Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Post pics of your watches Part II

11213151718152

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    893bet wrote: »
    Grand Seiko says to Rolex "My finishing is the best".......ALS says to Patek "here, hold my beer".........
    :D Lange finishing is second to none IMHO, especially in the movement. That's one thing I noticed with the two springdrive GS' I had in the hand. The dial hands etc and case were impeccable and you could see that with the naked eye too*, but the movement finishing was so so tbh.








    *granted I'm short sighted and have a built in loupe so my naked eye might see more than non four eyed people.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    893bet wrote: »
    How the hell do people get macro images with the whole picture in focus?

    Or do they just crop them?

    Lots of methods depending on what equipment you have - you can:
    1. buy an expensive dedicated macro lens which is built to render more items in focus even at very close distances;
    2. take multiple photos and overlay the in-focus portions over one another and build a composite image;
    3. the focal plane is flat - so if you're photographing head on instead of at an angle you will get more of area in focus.

    I wasn't using a dedicated macro lens with my Omega shots - instead I use a reverser ring - I mount one lens onto another lens and turn it into an ultra macro lens - it means I have very, very narrow DOF (depth of focus) a few mm or fractions of a mm:
    reverse-lens-macro-close-up-photography-06.jpg?resize=600%2C429&ssl=1
    https://digital-photography-school.com/reverse-lens-macro-close-up-photography-lesson-3/

    In my case I was reversing a 50mm lens onto a 200mm lens - so you can see the extreme magnification (the larger the magnification the less DOF you'll get too) and razor thin DOF. It does allow you to capture the raindrops on the eyelashes of a dragonfly though (sadly that image of mine got lost in a cloud storage incident!)

    @893bet - the dark spots could actually be dirt on the electronic sensor too - you might need to look up how to clean your sensor (a slightly nerve wrecking thing to do if you've never done it before). Or just use the clone tool to remove them if you don't want to stick a swab onto very sensitive electronic equipment ;)

    edit: And I was just about to recommend the photography forum too - but I see you posted there already ha! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,731 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Still the classiest watch on the forum.
    893bet wrote: »
    Got a macro lens for xmas and now realise that not having a macro lens is the problem. Its the idiot operating the camera.......

    I guess I shouldn't buy one then? Or even a camera? :o:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Fitz II


    Wibbs wrote: »
    :D Lange finishing is second to none IMHO, especially in the movement. That's one thing I noticed with the two springdrive GS' I had in the hand. The dial hands etc and case were impeccable and you could see that with the naked eye too*, but the movement finishing was so so tbh.

    .

    Exactly, its a magic trick with GS....in one hand the distraction the dial and hand...so well done.....look at this dont look at the case design, or thickness, or the rubbish bracelet and clasps...and spring drive is not sneaky quartz....oh no, its a horoligical innovation of immense importance....definatly not quartz.

    836bet...even your macro shots cannot mask to beauty of the ALS. Classic design and proportions, understated dial and wonderful craftsmanship. ALS is the brand for the true purist, as a Rolex pleb I am unworthy to touch the helm of the ALS garment.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Fitz II wrote: »
    and spring drive is not sneaky quartz....oh no, its a horoligical innovation of immense importance....definatly not quartz.
    It isn't "sneaky quartz", whatever that means, unless you consider a grasshopper escapement a sneaky verge or the pivot cup on a water clock. It's a completely new and innovative and more accurate way of regulating the stored mechanical energy in a mainspring to drive the hands for timekeeping.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,163 ✭✭✭893bet


    Fitz II wrote: »
    836bet...even your macro shots cannot mask to beauty of the ALS. Classic design and proportions, understated dial and wonderful craftsmanship. ALS is the brand for the true purist, as a Rolex pleb I am unworthy to touch the helm of the ALS garment.

    Pull your tongue out of my arsehole gary (in a bricktop voice).

    ALS is beyond reproach but they ain’t exactly cheap. I have been considering an AP next year to complete the holy trinity but...the only one I want really is the blue jumbo and that is hot ££££££££. Unobtainable at retail and way above RRP on second market.

