Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Dun Laoghaire Traffic & Commuting Chat

1106107109111112144

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No, couldnt cycle down it so didnt bother.

    Dont drive to Dunlaoghaire anymore, used to shop in Tesco but too much hassle now, I drive down Deansgrange Road to Cornelscourt instead.

    If I cant go up and down Deansgrange Road I will drive through the Hollypark housing estate to get to Kill Avenue, motorists will always find alternative routes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,270 ✭✭✭Mav11


    where did i say an 11 year old would have a mandatory test,

    You didn't, I said it. Maybe if you read the post properly, you'd see that.

    If a 10 year old is caught unaccompanied then its the same process if you catch a 10 year old doing something else illegal (but a relatively minor offence).

    Few questions on that:

    Would you confiscate the bike and who would have responsibility? The Garda Traffic Corps or maybe a special unit would be set up.

    Would all children have to carry documents to prove their age and compliance with your proposed mandatory testing?

    How would you deal with a say, a 5 year old on their bike outside their house, but in a public place? Would they have to carry documents? Would you take their bike?

    Just asking, I have plenty more but we'll start with these.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,817 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    If you thought about it, a logical extension is that ownership of a bike would require registration of that ownership so that resolves most of your queries regarding documents, proof of age, compliance etc.

    Your straw child 5 year old, are they breaking the law or not? (Remember i said public road, thats different to public place) if they are then whats the question. Is it ok to commit illegal acts near your house now?

    As to confiscation and penalties etc i mean you would have to flesh all that out.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Stop the nonsense.

    This is about courtesy on the roads and this applies to cyclists too.

    No one has a problem with children on footpaths, the problem is adult males speeding.

    I saw one the other day, he couldnt be bothered waiting at the lights to get into the cycle lane on Carysfort Avenue.

    He crossed the road at speed and onto the footpath and then crossed Convent Road and into the cycle lane.If an elderly person or child came around the corner and into his path they would have been injured.

    This behaviour is going unchallenged and is being defended by the cycling lobby here, oh but compare speeding cyclist to the damage a car can cause, the issue is adult cyclists should not be breaking lights and they should not be on any footpaths.

    Its desperate that we need the RSA to waste money by having to run a campaign to tell cyclists how to behave but it is unavoidable now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,270 ✭✭✭Mav11


    Your straw child 5 year old, are they breaking the law or not? if they are then whats the question. Is it ok to commit illegal acts near your house now?

    And you accuse Andrew (#3235) of avoiding answering questions? Really??

    It seems that your knowledge of the application of the law or constitution is, limited at best, so really as it is your madcap proposal, it is up to you to flesh it out!!

    I can't wait!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,270 ✭✭✭Mav11




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,817 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    madcap proposal?

    improving road safety for everyone and putting some structures around cyclists as road users (with the intention of protecting young cyclists) is mad cap?

    Given that you have solely focused on that, am i to assume that my proposal of fining drivers for breaking red lights given we have and have had the technology to identify it happening for years is also mad cap?

    you are so intent on going out of your way to disagree with me that i have to assume that is your sole intention.

    I will be sure to attend your next lecture on constitutional law.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,270 ✭✭✭Mav11


    I will be sure to attend your next lecture on constitutional law.

    I suggest that you start with something more basic first, like the fundamentals of criminal law. No point in diving in at the deep end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,817 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    thanks for your considered advice ill be sure to give it the consideration it warrants.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,270 ✭✭✭Mav11


    You're welcome. Pro bono advice this time.😁



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,431 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    In think we may have drifted off topic somewhat.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,646 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Pat Kenny 'looks into it' every week on his show. That doesn't mean that anything is going to happen.

    The 98% is from the most recent RSA Speed Survey.

    The thing with cyclists is that they don't kill a few people each week, so if you're planning any clampdown on the road to improve safety, you're looking in the wrong place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,646 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Wait till you hear about cars, TP.

    If you want to protect young cyclists, get drivers to slow down, put their phones down, and overtake safely. You don't need new laws and regulations. You just need drivers to start obeying traffic laws.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,817 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    can you link the survey please as that doesnt tally with any that i can find.

    road safety is everyones responsibility, even cyclists.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,817 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    did i not say stricter enforcement on traffice offences would be desirable?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,475 ✭✭✭RosieJoe


    Another day of a lively discussion on this thread

    Untitled Image




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,646 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    It's everyone's responsibility to keep safe when I practice my knife throwing and fire eating routine outside your kid's school at going home time, not just mine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,817 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    you like to present yourself as a smart chap andrew, i presume you know that this doesnt support your accusation that 98% of drivers break urban speed limits.

