Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1295296298300301907

Comments

  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,196 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    The government make laws. If the government made it illegal to do it, they could always just make it legal to do it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    Find a way. They can give me a call if they need a hand.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,669 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    German inflation figures out today, 7.6% v estimates of 6.8%. Inflation is running wild throughout the Eurozone, yet the ECB still remain adamant the they will not move on interest rates until Q4 at the earliest. Directly benefiting asset and mortgage holders, screwing renters and those trying to save in the process.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,182 ✭✭✭JohnnyChimpo


    My American father-in-law gets the NYPost as one of his daily papers so I read it when I'm in NY - it's politically somewhere to the right of Der Stuermer, so when you see "radical left" you can read it as "people with <€10m property equity", hth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    During the last pension expropriation by the state, the CEO of the company I worked for (an Allianz branch) made a rule where the company would fund the pension levy for all staff. He told us about in a townhall meeting and rightfully called it out as outright theft. Why is it men of integrity like that are not to be found in the halls of power?

    Anyways, I agree with you that the state will not make these illegal because it may just want to slip its unctuous fingers into the pot at some point. Then again, it's not like the state doesn't play fast and loose with law as it already is. I think that when it comes to pensions, it would not be a bad idea to buy gold bullion and bury it where Mr Taxman would never find it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,978 ✭✭✭growleaves


    I winced when I read the headline but if you read the article all the way to the end the politicians involved are Democrats who came up via the Democratic Socialists of America and who openly talk about nationalising NY's housing stock.

    The article was reprinted from The Tablet which is a centre British Catholic journal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,182 ✭✭✭JohnnyChimpo


    So yes, centrist politicians. No need to import the extremely corporatist right-wing ideology of American political media over here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    Philip Lane and the other top brass at the ECB would have to admit they were wrong if they acted too quickly and given interest rate increases will almost certainly cause a Eurozone recession, this would be evidence that in fact they did not clean up the mess that lead to 08 and their whole careers have been based on false beliefs. They likely also have a personal vested interest in the current high asset price environment, given their age profiles. So they are staying stubborn out of human nature more than anything more solid than that, in my view.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,978 ✭✭✭growleaves


    I've just told you the article was reprinted from a British magazine.

    I'll post what I like. Some people might like to know what the situation is for small landlords in other countries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,987 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    current inflation issues have little or nothing to do with the price of money, it was ultimately brought on by the disruption of supply chains from the virus, and now the war, which in turn is disrupting energy markets, raising rates would/will simply increase the cost of living more, as servicing our debts becomes more expensive.....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,870 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Number 1 reason any right to housing referendum should be voted down unless its coupled with the responsibilities of same



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,870 ✭✭✭Villa05


    There is no tax concessions on this scheme, its aimed a the lower paid paye workers. Govt contributing 1 for every 3 saved means greater saving for those on the standard rate of tax in a private pension. I believe its not open to self employed



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,669 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    I beg to differ to be honest. Supply chain disruption has certainly contributed hugely to inflation, but record breaking Covid-era QE has driven inflation (and I would agree that such QE was needed). The fact that the Federal Reserve acknowledged that inflation was no longer transitionary - long before the Ukraine war broke out and after the supply chain problems had largely been alleviated - is a clear signal that QE played a big role in driving inflation and continues to do so. The fact that the ECB also acknowledge the need to end bond buying to tackle inflation is also a clear sign that they recognise that QE is playing an underlying role in driving inflation.

    Inflation in the US was trending upwards significantly between September 2021 and January 2022, despite supply chain issues subsiding significantly and before war in Ukraine was on the agenda for the markets. Same story with the Eurozone.

    The US are raising interest rates, so they recognise QE has caused issues that need to be addressed. The ECB also believe interest rate rises are needed, but feel they cannot do so until bond buying has wound down completely. Both institutions know QE has contributed to inflation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,870 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Yeah you hear alot about a measly half a percent charge. Many of the providers charge considerably more than that for unmanaged funds.

    Is there any chance the pension holders whinging would give back the gains from quantitive easing in return for the pension levy. You can bet your pension they won't



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,870 ✭✭✭Villa05



    Maybe there is too many men of "integrity" as defined by the financial sector in the corridors of power

    Heaver forbid we forget the reason the pension levy was brought in in the first place




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    In other news, Electricity prices set to rise again.


    This time electric ireland to raise prices by 23% from May. Wage inflation looks to be inevitable with these rises in the cost of living, and we all know where asset (property) prices go from there. No brakes on the property train!



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,196 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    https://www.rte.ie/news/politics/2022/0329/1289081-private-sector-pensions/

    "It is expected that three quarters of a million private sector employees, aged between 23 and 60 and who earn more than €20,000 a year, will be automatically signed-up."

    If you're on €20k a year, you are paying tax at 20% so there is a tax saving. Putting €1,000 a year into your pension only costs you €800. You save €200 on tax. The employer matches you contributions. That is another €1,000. The state will contribute €333. So you have contributed €2,333 to your pension for a cost to you of €800. You have essentially tripled your money before it was even invested.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,702 ✭✭✭ittakestwo



    The expected housing stock that should be for sale is less than halve at the moment. Obviously covid decreased supply. But this cannot perpetually continue. As we go forward housing stock will have to increase.


    Thankfully the 3.5× income rules is containing prices somewhat. In other countries without lending rules the price inflation has been alot higher. I think increased supply and rising interest rates will bring the increase to the end next year. Could even start to unwind some of the gains of the last year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,120 ✭✭✭wassie


    Its a good point. The major difference between the Australian system I mentioned is that the individual effectively owns their own pension (via trust structure) and hence it is not the property of the Government. Problem solved. The Govt benefits through (low) taxation on contributions going in. Income & profits earned via investments inside the fund are taxed up until retirement age is reached.

    They have since introduced a first home buyer saving deposit scheme called the First Home Super Saver Scheme (FHSS scheme) which permits members to make voluntary contributions of up to AUD$15,000 each financial year (remembering that only the employer has to make manditory contributions to the pension).

    The advantage is that voluntary contributions are made from pre-tax income and receive concessional tax treatment of 15%. Also the deeming rate is higher than interest rates applicable to a normal savings account (yes, you can still earn a small amount of interest in Aus). This scheme allows for a maximum of $30,000 can be released from your super to use as a deposit for your first home. From 1 July this year, this amount is increasing to a maximum of $50,000.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,870 ✭✭✭Villa05


    The state contributing 1 euro for every 3 is instead of tax relief not in addition to tax relief according to ictu on Claire Byrne yesterday



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    QE doesn't generate inflation. It is the fiscal spending that generates it, the fiscal spending was required to deal with the impacts of covid on the economy but it could be argued that the spending was overcooked which resulted in extra money in consumers pockets.

    In my opinion there are 3 main factors to the inflation we are seeing.

    1) The expectation of inflation due to higher inflation rates seen in recent years due to supply side issue, build up of savings because people couldn't spend and the base effect on inflation up to Jan/Feb this year especially in relation to oil/gas where even if demand and supply was the same as prior to the pandemic we would still see inflation of 3-4% because oil dropped to such a low price in 2020. (i.e. the reasons for transitory inflation have resulted in permanent inflation because it ended up raising the expectation of future inflation and business raised prices to get ahead of it and in turn generated more inflation.

    2) The energy crisis brought about by growth in the economy resulting in more demand and the war in Ukraine.

    3) The labour market being very strong which is enabling employees to negotiate higher wages whether it is due to a shortage or/and because inflation was high in 2021.

    The fed's labour market is in a different place to the EU (but the EU is catching up quickly) and this is the main factor for differences in the speed of implementing rate rises.

    Just because the Fed is raising rates does not equal 'that they recognise QE has caused issues that need to be addressed'. All it is telling us that the Fed believe that we will see a secondary round of inflation due to wage increases and they need to act on this by slowing down the economy. The Eu have claimed that they are yet to see a secondary round of inflation but I think this is changing very quickly.

    Whether the central banks raise rates or reduce QE is irrelevant because both responses lead to a higher interest rate environment.

    The only home owners that benefit from undertaking QT and not raising rates are people with tracker mortgages.

    Anyone getting access to new credit will end up paying more for it regardless of a rate rise or QT or Both taking place which results in the economy slowing down as demand for lending should drop which reduces the money supply and as a result inflation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    The only way housing stock increases is if we build more or we reduce the population of the country via less immigration or more emigration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    I mostly agree except on the principle that fiscal spending was needed to prop up peoples incomes owing from covid shutdowns of businesses etc.

    When you pay all those people to not work it defacto generates inflation - you have added a load more money into circulation than there was/should be. Hospitality workers for example, would have their wages paid by business who gets money from other workers spending. Close the business and the other workers arent buying pints and food, they spend on something else. The hospitality workers still get paid, but by government, and they spend money too. Now you have an increased money supply for the sectors that are still open and doing business. The alternative is not good either, but you have to recognise that this approach will always generate inflation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    100% it generates inflation that was the purpose of the spending. The problem was that the inflation generated by fiscal spending was undertaken to counteract the deflation in the economy by people not spending etc. But the government overcooked it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,987 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    jesus christ, no they didnt, inflation has become a global issue, its clearly got to do with the disruptions caused, and virtually nothing to do with the money supply, ffs!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭combat14


    everyone will need a 20% gross pay rise at this rate just to keep up .... if employers wont pay people will have to look at changing jobs



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,987 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...or maybe the government can simply keep topping up peoples pay and/or electricity accounts, until inflation settles, thus reducing the pressure on employers...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,702 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    I was talking about existing stock for sale. Currently there is less than halve of what there should be for sale. Due to covid people have put off selling it seems, however life moves on. We should see the number of existing houses for sale go up to more normal levels of the the next year or two.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭combat14


    guess the government unfortunately doesn't have a bottomless pit but then again businesses will face these incessant energy rises also... serious recession surely on the way if these severe price rises keep coming.. most regular consumers will have to completely re evaluate their household budgets .. the knock on effects could be quite severe on certain sectors

    a 35% increase in electricity standing charge no less .. what next? time for cut backs .....


    https://m.independent.ie/business/personal-finance/esbs-electric-ireland-latest-to-announce-a-massive-energy-price-rise-41503274.html



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,987 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...at the moment, the ecb has governments backs, just keep borrowing, reduce the pressure on everybody, including employers, if we dont do this, it significantly increases the likelihood of businesses going bust, then of course, we ll have a nice unemployment problem along side a further inflation problem....



Advertisement