Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Formula 1 Round 22 Abu Dhabi GP

1676870727380

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 801 ✭✭✭SeeMoreBut


    Have Masi or anyone in the decision making give a reason why they gave 2 cars an advantage over all other cars?

    Max and the last car to unlap itself. Reason Max got 2 cars between him and person behind and 5 cars infront of him got removed to attack Hamilton.

    Last unlap car meant he couldn't get attacked and lose a place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    I wonder if the vitriol would be as strong if the 2 contenders were more likeable. Say what you will about both, but neither come off as particularly likeable individuals. That's possibly why they're the top 2 drivers (compare seb now who seems a right sounder to seb when he was winning), but it does make it harder for the Lewis fanboys to recongise Max's achievements and for Max fanboys to acknowledge that Lewis was hard done by at the end.


    Like if this was Danny Ric versus Carlos Sainz would people be fighting over this as hard?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,103 ✭✭✭Carcharodon


    Fair enough, one could go back to every single race of the year but the reality is the last race is what decided it, and in my opinion, just an opinion, that’s not how the world championship should be decided because that’s the end, no one has the ability to come back at the next race, game over, ball burst ! It is what it is but no team or diver would be happy losing like that, that should speak for itself, F1 needs to learn from this, it’s not good for the sport, anyone hung ho on either side is delusional, it’s a messed up situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    How is Lewis hard done by?

    Lewis gained a free lap and probably 10 points minimum more then he would have after he binned it at Imola because of a red flag.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Hamilton gained plenty more then Max did over the season from red flags or SC from what I can remember. So if the SC scenario on Sunday is to be considered, if the rules on red flag were different regarding changing damaged parts (start in pit lane for example and don't unlap yourself) then Max only needs 3rd place on Sunday.


    Lewis had plenty of good fortune earlier in the season, this is only an issue because the luck fell Max's way with 6 laps of the season left.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 12,692 Mod ✭✭✭✭2011


    Much to my suprise, Max is the F1 world champion. Like it or not, this fact will not change. Move on and accept it, life is too short. Lewis can try again next year, although I think that Russle will put manners on him.

    Speaking as a Max fan that has never supported Hamilton, I would like to acknowledge Hamilton's sporting behaviour. Fair play to Lewis, I now have so much more respect for him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,730 ✭✭✭McFly85


    I can’t take anyone seriously who thinks a title is tainted or has an asterisk beside it because of one incident, and mainly because that one incident is the most recent one.

    Both Max and Lewis had to race the wheels off each car for the whole year to even be in a position to win it, so to boil it down to one decision you don’t agree with just because it’s recent does an incredible disservice to the drivers imo.

    And the incident itself is being treated as if Mercedes literally had a title snatched away from them by the race director. Mercedes chose track position and distance on old tires for the whole race. That was their call. A late safety car without the distance to pit and maintain track position was always a possibility and they gambled on it not happening. Had they been a bit braver during the race and gave up track position during the VSC the car had the pace and Lewis the talent to get back into first by racing, and they would have been covered off from any danger with a late safety car.

    Max and Lewis are different class, and as much as I think Max deserved this season, had Lewis won I wouldn’t be begrudging him his title.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,464 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Sound post, McFly



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,464 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    A question: had Lewis pitted lap 38 VSC, do people think those fresher tyres would have given him a much better chance over the final 3.5 miles or so?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,730 ✭✭✭McFly85


    It definitely would have. But I can understand why they didn’t. They were in a position where they had 2 choices:

    Pit, lose track position and have to race Max to get it back(knowing that max can afford contact)

    Stay out and keep RB at arms length on old tires.

    They made the most sensible choice, and were incredibly unlucky that it backfired on them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,464 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Yes. I agree. They had to make a choice, and it was just unlucky.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,150 ✭✭✭Morrisseeee


    Been watching F1 since the 80's, and this season has been unreal. It has had everything. I wanted a GP every weekend.

    Over the course of the season I think Max has deserved the Championship, he's really delivered this season, his qualifying, esp the last 2 races was phenomenal. IMHO I think he's more of a racer, look how he goes for any opening & then defends it while in the lead. I was disappointed with Hamilton, ie. the duel with Perez (on worn tyres) and then not defending well enough against Max on the last lap.

    In terms of luck, just look back at Azerbaijan where Max was comfortably leading with a few laps to go & his rear tyre blows up, but then with the race at his mercy Hamilton makes an error & this ultimately cost him the Championship.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,748 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    A late safety car.... with the RD deciding only to unlap the cars in the way of Max, and bring the safety car in a lap earlier than would have been done on any other occassion.

    The issue isn't that Max benefited from a lucky safety car (from his perspective), it is that the RD decided to make up processes and ignore precident and rules to give max every advantage and a chance he should not have had, safety car or not.

    Merc chose track position cause there was not time to get back to racing. The RD throwing process and rules out the window is what changed that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,222 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    Not correct, you are making out that Masi did it for Verstappen.

    He did it because all teams agreed to finish under green flags where possible, he had the powers to meet that agreement and he used them.

    Fair play Masi.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,730 ✭✭✭McFly85


    I agree with you that the RD made a bad call(in fact for the last few races since it looked like a late showdown could occur it has felt like decisions had been made to ensure that’s what happens) but where we disagree is the extent that removing the back markers had on the result.

    In my mind, if he wanted to finish by racing, he should have continued the race without any cars unlapping themselves and gotten the race started as quickly as possible. But then, most likely we would have had 2 laps instead of one and those back markers would be out of Max’ way coming into the final lap anyway. And we know that the safety car came in a lap early but that’s at the discretion of the RD if he deems it safe.

