election which would really give them an opportunity to give a senior Tory a bloody nose, especially as the Brexit he sold them was a pup.

    Does anyone know when the Sue Gray report is due to be released? It doesnt look like it is going to arrive before the local elections on May 5th. I think the contents of that report could be what throws a huge douse of petrol on the fire and sparks calls for his resignation again, especially if even more details of the parties come out. We already know staff in no.10 were so drunk that they slept underneath their desks and that they were filling up suitcases with bottles of wine in Waitrose and thats just two details from 16 different parties. Boris was basically running a drinking den during the pandemic, if more of the same details come out in the Gray report the tabloids will have a field day and he will come under huge pressure from the public again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,086 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    That should happen, but time and again we have seen that there really is no bottom to which the party won't allow itself to sink. It is a weird situation that the massive majority, which usually leads to instability within a party and individuals are more free to voice their opinions, the opposite has happened.

    The large majority seems to have resulted in all those that got voted in being completely in hoc to Johnson and prepared to put up with almost anything to keep him in place. Far from the large majority giving rise to mavericks who feel they can speak their mind without unduly threatening the party, nobody wants to step out of line in case it impacts negatively on Johnson and thus robs them of their seat.

    There really is no longer a Tory party, with a policy ideology, there is simply a cult of Johnson. And they all must do whatever it takes to row in behind him, regardless of whether than means they come across as complete idiots.

    You simply have to look at the kudos he is getting for 'leading the world' against Putin. This is the man that buried the Russia report, that took weeks to bring in sanctions against the Russian billionaires, that gave a seat in the HoL to the son of a KGB spy, that leads a party awash with Russian money. But somehow all of that is forgotten because he went for a walkabout in Kyiv.

    They have no new ideas, only new ways to paint up the old ideas. There is no reform, no plans for the future. Get Brexit done, Ukraine and Global Britain is all they have. So this, and many other things, should have been the end of Johnson. Hell, the Brexit deal he signed off on should have seen him run out of the country, but it seems that nothing is more important that Johnson.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,709 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Starmer really destroyed Bojo in the PMQ's today. Possibly the most amusing PMQ's to date; everytime Johnson paused, someone would shout out "liar!" or "resign!"

    Fabricant getting some heat from Starmer, too, about his equivalence of nurses having a snort in a staff room and Bojo's behaviours.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 582 ✭✭✭Stanley 1


    Cameron blew it by allowing a Referendum, but quickly got back into his Tory stride by scamming the State through an OZ bank, he really should be forced to pay back all his earnings as they look like taking the State for at least 200m.

    BoJo is chomping at the bit to get his hands on real dough and sail away with Carrie on his back after the next GE, if he makes it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,789 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    God it was so good to see BJ being destroyed. It was great tv



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,090 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Exactly. It's not about an investigation. It's about forcing the Tory MPs to committ their names to vote against an investigation. Unpopular at local election and maybe even a bit unpopular when the next General election comes around. It forces Johnson to spend some of his political capital with his own MPs and forces the MPs to spend some of their political capital with their own constituents. It just weakens everyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,905 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    IMO the Gray report would do most damage if it featured some juicy photos or videos of the PM in mid carouse.


    Untitled Image




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,118 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    Brutal onslaught today , Kerr stamers response was pretty good, liked the bit were he reminded the house it was he who prosecuted an MP would lied .

    Tory backbenchers seem to be holding fire but the Sue Gray report, by-election and more fines might prove fatal for Boris , I thought the Ukraine crisis saved him, not so sure now but he's hanging on .

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Posts: 1,877 [Deleted User]


    Looks like the inquiry by the Commons privileges committee will go ahead, Johnson wasn't able whip enough Tories to block it. All he can do is try to delay it until the police investigation is over. This ain't over yet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,090 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Not sure that's the case.

    it seems they want to delay the vote on whether to investigate. After May 5 local elections would be long enough.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,577 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Long enough for what?

    It's long enough to mean that a Privileges Committee finding that Johnson has lied won't be published before the local elections, but I think at this stage most voters don't need the Privileges Committee to tell them whether Johnson lied. The division is not between voters who think he lies and those who think he tells the truth; it's between voters who care that he lies and voters who don't.

    So I don't think deferring the Privileges Committee investigation will necessarily do very much to shield the Tory party from the consequences of maintaining this bastard in office. What it will do is prolong the agony. The 5 May election results will be what they will be (and my guess is that they will be pretty torrid for the Tories) and the party will still have to face the Privileges Committee investigation, hearings, findings and report, and the debate on this in the House. And the further police fines that are expected. And the publication of the Grey report. And after all that Tory MPs will still be facing Owen Paterson moments where the party leadership is bullying them to ritually humiliate and debase themselves to save the tatters and shreds of Johnson's miserable career. But Johnson will have suffered even further damage than he has already, and have even less political capital to call on.

    Johnson isn't trying to delay the vote on whether to investigate because it's a clever wheeze. He's try to delay the vote because he recognises that, poor at that is, at this stage its pretty much all he can do.

    For Tory MPs, they need to realise that this is how it's always going to be, now. Johnson is who he is. He has behaved like this all his life. His behaviour is not going to change. His overweening sense of entitlement, his disdain for others, his moral incontinence - none of them are going to change. His future promises of reform will be as meaningless as his past promises of reform. If he survives partygate, some other manifestation of his gross character flaws will be along before much longer. They either commit to spending the whole of the rest of their political careers debasing themselves to protect him, or they show some respect for themselves and find a new leader. If not before 5 May, then after 5 May.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,771 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    If the vote is won and it goes to an investigation by the Privileges committee then I think he could be toast, not immediately but when they release their findings. What is really missing here is photographic evidence of these parties which he keeps describing as work events when they sound like they were major late night sessions with staff so drunk that they were sleeping under their desks. This is all juxtaposed against these same staff supposed to be running No.10s pandemic response while thousands were dying of Covid.

    There exists over 300 photos of these 16 parties which the Privileges committee can expose. If that happens that could be what tips him over the edge, it would be heavy photographic evidence that No.10 was party central during the pandemic all the while Boris was giving Covid briefings to the media at 3pm every day and telling people to stay at home and wash your hands over and over again. Its all these photos that could really expose his hypocrisy. Bonus points if there are photos of staff dancing on office tables in no.10 during a pandemic, it wouldnt surprise me if there is. Out of the 300 photos there is bound to be some in there that the tabloids will have a field day with and they will whip the public into a rage again over the whole sorry mess.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,771 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Labours motion for an inquiry has passed without a vote meaning that despite the Tory 80 seat majority Boris couldnt whip enough of his own MPs to vote against it. This isnt over yet and he is due to get a further 3 police fines in the next week as well.



Advertisement