Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Liverpool FC Team Talk, Gossip, Rumours 2020/2021

1196197199201202338

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,779 ✭✭✭1o059k7ewrqj3n


    Attached picture

    200.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,674 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Enzokk wrote: »
    It in no way contributes to him falling down a few seconds later. He falls down because he is trying to keep Salah away from the ball and is arching his body in such a way that he overbalances and falls over.

    But it was a foul, regardless of whether it ultimately relates to him falling over or not is moot, he was fouled and a free out was given which was the correct decision for that passage of play.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,539 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Christ this is tedious


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,955 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    But it was a foul, regardless of whether it ultimately relates to him falling over or not is moot, he was fouled and a free out was given which was the correct decision for that passage of play.

    But was he fouled ?
    Maguire ran backwards with his arse out into Salah with no intention or attempt of playing the ball and they both fell over ,

    IF that happened in the middle of the pitch there is no way your getting a free kick

    Doesn't really matter as it didn't effect anything just one of those weird moments in a match , Ref should have said play on as neither player was in control of the ball ,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,674 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    rob316 wrote: »
    Christ this is tedious

    Are non Liverpool fans not allowed to post in here or something because I must have missed the memo?

    I was commenting on the incident that was on topic of the thread, as per the rules of the charter. If you have an issue with that perhaps report my post and let the mods deal with it rather than making snarky comments?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,368 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    I'm still baffled by this foul given against Salah btw

    wzMqRAO.gif




    Clear obstruction. A five year old can see that, but not a seasoned ref. Sad


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,204 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    But it was a foul, regardless of whether it ultimately relates to him falling over or not is moot, he was fouled and a free out was given which was the correct decision for that passage of play.


    No it wasn't. There was no foul, but it is one that is given all the time for defenders. It's the same with goalkeepers sometimes falling over their own defenders in the box and getting a free kick. Not a foul but given most of the time.

    Just so you don't feel offended, this is not on Maguire as Liverpool defenders would benefit from decisions like this as well, doesn't mean its a foul.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,190 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    Nah worse one was the two footed lunge on Milner V Southampton where he was told to get back up and Liverpool didn't even get a free kick

    Pickford on Van Dijk. Should've been a straight red.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,204 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    Are non Liverpool fans not allowed to post in here or something because I must have missed the memo?

    I was commenting on the incident that was on topic of the thread, as per the rules of the charter. If you have an issue with that perhaps report my post and let the mods deal with it rather than making snarky comments?


    You clipped a moment that Salah had his hand on Maguires shoulder as proof this was a foul. Before that Maguire has his arms all over Salah, but you don't see us moaning about that being a foul because it isn't. What isn't a foul is Maguire falling over because he miscontrolled the ball and then blocked Salah and then fell over.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,674 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    But was he fouled ?
    Maguire ran backwards with his arse out into Salah with no intention or attempt of playing the ball and they both fell over ,

    IF that happened in the middle of the pitch there is no way your getting a free kick

    Doesn't really matter as it didn't effect anything just one of those weird moments in a match , Ref should have said play on as neither player was in control of the ball ,

    That's what I was asking. To me it looks like salah had a little tug on Maguires shoulder / upper arm as they were leaving the box which would be a foul ie he (Salah) tried to impede Maguires run. Whether the whistle was blown immediately or 2/3 seconds after the tug is largely irrelevant if that is indeed what it was blown for rather than HMs falling over.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,368 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    Serious lack of faith in Williams and Philips , playing Henderson there. I'd play Philips week in week out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,674 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Enzokk wrote: »
    What isn't a foul is Maguire falling over because he miscontrolled the ball and then blocked Salah and then fell over.

    100% agree there hoss, I was merely postulating that perhaps it was the little tug rather than the fall over that was the reason for the free. Anyway, I've given my opinion so will leave it there, cheers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,955 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    That's what I was asking. To me it looks like salah had a little tug on Maguires shoulder / upper arm as they were leaving the box which would be a foul ie he (Salah) tried to impede Maguires run. Whether the whistle was blown immediately or 2/3 seconds after the tug is largely irrelevant if that is indeed what it was blown for rather than HMs falling over.

    To me it looks like Maguire throws his arm and body across Salah as they leave the box and the fact Salah moves away and gives Maguire no resistance means Maguire has to scramble to keep his feet and eventually falls over ,


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,779 ✭✭✭✭jayo26


    That's what I was asking. To me it looks like salah had a little tug on Maguires shoulder / upper arm as they were leaving the box which would be a foul ie he (Salah) tried to impede Maguires run. Whether the whistle was blown immediately or 2/3 seconds after the tug is largely irrelevant if that is indeed what it was blown for rather than HMs falling over.