    I said in my previous post that Mercedes made the sensible call staying out but now I’m going to disagree with myself. Lewis definitely should have pitted under the VSC. He’d have enough laps to overtake Max at that point, and if there’s a late safety car either he’s in first with fresher tires and in a better position to defend or he’s in second and he can basically do what Max did, take the free pit stop and win it at the end.

    The fact that they kept him out makes me think that ultimately they were looking to avoid being close to Verstappen at any stage for fear of contact. And it backfired on them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 485 ✭✭guyfo


    That's one think I can't understand from the "he's not the real champ" & "the title is tainted" crowd.

    If this title is tainted because of the safety car then vise versa a Hamilton title won through massive points gains won through sheer luck would be equally as tainted. (perfectly timed red flag in Imola, or Bottas playing bowling in Hungary are the incidents I keep thinking of)

    Also, if the results of this race shouldn't count because of Masi speeding up the SC process to go green then the results of Singapore 08 shouldn't count either as the "face fixing" on that occasion was actually proven and completely turned the championship around... which would strip Hamilton of a title and give it back to the rightful winner Massa.

    A lot of double standards going on in comments sections at the moment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Well now we have a new precedent that we can see some racing in such situations which generates exciting finishes.


    If we only ever follow "precedents" life would be fairly boring. I've seen tweets from people who switched off with about 15 laps to go because it was fairly pedestrian but turned it back on when they got the sky sports alert on their phone about the SC. Sport is at its best when it is unpredictable.


    Masi is the race director and we got racing. If you want to watch a procession then go sit on a bridge over the M50 for a few hours.


    Oh and I think Merc got their commupence for Toto trying to persuade the RD over the Gio incident. Toto would rather risk a Marshalls life for a greater chance at a race win then win it racing.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 11,723 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    It's tainted in the same way Trump's 2nd term has been tainted by Biden winning the election.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,547 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    He did right away. He said it's a motor race and he wanted to see cars race



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,919 ✭✭✭jacool


    If he wanted to see cars race then why not 3, or more, instead of just 2?

    There were only 2 cars between Verstappen and Sainz. These cars weren't removed so Verstappen never had to look over his shoulder, as he should have had to do if "he wanted to see cars race". I'd say Masi will be gone now. He can go to UEFA and do their Champions League draws.

    Funny how no one is mentioning the massive advantage RB had earlier in the season (not only them to be fair) with the illegal flexible rear wings. Even when these finally got called out, the teams got a few weeks to "fix" them. Mercedes had complained about these consistently until they were fixed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,666 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    The Red Bull wing passed all the FIA tests so it wasn't illegal but Mercedes pushed their weight around to get the rules/tests changed mid-season. Funny that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,892 ✭✭✭✭Spook_ie


    Well this came up on my Google feed,

    In that race, McLaren driver Lando Norris was left in a precarious position after a power unit issue prompted smoke and fire to come from his car, and Masi was later criticised for ordering a safety car and then allowing it to stay out for a prolonged period.

    ”There’s a requirement in the sporting regulations to wave all the lapped cars past,” he later told Motorsport Week.


    So how come and why was it decided that not all cars should unlap in Abu Dhabi 2021?



  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 12,692 Mod ✭✭✭✭2011


    It is not "Funny how no one is mentioning the massive advantage RB had earlier in the season (not only them to be fair) with the illegal flexible rear wings", the thread is titled "Formula 1 Round 22 Abu Dhabi GP".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,547 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,222 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    Time to unfollow.

    It's going around in circles, when verstappen benefits from luck it's deemed that races and points are being handed to him, when he's on the opposite end of other driver errors it's his own fault but when Hamilton benefits its waved away and dismissed or its "but max got such and such in wherever".

    Anyway, hurrah for Verstappen WDC 2021.


    Oh, hope you all have a good Christmas.

    Post edited by Hijpo on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,811 ✭✭✭circadian


    Mercedes made a balls of the pit strategy, Hamilton should have just come in for softs, RB were clearly going to pit again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,445 ✭✭✭Gamb!t


    Its incredible how he kept his emotions in check after being so close to winning the championship.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,919 ✭✭✭jacool


    Fair point. The mention of Silverstone and Imola in the thread misled me. :(



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,197 ✭✭✭This is it


    RB would do the opposite to Mercedes. If Hamilton came in then Max would stay out for track position, it was luck that RB strategy worked with the SC but that's how it goes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,748 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    If Hamilton had pitted RB would not have. Maintaining track position and assuming that Masi would follow procudure was the smart call. RB took a chance the incident would be cleared quicker than it was, allowing racing to resume for the final lap. It wasn't cleared in time for process, but that didn't matter to Masi.

    Hamilton arguable should have pitted under the VSC but if he had, Max would not have so Hamilton would have had to make up the distance and pass him.

    As it was, Hamilton stayed out - had a more than comfortable lead with a few laps to go, the race should have ended under the SC as it turned out, and Hamilton would have been champion.

    If Masi had followed correct procedure, Hamilton would be champion - so it was not the Pit call that cost him, it was Masi deciding not all cars need to be unlapped and that the saety car can come in immediately rather than the following lap is the regulations state.

    And the race ending under Yellows/SC would be no more unfortunate for Max because without the SC in the first place he wasn't getting close to Hamilton in the last laps anyway.



Advertisement