Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Near Misses Volume 2 (So close you can feel it)

19192949697156

Comments

  • Posts: 15,362 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Traffic can wait until its safe to overtake and then overtake. Don't see the big deal.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,897 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Do you often pull over when driving in heavy urban traffic to let a faster cyclist through?

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,154 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    As a driver who doesn't cycle myself I'd be watching any bikes like a hawk along there as they just simply have to pull out, and suddenly too. What an absolutely atrotious bit of design.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 685 ✭✭✭ARX


    Health & Safety rules would never allow bus drivers in Ireland to be exposed to that kind of danger!

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Posts: 15,362 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,515 ✭✭✭Rosahane


    With a long queue behind, on a road with limited safe overtaking opportunities, the safest option for the cyclist is to pull in and allow the queue behind to overtake. It's the lowest risk option for the cyclist!

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Posts: 15,362 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Personally I mitigate such risk by taking the primary position in the lane making it physically impossible for an overtaking manoeuvre unless its 100% safe to do so.

    Anything less invites dangerously close passes.

    After 3 dangerous passes in a single bike journey a while back, this is the only way I cycle now. Haven't had a dangerous pass since adopting this practice.

    Might inconvenience a few drivers but ensures I get from a to b safely.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Posts: 15,362 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    There is always an opportunity to pass safely, just might have to wait. Just to be clear, I'm not stopping overtaking, I'm stopping dangerously close overtaking by those passing when it's not safe to do so. I also do this regardless of the road type or location (housing estate, city streets, regional or national roads).

    I believe its some kind of psychological thing where a pass in primary position results in the overtaking vehicle moving totally over the white line (as if overtaking a car). Once the car is about halfway over the middle libe, they've all (so far in my experience) gone fully over it.

    The opposite is true when I cycled in the secondary position, i.e. Close to the kerb/grass verge. Overtaking resulted in vehicles attempting to NOT cross the white line which ended up with me nearly being wiped out multiple times. This also results in passes occurring with oncoming traffic.

    As I've said many times, after 3 VERY close dangerous passes in one day I abandoned the secondary position and point blank refuse to take that position now. Its simply too dangerous.

    I get honked at regularly and have had a few shout abuse but most are fine. I'm guessing the ones most irritated by this are the ones most likely to attempt dangerous passes.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,588 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    if i was on a busy N road, i would pull in occasionally if traffic built up behind me. yes, there might be opportunities for passing but if traffic is building up behind you faster than it's getting a chance to pass, of course i'll pull in occasionally when suits to let it past. and yes, you can take the primary position also, as cletus said, combine the two strategies.

    i don't generally find myself on roads quite like the one LBSG mentioned, but i do find myself on some where i do pull in - generally not for cars, but for larger vehicles which don't have the acceleration to pass as easily.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Posts: 15,362 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    To your point and Cletus, absolutely, both ways work and to each their own.

    I have just stopped caring about the inconvenience of others where my safety is concerned.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 15,661 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    For me the safest thing to do is to get them out from behind me as soon as possible, I don't want them there. So first opportunity I have I'll move in.

    Most people you encounter on the road are grand but all it takes is one person to become impatient and it's everyones day ruined or worse.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,706 ✭✭✭Wildly Boaring


    Yeah in fairness I've driven that bit of n72 plenty, I'd get very little enjoyment out of a cycle on a route like that.


    However I used cycle bits of the n73 from kildollery to Mitchelstown and it's similar. Cus I lived there and it was my way home.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,897 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    But only when traffic = motorists, and not when traffic = cyclists apparently.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,588 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    I'm sure he'd allow faster cyclists to pass?

    Or; how do you conclude that he's not including himself as traffic too?

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,451 ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    That is classic victim blaming tbf. You might aswell say that when a house is broken into it is the home owners fault or that when someone is mugged that they are to blame for being there at that time/place whatever.

    You are probably correct though with some of the blind rage I have seen on the road.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,515 ✭✭✭Rosahane


    That's a great way to ensure that Bruce in his lowered 1.4 Golf or Willie in his Scania S650 overtakes you with an inch to spare after sitting behind you for three or 4 km.

    ...on the other hand you might be reasonable and aware of the law and rights of other road users not to mention your own safety 🙈

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,588 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    interesting to note the clip starting at 8:57; the vast majority of comments about that particular clip are critical of the driver.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,495 ✭✭✭DaveyDave


    I'd pull in if a road had limited overtaking and traffic was building up. I don't like the idea of traffic building up behind me for extended periods as people get impatient very quickly and you know some gobshite 10 cars back would try overtake everyone. I'm on a bike for enjoyment, if I pull in to let people pass it's to make life easier for me not them, I just don't want the hassle. There's certain roads I'll avoid for convenience or safety even if they're the most direct route. It's all personal choice really. If someone wants to push on that's their decision.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,588 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    it's quite simple; if you're doing 30 on an 80km/h road and traffic is building up behind you, AFAIK you are legally obliged to pull in.

    you can't quote 'not sacrificing my safety for the convenience of others' unless pulling in is actually endangering your safety. unless you've a monster tailwind and are going for a KOM, then all bets are off. KOMs are legally enshrined.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Posts: 15,661 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    And it's appreciated a lot of the time, the amount of raised left hands and glances in the rvm I've seen to acknowledge me having pulled in / moved over can't be counted. Or you get the odd one who will stick the right arm out the window in the summer to wave thanks.

