Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

BoJo banished - Liz Truss down. Is Rishi next for the toaster? **threadbans in OP**

13132343637297

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,598 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    No. If you invite people from another department who don't need to be there for work reasons and wouldn't be there but for the party, that's not on any view a work meeting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,102 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    You should be right, but I don't think k you are right. If he admitted to it in the first place, then he'd be playing by the normal rules and he would probably have needed to resign. He's brazening it out, lowering the bar and, so far, he has the support of more then enough of his party.

    if the PM will lie to Parliament when he could so easily tell the truth and survive, that points to an extremely cavalier attitude to lying to Parliament; he will lie for even modest advantage or short-term political convenience. That makes matters worse, not better.

    I'd have thought we all knew he would lie at the drop of a hat for fun, let alone minor gain. I really think toure overestimating the impact of quaint gentleman's agreements like resigning if you're caught lying to the house. He'll just brazen it out and make a new lie - like saying he thought it was a work meeting with snacks and a suitcase full of booze.

    If he goes, I really don't think it will be because of lying to the house or any other technicality that would have forced any other PM to resign. It will be because the voters are so cross about it that they here in serious danger of losing to Labour at the next election. I really doubt Johnson will lead the party into the next election so I think the MPs will want him to leave early, get a new leader in, win back their reputation and keep their seats at the next election.

    Technicalities are nothing to this PM. Another lie solves the last lie. Throw a Jimmy Saville sized dead cat on the table and you've shaped the narrative for another few weeks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,598 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Oh, sure. Johnson will never feel any compunction to resign because he has lied to Parliament. The notion will just baffle him.

    He'll have to go if enough of the Tory parliamentary party feel that he has lied, or has lied so publicly and so egregiously, and that this necessitates his departure. And, sure, this isn't going to be a pure, high-minded, disinterested, noble public interest decision; members will be focussed on the threat to their seats. But not just on that; don't underestimate the anger of MPs who have been forced to humiliate themselves for Johnson's protection. Don't underestimate the rage when they do humiliate themselves, and are then exposed when Johnson changes tack — again. And, remember, while there are obviously Tory MPs whose seats are under threat if the Tory star wanes, under the UK's quaint electoral system there is a large chunk of the party who, basically, cannot lose their seats; they can afford to form a view about whose leadership is in the best long-term interests of the party, and/or in their own best long-term interests. Neither consideration might point to Johnson.

    It's a combination of factors. The more Johnson is on the nose in public opinion polls - and he has been on the nose in public opinion polls for months now - the less plausible is the argument that Johnson, and only Johnson, can lead the party to victory at the next election. You'll have members that reckon, actually, their could be others in the party who could do it as well, or better, than Johnson, and who won't require such a sacrifice of self-respect; they might be worth a punt. And there'll come a point where some feel that nobody can lead the party to victory at the next election, and the time has come to start strategising about the one after that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,907 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    I see Johnson is going to use the defence that he was working at the parties and they want to make it a he said, she said about whether ot not he went back to work after the parties.

    But it's not up to him to decide whether this is valid defence and therefore he doesn't get fined. Adam Wagner, who seems to be the most prominent commentator on this stuff, rubbishes it

    It doesn’t matter what he did before or afterwards - the question is did he participate, and if he spent 10 minutes at a birthday gathering and there is a photo of him carrying a bottle of beer then he participated.

    “There is no technical defence of ‘I went back to work’ - there is no technical defence of ‘I didn’t get drunk’.


    Tomorrow the deadline for return of questionnaires; I wonder how soon afterward we will know the outcome...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,137 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I really hope they concocted a big joint lie because I am full sure as soon as they hand it to the police then the photos will emerge.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,703 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    The problem is the lie wasn't 'that' egregious. Technically you can say a lie is a lie, but in common sense that's not true. All lies aren't the same.

    What I find most amusing about this lie thing, is the idea that there seems to be some people who want to get rid of Johnson as if they would prefer a better leader of the Tory party. Hardly. That's the last thing a Labour or Lib Dem or Green supporter would want.

    I think what's really happening is that there are those who are desperate to get rid of Johnson, because they know full well the Tory's won't be as 'populist' if Johnson goes. They aren't in the slightest bit interested in 'standards in public life', only to get their tactical kill.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,102 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Neither Johnson, nor any of the cabine, is suggesting that the PM will resign if he gets fined. Its not about what's right ot wrong. If it were about that, he'd already be gone. It's about how the narrative is shaped and how peopel and MPs react to it.

    Where did you get the idea that a fine = a resignation?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,137 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The gas lights are really flickering tonight



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,907 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Where did you get the idea that a fine = a resignation?

    Where did I say that?🤨



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,102 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    You didn't say it explicitly. I thought that's what you meant when you said:

    But it's not up to him to decide whether this is valid defence and therefore he doesn't get fined.

    I didn't say his defence will determine whether or not he gets a fine, I think his defence is to protect himself from having to resign whatever happens regarding fines, photos and whatever else.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,907 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Oh right. I see your point I was replying to doesn't relate specifically to dodging a fine. But apparently his legal people believe this line about going back to work after the 'parties' will do that.

    But maybe they're just whistling past the graveyard. Or the team is headed up by Lionel Hutz and Saul Goodman...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,598 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    You do realise your last paragraph makes no sense at all? People who dislike populism do so precisely because they are concerned about standards in public life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,102 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    And I think what they're really looking for is a classic right-left issue to snap everyone back into line. Going back to work, isn't that issue (the Jimmy Saville comment t was more like it). They want to get people away from the core of the issue of whether he attended parties and flouted the rules and into the minutiae of something like whether he went back to work afterwards and whether that means he was working when he attended the parties, thus making them more like work meetings.

    I don't think this is the issue they need, but I think that's what they're trying to get. Just muddying the waters is good enough in the meantime.

    Is there doubt about whether the Gray report will be published in full again now? I'll bet they're working full time to get it changed and have the most incriminating parts removed. The longer it goes on the more successful they'd be at that too.

    Visiting storm damage would usually be a good middle-of-the-road leadership thing to do. But I wonder if he could even do it without being heckled at the moment. Might have to just visit the tory clubs in the affected towns to avoid it turning into a sh1t-show.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,102 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I see Johnson and the rest are able to see the evidence against them before they answer the questions asked of them. Total stitch up. The longer it goes on the further in the clear he gets. I wouldn't be surprised if they get the worst details removed from the report before it's published or else they get they make sure the full report isn't made public.

    None of this is normal. Johnson wins again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,703 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    My last paragraph makes total sense.

    There is no such thing as 'populism', that's a term coined by the upper ruling classes. Journalists. Legal eagles. Politickers. Made up by exactly the same people who would rather they would decide if Brexit would or wouldn't happen, and not by anyone else. Well, no wonder those types are bitter, when they can't rule the world. Guess those types don't think this democracy thing is as hot an idea they thought it was.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,007 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Lol populism doesn't exist now? And your reasoning is because someone just made it up? Hilarious.

    Also anytime you try bring up democracy in conversations about the UK we get to bring up the entirely undemocratioc voting system that is FPtP and remind you that only 1 government in 100 years has been elected by the majority of the voters.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    This makes no sense. If said demographics were really this powerful and didn't want Brexit to happen, they would simply have not held the stupid referendum to being with. Brexit happened because many of them did and pushed for the referendum leaving Brexit to be defined after the vote.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,598 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    You post that screed and you think it will make us think that other people are bitter?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,122 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    I think it's a safe bet Boris has survived and is not going anywhere at this stage, a week is a long time in politics, 3 weeks an eternity.

    Like covid, the #number10partygate off the news agenda.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,589 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    We will see I suppose. I think keeping him in charge helps labour in the next election tbh



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,122 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    I initially thought, he's Toast, then had second thoughts , then it was clear no one person in the Conservatives had the support to beat him , so back to he'll survive, then we had the Stammer incident out side parliament, I thought this will be linked to Boris's Jimmy Saville comments, back to toast , but Boris then dug his heels in, no apology, off to act the statesman, Ukraine and the partygate saga almost forgotten at this stage.

    Unless something new an dramatic surfaces I think he'll survive but of course in Politics who really knows 😉

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,296 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    The Russians will save him now. The impending crisis in Ukraine will allow him to make a few speeches and the Tory voters will row in behind him as if he was the 2nd coming of Winston Churchill

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,717 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Wouldn’t surprise me if he’s been sitting in No. 10 all this time wishing for a Russian invasion to actually come. It would certainly buy him a load of extra time and raise the bar of what the Tories will tolerate before throwing him out.

    However it probably wouldn’t save him forever. Churchill himself was voted out of office before the end of the war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,102 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I think he's getting all he needs from Russia. I really doubt they'll invade Ukraine. I think the west would give in and do nothing pretty quickly if Russia invades. So I'd say the threat of Russia invading is the high point. Then nobody will take responsibility for giving Putin what he wants in the diplomatic solution. But Johnson will have the advantage of pointing the finger at Europe for being addicted to Russian gas.

    I think the situation is ideal for Johnson the way it is right now - talking up an invasion in the near future but it never actually comes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,598 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    To be fair, it has been off the news agenda before. That doesn't mean it's dead. It will be back on the news agenda when the Metropolitan police complete their investigation and issue (or don't issue) fixed penalty notices. And then it will be back when the Grey report is released. And it may be back on other occasions when, e.g., more photographs of Johnson looking inebriated at a work meeting emerge - there are a lot of photographs out there. Etc, etc.

    None of this means that Johnson will necessarily be forced to resign over this, but (a) it will dog him, and (b) it does bring closer the day when the party dumps him. Johnson has burned a lot of political capital over this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27 Mirafiori




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,282 ✭✭✭MrVestek




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,102 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    This aged well...

    I really didn't think Russia would invade Ukraine but I was dead wrong about that. This surely puts all the party stuff to bed.

    Johnson survives again. What a terrible leader for the UK during this conflict. At least Trunp isn't in power in the US too.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 43,142 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    One of Johnson's supporters in Westminster posted this now deleted tweet...

    IMG_20220227_180940.jpg

    What Joe failed to disclose was that the frontline that Johnson was on was in Oxfordshire front (which is actually further away from Ukraine than Downing St!)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,598 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    He's only "one of Johnson's supporters in Westminster" if we have a very expansive concept of "Westminster". He's a member of the Staffordshire Moorlands District Council, which is responsible for one of the more rural parts of Staffordshire. Most of the District is, well, moorland. The Council is based in Leek (pop. 20,800, which makes it about the size of Mullingar, but not nearly as lively). Leek is about 260 km from Westminster.



Advertisement