Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Dee Forbes banging the RTE TV licence drum again 60m uncollected fee *poll not working - pl ignore*

1230231233235236466

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,516 ✭✭✭arctictree


    yabadabado wrote: »
    Is there a reason why all the top earners who seem to be contractors rather than employees can't just be offered a much lower contract when it comes around for renegotiations ?

    If the top earners are contractors, can they not just do jobs for other stations at the same time? Isn't there some revenue rule that you can't work exclusively for one company as a contractor?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,410 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    McMurphy wrote: »
    Does landlord have to pay the license fee for his tenants television?

    No, it is the occupier who must pay.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,582 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    Floppybits wrote: »
    Sure the presenters are so in demand by other stations world wide that they would have no problem getting a new job right away.
    :D It's time this was tested.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,980 ✭✭✭buried


    Was always surprised that the troika never called a halt to this nepotistic money sucking organisation. Did none of them look at the books and ask any of the various ministers of communications why some lads that are only qualified to pull balls out of a lotto machine are in receipt of a near 500,000 euro yearly wage?

    Bullet The Blue Shirts



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,051 ✭✭✭✭Odyssey 2005


    yabadabado wrote: »
    Is there a reason why all the top earners who seem to be contractors rather than employees can't just be offered a much lower contract when it comes around for renegotiations ?

    No .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,410 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Feisar wrote: »
    I’m all for a public service broadcaster, not the bloated blimp that is RTE.

    Really all we need to do is decide what sort of public service broadcasting service we want and how we want to pay for it.

    Can't be that difficult, can it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,702 ✭✭✭dhaughton99


    Id say the pension costs are astronomical.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 556 ✭✭✭shtpEdthePlum


    tenor.gif
    Joe Duffy cost the taxpayer 150k today because he slandered Donnacha O'Laoighre on air. RTÉ paid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,051 ✭✭✭✭Odyssey 2005


    Joe Duffy cost the taxpayer 150k today because he slandered Donnacha O'Laoighre on air. RTÉ paid.

    No they didn't
    We did !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,980 ✭✭✭buried


    elperello wrote: »
    Really all we need to do is decide what sort of public service broadcasting service we want and how we want to pay for it.

    Can't be that difficult, can it?

    Well, it is difficult when nobody even bothers to genuinely ask the citizens what sort of service we are willing to pay for. All we are told is 'pay the licence or end up in court'

    Bullet The Blue Shirts



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,410 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    buried wrote: »
    Well, it is difficult when nobody even bothers to genuinely ask the citizens what sort of service we are willing to pay for. All we are told is 'pay the licence or end up in court'

    Doesn't have to be that way.

    A proper process to decide on the shape of PBS we want and pay for it from direct taxation is my solution.

    We end up with a sustainable PBS free at point of use just like radio is today.

    What's not to like?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    elperello wrote: »
    No, it is the occupier who must pay.

    I thought what you posted sounded kind of unbelievable, and I'm not having a go, just couldn't understand how landlords would be expected to pay TV licenses for the televisions their tenants brought to the landlords house.

    We pay the license here, (the wife insists) not entirely sure why as it's not something we avail of a lot (RTE) and streaming is definitely about 99% of what's on here anyway, and TV's most definitely aren't required to stream it. I'm talking Netflix, Disney Plus, Hulu, Plex, Emby and IPTV.

    The TV license business model is doomed I think.


  • Posts: 2,752 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    RTE should be modelled based on the opinions of men in their 30’s and 40’s.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,980 ✭✭✭buried


    elperello wrote: »
    A proper process to decide on the shape of PBS we want and pay for it from direct taxation is my solution.

    Yeah I like it and I'm all for it too, but lets be realistic, do you see any minister of communications push for this sort of agenda? I mean, this sort of thing is so simple to organise, the government can and more importantly have set up this sort of public debate for plenty of other agenda's, so why haven't they done it for this?

    Bullet The Blue Shirts



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,968 ✭✭✭✭EmmetSpiceland


    dubrov wrote: »
    5) I doubt that is true given the numbers paying and the numbers complaining on boards.

    Ah now, if boards reflected “real life” then Peter Casey would be president and Michael O’Leary would be running every public service.

    “It matters not what someone is born, but what they grow to be” - A. Dumbledore

    “It is not blood that makes you Irish but a willingness to be part of the Irish nation” - Thomas Davis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,410 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    McMurphy wrote: »
    I thought what you posted sounded kind of unbelievable, and I'm not having a go, just couldn't understand how landlords would be expected to pay TV licenses for the televisions their tenants brought to the landlords house.

    We pay the license here, (the wife insists) not entirely sure why as it's not something we avail of a lot (RTE) and streaming is definitely about 99% of what's on here anyway, and TV's most definitely aren't required to stream it. I'm talking Netflix, Disney Plus, Hulu, Plex, Emby and IPTV.

    The TV license business model is doomed I think.

    Yes, it's the landlord who owns the property but it's the tenant's home.

    In years to come people will look back on the TV licence as something like the window tax in the 19th century.

    It's a complete anachronism which is long past it's sell by date.