    I think you're correct in this assessment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,375 ✭✭✭brevity


    Ahhh it's nothing imo. Frustrating and maybe a bit cynical by Maguire but I don't think it's anything to be too annoyed about. Some of the var stuff is much more annoying.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,279 ✭✭✭✭Utopia Parkway


    I'm still baffled by this foul given against Salah btw

    wzMqRAO.gif

    Dragged Salah down if anything. The reaction of the players is usually instructive and Salah is fuming which is unlike him.

    Simultaneously clever and clumsy by McGuire.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,157 ✭✭✭Markitron


    Dragged Salah down if anything. The reaction of the players is usually instructive and Salah is fuming which is unlike him.

    Simultaneously clever and clumsy by McGuire.

    Simultaneously lucky and clumsy more like


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think we should take a 6 month punt on Sokratis....

    I'm not Klopp though, trust Klopp obviously...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,955 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    Fieldog wrote: »
    I think we should take a 6 month punt on Sokratis....

    I'm not Klopp though, trust Klopp obviously...

    No he is like that anti CB to what we would look for


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,955 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    Serious question how come no jurno's asked Klopp about Keita
    Didn't he say it was nothing serious and here we are nearly a month later and still no sigh of him,
    We score so many more goals when Naby is involved ,


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,157 ✭✭✭Markitron


    Fieldog wrote: »
    I think we should take a 6 month punt on Sokratis....

    I'm not Klopp though, trust Klopp obviously...

    I wouldn't be arsed myself but I wouldn't rule out Klopp doing it, not after Caulker.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,539 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    He's 32 he'll be looking for far more than 6 months.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 386 ✭✭radiata


    Serious question how come no jurno's asked Klopp about Keita
    Didn't he say it was nothing serious and here we are nearly a month later and still no sigh of him,
    We score so many more goals when Naby is involved ,

    Because it's Keita, so presumed out for another while.
    He's so frustrating. I was just looking at his stats, he has played a total of 2580 minutes or the equivalent of just under 29 games in the premier league for Liverpool since he joined, out of a possible 94 games.
    All from little niggles that drag on for months.
    Hope to fcuk Matip is back too, Gomez has still played more than him this year!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,204 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    So some fixture changes for TV,

    https://twitter.com/LFC/status/1351922441216524289?s=20

    Now between the Man City match on the 7th and Leicester on the 13th we have a potential 5th round match on the 10th February. So it would again mean a Wednesday and then midday Saturday match if we win on Sunday against United. At the very least it would mean another day out for the squad players for that match I would think.

    Leicester is playing against Brentford in the 4th round so if they make it out and we get knocked out we have more rest between the match. They could lose and we win, which would mean we would have less time to prepare again. Interesting times ahead.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,779 ✭✭✭1o059k7ewrqj3n


    Surely the Greek chap on a free is a no brainer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,158 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    Feb games

    February Team TV
    3rd Brighton BT Sport
    7th Man City Sky Sports
    13th Leicester (a) BT Sport
    16th RB Leipzig (GER) (a) BT Sport / RTE
    20th Everton Sky Sports
    27th Sheff Utd (a) TBC

    ******



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,955 ✭✭✭✭yourdeadwright


    Feb games

    February Team TV
    3rd Brighton (a) BT Sport
    7th Man City Sky Sports
    13th Leicester (a) BT Sport
    16th RB Leipzig (GER) (a) BT Sport / RTE
    20th Everton Sky Sports
    27th Sheff Utd (a) TBC

    We already played Brighton away ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,424 ✭✭✭.G.


    We already played Brighton away ?

    They're letting us play it again cos we were robbed at the end :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,143 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    rob316 wrote: »
    He's 32 he'll be looking for far more than 6 months.

    Indeed. The time to get him was on loan from Arsenal. Now that he’s a free agent the only chance we’d have is if he’s not getting the interest he’d like and wants a shop window.


    As for the comment on him being the anti-cb - his shortcomings are the same as our current cb’s, Matip aside, except he’s not as slow and is immeasurably more talented at the aspects he’s good at, and comes with experience.

    To buy, absolutely not - but would he improve us for 6 months? Inarguably.

    Subscribe to save Boards.ie from closing down: The Bad News

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,157 ✭✭✭Markitron


    .G. wrote: »
    They're letting us play it again cos we were robbed at the end :D

    Then is there any chance we can get a do-over of the Everton game from December 2017? I'm still incandescent with rage over that one.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement