Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Dun Laoghaire Traffic & Commuting Chat

1111112114116117144

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,430 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    DMURS is a farce of a thing. Biggest threat to safety, particularly cyclists in my opinion, in decades.

    I know of at least 10 schemes around Dublin where roads and junctions and roundabouts were revamped according to DMURS specifications and the inherent dangers they introduced had to be rowed back on after local outcry. It has removed left slips, narrowed turning radii and changed yield priorities in some instances.

    So bad was it that the 2013 version was substantially replaced in 2019. There was a supplement issued for Covid guidance, but in really it was toothless and without any sort of strategic basis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,273 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Freedom of choice, but it shouldn't be freedom of choice. You shouldn't be allowed drive and park your toxic fume spewing tank wherever you want. It infringes on other people. People used to say the same about smoking before it was banned indoors, they're taking our freedoms.

    Your so called freedom is wrecking things for other people. Private cars need to be cut out of our lives as much as possible especially in cities, whether granny wants to drive around Dun Laoghaire or not, and very slowly the tide is turning that way.

    And personally I couldn't care less if a few very old people can't get to certain places because of the banning of cars, tough. We must do what is best for the majority. I wont expect to be driven wherever I want to go when I'm old and decrepit, the world doesn't revolve around a tiny percentage of people who can't walk a few meters, and nor should it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,430 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    You showed your true colours there TM.

    The mark of a society is how it treats its most vulnerable and those with less of a voice. Thats why your zealotry won't be allowed succeed, in Dun Laoghaire or elsewhere.

    Personal private transport will change - is already changing in fact - and there will be a greater rebalancing of safety and accessibility, but it won't be to the exclusion of one mode or another. You might as well get that notion out of your head early on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,273 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    You're the only zealot here Larbs. Also are you telling me the likes of Berlin, Paris, and other cities that are removing cars from vast areas, are all treating the vulnerable terribly? Give me a break, the likes of you use the old and disabled to try and stop any change, it's pathetic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,430 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    When we develop out our public transport to the standard, relatively speaking, of Berlin, Paris and other cities, then we can have a legitimate in conversation on that level.

    The carrot must precede the stick, it really is the only credible game in town.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,273 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    so the old and vulnerable can get on the U-Bahn or Buses? Don't they need to be driven around?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,640 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    "When You’re Accustomed to Privilege, Equality Feels Like Oppression"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,430 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    That may be so Andy, but good luck fighting the well resourced, you might as well collaborate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 626 ✭✭✭Gareth Keenan




  • Posts: 846 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    "a person who is fanatical and uncompromising in pursuit of their religious, political, or other ideals."

    TM, Andrew and others are perfectly happy to take on third party opinions, defer to expert knowledge and give weight to real world evidence. Larbre and his ilk run away from all those things as soon as they run counter to their risible opinions, instead hiding in circlejerking each other's increasingly desperate snide andcondescending truisms that [b]never hold up to any scrutiny whatsoever[/b]. If they did hold up to scrutiny, any one of them would actually be able to defend the nonsense that they post and yet here we are.

    "😂"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,817 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    The people i agree with make excellent points, the others not so much....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,317 ✭✭✭patrickbrophy18


    Well, equality can feel like oppression when businesses have to comply with the increasing scrutiny and extortionate processes implemented by governments at the behest of social justice groups before they even get off the ground. In the context of Commuting and Traffic, such businesses will have to cave to the requirements of the DMURS along with the countless other rigours which cost them big in overheads. In my opinion, the DMURS often comes off as a socialists guide to road design where the requirements almost scrutinize the type of footfall to the affected businesses. Ergo, this puts limitations on the potential income which a business can yield.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,640 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Funnily enough, the evidence around the world shows clearly that measures like pedestrianisation greatly increase consumer spending. There's a reason why Grafton St has some of the highest rents in Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,430 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    And Oxford Street of London? Kurfürstendamm of Berlin? All have plenty of vehicle traffic.

    Grafton Street was always a hugely popular shopping street long before it was pedestrianised. Pedestrianisation has certainly enhanced it, but as part of a wider strategic city centre offering.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,047 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults


    The only way to develop public transport to even a halfway decent standard in Dún Laoghaire, is to remove as many cars from the roads as possible and replace on-street parking with bus lanes. Parked cars hinder buses on almost every road into and out of the town. Glenageary Rd and the top half of York Rd are currently the only places where doing so is illegal, but it still happens regardless, and is largely unpoliced. You'll be a long time waiting for a carrot to precede a stick because even if hundreds of new buses were thrown onto the roads, they'd still be trying to squeeze past cars.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,270 ✭✭✭Mav11


    Could you do that with a removal of on street parking? I'm not a great fan of traffic myself, but many of the residents have no other choice but to park on the street.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,430 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    You're right Mav. It works in cases where alternatives are available or provided, but as a panacea, Burt's suggestion is nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,047 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults


    They have other choices. But those choices would involve inconveniencing themselves, rather than just inconveniencing, you know, other people.

    Park elsewhere. Rent a secure parking space a short distance away. Or just get rid of the car and use public transport instead. Buses should not be forced to waste time squeezing past parked cars on roads that aren't wide enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,259 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Yes, if you buy a property without off street parking. You can’t rely on the public to provide you with parking in the public owned road outside your house.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,430 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Yes, within reason, you absolutely can, because it has been custom and practice for a century or more. So many roads of the mid to late 20th century were designed specifically with it in mind.

    Statements like the last two above from Burt and Ted simply do not reflect the real world.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,047 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults


    Smoking in pubs was custom and practice for a century or more. Obnoxious, selfish customs change, thankfully. Sometimes people need to be nudged in the right direction.

    There are too many cars nowadays to allow people to store them at their convenience in public areas. And they're bigger too. I can't think of a single road in or out of Dún Laoghaire that has on-street parking spaces wide enough to safely accommodate a modern parked car and passing buses. I know people who live in areas of Dublin where it's literally not possible to park outside their own houses. They solve this problem themselves either by renting secure spaces in the underground car park of a nearby apartment block, or getting rid of their cars altogether and availing of public transport and the occasional hire car.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,640 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    The real world that had people in Ireland parking their cars outside their houses in 1921 and before?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,259 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    A century. That’s a bit of a stretch. Many roads were built for horse and carts, bikes etc. Cars were an after though


    look at street view vs the pictures

    https://www.daft.ie/for-sale/terraced-house-10-breffni-terrace-breffni-road-sandycove-co-dublin/3581407



    I suggest you look at breffni road , all the houses there have just put off street parking in. For 500 years they have been parking on the road. The road is now much more passable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,430 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Screenshot_20211020-224724~2.png

    First car registered in Ireland, 1898.

    Number of cars in Ireland in 1914, 20,000.

    Now, it won't be too much of a leap, even for you, to imagine that not many average houses built before that had driveways to accommodate such cars. In fact the most of older parts of Dun Laoghaire would be an excellent example of that.

    So yes, that real world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,640 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    So you don't think those 20k cars would have been largely owned by the landed gentry with their big houses, driveways and garages and all that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,259 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    20,000 cars with a population of 4.3Million.

    are you really trying to suggest that 1914 and 2021 are comparable?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,270 ✭✭✭Mav11



    Sometimes people need to be nudged in the right direction.

    Seems to me what you are suggesting is less nudge and more coercion?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,430 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Nope, simply that cars have been parked on the public road in this Country since there have been cars. People like Burt and yourself seem determined to deny this easily verified fact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,259 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Not to the same he extent , the population has exploded as has car ownership. The status quo can’t remain



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,640 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Where's the public consultation on the impacts of the huge increases in car ownership?




Advertisement