Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1245246248250251909

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭Browney7


    Well when the state is spending over half a billion per annum on HAP and then the enhanced "Homeless HAP" which has a much higher individual payment, this outcome is inevitable.

    Ires also had rented out a large number of apartments in Finglas to HAP tenants and then got Tuath to take over the tenants and agree a 25 year enhanced lease. Of course it's "commercially sensitive" so they couldn't possibly say how much of joe taxpayer's money is being spent. Nice work if you can get it. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/investment-fund-in-social-housing-lease-for-40m-apartments-1.4619780



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,877 ✭✭✭Villa05


    From the program they stated that of the units currently in planning. Roughly two thirds are apartments with the remaining been houses.

    At a minimum you would expect 30% of houses to end up in social/affordable or in the hands of investment funds given their declared intentions to expand in both financial and geographical terms in the country

    Given that developers have suddenly decided that apartments are more expensive than houses and that private buyers won't touch them. The current system is completely against the private buyer in terms of both buying, but also in terms of driving up current rents

    The land and construction lobby have very quickly wrestled back control of policy and the result is the most expensive social housing in the world paid for by perspective first time buyers. So the fruits of there hard work is used against them by there government.

    Let's not try to paint a picture that ffg is on the side of hardworking people trying to provide housing for themselves. The facts show the complete opposite



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    I said noting about FF/FG..... what I said is I believe that FTB's will be worse off if SF are in government because they will not be able to deliver on 40k houses a year and will prioritise social housing over private housing.

    Every man and there dog new that SF would be asked how they would be able to build 40k when the existing government is struggling to build half that number. The answer provided no confidence that they would be able to do so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,877 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Gov don't claim to build 33k this year but to have an average of 33k per year over 5 years.

    Cork City is crumbling in places. Huge blocks of Limerick are cordoned off for a project that's been talked about for 20 years. Lots of empty unit mainly caused by dounut planning policies. Former landmark commercial units lie empty

    Using what we have more efficiently is always better for your pocket, environment

    What could be done to bring back unused properties to the market?

    Carrot

    Allow ftb grant to be applicable to long term empty units

    Pool ftb and seai grants to help bring units back to acceptable standards

    Pool state resources such as councils, bord Failte and others to help reinvigorate Town centres. Convert closed businesses to housing. These towns would have spare capacity in their schools, this could save the state in other budget departments. Seen on Irish Times today Ballinrobe has 199 vacant units and 0 rentals.

    Remove extortionate charges for reconnection to services. Very few services charge you to be a future customer.

    Stick

    Hefty tax if empty after a (to be determined) period of time.

    If after a period of this tax the property remains empty, introduce a compulsory selling order.

    We need to be taxing waste more and productivity less



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,329 ✭✭✭The Student


    I don't necessarily agree. Yes in the short term rents would continue to rise but investors would see super normal profit and therefore increase supply in the longer term.

    The vacancy rate by institutional landlords would be force down. While I agree institutional landlords do have deep pockets they also have a cash flow need to service existing pension payouts.

    It is a very risky gamble in my opinion holding out too long. If we go into a recession or as we are seeing the cost of living increasing so much people will not have the money to pay the high rents of institutional lettings.

    Again I would ask why would a landlord invest in improving ber without a corresponding increase in rent? If this happens logic would suggest some landlords will not do this thereby reducing limited supply even further.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    I don't disagree that we need to use the housing stock more efficiently..... but that still does not explain how 40k of properties can be delivered...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,877 ✭✭✭Villa05


    "I said noting about FF/FG..... what I said is I believe that FTB's will be worse off if SF are in government because they will not be able to deliver on 40k houses a year and will prioritise social housing over private housing"

    Apologies on the first sentence. I get a bit carried away when I realise the damage they are doing to our country and people.

    On the rest, I disagree somewhat for 1 key reason

    Polls show that SF are the 2nd highest just slightly below FG in 1st preference votes amongst 3rd level educated voters. One would assume that these are younger voters most probable in potential ftb bracket.

    For this reason I belive SF are genuine when they say 50/50 split between private and social/affordable in new builds. They know where there vote is and there has been noticeable moves to centre left in their policies

    Also if you are working off the same budget, but can get more built for less money you increase supply. What's being paid out on some of these long term leases could build 3 units on state owned land for the price of 1 leased unit.

    SF are well aware of history and will know that FF were handsomely rewarded for providing housing for our citizens throughout the last century.

    I'm not a SF voter, rater reading the tea leaves



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    I agree with your logic except for one point and that is that the housing market is inelastic at the moment as there are constraints on how many properties can be built.... if this can be built up over time then yes the increase in supply makes property more affordable.

    There was an interesting working paper on the topic that looked at the US housing market and the impact of institutional investors and QE on the housing market that would support what you are saying in a market that has capacity to build.

    https://s3.amazonaws.com/real.stlouisfed.org/wp/2020/2020-047.pdf



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,877 ✭✭✭Villa05


    People can get bogged down on the HAP figures, while the figure is eye watering. The multitude of different schemes means the cost to the state is far higher. This is from a document available online titled:

    Spending Review 2021

    Analysis of Social housing current expenditure programne


    In response to this level of need there has been a significant increase in Government intervention. 


    Total expenditure related to housing has increased significantly (128%); from €1.2 billion in 2016 

    to a peak level of €3.1 billion in 2021.

    Figure 1: Total Expenditure Related to Housing, 2016-2021



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    The issue is not the money the issue is the capacity to build.... even if you are able to build a house cheaper it doesn't mean you can build more of them.

    I get that there is a big protest vote and can understand why but I have serious questions about the SF plan as it doesn't stack up. I tuned in to the debate expecting Eoin to explain how he could make his plan work but instead all that came across was someone that was unable to answer questions.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think that there are plenty of apartments for those Facebook and Google etc people. A whole load of the ads on the first few pages of daft listings are for multiple flats of all sizes in the big developments (Clancy quay etc), though they only would appear, in your analysis, as a single ad.

    But they’re all €2.5k plus (with most €3-4K), so very specifically for those kind of earners. Sunday times published average earnings for tech staff today….can’t remember the exact number but was €130k+ I think, maybe higher (the average wage). There is good supply of apartments for these people

    It the squeeze for the middle earners, who need apartments below €2k, that is the issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 996 ✭✭✭Ozark707




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    in fact it’s more. was in the Sunday times today, for a Facebook & Google worker. It was an insane number. Unfortunately I stuffed today's Sunday times into my boots after I got swiped by a rogue wave in strandhill this morning. But just checked the times online edition

    can’t paste, and link will need a password, so will paraphrase:

    ”average yearly salary including shares and pension at Facebook in Ireland is €160k. Google is €148k”

    I know that averages are inflated by the very high salaries of senior management, but it’s still a staggering number. Is no wonder that apartments are getting bid up and up and that €3/4k monthly rent for the many new top end developments on Daft doesnt seem to be a barrier



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,914 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Dublin is finished. As well as an awful housing situation Ireland also has a nasty reputation for its immigration services. And lockdowns. The next census (postponed from 2021) will be interesting..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,947 ✭✭✭Taylor365


    Bezos walks into a bar, we're all billionaires.


    Avg is useless metric when talking population and money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,573 ✭✭✭DataDude


    If you assume 30% bonus (which will have a vesting period) and 10% pension (both conservative i’d suggest). €160k is ‘only’ €5.5k cash per month (110k base salary). Be bonkers to paying much over €1750. Obviously the maths changes if your partner is earning the same which may be the case!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 146 ✭✭spalpeen


    Fb and google are hardly representative of all tech though



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭dasdog


    Reinstatement of the penal laws and the cutting throats of golf course captains seems a better option long term.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    I reckon the coastal properties have had their boom and with the dust settling on covid and people getting back to normal, the novelty will have worn off and some buyers will feel isolated and cut-off as well as struggling with the commute, even if only a day or two a week. The fact that mobile home was even put on the market for half a million shows how ridiculous the situation was and that it was definitely not sustainable.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    This thread has a new cracker each week. Dublin is now finished!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,617 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    It's not "finished" - but it almost certainly will (or is already) stagnating. Population growth will slow, new jobs will slow, new housing will continue to be snapped up due to high existing demand. Dublin's losses will be other cities/countries gains.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,045 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    Personally, I think despite the incredible opportunity WFH has given to individuals I don't think outside of Dublin will suddenly become attractive or comparable for those used to living and working in Dublin. West Clare or Waterford or Leitrim or wherever aren't going to become these cosmopolitan areas just because a few people with good jobs moved there. The investment needs to come and I don't think it has to date. The net point is that Dublin will still be the economic heart of the country and I think the areas and communities struggling pre-covid might not kick on post-covid and achieve much more than they already have during covid, which is sad but our government is not ambitious or willing in that regard.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    Surely that is a reason to approve a development? It is peculiar that a stated reason to object to a development is because it would bring down housing costs in an area; that is literally the targeted outcome of a supply increase!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,100 ✭✭✭Browney7


    Of course the luas being built there had no positive impact on the value of the existing properties in the area either



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,045 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals


    Exactly the Luas makes it way more attractive, aside from that a fairly bland suburb with not much going on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,914 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    I originally moved to Ireland from my own country to work, and expats like me are not going to p!ss away our lives waiting for the Irish state to get its act together. We're not coming back. And our companies know that letting us work from overseas is a hell of a lot cheaper than having to replace half their tech teams.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 727 ✭✭✭Phat Cat


    €645k for a run of the mill 2 bedroom semi-detached with a tiny back garden? Okay the location is great but this should be less then €300k in a normal functioning housing market. The prices are insane!

    https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/homes-and-property/new-to-market/monkstown-two-bed-in-friendly-estate-close-to-the-sea-for-645-000-1.4789898



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 55,061 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I'm confused about that article. The image says it's an artists impression of what the scheme will look like, but it's literally a photograph of the existing Wyckham Apartments on Balinteer Road.

    Also where is Marmalade Lane? I've never heard of this street, and Google knows nothing about it either.



Advertisement