What does the future hold for Donald Trump? - threadbans in OP

On 18th August I asked you - quote: "What do you think of the reported quality of the "cyber-ninjas" looking for traces of bamboo in the ballots, that will apparently prove beyond doubt that China hacked the election, even though all this nonsense has been thrown out of court time and time again?"

You said in reply on 19th August, quote: "Sorry, don't know anything about that and, honestly, not worth my time to look into it."

What part of your reply indicates that you care about the quality of the election?

I also followed it up saying I guess they're good because democrats are afraid of what they find and I believe I noted somewhere along the line that I guess they seemed to be okay because the majority of the Senate put their confidence in them. Not good enough for you?

I also noted in a prior post that there are too many things that didn't make sense about the results (and listed them) and therefore in my opinion a forensic audit was warranted. Sorry, I'm not about to repeat my self over and over and over and over and over again. If you are interested in what I comment then please take the time to read what I have written. I answered a lot of questions here thrown at me from those worthy of a reply. That may sound a bit snarky, and a apologize, but put yourself in my shoes regarding all the questions thrown my way over many pages. Would you want to keep repeating yourself with the same answer to numerous posters asking basically the same question?

Tbf vampires can't use mirrors, so...

So what is the difference between a forensic audit and a regular audit?

😪

I spent all of my Soro's money Banie.

Two words: Trayvon Martin.

In practice, from what I can see from numerous court judgements, if a gun-toting Yank fears that their life is in danger from somebody else (correctly or not) and shoots them dead, they will get away with it.

It's why "Karens" (I actually hate the misuse of this proper noun because I know some especially charming people called Karen, but then, they all live over here) calling the police on "suspicious" people, eg bird watchers, kids in swimming pools, because they don't like the look of them is rightly considered to be such a dangerous thing to do. If the police believe you and shoot first and kill someone, they will get away with it.

As would the "Karen" if she had a derringer packed in her pocket book.

I think the only thing the Democrats are afraid of is that these "cyber ninjas" are Trump-biased. I don't particularly see anything wrong with that. Now that you're (apparently) concerned about the quality of the audits, I assume you're aware that these cyber-ninjas have already refused to cooperate with congressional oversight of the probe, and have no prior election-auditing experience. Does that cause you any doubt about whether their findings can be trusted?

Just on the second part - with the greatest of respect, you've spent the last few months generally avoiding answering questions put to you. It's a bit rich of you to now accuse others of not reading what you've been saying. I'll leave it at that.

Most damning of all in her judgemewnt she said

...and instructs the lawyers to complete at least 12 hours of legal education within the next six months on election law and pleading standards. 😂

Before the George Zimmerman case I’d never heard of this law, and then John Oliver did a segment on it, which kind of built on my limited knowledge of it ,and it’s even more batshit that I’d believed. There seems to be no actual threshold a person needs to achieve before firing a gun under this law.

Democrats go full Fascist which isn't surprising with old Nancy.

McCarthyism anyone?

zY

What points do you agree with and why?

I'm sure glad Tim Pool and his brand of grifting BS wasn't around in the 40s, because he would have a video about how the Allies were bigger fascists than the Nazis were because they even arrested Karl Donitz.

Flip the situation - have a Democrat do as Trump did on January 6th and watch the complete meltdown had by virtually every single commentator on the 'new right'. It would be hard to fathom the ferocity considering their rage over a tan suit.

Yes, what Trump did was that serious, and every activist of his should be looked into in order to see if they had expressed support for his actions on that day, and his aggressive pushing of the completely invented claim of election fraud, and be sanctioned for it.

It was determined through investigation Martin attacked the community watch individual, beating on him, and was attempting to get hold of his gun in the scuffle.

No it wasn't.

It was determined that that's what MIGHT have happened. There were only two witnesses and one of them was dead by the time the cops came. And as Zimmerman was on trial for murder and Martin was already dead, the benefit of the doubt goes to the accused. So he got away with killing a 17 year old kid.

And even if that WAS what happened, who was at fault? The kid who had been walking home from the candy store minding his own business, or the paranoid blubber butt who had made a "Karen call" to the cops saying that there was somebody behaving suspiciously in his area? ie Wearing a hoodie on his head after dark while being black (it was raining); walking in a meandering seemingly directionless way (he was engrossed in a phone call with his girlfriend) and not being known to the man with the gun (he didn't live in the area normally but he was staying in the area with his father as an invited guest of a local woman)?

Remember that the kid actually ran away from the man with the gun, spooked by the weird older man who was stalking him. It was only after Zimmerman chased him (despite being specifically told NOT to by the police dispatcher) that the fight ensued.

Many people in America rejoiced at the not guilty verdict and then seem bewildered when the "Black Lives Matter" movement explodes a few years later. You don't get away with excusing irresponsible gun toting paranoiacs who provoke unarmed kids into fights and then claim that they have a right to shoot to kill because THEIR lives are threatened by THEIR OWN guns!!! It mystifies me how so many Americans wanted to absolve Zimmerman of wrong doing. In any decent society he'd still be chewing his pillow in prison.

And good thing too.