Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

New Alternative News Channel "GB News" chaired by Andrew Neil launching - read OP before posting

1203204206208209279

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,158 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I know that, but that wasn't my point that you conveniently ignored.

    Are you saying that the only bias in reporting news and giving opinions on TV is on the right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,200 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Quote me where I said this please? Otherwise, please stop fabricating absurd nonsense.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,039 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    Can you define left and right? I'm not sure we're all on the same page.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,158 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    So why is it that only the right that need their own special news channel with no dissent whatsoever?


    Quote me where I said this please? Otherwise, please stop fabricating absurd nonsense.


    The keywords here are 'Only the right' which presupposes that anyone else has no news channel that leans their way.

    Your short, blunt, and dismissive replies suggest you want to perhaps pull back from your own absurd statement that was not thought out.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Agreed.

    I've been dealing with this line of argument for quite some time. Thank goodness you're calling it out.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,324 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Frankly something like "The Morning Star" is just as absurd as GB News.

    However what it doesn't have is someone slavishly defending and deflecting any and all criticisms and making excuses for it's obvious bias and outputs.

    The Morning Star, just like GB News is a fringe outlet serving a tiny audience.

    Doubt there's any here that would disagree on the Morning Star , but at least one will try to tell us that the sunny uplands are just around the corner for GB News and that there's a massive audience for it's output if only they could find their way to watching it.

    I don't think anyone here has a particular issue with the existence of GB News or indeed any other media outlet regardless of their political bent. Each to their own and all that.

    This entire thread is one person desperately trying to convince everyone (and perhaps themselves) that more than a handful are remotely interested in what GB News has to say.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,039 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    I'm not sure you can compare newspapers and TV channels, the budgets aren't on the same scale. GB News must be hemorrhaging money at some rate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,076 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Never even heard of the Morning Star tbh...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I'd seen the Morning Star here and there, but it was always incredibly niche and blatantly editorialised to the Nth degree. Nobody would seriously claim it was a major voice in print media - it's barely mainstream. Good luck finding it in your local Centra (happy to stand corrected, long time since I bought a newspaper).

    Now, neither is GB News; it ain't mainstream ATM. But the difference here is 1) the channel has a much higher budget 2) notably famous names in right wing contrarian circles formed the spine of the channel and 3) is broadcasting nationally as a new "major" player in television news (see 1)). GB News has sought to exist in the mainstream, the Morning Star doesn't exist anywhere near that altitude. If anything, it has cut a figure as something intentionally counter cultural.

    Comparisons here are apples and oranges and if we want to compare equally or fairly, you'd have to find a polemical left wing TV station, obsessed with (say) Purity Tests and making continuous screeds along the same limited topics. And one trying hard to establish the veneer of legitimacy.

    And the only reason we are still here reading about the station, is TBH, one posters slavish obsession to chart it's existence as some meteoric rise of a conservatism that isn't as big a deal as they say.

    Post edited by pixelburp on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,200 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Can you name a left wing equivalent of GB News in the UK? With evidence, please? Otherwise, my comment is spot on.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,200 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I've been here a decade and the only time I've ever even seen a physical copy is once when I was on a train in Brighton and a woman beside me gave me her copy to read. I didn't ask for it. I don't see it in shops. Citing it in a thread about a failing TV channel is a bit desperate.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think you forget that GB News has left-wing staff, too.

    Indeed Andrew Doyle is very vocal on the whole woke thing, but he himself identifies with the Left and voted Labour in recent past elections.

    Woke and being of the Right are not synonymous - especially when you consider how many traditional Labour voters brought Boris Johnson to power and who are largely opposed to political correctness etc.

    But your question was answered earlier, Channel 4 is as to the Left as GB News is to the Right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,200 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    But your question was answered earlier, Channel 4 is as to the Left as GB News is to the Right.

