Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Formula 1 Round 22 Abu Dhabi GP

1697072747580

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,380 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    If you had to put it down to one thing that allowed Max win, was it Lewis not pitting during VSC?

    his tyres on lap 58 were about 44 laps old



  • Posts: 1,824 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The marshalls are on track in that image, which is in the closing corners of lap 56. The last we see of them, they have jumped over the barrier but are still in front of the fence. Then the camera cuts and lap 57 begins less than 10s later.

    The earliest possible moment that the track can be considered clear is the beginning of lap 57.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,450 ✭✭✭Anjobe


    He probably thought it was better to let Max through there and try to re-overtake on the back straight, rather than go defensive and then be a sitting duck himself on the back straight. Remember Max was 2nd in the race but leading the championship if neither finished, so he had nothing to lose by making the late lunge, but Lewis really had to avoid any contact which could have put him down the order.

    If Lewis had pitted then he would have conceded the lead. Staying out and maintaining track position was the correct decision at the time, it was only the late safety car that changed that.



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    It was a bit of a lunge (not a dangerous lunge) whereby Max was the latest on the brakes and had the grip of the soft tyres. I think there was a mix of Hamilton being unable to afford to make contact and also realising he had two straights that would give him a chance.

    It was a great move from Max. I don’t think anyone expected him to make the move there and he defended admirably afterwards.

    It was a last lap worthy of a champion, regardless of the tyre advantage he had.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,380 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Yes. Agreed. It was pure skill and bravery. Real champion move!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,639 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,837 ✭✭✭quokula



    So we're in agreement that the marshals were totally off the track and behind the barriers on lap 56. They don't need to be behind the fence for lapped cars to safely unlap themselves and drive to deltas. They don't even need to be behind the barrier, it's totally normal in many incidents that VSCs have been enough for marshals to clear incidents once there isn't something like a car or a large amount of debris on the racing line. There's also the fact that if the lapped cars were let go after that corner, they had a whole couple of minutes before they'd arrive at the corner again, which was plenty of time for the marshals to take the few footsteps required to get behind the fence.

    This is all normal, it's why multiple drivers who have nothing to do with either Mercedes or Red Bull were getting on their team radio questioning why lapped cars aren't being allowed to pass like they normally are. The one and only mistake that was made was delaying that call. If they had been more timely then it would have had zero impact on the outcome but would have taken away this silly talking point that Mercedes are pushing.

    Other than that it was an unremarkable safety car period. A car goes off on lap 53 and blocks the racing line necessitating a safety car, the car itself is cleared on lap 55, the marshals are completely off track on lap 56, the lapped cars unlap themselves as is entirely normal, and they go racing on lap 58 as you'd expect.



  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 12,688 Mod ✭✭✭✭2011


    Hilarious 😄😀😃

    This has zero chance of changing anything, I would be very suprised if Hamilton would support it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,967 ✭✭✭✭blade1


    Just saw Lewis getting knighted or something there on the news.

    Was expecting Max to barge in and blow Lewis out of the way just as the sword came down, resulting in Max getting knighted instead. 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,682 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt



    Ah Bourdais...I hope he doesn't watch the 2016 race, Lewis was doing it for the whole race!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,550 ✭✭✭recyclebin


    I suppose its a slippery slope. First it's Max team mate holding up his rival which is fine, then it's the Alpha Tauri. Not too far off a race fixing then at that point.

    Couple of the bigger teams have way too much sway and power to influence other teams and drivers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,531 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    But he wasn't a back marker, there weren't blue flags. It was a legitimate fight for position...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,641 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Perez was in P1 at the time and on that basis alone, forgetting team orders and Max, he was more than entitled to fight for the position and keep P2 behind him. Hamilton did the exact same thing in 2016 to slow up Rosberg and back him up into Vettel and the others behind him.



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Ah come on it is a bit different to 2016. Hamilton was holding up his rival, Perez wasn’t in the title fight.

    Thats not to say there was anything wrong with what Checo did, mind. Complete non-issue for me and only for the SC it would have been the most exciting part of the race.

