Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Trump vs Biden 2020, And the winner is.......... (pt 4) Read OP

1210211213215216325

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Triangle wrote: »
    According to the secretary of PA, it was about the distance the observers (both sides) had to be from the staff.
    It's not a republican only change, its both sides.
    Fair enough, I was referring to the "massive" win.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,739 ✭✭✭scamalert


    Triangle wrote: »
    Clark County, Nevada don't expect their final numbers until saturday/Sunday unfortunately.
    yeah they are getting over 50k extra votes in tomorrow and said it will be Sunday or Saturday for final tally up, plus trumps BS about non residents could delay it further.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 309 ✭✭Dressoutlet


    funnydoggy wrote: »
    I just had this with my brother :pac:

    Seconds between the statement of
    Check Fox it's real
    To
    Fox is bad.
    And these call other people sheep. The irony is frustrating


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,845 ✭✭✭py2006


    It is hard to conceive how any rational, reasonably intelligent, right thinking human could support a personality like Trump as president or even has a friend or colleague.

    What floors me more is the realisation that there are people here in Ireland who like him, support him and hope he does well.

    Like what is wrong with people?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 139 ✭✭J2CVC


    So I'm seeing comments from Irish Trump supporters, saying no don't follow that news outlet, check out Fox, you will get the real news. Then when pointed out Trump now hates Fox, they say oh yeah Fox went like the rest. This is within seconds
    I'm honest to god worried for our own country with these idiots, who let's be honest, mostly vote for Sinn Fein, the polar opposite to DT.

    I know a few Trump supporters here and honestly I could have predicted them. Idiots, no careers, fond of conspiracy theories.


    One guy has a MAGA hat. He might as well have IDIOT on it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 960 ✭✭✭Triangle


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Fair enough, I was referring to the "massive" win.

    Sorry, can't help with that one. I'm looking forward to seeing what it was myself!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,839 ✭✭✭Doctors room ghost


    Go on Biden


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,379 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Seconds between the statement of
    Check Fox it's real
    To
    Fox is bad.
    And these call other people sheep. The irony is frustrating

    It's palpable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,841 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Hurry up Nevada end this thing

    Pennsylvania could steal a march on them


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Triangle wrote: »
    Sorry, can't help with that one. I'm looking forward to seeing what it was myself!
    No, that was it!

    A Pennsylvania court ruled that Trump campaign observers could stand closer to watch ballot processing in Philadelphia!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Baseless falsehoods don't dispute anything but the truth.

    It's called a precedent, right now it is just hiding it, soon it will be blocking completely. And I used the word disputed because they use it, meaning that the power over information flow is being concentrated in a couple of corporations. All politics aside I don't think that's good for the world.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,949 ✭✭✭ChikiChiki


    So I'm seeing comments from Irish Trump supporters, saying no don't follow that news outlet, check out Fox, you will get the real news. Then when pointed out Trump now hates Fox, they say oh yeah Fox went like the rest. This is within seconds
    I'm honest to god worried for our own country with these idiots, who let's be honest, mostly vote for Sinn Fein, the polar opposite to DT.
    We've gone from The Twilight Zone to One flew over the Cuckoo's nest

    Facebook in particular has a huge part to play in framing susceptible people's opinions to such an extent that continued reinforcement of these beliefs makes it very difficult to reverse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 842 ✭✭✭Hego Damask




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 246 ✭✭sheeplover55


    ChikiChiki wrote: »
    Facebook in particular has a huge part to play in framing susceptible people's opinions to such an extent that continued reinforcement of these beliefs makes it very difficult to reverse.

    What do you suggest we should do to reverse that problem, gulags?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    scamalert wrote: »
    yeah they are getting over 50k extra votes in tomorrow and said it will be Sunday or Saturday for final tally up, plus trumps BS about non residents could delay it further.

    It does strike me as ridiculous that you can get 50k 3 days after election day......

    It's not like the election date was known in advance....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,067 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    It's called a precedent, right now it is just hiding it, soon it will be blocking completely. And I used the word disputed because they use it, meaning that the power over information flow is being concentrated in a couple of corporations. All politics aside I don't think that's good for the world.
    Stopping the spread of utter shíte is certainly good for the world. The world needs to re-separate itself from conspiracy loons.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,759 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Fair enough, I was referring to the "massive" win.

    Indeed - 4 Cases heard , they were essentially run out on a rail in 3 of them for failing to provide any evidence of what they were alleging but they are allowed stand a bit closer to the counting tables now.

    So yeah - Massive win.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,974 ✭✭✭Panrich


    So I'm seeing comments from Irish Trump supporters, saying no don't follow that news outlet, check out Fox, you will get the real news. Then when pointed out Trump now hates Fox, they say oh yeah Fox went like the rest. This is within seconds
    I'm honest to god worried for our own country with these idiots, who let's be honest, mostly vote for Sinn Fein, the polar opposite to DT.
    We've gone from The Twilight Zone to One flew over the Cuckoo's nest

    And we're well on the way to President Camacho



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,118 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Like a half assed dictator, it's very funny but then you realise they are serious.

    https://twitter.com/kayleighmcenany/status/1324407170268540934

    Poor Kayleigh, unemployable after January, like the rest of them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,970 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    Penn wrote: »
    They have been allowed, and in accordance with the proper processes set in place before the election.

    What Trump has gone to court for was for observers to be allowed to go closer to the counters. That's in excess of the proper process, but has been allowed. Dems are challenging that, but regardless, it's not a case of impropriety or anything being done wrong.

    how close are they allowed to be and can they reasonably be expected to monitor accurately from there; and is that being adhered to?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,839 ✭✭✭Doctors room ghost


    If I had to vote between trump and an onion, that onion would “get my complete and utter endorsement”.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,774 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus



    It's already been debunked, the dead man has a younger relative with the same name, living in the same area.

    https://www.logically.ai/factchecks/library/0dd425c5


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,813 ✭✭✭joe40


    Padre_Pio wrote: »
    They factcheck tweets relating to sensitive topics like elections, and add warnings if there's no proof.

    Most of Trumps tweets have a warning on them.

    Social media companies should be accountable for what goes on their platforms. No traditional media outlet can allow people to say what they want without been open to libel laws.
    You can't go on Joe Duffy and slander people, because RTE would be liable for the slander.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,067 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    What do you suggest we should do to reverse that problem, gulags?

    Well theres these places that provide a thing called education. You should check it out. It has different levels depending on age.

    Its far better and more reliable than twit-education.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Enquiring



    What's this all about? Who did the dead man vote for?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,443 ✭✭✭sondagefaux


    Zero ****s given by Twitter anymore with Trump. Censoring everything.

    A warning to say that his tweets aren't supported by evidence isn't censorship.

    People can still read them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,443 ✭✭✭sondagefaux


    It's called a precedent, right now it is just hiding it, soon it will be blocking completely. And I used the word disputed because they use it, meaning that the power over information flow is being concentrated in a couple of corporations. All politics aside I don't think that's good for the world.

    You're calling for the breakup of the Murdoch media empire? Good call.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    Inquitus wrote: »
    It's already been debunked, the dead man has a younger relative with the same name, living in the same area.

    https://www.logically.ai/factchecks/library/0dd425c5

    With the same year of birth (or does that not matter)?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,949 ✭✭✭ChikiChiki


    What do you suggest we should do to reverse that problem, gulags?

    Why would we need gulags when the problem is code and alogithirms??

    The people are not doing much wrong apart from maybe spending too much time online and not questioning what they read.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,643 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    Enquiring wrote: »
    What's this all about? Who did the dead man vote for?

    A man with the same name as a dead man from the same area voted.

    It is apparently the cause of Trump losing the Presidency. :rolleyes:


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement