Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1301302304306307907

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,870 ✭✭✭Villa05


    I have no doubt there is an element of what bass is saying going on, but I'd imagine it's confined to a small proportion of people.

    Can you give a brief description of the renovation proposed, just to see if the cost differential can be in anyway justified



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    There is always someone along to blame someone else in Ireland. Its the main reason we will never ever catch up on housing supply.

    We havent a hope in hell of building enough houses for the current demand, never mind additional future demand. Its too far gone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,870 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Hard to disagree, but we really need to ask how we have had a starting point of knocking down oversupply to chronic undersuppy in the space of a decade.

    I think its a situation that could have been managed better



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,128 ✭✭✭Fattybojangles


    It's really simple supply will never catch up with demand unless the state gets up off its arse and starts building houses in a big way and we all know that under FG/FF that will never happen as they are ideologically opposed to that.

    Private developers are like any other private business their sole purpose is to make money so they will never catch up with demand because it would not be in their financial interests to do so. You can bring in all the schemes and tax breaks and various other nonsense you want to encourage the private sector the simple fact is it can not and will not meet demand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,207 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    The cheapest part of any houses is the four walls. When you get into renovations the only saving I see is the fact the house was there so no planning required.

    There is a large percentage of people that want the '' new house or new house look''. What people need to start realising is forget about Ber ratings. Look at running costs. There is no one forcing you to have a A rated house unless its a compete new build.

    When you go looking for planning ya they want iy. A lot of C and D rated houses have nearly as low running costs as an A rated house.

    We have a holiday home and the one next door was bought lately. New owner is talking about changing the windows and door, doing insulation, revamping it completely and bringing the house up to an A or B rating. It will cost 150-k IMO. This is a holiday home.

    We have put in a pellet stove in the living area. We hardly burn 150 euro worth of pellets in the year. Our electricity bill is less than 600/year for th house. The windows and door were put in about 2003/4. Are they not as well sealed as nowadays, ya but spending 20-30 k replacing them ??. It just dose not make sense. Ya I probably do the insulation wrap some time on it. But surely there is some way to redo window seals. The crazy part is the new windows will have exactly the same issue in 20-30 years time

    It's the same with doing floors. Is it justified to take out floors and put in new insulation and underfloor heating. Even in a small house its adding 10+k to the job at least. This might seem all beer. But managing minor costs is as import as managing the larger ones.

    In a lot of older houses a pellet stove based heating system should probably be considered. On some houses drylining using insulated board should be looked at. These also make rewiring much easier.

    But you will not have the ''A rated house or the new house look''.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    taxes account for a lot of costs but there is no allowance made for loss of such taxes in SF alternative budget so the 150k per house is including taxation. If the costings can be backed up then then they could show the public where the 3billion in lost taxes each year is taken into account.

    20,000 houses x 150k = 3 billion



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 720 ✭✭✭houseyhouse


    I hear you but the building regs require this type of upgrading. It’s not really a choice if you’re doing anything but a small extension.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    In my opinion, the entire mess that we're in merits thorough examination of the wheels of power and of the systems of the state that are supposed to manage this. Either by brutal incompetence or sinister intent, we're in a mess, and those responsible (politicians AND civil servants) need to face serious consequences for their failings. If this does not happen, we will face another disaster in the future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,870 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Fair point, but you also have margin, sub contracting margin, cost of Finance, connection to services.

    If housing was substantially cheaper, would the state be subsidising to the same degree, ftb grant, HAP savings,

    People closer to employment centres Greater efficiencies.

    If we approached housing with a focus on what's best for the economy, the country and people, we would have a very different system to what we have now and surely that is the responsibility of government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    You will always have a builders margin and sub contractor margin as the only option for the government to build directly will be via contracting the work out to the private sector.

    if the county councils employed builders directly then it would be a financial disaster as councillors are unable to make any decision without first getting a report from consultants as a form of insurance incase things go wrong so they don’t loose their jobs or alternatively setting up a committee to shield them. That is even before you take into account the attitude that if the government are paying that it’s a blank cheque book.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Good point but every layer of taxes is extra waste.

    If state building could cut out a few billion in taxes from going:

    -> revenue -> local authorities -> bidding on houses/HAP/lease agreements

    Then its a good thing. High prices and high taxes lead to high amounts of money wasted



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    If you think for one minute that just because social houses are built the government will stop bidding on existing houses then I am afraid that you will be disappointed. There was a report the other day about the issue of apartment blocks been bought on mass causing ghettos because there is little mix of owners and private tenants and social tenants. The only way around that is buy houses in areas with low social housing.

    if SF have the answers then they should be able to explain in detail their solution as opposed to sound bites just giving out. Likewise there plan is to increase taxes not reduce them so I just don’t see how it all fits together and just see it as smoke and mirrors.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,870 ✭✭✭Villa05


    How many Irish social housing estates are in fact ghettos. Is it a case of the noisiest being the "voice of all". Would it be an exaggeration to say half our city stock was initially social housing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    The difference then was in composition of social housing - it was mostly working class not welfare class.

    Plenty of towns all over the country have rows upon rows of houses all social housing from 50s-70s, most are quite nice established areas.

    Its not state ownership that makes these places bad, its who is prioritised for social housing nowadays. Give lower income working people priority and the ghettoisation is no longer a thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,913 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    @Bass Reeves

    When you go looking for planning ya they want iy. A lot of C and D rated houses have nearly as low running costs as an A rated house.

    To me the whole rating system is a bit of a joke. Seems to be some formula that takes window size and a few other tick-list items such as heat source, rather than attempting to measure things like heat loss.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,870 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Thank you, you emphasise my point for a decade on these threads.

    A significant build by the state would replicate that success with a focus on working people that are currently gouged by high rents. Housing would then be a source of income rather than a black hole for the state. Economy booms as competitiveness is restored and citizens have a little bit more spending power.

    Everybody wins, right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,490 ✭✭✭✭Ush1


    Source of income you say?

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/dublin-city-council-owed-38m-in-unpaid-rent-1.4781829



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,870 ✭✭✭Villa05


    All these things are fixable with the right processes. If your handing out below market rate housing you can add a few terms and conditions. Nod, wink



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    council houses resolved the previous housing crisis but will the housing be for working class or people unable to get on the housing ladder for whatever reason. This is never debated. If the housing was open to anyone regardless of income then the argument of having to pay taxes for the welfare class goes out the window. But this will never be debated despite it having solved previous housing crisis when implemented by previous governments.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Can you really add terms and condition in this day and age when it will be interpreted as discrimination.

    e.g. You wouldn’t be able to remove a drug dealer without them being prosecuted by the courts…even then you would be discriminating against people who have spent time in jail….not paying rent is a minor issue in comparison.

    The only Nod wink involved would be in paying ‘security’ to some drug dealer for not burning out the houses being built by the council like what had been happening around the country for years.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,268 ✭✭✭enricoh


    I see the housing minister is meeting builders next week regarding accommodation for Ukrainian refugees. I reckon there will be a lot of builders binning the house building and going at refugee accommodation instead. Less supply n invariably higher prices to come-

    Housing Minister Darragh O’Brien will hold an emergency summit of key stakeholders from the construction industry, estate agents and other bodies next week to discuss the medium to longer term response



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,777 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    There's a decent amount of construction effort currently deployed in offices and hotels; with the former in much lower demand due to WFH and the latter massively cooled off and plenty of proposals up for sale as sites+planning going on the property pages of the IT/SBP.

    The expertise in those sectors would also be more suited for rapid build type projects.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,870 ✭✭✭Villa05


    council houses resolved the previous housing crisis but will the housing be for working class or people unable to get on the housing ladder for whatever reason

    Is there a difference between these 2 cohorts you mention? Certainly the qualification income limits need review in light of current property prices and lack of affordability. Increased supply would also cool both rental and price inflation

    Of course certain candidates should be prioritised such as essential workers that need to be physically present at their workplace. Dress it up as a reward to those that kept the show on the road during lockdowns.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    There should be no income limits full stop.... If housing is to be provided then it should be provided for all on a pro-rata basis including the middle income who pay most of the tax in the country..... By just providing to one section of the population you breed resentment. If this was done you could build large scale 'social/affordable' housing projects and would have a wider cross section of the population. If middle income or high income workers choose not to avail of the housing and purchase elsewhere then that is their choice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 641 ✭✭✭J_1980


    Rates are jumping higher in the US and aso in Europe.

    irish 10y now 1.30%, hope this hits 2% thisnyear. This whole “big government” needs to come to an end to fix the housing market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,987 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...so we should allow the market to solve it, yea?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    There should be a higher cut off income for it (high enough you could afford a mortgage), but below that its simply means tested rents. But again, this would require actual enforcement of non-payments & evictions, which is the reason for such massive arrears in social housing. People who decidedly can afford to pay (the rent is means tested), but choose not to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,987 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    what if some renters simply cannot afford to pay their rents, maybe we need to increase welfare, and deduct rent from source?

    public housing should be build for professionals that are simply caught between unable to rent or purchase, but these properties should never be sold into the private market



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Rent is means tested so that almost everyone can afford it, even if on welfare alone

    Deducting rent from welfare directly would be a good idea, stop chancers from withholding.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,987 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    means tested to whos means or whos standards?

    i think its the only way to deal with none payments, but welfare would also need to be increased to at least the same amount of rent, but ideally higher, as this would benefit the economy directly, due to the increase in money spent into it



Advertisement