Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all, we have some important news to share. Please follow the link here to find out more!

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058419143/important-news/p1?new=1

What does the future hold for Donald Trump? - threadbans in OP

13463473493513521189

Comments

  • Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's good that people voted in a competent leader in the prime of his health like Joe Biden then right?


    I mean Afghanistan was superbly handled and was in no way a historic embarrassment. And Putin clearly fears and respects a worthy adversary in Joe. When he isn't have drool wiped from his mouth that is.



  • Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It was a policy - his immigration policy. The wall was just part of the policy, albeit a big part.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,976 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    and it failed miserably. like everything else the man touches.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,976 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    it beats having a lapdog and a traitor in the White House.



  • Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    In what way did it fail? Because there are more illegal immigrants crossing the border than ever? Do you see that as a good thing?


    Also - if it failed, was that because of Trump or because of Democrat obstruction?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,976 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    it did fail. there is no wall. Mexico did not pay for it. And he had a majority in both houses for 2 years and still couldn't get it done. He boasts that he is the great deal maker and still couldn't achieve anything with a majority.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Fox news is one of the most watched stations. That isn't left wing. Most stations have been very very critical of Biden over gas prices in spite of it being a world wide issue. They have been on about it for months. Wasn't the laptop in possession of someone right wing at some stage so I presumed that should have wrapped it up? Honestly from my view many seem to call anything that doesn't agree with the far right a left leaning station. You talk about border control being seen as far right but there is still border control, you know that right? Remember the E-Mails, the E-Mails!!!!!!!! Non stop coverage over a complete "nothing burger".


    Trump's sons were heavily involved in Trump's administration because well nepotism and so generated more air time. As for why people vote for him I really can't figure it. Even if you want to avoid voting for a "left" wing candidate like Biden at least get a somewhat decent candidate from the primaries. The man made an official statement that he made a hole in 1. Child like is a good description for him. You gave out about censoring people and cancelling but mention people voting for Orban who has put incredibly heavy restrictions on dissenting voices in the Hungarian press so I find it hard to see consistency in what you want.



  • Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,976 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    It is the reality. Trump failed as he does with most things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 516 ✭✭✭BattleCorp1


    The culture war has been overwhelmingly won by the so-called liberal left. It's over pretty much. But rather than enjoying their victory the left are running around shutting down voices, censoring, cancelling people wherever they can. The media is almost exclusively run by left leaning idealogues. 

    Just a point on the above statement. The left carrying on like that is going to ensure that we aren't finished with Trump/Trump-like figures. The pendulum swings both ways. The more the left go around trying to shut out opposing opinions, the more the likelihood of a kick-back towards Trump-like politics.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You make me laugh with your complex and rigorous analysis there. Trump is a lapdog and a traitor? For working with Putin to smash the Isis caliphate? What a.......monster?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,310 ✭✭✭✭everlast75



    Firstly, I am happy to debate policy.


    "I'll give you one actual policy - enforcing Border Control. True, the Democrats successfully did everything they could to stop the wall being built"


    Hang on - Trump had the White House, the House and the Senate. He didn't get it done. It was nothing to do with the democrats stopping him. He said Mexico was going to pay for it. They didn't. The wall was a shambles. It did not stop people coming into the country. It did not work. They are not opinions. They are fact.


    "(The democrats) want illegal immigrants."

    That's not true either. Obama had a stop and track policy which worked. The stats show it did. Trump's change in policy didn't work. They again are facts.

    You can say that Trump wanted to stop illegal immigration. But his policies didn't work. Where's your criticism of him, as opposed to having a go at Democrats for his incompetency?

    He employed illegal immigrants himself. How do you circle that square?

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,976 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Putins lapdog, yes. have you seen them together? it was quite clear who was in charge of that relationship. Kompromat will do that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 953 ✭✭✭Detritus70


    Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism



  • Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Definitely a fair point that he had both houses for 2 years. My memory of it is that they made some progress on it but given how big a project it was, it needed a lot more than 2 years to design, plan and begin construction on something that big (essentially half the length of America). As for how effective it is, there was one hilarious incident with the reporter Jim Acosta where he showed up at a stretch of newly constructed wall, attempting to show it doesn't work but inadvertently proving it's effectiveness. There was a calm scene, nobody around. Law. Order.


