Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

FF/FG/Green Government - Part 3

1146147149151152747

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Be interesting to see how this Slaintecare situation evolves, just before the traditional, never saw it coming, people on trolleys in the corridor yuletide festivities. I wonder will the private care homes throw the tax payer a few bed spots?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Is this one of those ones were you are exempt if you have a big toe on each foot?

    THE DÁIL HAS passed a controversial amendment that allows funds to side-step 10% stamp duty if they lease back houses to the State for social housing.

    Last month, the government moved to introduce a new 10% rate of stamp duty on bulk purchases of 10 homes or more last month. 

    However, the amendment that came before the Dáil this evening will exempt institutional investors from the charge under these circumstances. Jul 7th 2021




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    I get great laugh when I read this type of thing:

    Councillor David McManus of Fine Gael supported the deal, saying that the country is in the middle of a housing crisis and that affordable and social housing is needed now, not in ten years' time.

    You would think Fine Gael only got into office this morning.

    Sure more of the same will fix it 😏



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    He's a fairly dimwitted individual that fella, witnessed him get torn to shreds one day when he was giving it large about (think it was Pearse Doherty) a shinner "leaking something" on twitter that they literally had obtained via get ready......


    Freedom of information. I'm not messing. 🤣


    He's fairly shameless that lad, wouldn't be the fizziest can of pop in the fridge if you get my drift.

    Post edited by McMurphy on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭dudley72




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    ...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Edit: forgot I was banned from this thread. Deleted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,831 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    This 1bn COVID bonus package is nothing more than good PR for a deeply unpopular government. Don't think anyone should be getting a "bonus" to be honest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,090 ✭✭✭skimpydoo




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭dudley72


    Why wouldn't people get a bonus?

    We have people sitting at home on their arse's on PUP the entire pandemic, yet we have front line workers risking their health and families health for what, a clap at the end of the day? we should take the money from the PUP and hand it to all of those people, especially the nurses in the HSE. PUP alone cost 6 billion.

    Not sure why anyone would complain about that?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,324 ✭✭✭Shebean


    So you understand that the state can pay a developer to build on our behalf? Well done. I am all on board.

    However, what we see is a developer building and then leasing or selling to us. That's something I've a problem with. I want opposition to block that.

    You are essentially selling that all the problems caused by FG and supported by FF, will now be solved, and about damn time too, by the very boyos caused it, by repeating some of the same things and copying the London model which everyone bar FF/FG/Greens say will fail. You'll excuse my unwillingness to buy that line of scutter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    So 68 millionaires in the Dail and many are landlords and property investors. I wonder might it colour government policy? Surely not? Is this why they support the tax payer leasing rentals? Say it ain't so?

    One-quarter of the 160 TDs are landowners or property investors, with some renting up to four properties.

    Fianna Fáil’s Seán Haughey owns properties that are estimated to be worth €2.8m, including two rentals in Kinsealy and Portmarnock, Co Dublin.

    Fine Gael TD Michael Creed, a former agriculture minister, is letting a commercial unit on the main street in Macroom, Co Cork, which includes three apartments. He is also renting out two other residential properties and lists his occupation as a landlord. His properties are estimated to be worth around €1.1m.

    Sinn Féin TD for Meath West Johnny Guirke, who was elected for the first time in 2020, owns four properties which are being let. Three are owned by him and the fourth is in the name of Moylagh Construction, a company he is director of. No other Sinn Féin TD is a landlord or has invested in property according to the Register of Members’ Interests for last year.

    In Cabinet, Health Minister Stephen Donnelly rents two properties – an apartment in Sandyford, Co Dublin and a house in Clara, Co Offaly.

    CAB should have taken everything off the Haugheys IMO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Deleted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,063 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    What makes you think FF or FG will succeed with housing in the south when they've failed in the south though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Because FF/FG are going to fix the mess made by FG/FF by doing the exact same things! :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    And make their friends and themselves wealthier while doing it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,090 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    If you went back in your Delorean 20 years, you will see what today will look once they finish their latest housing plan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,511 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    What has that got to do with the points I was making?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭dudley72


    Maybe you could point to the original article? I guess it is this one: https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/michael-healy-rae-is-d%C3%A1il-s-biggest-landlord-and-declares-nyt-shares-1.4496338

    Seems like selective copying out of the article. First off the Dail works based on a majority to pass and policies. You said 1/4 are landowners so straight away that's not a majority.

    Then we look into the numbers and it seems across all the parties we have landlords and landladies. Everyone is well aware of the Healy Rae family buying properties from Nama to build the empire, but it seems most people don't care about that carry on.

    I am struggling to see how 1/4 of the TD across all the parties have the ability to change policies to work in their benefit, maybe you could explain?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    I cannot post links.

    I pasted the part I was commenting on. You need to report any problems with my posting to the mods. Otherwise why I post some things and not others is not your concern.

    I posed the question would one quarter of the ministers being landlords and property investors colour their policies.

    You are answering my question by repeating it back to me.

    I don't know. I would guess yes as we have a number if liars and cheats at top levels.

    Having so many millionaires who made money on property during a decade long housing crisis is concerning to me.

    You've no concerns?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭dudley72


    As I said before, you can easily provide information on the article in question without linking the source.

    I didn't repeat back the question, I gave you my opinion. I asked a question which of course as par the course here you ignored. As I pointed out above 1/4 of TDs spread across multiple parties don't have a majority.

    Now the issue would be if a political party came into government which was also a large owner of properties. Then you would have a huge conflict of interest do you not think?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,122 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    As you say that the Landlord TD's are spread across all parties I am sure you have no problem providing the list of the Landlord TD's and the Parties that they belong too? Just so that it is clear and transparent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭dudley72




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    I didn't bother with your goal post shifting irrelevance.

    Would so many having skin in the property game colour policy?

    You can debate if their are enough to do that. That's valid. It doesn't negate my question or concern that we likely, IMO, have TD's who are in a position to vote for their pocket over the tax payer. That should concern everyone.

    Why are you intent on dismissing and dodging my question?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭dudley72


    I answered your question. Do you not think it would be more concerning that a political party with a huge interest in property was in power and have a majority? then they could actually change and implement policy to suit their requirements?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 141 ✭✭BKelly21


    We've been there and done that, FF were the party of the developers (do you remember the Galway tent?) which we replaced with FG, the party of the landlords and vulture funds.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,122 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    So you are answering a question with a question. I haven't see you answer any of the posters questions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,324 ✭✭✭Shebean


    Dodgy dealing FF/FG make their personal millions from property renting and investing, while making policies that suit investors and fail the public. Seems very clear cut to me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 451 ✭✭MBE220d


    Should Eoin O Broin be front and centre of SF housing policies, would being a renter also colour his policies, seem to me like he is anti-landlord, it's all about renters in his book because he rents.

    Funny that he cant afford to buy a house, must be awful for him to have to play along with his voters.



Advertisement