    ALS are expensive.....but are actual value for money when you put them beside the steel Rolex, AP, Patek, etc. Hope to add a second next year all going to plan.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    893bet wrote: »
    ALS are expensive.....but are actual value for money when you put them beside the steel Rolex, AP, Patek, etc.
    +1. In the flesh they don't disappoint either. A chap I know has one, a black dial two register flyback chronograph(ticking all the boxes :) ) and it's one of the finest watches I've ever laid eyes on. Arse puckeringly* expensive mind you. I think he told me it was 30 odd grand? He worked up to it though, flipping over the years adding a little at a time, buying used as he went, so it was more like 10 odd to him in the end.




    *should be a word. :D

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Fitz II


    Wibbs wrote: »
    It isn't "sneaky quartz", whatever that means, unless you consider a grasshopper escapement a sneaky verge or the pivot cup on a water clock. It's a completely new and innovative and more accurate way of regulating the stored mechanical energy in a mainspring to drive the hands for timekeeping.

    Depends on your perspective. If a quartz crystal is regulating the watch its quartz for me. If you split hairs on how the pizo electric regulation force is transferred you can start making a differentiation, but for me you have stolen the pure "engine" feeling of the movement in order to add extra accuracy still inferior to a basic quartz movement. I know there is no physical connection between the quartz and the movement except the electromagnetic braking effect, but for me if there is electricity involved it's not mechanical, its a hybrid or a chimera. If you need more than Newton knew to describe the watch its not analogue.

    I dont know about the other things you mentioned, but the ghost of George Daniels appeared to me as an apparition and scolded me for being a filthy casual while I read them, and honestly that turned me on.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,163 ✭✭✭893bet


    Wibbs wrote: »
    +1. In the flesh they don't disappoint either. A chap I know has one, a black dial two register flyback chronograph(ticking all the boxes :) ) and it's one of the finest watches I've ever laid eyes on. Arse puckeringly* expensive mind you. I think he told me it was 30 odd grand? He worked up to it though, flipping over the years adding a little at a time, buying used as he went, so it was more like 10 odd to him in the end.




    *should be a word. :D

    Some one on TZ recently got one. Mesmerising caseback. Pure porn. In the region of 30k sterling.

    https://forum.tz-uk.com/showthread.php?486525-A-Lange-amp-Sohne-1815-Chronograph&p=5626288&viewfull=1#post5626288


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,731 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Wibbs wrote: »
    It's a completely new and innovative and more accurate way of regulating the stored mechanical energy in a mainspring to drive the hands for timekeeping.

    Indeed. Very interesting for someone into horology. What's the point of it though? The overwhelming majority of people buying expensive men's watches aren't all that interested in how good it is at timekeeping. Your phone can do that.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,012 ✭✭✭njburke


    893bet, I'll use the shot of the balance wheel for my screensaver, with your permission. I really like the weights on the wheel, my eye is drawn there as to me that's where the magic happens.

    The spring drive technology was not new to Grand Seiko, their production floors would have been full of tools using linear motor technology, well before spring drive. What they did do was scale it down and make reality Richard Feymanns tiny hands thought experiment.

    I agree the GS is not finished in the movement to the standard in the Dial. I do recall the germans being critical of the T34 weld finishing on the exterior of the tank, did they look at the bearings I wonder?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    unkel wrote: »
    Indeed. Very interesting for someone into horology. What's the point of it though?
    As you say U it's very interesting for someone into horology more than just the jewellery side. Both sides have their thing and that's fair enough, but there are two sides. It's not my thing personally, but I don't have any problem with someone buying a [insert brand here] as a luxury jewellery piece* and that making them happy and fair bloody play, so I don't get the attitude that someone who doesn't or is more into the horology aspects is somehow wrong.
    Fitz II wrote: »
    if there is electricity involved it's not mechanical, its a hybrid or a chimera. If you need more than Newton knew to describe the watch its not analogue.
    If you stop at Newton we'd be kinda boned. :D Silicon hairsprings and sapphire crystals are out for a start and good luck in manufacturing or regulating a modern watch without electricity and quartz and atomic time. COSC and the like rely on it. And Newton was aware of electricity and magnetics, even mused about how electricity might work in the nervous system, clever if bloody odd bastard he was. He'd need a quick primer on peizo effects alright, but within the space of the making and drinking of a cup of coffee I reckon he'd be up to speed with how a springdrive operated.
    I dont know about the other things you mentioned, but the ghost of George Daniels appeared to me as an apparition and scolded me for being a filthy casual while I read them, and honestly that turned me on.
    :D
    893bet wrote: »
    Some one on TZ recently got one. Mesmerising caseback. Pure porn. In the region of 30k sterling.

    https://forum.tz-uk.com/showthread.php?486525-A-Lange-amp-Sohne-1815-Chronograph&p=5626288&viewfull=1#post5626288
    Yeah, like that only with a black dial. I got a semi just looking at the front and then I turned it over... :D





    *though I think actual jewel encrusted watches tack as fook

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Ah well, back on topic. :o My unashamedly and most certainly quartz not sneaking around. :D

    537829.jpg

    I set this when I got it in September, then noted it was running slightly fast after a fortnight so did the oul tappy tap tap with the built in regulation bits and bobs(gave it two - .33 sec per month) and since has not gained or lost a second. Well if I squint hard enough I think it's maybe half a second fast. Though a mate's phone app that checks watch accuracy has it at zero taking a reading ten days apart.

    A few weeks ago I even got a spare working movement from the Bay. 20 quid. Sweet. Look away Fitz, Unkel! Save yourselves! :D

    537830.jpg

    They're usually more like 1-200 as there's even odder than me hyper accuracy non radio controlled quartz nutters out there who look for these and it also fits some Omega models.



    Judging by the dial it looks like it came from one of their solid gold jobs from the late 80's. Probably long melted down in a cash for gold place. Many if not most of the loose movements mechanical or otherwise we see on the Bay come by this route. Back when I'd poke about in general/house auctions in the 80's generally the only watches that got attention were the solid gold ones regardless of brand(and current "fancy" digitals), the steel and plated went for buttons in general. Plated probably made up two thirds of all that showed up.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    @Wibbs - sorry to sound like a broken clock :P but I think the Zenith defy lab movement is the most recent really clear horological innovation - as accurate as quartz but entirely mechanical in operation (insofar as something designed by computers and CNC machines can be "fully mechanical").

    Shame it just looks so weird right now - but I do think it will give Spring Drive a big run for its money once the price comes down in future production models.

    …The calibre 9100 is what I was thinking of - something that really appealed to me - but too many compromises in visual design currently.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Feck off! :mad: :pac: Ah no I agree 100% TF. :) The Zenith defy lab movement is a fantastic piece of kit and certainly the most recent of true horological innovation and as you say fully mechanical. Now me being me :eek: I do like that it's a bit weird looking and conservatism be damned, :D but I could see that hurting sales alright until they make it more "traditional" and/or cheaper of course. At a lower entry point they could pick up a fair number of customers even at with the wacky looks. I would imagine residuals would tank though?

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Feck off! :mad: :pac: Ah no I agree 100% TF. :) The Zenith defy lab movement is a fantastic piece of kit and certainly the most recent of true horological innovation and as you say fully mechanical. Now me being me :eek: I do like that it's a bit weird looking and conservatism be damned, :D but I could see that hurting sales alright until they make it more "traditional" and/or cheaper of course. At a lower entry point they could pick up a fair number of customers even at with the wacky looks. I would imagine residuals would tank though?

    No different than any other Zenith watch? :P

    The aeronith has been uncharitably been described by some as looking like concrete and I'm disappointed they couldn't fit a date complication in a 14.5mm thick watch - but hopefully this will change in the future.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Fitz II


    unkel wrote: »
    Indeed. Very interesting for someone into horology. What's the point of it though? The overwhelming majority of people buying expensive men's watches aren't all that interested in how good it is at timekeeping. Your phone can do that.

    That is an insightful and pertenant question, that cuts to the core of this absurd hobby, however instead of answering.you I shall.dodge and.mansplain to you how you don't understand the mechanics of watchmaking or it rich history.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,684 ✭✭✭david


    Things have been pretty quiet for me on the watch front. Still happy out with this pair now I have the the Sinn back from a service/refurb. Some nice watch related gifts this year from the other half, a new strap tool and leather watch roll.

    Happy New Year guys!

    537868.jpg
    537869.jpeg


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Stowa still my bricks & mortar watch.

    537873.JPG


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    mVKWvyDh.jpg

    What's everyone else wearing for the first day of 2021?

    This is something hopefully that will be seen in 2022-23 if it passes all tests - ignore the case, dial etc. etc. - this is purely a movement testing sample... But Hangzhou being the nice guys they are - were able to incorporate the Sólás S into the co-axial tourbillon cage (not a carrousel I believe)... that won't be the only "trick" we have up our sleeves though - model 3 hopefully should be a really good foundation for our Lir repeater model - but testing needs to be conducted now if I'm going to go ahead with a tourbillon model that I'd be happy to release to customers.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Thirdfox wrote: »

    What's everyone else wearing for the first day of 2021?

    This is something hopefully that will be seen in 2022-23 if it passes all tests - ignore the case, dial etc. etc. - this is purely a movement testing sample... But Hangzhou being the nice guys they are - were able to incorporate the Sólás S into the co-axial tourbillon cage (not a carrousel I believe)... that won't be the only "trick" we have up our sleeves though - model 3 hopefully should be a really good foundation for our Lir repeater model - but testing needs to be conducted now if I'm going to go ahead with a tourbillon model that I'd be happy to release to customers.

    I'm wearing my Stowa no-date/branding automatic flieger that I bought from Micks-address. See pic I posted earlier.

    Don't want start an argument but are the public (customers) clamouring for a tourbillon? It always struck me as a solution to a problem that no longer exists and as such is an interesting but utterly useless complication in this day and age.
    I'm probably missing the point but to me it's like all those people who want to climb Mount Everest even though it's been done numerous times already and is now just an item on certain people's bucket list.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,731 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    david wrote: »
    Some nice watch related gifts this year from the other half, a new strap tool

    Is that the Bergeon 7767-S? Got one myself a few months ago, although yours looks slightly different in the middle. Makes a big difference compared to the cheap Chinese ones I was using before (and I was not going to try those on a Rolex)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,149 ✭✭✭redlead


    Thirdfox wrote: »
    i.imgur.comh.g

    But Hangzhou being the nice guys they are - were able to incorporate the Sólás S into the co-axial tourbillon cage (not a carrousel I believe)... .

    I think that releasing your own Tourbillon with the Solas S incorporated into the co axial cage would quite possibly be the biggest horological F you to all the "comic sans" naysayers out there!

    On a side note, when are we going to get to see the dive watch thats number 2 or is that on hold until delivery of the starlight?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,731 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    Don't forget the spring drive :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,684 ✭✭✭david


    unkel wrote: »
    Is that the Bergeon 7767-S? Got one myself a few months ago, although yours looks slightly different in the middle. Makes a big difference compared to the cheap Chinese ones I was using before (and I was not going to try those on a Rolex)
    It’s the previous model 6767F from Amazon US store. Been wanting to upgrade for a while and herself was looking for stocking filler ideas.

    I actually haven’t tried the fork yet just the push pin end for micro adjusting. Seems pretty surgical and the replaceable threaded tips are a good design. Had a cheapo one I got in one of those €15 watch tool kits off eBay which left its mark on the lugs of my old seikos. Broke two of the tips and they kept slipping out of the clamp even after tightening it with a vice grip.

    Might treat the Stowa to a new hand stitched strap and give her a whirl.

    The leather watch roll is from a guy in Switzerland who designed the Phase de Lune cases and since went out on his own. Carapaz is the brand. Relatively well priced, I didn’t want PU leather and the design seemed better than the Everest ones for similar coin.

    I think she had it shipped to the her place in Florida to avoid the VAT and customs duty. Seems like such a waste of resources shipping it to the other side of the world only to bring it back again. The tax free allowance is way higher in USA.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Fitz II


    Thirdfox very Superman's chest the design :D .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,012 ✭✭✭njburke


    unkel wrote: »
    Don't forget the spring drive :p
    There's an electric motor at each corner of your EV, and some serious control electronics. Is there heart/soul/ character with the EV or just economy and performance. Why so hard on an electronic watch?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,267 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Wearing the VC today

    jgxZmml.jpg

    QMdJFPY.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Fitz II


    I want that VC....drool


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65,731 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    That looks good on you Cyrus. Very manly watch.
    njburke wrote: »
    There's an electric motor at each corner of your EV, and some serious control electronics. Is there heart/soul/ character with the EV or just economy and performance. Why so hard on an electronic watch?