  • Posts: 2,752 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    buried wrote: »
    Yeah I like it and I'm all for it too, but lets be realistic, do you see any minister of communications push for this sort of agenda? I mean, this sort of thing is so simple to organise, the government can and more importantly have set up this sort of public debate for plenty of other agenda's, so why haven't they done it for this?

    Eh, we have a broadcasting authority, dude. They are always having public consultations. Check out their website. You can write a philosophical essay on RTE if you like and they’ll read it.

    And this. This closed a fortnight ago.

    https://www.rte.ie/eile/2021/0209/1196058-have-your-say-about-rte/


    RTÉ is preparing a new Public Service Statement – this will be our commitment to you, the audience. We want to understand what you think about RTÉ and what you want from it. Your views will guide what we will do over the years ahead.

    All opinions are welcome, whether you regularly consume RTÉ's television, radio or online services, or whether you don't. The survey will remain open for five weeks, until Sunday 21st March 2021.



    Still, giving out on the internet seems to be more effective.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 908 ✭✭✭French Toast


    Writing's on the wall for RTE. A dinosaur of an organisation.


  • Posts: 2,752 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Ah now, if boards reflected “real life” then Peter Casey would be president and Michael O’Leary would be running every public service.

    Lot of ‘common sense’ and anti ‘woke’ content. The voice of the white man in his 30’s is in danger of getting drowned out otherwise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,980 ✭✭✭buried


    Still, giving out on the internet seems to be more effective.

    Don't worry dude, I took part in the thing but I can bet you my house and entire possessions that the few basic measures I wanted to see happen have more chance of happening than a banshee clambering down my chimney this very minute and giving me a lapdance in my living room.

    Bullet The Blue Shirts



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,752 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    buried wrote: »
    Don't worry dude, I took part in the thing but I can bet you my house and entire possessions that the few basic measures I wanted to see happen have more chance of happening than a banshee clambering down my chimney this very minute and giving me a lapdance in my living room

    The thing about consultations is that they take a snapshot of public opinion instead of just listening to your opinion. As humbling as that might be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,171 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Writing's on the wall for RTE. A dinosaur of an organisation.

    But it keeps coming back from the brink of extinction miraculously.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,980 ✭✭✭buried


    The thing about consultations is that they take a snapshot of public opinion instead of just listening to your opinion. As humbling as that might be.

    Yeah because the entire scope of the country is totally fine with lads basically only qualified to pull balls out of a lotto machine in receipt of yearly salaries of 500,000 euros. Its only little old me that has a problem with it.

    Bullet The Blue Shirts



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,915 ✭✭✭The J Stands for Jay


    Eh, we have a broadcasting authority, dude. They are always having public consultations. Check out their website. You can write a philosophical essay on RTE if you like and they’ll read it.

    And this. This closed a fortnight ago.

    https://www.rte.ie/eile/2021/0209/1196058-have-your-say-about-rte/


    RTÉ is preparing a new Public Service Statement – this will be our commitment to you, the audience. We want to understand what you think about RTÉ and what you want from it. Your views will guide what we will do over the years ahead.

    All opinions are welcome, whether you regularly consume RTÉ's television, radio or online services, or whether you don't. The survey will remain open for five weeks, until Sunday 21st March 2021.



    Still, giving out on the internet seems to be more effective.

    This was brought up on another thread, and it looks like a good few from here (me included) took part. The questions were structured to only allow for the answers rte wanted. No real.opinions will be gathered.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 22,058 Mod ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    I'm sure the BBC and Channel 4 would fight to get Tubs with his misery slot, "Have you any Irish ancestry?" and rigid "stick to the questions" style of interview technique.

    Graham Norton and Jonathan Ross must be biting their nails hoping more money is thrown at RTE.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,038 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    RTE should be modelled based on the opinions of men in their 30’s and 40’s.

    Why not

    We pay for the fcuking thing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,410 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    buried wrote: »
    Yeah because the entire scope of the country is totally fine with lads basically only qualified to pull balls out of a lotto machine in receipt of yearly salaries of 500,000 euros. Its only little old me that has a problem with it.

    A little exaggeration perhaps but no matter, you are definitely not alone but most likely in a minority.

    That's not to deny you your right to speak your opinion but a little context is no harm.

    There is another long running thread about RTE on this very forum where the vast majority of posters have little time for our national broadcaster.

    In the poll attached to that thread only 29.56% want to scrap RTE altogether.

    I think there is broad support for a PBS among most of the population.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,242 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    Ah now, if boards reflected “real life” then Peter Casey would be president and Michael O’Leary would be running every public service.

    a man can dream....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,410 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    McGaggs wrote: »
    This was brought up on another thread, and it looks like a good few from here (me included) took part. The questions were structured to only allow for the answers rte wanted. No real.opinions will be gathered.

    I did it too and there were sections where you could write in your own free range opinions.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,980 ✭✭✭buried


    elperello wrote: »
    In the poll attached to that thread only 29.56% want to scrap RTE altogether.

    And remind us all there what the percentage ratio on that poll concerning reducing salaries is, elprello?

    Bullet The Blue Shirts



Advertisement