    Id love to see more fighting for the team to the extent Checo did, personally. Alonso in Hungary another example.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,550 ✭✭✭recyclebin


    I said what Perez did was fine! I'm just expanding the discussion as I think race results and decisions are being compromised by the power Mercedes and Red Bull have over the driver market.

    Alonso on the other hand just has a vendetta against Hamilton :p



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    The definitive reason why Masi got it right

    Or else Toto is selling his stake to Storey

    https://twitter.com/rich_energy/status/1470471870151593991?s=20



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,967 ✭✭✭✭blade1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,386 ✭✭✭alan partridge aha


    Posted it earlier in week, proves Lineker knows nothing about F1. Bit awkward if he has to present Max with the overseas spoty award.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,967 ✭✭✭✭blade1


    You could probably say that about most people using analogies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,386 ✭✭✭alan partridge aha


    The most highest paid sports person on BBC making stupid statements. He should be told to cop on.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,285 ✭✭✭ebbsy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,380 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    I’m sure he knows as much as any of us. I think any educated people can understand the analogy, as I am sure he can. Of course, there’s so much nuance involved in F1, that a tweet just won’t capture..Lineker knows this!

    in a way the analogy is spot on. It applies to all. You perform great and drive great and build up a deserved insurmountable lead, only for some idiot to crash that has nothing to do with you, and all your efforts and talent are taken away, and you’re then put in a position of weakness, not even a somewhat fair position , but a clearly weak position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,380 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Which one could ask: what was to stop Perez having an unfortunate driving error and crashing, resulting in a SC?! Just a thought.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,641 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    It's not spot on at all. The fact that leads evaporate under Safety Car is nothing new and is a part and parcel of the sport. Teams have entire strategies mapped out of what to do under SC. It's like complaining that the offside rule is unfair after you scored a goal from an offside position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,380 ✭✭✭✭walshb



    Missing my point. Spot on as regards how such a lead can be disintegrated due to issues outside your control.

    we all know the rules of F1 here, and I’m sure Lineker is no different.

    I can easily understand the analogy, while also realizing that there’s nuance involved.

    the tweet shouldn’t be taken word for word literally! And Lineker knows this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,791 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    The analogy I'd use is Red Bull are 3-2 down, have a free kick in the final added on minute in a match where the away goal rule exists and Mercedes keeper was sent off with no replacement. 😄

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,641 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    No it's a very silly analogy. It's framed as if it's completely wrong and against the rules that you lose a big lead under the safety car, when it's far from it. The people replying to Lineker's tweet have about as much a clue as he has.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,837 ✭✭✭quokula


    The problem with people like Lineker who don’t understand the sport is that they’ve just tuned in for this one race and think it represents the whole season.

    Even discounting all the more controversial incidents like Silverstone etc, if you just look at Imola alone, Hamilton indisputably gained more points from a Red Flag there than Verstappen gained from the safety car at Abu Dhabi. And that was through absolutely no fault of Verstappen’s or act of Hamilton’s.

    Verstappen was robbed of far more points over the season than the opportunity he gained from that one fortunate safety car was worth, and he and the team had to make it work with quick thinking to pit and great racecraft to overtake with just one lap. There’s no way in the world anyone could look objectively at the whole season and think Max didn’t deserve it, just because he happened to have that one small piece of luck.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,707 ✭✭✭McFly85


    That’s poor form from Lineker tbh. Either he’s tweeting about a subject he genuinely hasn’t a clue about or purposely misleading people to stoke the feelings of injustice.

    At best Sunday was a last minute controversial peno to win on away goals anyway.

    Maybe it could start a new trend? Man City throw two footed challenges to the entire Liverpool squad until they can’t field a team, get stern warning and 3 points.

    Messi injures himself, match stops until he can continue, comes back and scores 2 goals.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,380 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Guys, Lewis was 11-12 seconds ahead with 5/6 laps remaining to claim his 8th championship. Horner himself admitted they needed a miracle. Lineker’s tweet sums that up, albeit there being a nuance missing ..we all know F1 can change so dramatically so quickly..we all know you can’t compare apples and oranges here.



Advertisement