    Even the glace back to acknowledge a car on your wheel, yeah I know you're there but no room for you to pass or me to move over helps usually.

    For all that yeah you meet some fools on the road who will beep and drive up your arse or pass anyway.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 15,362 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    As I said, I'm not stopping any overtaking manoeuvres, just dangerous ones.

    If I should get a ticket for this I'll happily take it and keep doing the same thing.

    Doing this has seen me go nearly 6 months with zero dangerous passes. Taking secondary position save several dangerous passes a week.

    Now, if protected infrastructure or the likes of a hard shoulder are available, I'll be more than happy to use that instead but until then I'll maintain that my safety is more important to me than convenience to others.

    You may not like it, some don't, but that means little in any equation that involves my personal safety while on the bike.

    Since adopting this practice I've made zero apologies for it and I don't see that changing. It gets me home safe, that's all I'm concerned with.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,706 ✭✭✭Wildly Boaring


    I take a pretty primary position myself. Maybe not the middle but left wheel track at least and if a manhole or pothole us in my way it's out I go, not in.


    I rarely pull over, but if I knew a truck was back there a couple mins I'd pull in.

    Pulled in once in last 2or 3 weeks. Bus stuck behind me between termonfeckin and clogherhead.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,588 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    You may not like it, some don't, but that means little in any equation that involves my personal safety while on the bike.

    i think we're talking at cross purposes here. you're talking about taking primary position to prevent dangerous overtakes; i have no issue with that.

    what i am talking about is occasionally pulling in (to a stop or near stop) to let a buildup of traffic behind, to get past. you can do both. you are not compromising your approach to safety by doing so.

    pulling in to let traffic past, when safe, is most definitely not the same concept as preventing dangerous overtakes.

    as per WB, it's not something i find myself doing a lot. once every couple of weeks, maybe.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,035 ✭✭✭De Bhál


    Is that cyclist supposed to be indicating to go right, no idea what's he at...just a bare gesture and move right in front of a car.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭Mundo7976


    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,576 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Weird post. I've cycled the N72. It's absolutely fine. There's a school a few hundred metres West of the point you linked. Cars are bumper to bumper there a few times a day. Most slow-moving vehicles on this road don't do a great job of "getting out of the way", because there's nowhere to go. A lot of slow-moving HGV's use it. Tractors are regularly on it.

    I also don't understand what you're saying about the Clonmel-Dungarvan road. Are you suggesting that leisure cyclists should pick a meandering route with lots of stopping and starting and extra junctions, in an effort to avoid collisions with/from motorists? So: cycle on a poor road surface, with potholes etc, in the hope of NOT having a crash?

    I have no problem with suggesting someone should move in if traffic is building up behind them, but if you're saying that an N road is off-limits to a bike, I disagree. And if you're saying that an R road should be off limits to a bike, I'd use much stronger language to say that I disagree.

    Yours feels a bit like a victim-blaming post to be honest with you, even if that's not what you intended.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,388 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Jaysus if a cyclist had to pull in all the time to let motor traffic drive past then you'd be all day getting somewhere! :D

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,897 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko



    I don't think there is anything specific in legislation about differences in speed. Last time I looked at legislation, it was about driving in a manner that prevented other road users from overtaking (paraphrasing obviously).

    My interpretation of that would be that if the oncoming traffic is preventing other road users from overtaking, I'm not not breaching any legislation.

    He specifically said that he wouldn't pull over for faster cyclists.

    What has 'differential' got to do with anything. You've come up with your mythical rule about having to pull over to let faster traffic through, but now you are weaseling out of complying with your own rule yourself, with weasel words. If you expect other people to get out of your way, it is only courtesy that you get out of their way also.

    I'm a bit confused that people are finding traffic conditions where queues of 10-20 cars appear behind cyclists at the drop of a hat, but they never experience conditions where motorists are holding up cyclists in busy traffic.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,588 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    He specifically said that he wouldn't pull over for faster cyclists.

    he 'specifically' did nothing of the sort.

    consider this a mod warning - if you want to debate, don't accuse others of weasel words when you're the one being disingenuous and twisting people's words into something they didn't say.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,897 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    In fairness, you went a bit further than just telling us what you do;

    ”That's all well and good, but I would be of the opinion that if you're on a road where traffic is travelling at 80kph, and there's a build up behind you, it costs very little to pull over, if there's an opportunity, and let the faster traffic past.”

    Honestly, it’s hard to believe that anyone doesn’t meet heavy traffic at one time or other . It’s hard to believe that anyone would experience traffic heavy enough to build up behind a cyclist but yet never busy enough to hold up a cyclist behind a motorist.

    Courtesy is a two way street.

    Post edited by magicbastarder on


Advertisement