    At best it would support the assertion that from a very small sample size that 98% of drivers break one urban speed limit.

    As for your knife throwing and fire eating routine, it makes sense now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭qb123


    Actually, according to a nationwide study by the Road Safety Authority, 98% of drivers break 30kph speed limits. Over half break 50kph limits. Extracts:

    The percentage of car drivers breaking the speed limit on urban roads was 52% (57% in 2016); when residential roads are excluded, this rises to 65% (71% in 2016) for all other urban national roads.

    At the Urban National 30km/h location, only 3 out of the 140 cars sampled was travelling at or under the 30 km/h speed limit. At one of the Urban Residential locations, a vehicle was recorded travelling at 67km/h.

    Full report:

    So, I think Andrew has some good statistical backing for what he claims. Not sure about others.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭qb123


    Study size is 16,672 vehicles btw.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,817 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    The sample size for the 30 km zone was 140 cars.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭qb123


    No, not all the 16,672 cars were surveyed in a 30kph zone. Sample size is naturally going to be smaller given limited scope of 30kph roads. But you can't say it's unrepresentative or that the data is being cherry picked. You're also studiously ignoring the fact that most drivers speed in urban areas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,817 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    I can say that saying 98 percent of drivers break urban speed limits is not an accurate statement. Which is what I said.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,317 ✭✭✭patrickbrophy18


    In an ideal world, there would be complete segregation between the road user groups and enforced at that. The very big nation wide problem is the complete lack of continuous i.e. non disruptive facilities.

    For example, it is a very common problem to see parking in cycle lanes as well as actual designated parking spots on them. This forces cyclists to take to the main carriageway as it creates an abrupt stop. Another issue is poor maintanence of cycle lanes which gives rise to pot holes which again is not conducive for the use there of.

    A lot of roads in the burrough of Dun Laoghaire itself are also two way, narrow and lack a footpath on some sections. Adding footpaths on some of these roads nevermind cycle lanes would encroach on the scarcity of road width between residential boundary walls. This holds true in large portions of Killiney, Dalkey, Glenageary and some parts of Sandycove.

    The road network in the burrough wasn't designed holistically i.e. on the macro level to comfortably allow seamless permeability for all road user groups from pedestrian and cyclists up to buses and trucks. Addressing these issues properly would require a mixture of making narrow two way roads one-way, a whole heap of CPOs and in extreme cases structural demolition or relocation. Structural relocation has not been explored nearly as much as it could be where the owners of said structures are sentimental about them or if they are listed.

    Consequently, the infrastructure in the burrow is a disjointed mess. Anyway, I'll leave it there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,431 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The Borough of Dun Laoghaire ceased to exist 27 years ago.

    And the ambling and varied nature of the streets in the area are a big part of its character. Who the hell wants to live in the middle of an American style grid of four-lane urban roads entirely hostile to pedestrians?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Not me anyway.

    And nor do I want my front garden CPOd either to make way for the childer to cycle to school.

    People who pay high rates of property tax have the right to invest int heir homes and gardens without worrying about officials drawing up plans to turn their gardens into cycling lanes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭qb123


    So we don't want four-lane roads hostile to pedestrians, nor do we want to CPO gardens. And I think the vast majority of people would agree with these sentiments. So the only viable alternative is to take space away from cars, painful as it may be. And the reason it's so painful is that we've spent the last 100 years orienting our towns and roads to cater for cars at the expense of pedestrians, bicycles and public transport. But it seems clear that he status quo has to change given our need to adapt for climate change and for an increased population in the country - the roads can't bear any more cars.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,270 ✭✭✭Mav11


    If I read it correctly, its only those who live in expensive houses and pay high rates of property tax that shouldn't be subject to the threat of CPO. The plebs can look after themselves.

    But that my interpretation, could be wrong?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No point in taking space away from cars to put in cycling lanes that arent used.

    This is just causing congestion and making other roads more dangerous.

    We cant put cycle lanes everywhere with out putting CPOs on gardens and you have to think how do you get into cycle lanes and how do you get out of them.

    The only solution is better public transport, more rent a car option, more car-sharing in new developments but covid has made many people not want to interract with others so giving up their own car will be difficult.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭qb123


    But...properly segregated cycle lanes are used when they're put there. The Coastal Mobility Route is evidence of this with over 5000 trips per week. And it's proved its worth through the winter months too - a noticeable amount of school children use it, for instance. Just because you would put your bicycle away at the first sign of inclement weather doesn't mean that everyone else does.



Advertisement