Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Are the attempts to stop the British government amnesty for the troubles futile

245

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,094 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You are forgetting that there are IRA murderers walking around waving letters that they got from Tony Blair in order to avoid prosecution.

    If we are to deal with the legacy of the Troubles, these letters must be declared null and void so that all of those who committed criminal acts can be prosecuted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,094 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It has never been demonstrated that the British government murdered innocent people. There is no evidence of any government decision to permit the killing of innocents.

    Yes, some British soldiers have been convicted of murder. One example is the killing of a Taliban fighter:

    However, nobody would ever argue that the British government murdered that Taliban fighter, and the same applies with respect to Northern Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    Personally I'd rather a truth and reconciliation process which would end ALL convictions, the British are the only ones strongly opposed to this as the truth is the last thing they want or need right now.

    I'm in favour of ending all prosecutions but doing this has to be done in accordance with some sort of truth process so the loved ones of the dead can get answers, what the British are trying to do with this amnesty is make sure the truth will never come out by making all inquiries and inquests into the troubles illegal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,094 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I want them all to go to jail, those British soldiers who broke the law, and all those terrorists who committed criminal acts. Those Tony Blair letters were a disgrace.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    There's no chance they're going to prosecute their former soldiers for behaviour that was approved of at the time, the Queen awarded the soldiers of bloody Sunday medals for their "good work".

    There's also no chance they're now going to prosecute the intelligence services in 2022 for carrying out state approved collusion in their psychological warfare campaign against the IRA.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 948 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Thanks Blanch152 - I don't really see how that is relevant to my point tbh, or if you are being naive possibly.

    That looks to me like a soldier killed a wounded Taliban fighter in Afghanistan - a country where the UK was at war. The soldier involved in the killing was jailed for doing so. What does it have to do with the British army murdering it's own innocent civilians on British soil?

    You say it has never been demonstrated that the UK government murdered innocent people. Do you mean it has never been demonstrated in a British court of law? Is that not the point of this thread, they are refusing to look into the matter and offering amnesty not only to the soldiers, but to all those in government who lied and covered it up?

    What I will say about your story - do you not find it odd that when a soldier does something illegal on his own back, that he was prosecuted by the army for it.

    Whereas in NI when a battalion of soldiers massacre innocent civilians (such as at Ballymurphy), they are actually redeployed to murder again two weeks later (Derry).

    That some of the soldiers who murdered innocent people were promoted in the army after the fact (e.g. Mike Jackson, who took part in the Ballymurphy massacre was actually promoted all the way up to head of the British army!)

    That UK politicians and army figures lied repeatedly down the years that the victims of the British Army were IRA bombers and terrorists?

    How can these unbelievable coincidences be explained away? The whole amnesty thing is disgraceful, and I really think excuses shouldn't be offered toward the UK government in this whole affair.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 948 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    I agree - I just can't equivocate what terrorist groups did with what the British government did - they are completely separate.

    A government would have absolutely no moral authority to go after terrorist groups if holds itself to the same standard as those terrorists.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,094 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Except as I have said, there is no evidence of direct British government involvement or of orders from above. Those who have been implicated in acts of criminality by the British forces either acted alone or under local command. There doesn't appear to ever have been orders from London for acts of violence. The British government may be guilty of acts of omission if they knew post-hoc of such incidents and didn't act but acts of omission don't equate to the acts of commission by the PIRA, and by Sinn Fein supporting them, which are on a more serious level.

    Holding the British government to a higher standard still does not bring them down to the level of the PIRA who made no bones about terrorising their own community and together with other republicans, killed more from the nationalist community than anyone else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    There's no evidence? There's overwhelming evidence if you bothered to look, there would be far more evidence if the British didn't keep putting a stop to public inquiries.

    The MRF was a top secret British army unit consisting of people hand picked from across the army including the SAS, their main task was to track down and kill members of the IRA, that's not the only thing they were tasked with though, they were also tasked with creating tensions by indiscriminately killing innocent Catholic civilians, the former members of the unit being interviewed say "we were not there to act like an army unit we were there to act like a terror force" here's a good documentary on it.

    https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3D92ApTmOCcPM&ved=2ahUKEwjWq7G-8971AhUKilwKHdCyDscQFnoECAQQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0ubifS20Dqr3f5nGUp2yXb

    There's overwhelming evidence MI5 and the British government set Pat Finucane up for assassination, a human rights solicitor who was was investigating British state collusion with loyalists, strong evidence MI5 set up the Dublin Monaghan bombings, the Miami showband massacre which Netflix done a good documentary on recently, I could go on forever.