    Watch to me is mostly decorative. It's the only piece of jewelry that I wear, I don't even wear my wedding ring. No tattoos or piercings either. Short hair, no beard, moustache or stubble. It's the only thing I got :p

    As everyone else, I carry a phone with me which will be more accurate than any mechanical or quartz watch, spring drive ones included.

    The car has just one electric motor, not 4 :D Family car is completely different, it is mostly function, form, economy and performance. Plenty of fun too with a Tesla Performance model :D Other car is a Porsche with a lot more heart / soul / character but it's mainly off the road as I rarely need a second car. Contemplating converting it to electric too...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,264 ✭✭✭saccades


    I have access to a camera with 15k magnification - would be interesting to get the GS under it for a really close up look.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    This today. Hanging out with fish well past being fresh. Humming in the new year. :)

    537934.jpg

    Only just realised I don't currently have a mechanical watch with a date function. :eek:

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,012 ✭✭✭njburke


    Unkle, didn't know you had a Porsche as well, and was way off on the way tesla drive train.
    I was outbid on an Ultronic diver at £330 this week, pepsi dialled not as nice as wibbs. There's a 2mm index wheel with 20 micron teeth in them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    saccades wrote: »
    I have access to a camera with 15k magnification - would be interesting to get the GS under it for a really close up look.

    "Ugh those electrons aren't even lined up properly" :P


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    njburke wrote: »
    I was outbid on an Ultronic diver at £330 this week, pepsi dialled not as nice as wibbs.
    The orange bezel version? They're more usual to see and a few Longines divers had a similar orange bezel, the grey/green less seen. I heard tell there's a blue bezel version, but I've never seen one myself. 330 quid is a very good price for one if that was the final bid. I've seen dead ones with fecked up dials going for that. Around eight to ten years ago a few "big collectors" on different forums bought and raved about the quality of them and prices went rapidly north. Good ones in working order run between 800-1200 in auctions, add 500 for dealers, so 1700-2000 on chrono24(though that's an arena for price gougers IMHO)
    There's a 2mm index wheel with 20 micron teeth in them.
    Yeah, mad for mid 20th century tech and manufacturing. How the index wheel and jewelled pawls were produced is still a trade secret. This is a short vid on the Accutron.

    The movement in the Longines diver the ESA 9162 was an evolution of that made in Switzerland when the original Swiss inventor got the bum's rush from Bulova with his updated design.

    537940.jpg

    Omega bought in most of them for their f300 series of watches. Cleverly putting them up for chronometer status because of a loophole at the time, knowing full well they'd fly that test. Up there for thinking :D They're also found in IWC, Zenith, Tissot, Certina and a couple of other marques of the time. There is also a chronograph version, which Bulova apparently did want to see if NASA would look at them again for flight status but... Bulova did well out of it though as they were paid a cut on each movement sold as they held a few patents on the tech.

    537941.jpg

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,012 ✭✭✭njburke


    The eBay hammer dropped at £331. Running and looked ok, I was kicking myself afterwards, like I said it's your coloway the I like most. I've found if you get a good deal on a price, the seller can come back with some story that he dropped it whilst packing it, I've had that a couple of times.

    Heres the watch.
    537946.jpg

    From what I read Bulova supplied the index wheels to other manufacturers, and at the end of the production run they deliberately destroyed the tooling for the wheels.

    Here's a link to Tuning fork patents, lots of omega patents, the IP for your Ultronic.
    The omega 1972 speedsonic chronograph patent is there.
    https://www.accutrons.com/tuning-fork-watch-patents


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,110 ✭✭✭Thirdfox


    Fitz II wrote: »
    Thirdfox very Superman's chest the design :D .