    Tell me, if Trump proposed a stop and track policy, how do you think Democrats would respond to that? In all honesty, they would be linking it to slavery no doubt.


    His policies didn't work because his personality was such that he could not make a deal with the Democrats. I get that they cannot be seen to be working constructively with him, since they built him up to be literally Hitler. The Democrats were as obstructive to him as the Republicans were to Obama initially. Just disgusting. Where I would criticise him is the braggadocio around getting "Mexico to pay" for it. Fantasy land stuff. He is not without fault, absolutely. But people voted as much for his policies, and to go against Hillary, and less so because they endorsed every facet of his personality.



  • Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    In your imagination maybe. And tell me, how did that manifest itself in the real world. What tangible benefit did Russia gain or America lose from Trump supposedly being Putin's lapdog? Maybe just the biggest example, you don't have to go into too much detail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,976 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    One part of trump immigration policy that was successful was reducing the number of legal immigration including those applying for highly skilled visas and company transfers. he also reduced the number of serving military getting citizenship. a winning policy all round I'm sure you will agree.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,976 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    I suppose we could start with him withdrawing from the Open Skies agreement giving russia a free hand in Ukraine.



  • Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    No I don't see those as good things. They appear to be bad. I am not the mind-controlled automaton you would like to believe.


    One thing though - I wonder how much of the reduction of legal immigration was due to Covid which took up his last year in office (maybe 20% of his total term in office)? But leaving that aside - the outcome is negative.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,976 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    bad? very bad you mean. and those policies were in place before covid so that is not an excuse. Denying citizenship to those who put their lives on the line for the country is inexcusable. The GOP and Trump claimed to support the military. how is that supporting the military?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Is that the biggest thing? So the Open Skies agreement would have prevented Putin from sending in the tanks into Ukraine?



  • Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm agreeing with you, but not strongly enough it would seem. OK - it was very, VERY bad. Is that better?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,105 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    You were asked for a policy, a policy that would be worth overlooking the lengthy list of negatives of Trump. You mentioned immigration and specifically the wall. He,, by his own admission, failed to deliver.

    The ins-and-outs of the failure are not really important. He said he would deliver something and he didn't. If, buts and maybe, but at the end of the day people are judged on results.

    So is a failure to deliver enough to keep people interested in voting for him, despite all the negatives? Does failing to deliver the wall, which he promised was ready to go as soon as he was elected and would be paid for by Mexico, and that he knew more about construction that anyone, is that worth a failed insurrection? Is it worth a degrading of the trust in the democratic process? Is it worth a demeaning in the rules of the WH, such as nepotism, using the WH for electioneering etc. Is it worth watching POTUS side with Putin and Russia over American service men and women?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,976 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    prevent, no. that was not the intention of opens skies but you know that already.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,976 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    It's a start. Perhaps you might start to reappraise those brilliant policies of trump. Of course the fact that you didn't know how bad they actually are is part of the reason that trump had so many supporters. the uninformed love him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,310 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    "Definitely a fair point that he had both houses for 2 years. My memory of it is that they made some progress on it but given how big a project it was, it needed a lot more than 2 years to design, plan and begin construction on something that big (essentially half the length of America)."

    That is giving him a huge pass on this. He campaigned on building the wall and Mexico paying for it. What you are saying is that he was not capable enough to understand the task and couldn't follow it through when he was in power. That is the reality of it. I could campaign on saying I would make everyone a millionaire, but because I tried to do it, i deserve the credit. The border issue is extremely complex and he hadn't a clue what he was doing.

    You haven't addressed the facts, that are;

    1) He (according to you) didn't grasp what was involved

    2) He didn't build the wall

    3) He campaigned that he would make Mexico pay for it, and he didn't

    4) Moreover, his associate Bannon swindled his supporters out money from people like you who wanted it built.


    NONE OF THAT is the Democrats fault.


    "As for how effective it is, there was one hilarious incident with the reporter Jim Acosta where he showed up at a stretch of newly constructed wall, attempting to show it doesn't work but inadvertently proving it's effectiveness."

    There are also clips of people flying over the wall, proving it didn't work.

    We had a poster on here for months telling us that the wall was being built when it wasn't. I have no truck with CNN, but singling them out for bullshitting when FOX, OAN etc are doing it on a much more egregious scale.


    "There was a calm scene, nobody around. Law. Order."

    I'm not entirely sure whether that last part is an indication that Trump was a law and order president. If it was, I don't have enough hours in the day to debunk that.


    "Tell me, if Trump proposed a stop and track policy, how do you think Democrats would respond to that? In all honesty, they would be linking it to slavery no doubt."

    Now, what this is telling me is that no matter what the Democrats say, you will slate it. That, coupled with mentions of left leaning media, hunter biden etc really doesn't add credibility to your posts. That's not a personal attack, it is an overexaggeration that doesn't help your argument.


    "His policies didn't work because his personality was such that he could not make a deal with the Democrats."

    He did do deals. Reasonable deals were made on budgets etc.

    He campaigned on being a deal maker, the best deal maker ever. He promised to make people wealthy, because incompetent politicians couldn't do the job.. but he could. Tell me, how did that go? Are you telling me, again, that he bit off more than he could chew?


    "I get that they cannot be seen to be working constructively with him..."

    Again, they did do deals with him.


    "The Democrats were as obstructive to him as the Republicans were to Obama initially. Just disgusting."

    If that's true, which it isn't, did you post on here having a go at McConnell et al while they relished in obstructing Obama at every turn?


    "Where I would criticise him is the braggadocio around getting "Mexico to pay" for it. Fantasy land stuff."

    Hang on. This is not a victimless statement. He promised to make Mexico pay for it and took it from tax payer money. That's more than just an empty promise.


    "He is not without fault, absolutely."

    Agreed


    "But people voted as much for his policies, and to go against Hillary, and less so because they endorsed every facet of his personality."

    And there is the but.

    You mentioned people forgiving Churchill for his flaws. That's a fair point. So tell me, on what basis could Trump's "achievements" in any way compare or balance the scale of his flaws? The only way that it could, in your or anyone else's book, would be if you don't see Trump's flaws in the same way others do because in terms of what he achieved, there is a pitiful amount, so few in fact I cannot make a list.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think you've given some good examples of bad behaviour by Trump. I don't defend any of those negatives. The "insurrection" is a joke but I'm not defending it, I just think a bunch of fringe lunatics broke into the building and then had no idea what they were doing so took a bunch of selfies and stole some souvenirs. "Insurrection", "Coup" - these are words that imply an actual plan. These people don't represent your average Trump voter, they represent a tiny extreme wing.


    Anyway, nepotism is wrong but I think his family were trying to help. Would be far easier for them to live off Daddy's money than get involved in flying to places like Oklahoma or North Dakota.


    No idea how you think he sided with Putin / Russia of the US military - what exactly are you on about there?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,310 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    So far, you have excused Trump saying Mexico would pay for the wall as braggadocio, mentioned left leaning media, had a swipe at CNN, mentioned Hunter Biden's laptop, denied that Trump helped Putin out, blamed the democrats on Trump's failings and sought to minimise January 6th and Trump's involvement in it.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 605 ✭✭✭Stanley 1


    The sons will probably have collected a fee (offshore) to jump those who could afford up the queue and reach the promised land.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So far, you have excused Trump saying Mexico would pay for the wall as braggadocio - I didn't excuse it as braggadocio - I condemned him for it.

    mentioned left leaning media, - And? Is this a crime? Does anyone doubt this is true apart from Fox News?


    had a swipe at CNN, - No I didn't, I mentioned an incident involving Jim Acosta - a personal tweet he sent - I didn't mention CNN (which by the way wouldn't mean anything)


    mentioned Hunter Biden's laptop, -- And?

    denied that Trump helped Putin out, -- I'm genuinely searching for answers as to how Trump helped Putin out. Some flight treaty seems to be the extent of it, unless I'm mistaken.


    blamed the democrats on Trump's failings and sought to minimise January 6th and Trump's involvement in it. -  I was initally responding to a post that said anyone who supports Trump also supports his personality. I definitely DID minimise January 6th because it's the most overblown melodrama in US history (possible since the Will Smith slap). "People died" is the usual response - Yes - the idiots involved died. It's called Darwinism. But to Democrats, Jan 6th is on a par with 9/11. It's hilarious. Trump's involvement in it I am willing to discuss - I think there is an investigation so hopefully due process will take place and we get a fair and honest outcome. If he is guilty of something then he should face the consequences, absolutely.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement