Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Recession predictions

Options
1101113151645

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,303 ✭✭✭wassie


    https://joebiden.com/made-in-america/

    Biden is also campaigning on an America first policy which includes standing up to China and bringing supply chains back to America.

    Its doesn't specify which supply chains but possible that pharma is included.

    I don't think Ireland has to much to be concerned with. These pharmas are big MNCs and Ireland provides access to EU markets as well as tax benefits. This is just bluster in an election year.

    The reality is that the issue with pharma supply chains is that a lot of the requisite inputs for manufacturing come from from Asia, and more over China.

    The bigger worry as I see it would be the threat of the US aggressively cutting its company tax rate to levels close to ours. That could see a huge amount of US capital flowing away from here back to the states.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,842 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    wassie wrote:
    The bigger worry as I see it would be the threat of the US aggressively cutting its company tax rate to levels close to ours. That could see a huge amount of US capital flowing away from here back to the states.


    More money for massive job creation initiatives such as share buy backs!


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭screamer


    wassie wrote: »
    I don't think Ireland has to much to be concerned with. These pharmas are big MNCs and Ireland provides access to EU markets as well as tax benefits. This is just bluster in an election year.

    The reality is that the issue with pharma supply chains is that a lot of the requisite inputs for manufacturing come from from Asia, and more over China.

    The bigger worry as I see it would be the threat of the US aggressively cutting its company tax rate to levels close to ours. That could see a huge amount of US capital flowing away from here back to the states.

    In the us is the wages and things like Medicare cost a fortune. US employee are paid way more for the same jobs that we do here, so a saving on the corporate tax wouldn’t necessarily mean a cut in cost base for relocating US companys, quite the opposite.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    wassie wrote: »
    The bigger worry as I see it would be the threat of the US aggressively cutting its company tax rate to levels close to ours. That could see a huge amount of US capital flowing away from here back to the states.

    This has happened already, under Trump, in 2017.

    The US federal CT was cut from 35% to 21%.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,274 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Does anyone know whats still driving the demand for house prices? Are people still confident for good reason? Are banks still happy to loan?


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭Snow Garden


    Does anyone know whats still driving the demand for house prices? Are people still confident for good reason? Are banks still happy to loan?

    Give it time. There will be a lag between the economic impact and house prices. The government cannot sustain their current social welfare spending rate either. House prices started to decline in 2008 but did not bottom out until 2012/2013.

    I believe we will see significant house price decreases in 2021 and 2022.


  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    With rent prices people will do absolutely everything they can to "get on the ladder". How long that can keep things going probably isn't as long as people would like but if I had any wealthy family I'd be doing anything to get a deposit from one and pay a third as much per month compared to renting the same place.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,566 ✭✭✭Treppen


    Does anyone know whats still driving the demand for house prices? Are people still confident for good reason? Are banks still happy to loan?

    Look at the daft monthly report.

    Basically supply is down prices don't go down


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,842 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Give it time. There will be a lag between the economic impact and house prices. The government cannot sustain their current social welfare spending rate either. House prices started to decline in 2008 but did not bottom out until 2012/2013.


    If our government doesn't maintain current welfare payments, it will force more businesses to close, permanently, it's a critical life line now for the private sector, it's counter intuitive, but it does work, it's commonly called 'helicopter money'. The private sector currently has extremely limited capacity to expand the money supply via debt expansion, so at the moment we re left with the only other option, public sector debt expansion, baring in mind, rising private debt has caused far greater damage than rising public debt, historically, so there's nothing truly to worry about there.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    If our government doesn't maintain current welfare payments, it will force more businesses to close, permanently, it's a critical life line now for the private sector, it's counter intuitive, but it does work, it's commonly called 'helicopter money'.


    "Helicopter money" is actions by the central bank, not the Govt.

    Helicopter money is an unconventional monetary policy.


    The welfare payments are fiscal policy.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,274 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Give it time. There will be a lag between the economic impact and house prices. The government cannot sustain their current social welfare spending rate either. House prices started to decline in 2008 but did not bottom out until 2012/2013.

    I believe we will see significant house price decreases in 2021 and 2022.

    Ok so would you advise someone to buy a house in the current climate?

    Demand is still high and money seems readily available from lender's?

    Apologies for the thinly veiled advice question


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    The private sector currently has extremely limited capacity to expand the money supply via debt expansion, so at the moment we re left with the only other option, public sector debt expansion, baring in mind, rising private debt has caused far greater damage than rising public debt, historically, so there's nothing truly to worry about there.

    This is what's happening with the money supply in the eurozone:

    Money and credit
    Broad money growth increased further in May. The broad monetary aggregate
    (M3) experienced another large inflow, signalling an ongoing strong build-up of
    liquidity amid uncertainty related to the pandemic crisis.

    The annual growth rate of M3 increased to 8.9% in May 2020, after 8.2% in April (see Chart 11). While the slowdown in economic growth dampened M3 growth, substantial support came from the extraordinary liquidity demand of firms and households.

    The increase in M3 was mainly driven by the narrow aggregate M1, which includes the most liquid components of M3.

    The annual growth rate of M1 increased from 11.9% in April to 12.5% in May
    2020, which was mainly attributable to a further increase in the annual growth rates of overnight deposits. While for firms precautionary motives seem to remain an important driver of increases in their deposit holdings, in the case of households constraints still limiting spending possibilities might also have played a role. Other short-term deposits and marketable instruments made a small, positive contribution to annual M3 growth in May.

    See section 5:

    https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/ecbu/eb202005.en.pdf


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    The money supply is rising:


    ecb.md2006.en_img0.png?d4cd703d68efe1868b095b66db8cf488


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,842 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Geuze wrote:
    "Helicopter money" is actions by the central bank, not the Govt.


    True, but I would call covid a type of helicopter money, since our restrictions of money creation via our own central bank, it was a good move, and very unusual from a more traditional economically conservative government, it would give you hope that our major parties are willing to change, very interesting to watch


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,842 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Geuze wrote:
    The money supply is rising:


    Of course it is, it has to, or we re toast, but I'd imagine the money supply from the private sector, I.e. credit, is reducing, since demand for it is probably falling?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 979 ✭✭✭Thierry12


    Ok so would you advise someone to buy a house in the current climate?

    Demand is still high and money seems readily available from lender's?

    Apologies for the thinly veiled advice question

    Depends

    Will you have a job in 21/22?

    If you will wait

    Cash buyers id imagine are waiting it out


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭Snow Garden


    Ok so would you advise someone to buy a house in the current climate?

    Demand is still high and money seems readily available from lender's?

    Apologies for the thinly veiled advice question

    Absolutely not. It's way way way too early to see the real impact. The housing market is completely flawed at the moment with the government paying wages and banks giving mortgage holidays. Write this year off. Too much flux and a fair dollop of denial. The real pressure will come next year and 2022 as the financial impact hits home (I also see massive unemployment next year). We cannot keep running massive budget deficits month-on-month like we are doing now, eventually reality has to kick in.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,842 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Absolutely not. It's way way way too early to see the real impact. The housing market is completely flawed at the moment with the government paying wages and banks giving mortgage holidays. Write this year off. Too much flux and a fair dollop of denial. The real pressure will come next year and 2022 as the financial impact hits home (I also see massive unemployment next year). We cannot keep running massive budget deficits month-on-month like we are doing now, eventually reality has to kick in.

    currently being debunked, in fact, id class it as dangerous, particularly right now


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,126 ✭✭✭Snow Garden


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    currently being debunked, in fact, id class it as dangerous, particularly right now

    Jaysus you are a broken record.

    I am not saying right now or even this year! We all get your point.

    But ok let's run 30bn budget deficits forever and see how we go...


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,842 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Jaysus you are a brokeh record.

    I am not saying right now or even this year!

    i am indeed, and i ll keep going until its widely accepted. we need to step away from the idea of constantly feeling the need to reduce public debt, private debt has in fact, historically caused far more damage, as we ve recently discovered. create the bonds, keep creating the bonds, until confidence returns, particularly in the private sector, then redirect towards servicing public debt


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 28,842 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Jaysus you are a broken record.

    I am not saying right now or even this year! We all get your point.

    But ok let's run 30bn budget deficits forever and see how we go...

    hopefully theres no need to, long term bonds are common, and possibly gonna become more common after this one


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,285 ✭✭✭Deub


    Talking about private debt. It looks like over 1/3rd of Irish households wouldn’t have enough money for an unexpected expense.

    https://twitter.com/C_Barraud/status/1292376280411918336


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,314 ✭✭✭KyussB


    Jaysus you are a broken record.

    I am not saying right now or even this year! We all get your point.

    But ok let's run 30bn budget deficits forever and see how we go...
    The main thing people advocate is running deficits until we reach Full Employment - and to efficiently allocate those deficits directly into providing jobs doing useful/necessary work - which would be a very wise thing to do. Nobody advocates 'deficits forever'.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,842 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Deub wrote: »
    Talking about private debt. It looks like over 1/3rd of Irish households wouldn’t have enough money for an unexpected expense

    yea, im becoming deeply concerned about the financial sector again, its already showing signs of stress, lets hope it doesnt buckle, we need to just keep giving people money, to try prevent what happened the last time


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,818 ✭✭✭Tea drinker


    Deub wrote: »
    Talking about private debt. It looks like over 1/3rd of Irish households wouldn’t have enough money for an unexpected expense.

    https://twitter.com/C_Barraud/status/1292376280411918336

    Graphic states data is as of 2018. The likes of Croatia have been massively affected due to heavy reliance on now collapsed tourism sector so would expect their position to be relatively more worsened.
    I think Montenegrin tourism has collpased 90% or some such, in a poor country, this is devastating


  • Registered Users Posts: 828 ✭✭✭2lazytogetup


    anyone with economics knowledge have any thoughts on whether this pandemic will lead to an improved economy.

    So if people are working from home, and thus need for less resources such as office buildings, and if people are getting deliveries of clothes, thus using less resources to go to shops, buying less cars as not needed, shouldnt this lead to a more efficent economy and thus increase GDP.

    As a collary, if the government was to announced that they would be employing a million workers to build a hole in the ground, there are increased employment, but it wouldn't improve our economy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,842 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    anyone with economics knowledge have any thoughts on whether this pandemic will lead to an improved economy.

    So if people are working from home, and thus need for less resources such as office buildings, and if people are getting deliveries of clothes, thus using less resources to go to shops, buying less cars as not needed, shouldnt this lead to a more efficent economy and thus increase GDP.

    As a collary, if the government was to announced that they would be employing a million workers to build a hole in the ground, there are increased employment, but it wouldn't improve our economy.

    how longs a piece of string? it ll more than likely bring some good, and some bad, as any shock does, but urgent change has been needed for a long time, particularly since the last crash, which didnt happen, this pandemic is now forcing some of these much needed changes, it ll probably lead to some good and some bad, we simply dont know for sure. (un)fortunately, our current government is traditionally quite resistant to serious change, so it ll be interesting to see how they react, when the only options will be ultimately, serious change, tis fascinating to watch


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,314 ✭✭✭KyussB


    The pandemic unemployment payment is the same as employing (half) a million workers to dig holes - just minus the unneccessary hole-digging part.

    People want useful things done - like housebuilding (can be done on a self-financing basis even) and infrastructure etc.. The 'hole in the ground' stuff is a common rhetorical tactic of begging the question, in silently assuming governments are not capable of employing people into useful work - despite centuries of evidence otherwise.


  • Registered Users Posts: 365 ✭✭Roger the cabin boy




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 28,842 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78




Advertisement