    “It means hope in the language of my people” ...or at least comfort/solace... :D


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    njburke wrote: »
    The eBay hammer dropped at £331. Running and looked ok, I was kicking myself afterwards, like I said it's your coloway the I like most.
    Now I see why it didn't go higher NJ. The Bezel is wrong and good luck trying to find an original bezel for one. Still working movements go for over a hundred quid and if someone already had one with a bad dial/hands that one would have been worth a punt alright.
    I've found if you get a good deal on a price, the seller can come back with some story that he dropped it whilst packing it, I've had that a couple of times.
    I've heard that before, so far I've been lucky* touches wood*

    Thanks for the list of patent PDFs. :) The Longines ultraquartz ones are interesting and I've not seen them before.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    I don't really own this Swatch.

    537999.JPG

    My wife has her eye on it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 647 ✭✭✭fulladapipes


    Not the sharpest shot of the Speedy's lume, but it also shows the effect of the hesalite glass.

    tfk887f.jpg

    This picture has been at the top of my stairs for so long, I had kind of forgotten it was there. I can't remember where I got it, but it was framed by the guys in Phibsborough, who did a top class job. (For those of you with an interest in such things, that's the original 1929 stairs and timber work. Even the stairs itself was hand made.)

    CCdwl8c.jpg

    Finally, one for Wibbs and those interested in trench watches and all that: this is a 1914 Waltham watch, with a shrapnel guard. It's in the A Man and his Watch book.

    bMDNHpX.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,149 ✭✭✭redlead


    That trench watch kind of makes a G shock seem a bit tame doesn't it. I have that book myself, it's really nice to flick through now and again.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    From Russia with love.

    538104.JPG


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,257 ✭✭✭✭Eoin


    A Feiko Black Bay mod to kill some lockdown time. Complete with faux patina, but genuine dust and scratches on the dial as I am lazy and heavy handed. The Seiko jubilee bracelet feels very cheap, nearly like something from a $10 watch bought on a beach in Lanzarote, I think I will find something different to put it on.

    50795154652_4b3217e636_z.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,942 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    I'm debating having a "little" bit of work done to my Accutron Astronaut and I'm hoping that the wise heads here can give me a sanity check.

    I love the piece, and tbh part of what I like is it's age and patina.
    That said the lume is completely shot and there is some missing from the hands.
    It's affecting the legibility is a big way,

    Would I be mad to get a sympathetic relume done?
    Faux aged lume, with appropriate colour of course rather than going with superluminova :pac:

    https://ibb.co/N2RQTF4

    N2RQTF4


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭Lorddrakul


    banie01 wrote: »
    I'm debating having a "little" bit of work done to my Accutron Astronaut and I'm hoping that the wise heads here can give me a sanity check.

    I love the piece, and tbh part of what I like is it's age and patina.
    That said the lume is completely shot and there is some missing from the hands.
    It's affecting the legibility is a big way,

    Would I be mad to get a sympathetic relume done?
    Faux aged lume, with appropriate colour of course rather than going with superluminova :pac:

    https://ibb.co/N2RQTF4

    N2RQTF4


    I'd be very careful.

    A new crystal might do more for it.

    Why not leave the dial as is, and perhaps get some service hands and see how that grabs you? You can always go back.

    I'd not be too concerned at the value of the piece, but the last thing you want is for it to come back looking like it has had a 'makeover'!

    It is a classic piece and should look the part, IMHO.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Casio 5208 Solar for when the going gets tough.

    538227.JPG


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭IrishPlayer


    Always look forward to getting home,putting up my feet and relaxing with some watches :)

    Uz8cuJ1.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,918 ✭✭✭hitemfrank


    Same would have tried to source one. My black Batman cave would have worked perfectly with it

    I got a response from Sinn about the clock this morning. They will be available by the end of February and they are taking pre orders.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,593 ✭✭✭Northern Monkey


    hitemfrank wrote: »
    I got a response from Sinn about the clock this morning. They will be available by the end of February and they are taking pre orders.

    Defo ordering that!

    Edit: ordered, it says delivery 1-2 weeks


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,942 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    One for the Rolex folk here.
    Need a steer and an idea of value, usual Rolex "fears" in play.
    Is it a gen 116334? What's it worth with no papers and only a watch register cert as provenance?
    I've traded with the guy who contacted me re this one before, but the Spidey senses are tingling on this.

    HOHlLeh_d.webp?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium


Advertisement