    Not only all of that but the UDA was a legal paramilitary organisation up until 1972 despite being involved in the the murder of hundred of innocent civilians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    RTE done a documentary on collusion not too long ago, although anyone with even a passing interest in the troubles would have known most of it anyway. The documentary concluded that "there is clear evidence that points to collusion being not only practice but policy; it was planned and directed with full political authority".




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 948 ✭✭✭Miniegg



    I don't really see how you can argue the point about evidence in any credible way blanch152?

    The UK government is refusing to look into it's own actions around British Army murders in Northern Ireland. They are refusing to release the official documents they have on file relating to their behavior around that time. Given their position, why would you expect to see evidence from them?

    Why would you ignore the points I made (which are easily researched facts), and base your opinion on a government who is admittedly covering up their behavior and offering amnesty to all involved in what has been proven to be murder of its own citizens?

    Lastly - I am clearly not equivocating the British to the IRA/ UVF etc - everybody knows about the atrocities they committed - this thread isn't about them.

    Despite what you say, in practice you are patently NOT holding the British government to a higher standard than you are terrorist groups.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Its important that the British state is shown for what it is. They suit themselves and do not care about the Northern Irish from any community unless its convenient.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Only one side has the support of a so called legitimate government who are working to protect their murderers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway


    Surely you would be behind this amnesty, given that there was a war and people get killed in wars??

    No rush to answer if you have an important interdiction mission to do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    I'm behind an amnesty in correlation with a truth process, I'm not behind this amnesty which would not only end all prosecutions, it would also make all inquests and enquiries into the troubles illegal, the only goal of this amnesty is to make sure the truth doesn't come out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,538 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    the letters can't be declared null and void as the reason they were written is that there would not be enough evidence to bring a successful prosecution against the individuals anyway.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 245 ✭✭oisinog


    The letters say something alone the line that you dont face procesction on the current evidence and should fresh evidence arise they would reconsider the case.

    Its very clear that the British are hiding something as they have refused to release documents under national security that should now be available



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,990 ✭✭✭c.p.w.g.w


    Sure the Brits created the first large range concentration camps, believe it was in South Africa before the Nazi's were even a thing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,538 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,094 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Northern Irish people are part of the British state so your post does not make any sense.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    It does if you read it back again. Members of the public do not make decisions on how the army behave themselves in certain operations. They are not privy to every political meeting and decision.

    Go on now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,538 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    this is just deflection.

    his post is correct regardless of semantics.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Posts: 19,178 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Truth and reconciliation in South Africa involved immunity from prosecution.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,094 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Last I checked the people of Northern Ireland were part of the British state. Unless there has been a vote under the GFA that I didn't hear about. You may call this semantics, but the UK is a democracy, and the state is of the people, as in any democracy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    When people talk about the actions of the Irish state they aren't talking about you, me or Dickie Rock.

    You are just trying it on again, rather than ignoring or addressing the point. Its tiresome and juvenile.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,094 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Well actually, that is one of the biggest problems with the populist nonsense that goes for political discourse these days. The Irish state is you and me. Is Dickie Rock tax resident?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Why do you bother? You look foolish on this. Should I be saying 'the British, not the grocer and cobbler, the government and their army? Adults know how the British state differs from Chas and Dave when discussing its actions in NI, (murdering and lawlessness).

    I'll leave you to your childishness I'll not be sanctioned for playing along with your deflectionary foolishness.

    Its important that the British state is shown for what it is. They suit themselves and do not care about the Northern Irish from any community unless its convenient.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 185 ✭✭Green Finers




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 948 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    What sort of "democracy of the people" sends it's most violent battalion of soldiers onto it's streets and permits them to massacre it's own citizens?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    The same one that assists loyalist terrorists in blowing up it's own citizens.



Advertisement