    Nothing was answered. Given that you've yet again have nothing to back up your hysterical reaction to a perfectly logical statement, I'm going to conclude that you have nothing. Again.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If you believe that Channel 4 is right-wing, that's your choice.

    Most people accept that Channel 4 is bent to the Left and challenges conservatism to a far greater extent than every other mainstream UK channel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,076 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Strawman - No one said Channel 4 was right wing. The claim was that it's not bent to any one side to the same level that GB News is bent to the right. Which is true, as Channel 4 falls under far more stringent rules as a publicly funded ACTUAL news organisation and therefore has a much greater responsibility to remain impartial. There's also the fact that the Conservatives have been in power for over 10 years, and so there would be more challenging and pieces of Conservative policies as they are the party in power.



  • Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Channel 4 News has incredibly high editorial standards, highly respected and runs for half an hour each day. So it's not exactly similar to a 24 hour news channel that basically consists of rants rather than news reporting. So they're really not remotely equivalent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,948 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Strawman. Logical fallacy

    Your debating technique is, if anything, getting worse rather than improving as you'd expect after hundreds of pages.

    Core logical fallacies. Evasion, distraction, denial.

    It doesn't actually work, except in your mind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,392 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    If Channel 4 is the left-wing corollary of GB News then how does the left-wing TV station's viewing figures compare to the right-wing TV station's viewing figures? What can one then infer from this disparity?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,200 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    We're back to making up nonsense, I see. I never said it was right wing.

    This is why I ask you for evidence. You can't keep peddling lies and expect to be taken in good faith.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,091 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Good post and a good summation of the cyclical nature of this thread.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,200 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Precisely. It's a professional channel with a good pedigree. GB News is a trolling YouTube channel pretending to be a News channel. It's an expensive facade but it's not my money they're wasting.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,158 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    That presupposes that all other news outlets, apart from GB News are bang on the centre-ground and don't lean left. Is that what you are saying?

    I guess you could be 'technically' correct that there is no dedicated overt left-wing news channel, but then some may argue that news outlets on the BBC, ITV and Channel 4 lean left, particularly in its editorial lines. The keyword here is 'overt'.

    Of course, needless to say, there are dozens of online outlets that lean both left and right. Young people tend to lean left and young people tend to watch less TV but more online media content, so why from a pure business point of view would one create a dedicated left-wing news channel, when the market is already flooded online anyway? If a young person wanted to watch and consume left-wing news, there is a plethora of content online for them to see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,158 ✭✭✭✭markodaly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,200 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Since you're determined to continue lying about what I've written, I'd best leave it there. I see you forgot to provide evidence again.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,324 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Not attempting to in the slightest.

    My point is that there are lots of "fringe" outlets across the political spectrum of varying size and that is perfectly fine.

    GB News is somewhat unique in that it is trying to be a large mainstream player while pandering to a fringe audience.

    As other have said here repeatedly , they'd be far better off and potentially profitable if they were just a YouTube channel instead of trying to compete with National broadcasters.

    There are plenty of quietly profitable YT channels out there serving small niche audiences , GB News could have been one of those.

    Instead they are a large scale high profile money pit surviving only on the good graces and deep pockets of their benefactors.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,158 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    I see you think that all UK News channels are bang on point and centrist... :)



  • Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Except GBN isn't really a news station. It's a 24 hour opinion channel. No news stories are broken by it etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,200 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The problem with the Youtube model is that it only works for individuals and very small production teams and even with only one person, it's a 7-day a week job with none of the benefits you'd get from a traditional job such as a pension or health insurance. So, GB News has none of the advantages of that model due to its bloat but all of the disadvantages of being a top heavy channel with no viewers.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,129 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Into the bargain, 99.9% of the people on this thread have never even heard of The Morning Star, irrespective of their views on the disaster that is Gbeebies.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,076 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Plus a lot of their staff (on and off screen) would be unlikely to stay if they moved purely to online. Working for a TV station or working for a Youtube channel are hugely different things to have on your CV.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement