All Covid-19 measures are permanent, don't be a boiling frog!

Cool. Link to these numbers and explain how you got them.

Don't just avoid this. By avoiding it, you're admitting it's not actually true.

Ok. You can't back up you claim. You're admitting it's not actually true. Great.

Why should anyone take the rest of your silly hyperbolic rant seriously when it's all predicated on a factoid that at best you can't support or at worst is a outright lie.

Also maybe you could do what conspiracy theorists haven't been able to for the last nearly 200 posts?

Can you explain which measures are going to be permanent? Why will they be permanent? How do they benefit the people behind the conspiracy you believe exists?

Also remember that conspiracy theorists throughout this thread have been dismissing the 4.1 million deaths from covid as insignificant and not worth worrying over.

Yet somehow 2000 deaths (which grofus has admitted can't be shown to be due to the vaccine) are evidence of a global conspiracy to kill us all?

If you can back it up, do so.

This pretending that you are too good to back up your claim is simply not going to work. No one is going to believe this. No one is that stupid.

You can't provide the evidence you claim to have, because your claim isn't true.

If this isn't the case, provide your evidence.

If you are going to continue to refuse to do this, then we can all assume that this is you admitting that you can't do it.

You could also just admit this, but experience with conspiracy theorists tells me that you aren't going to do this.

And again, it's a bit bizarre to whinge about me not answering your silly vague question while at the same time declaring that you're not going to answer my direct one. And also again, all while we're nearing page 200 of conspiracy theorists ignoring the same central question.

So did you not read all of that website?

Particularly the very large, very clear, very prominent disclaimers it has?

https://www.adrreports.eu/en/understanding_reports.html

Also this page that specifically comments on conspiracy theorists and anti vaxxers looking for stuff to support their claims:

https://www.adrreports.eu/en/covid19_message.html

So why are you claiming that this site says that the vaccine killed 7000 people?

The site itself specifically states that it's not saying that.

Why lie?

But is the evidence for these side effects the same as your lie about the evidence you had to support the number of deaths?

Remember also, that covid has killed 4.1 million people and left many with permanent injuries also. Why do you dismiss those numbers?

Is it not disgusting to lie and promote misinformation during a pandemic?

Why are you ignoring my other post where I show that you are lying about your source for the side effects of the vaccines?

Like with the deaths, the adverse reaction reports cannot be solely used to link vaccines to specific side effects or make judgements about how often they occur. You have claimed that thousands of people will be permanently harmed by Tozinmeran. The adverse reaction reports cannot support that claim. Hence you are lying.

Why do you have to lie to support your conspiracy theory?

How is ignoring my posts and other questions different from "putting your head in the sand?"

Did you read your own link?

Adrreports.eu

"The information on this website relates to suspected side effects , i.e. medical events that have been observed following the use of a medicine, but which are not necessarily related to or caused by the medicine.

Information on suspected side effects should not be interpreted as meaning that the medicine or the active substance causes the observed effect or is unsafe to use. Only a detailed evaluation and scientific assessment of all available data allows for robust conclusions to be drawn on the benefits and risks of a medicine.

The European Medicines Agency publishes these data so that its stakeholders, including the general public, can access information that European regulatory authorities use to review the safety of a medicine or active substance. Transparency is a key guiding principle of the Agency."

Which part of the article is incorrect?

"It only makes sense that fully vaccinated people can pass through borders (or go to e.g. large events)." Why? back at you

Don't think any of this makes any sense, period. None of these vaccines claim to prevent infection or re-transmission. (I've personally seen over a dozen twice vaccinated people return positive PCR tests results in the last two weeks alone). Correct me if I'm wrong, I believe the main marketing sell is to reduce potential hospitalisation of those exposed.

Safe to say, I've probably received more vaccination shots than over 99% of those my age group, 50's, never been an issue. So find the current goings on very worrying, like something from the inquisition, anyone daring to question the one true narrative is instantly labelled anti-vaxx, conspiracy theorist.

Hi, Sorry. You seem to have missed my posts entirely.

I showed that you were lying about the evidence you claimed to have.

Do you not have a response to this? Why are you ignoring it?

You understand that everyone else saw my post and by refusing to address or even acknowledge it, you're kind of killing your own credibility, right?

Why do you think ignoring my post and other points and questions is helping you?

All the nutters have gone quiet havent they? Theres a palpable sense of regret everywhere at the moment. Their little predictions have been proven to be total nonsense. Theyve been had.