Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Madeleine McCann

1…969799101102…169

Comments

  • #2942
    cnocbui
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,179 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Cereal_Killer wrote: »
    If they didn’t abandon/leave to fend for herself/desert her they wouldn’t have to look for her for 13 years. Had they looked after her, had she not been unattended, nobody would know who Madeline was. Unfortunately they were negligent and the poor child paid the price.

    If you hadn't been born, I wouldn't have to read this tripe. A lot to be said for condoms.


  • #2943
    splinter65
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    Plumbthedepths wrote: »
    Would it not be better to put those questions of yours to UK child services and the Portuguese prosecution service? Instead of a randomer on Boards?

    Ok put it another way. You do know that social services in the UK investigated them and clearly found no case to answer?
    What makes you think you know different?


  • #2944
    dark crystal
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,962 ✭✭✭✭dark crystal


    Plumbthedepths wrote: »
    No idea why you are addressing your reply to me as I did not ask these questions.

    You asked why the poster wasn't addressing his questions the UK social services and I replied with the relevant reply that they had been addressed by the UK social services.

    Why bother posting open ended questions if you don't like the replies you get from them? Seems to be a common theme emerging...


  • #2945
    Plumbthedepths
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    splinter65 wrote: »
    Ok put it another way. You do know that social services in the UK investigated them and clearly found no case to answer?
    What makes you think you know different?

    What have I claimed to know differently? What level of nonsense have you descended to?
    You asked specific questions of a poster here who unless they work for UK child services or the Portuguese authorities cannot possibly answer.


  • #2946
    splinter65
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    Plumbthedepths wrote: »
    I answered all this to Walshb during your ban.

    Again with the mention of my ban...anyway, so if I go back through your posts I’ll find your timeline of what you think happened to Madeleine?


  • Advertisement
  • #2947
    splinter65
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    Cereal_Killer wrote: »
    That’s quite a nasty thing to say. I think any normal right minded person would love for Madeline to be reunited with her family. Who’s right and who’s wrong is insignificant in the grand scheme of things. If she was abducted, I hope the perpetrator is caught and brought to justice, if it was her parents then I hope that the truth comes out eventually. What we do know is, the last people we know to have seen Madeline alive is her parents when they abandoned her to go for tapas and wine. They should have a lot more to answer for.

    How do you know that her parents were the last to see her alive?


  • #2948
    limnam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,345 ✭✭✭limnam


    ittakestwo wrote: »
    you cant discard evidence you dont know of. The public dont know what evidence they have.


    So we're not discarding anything then.


    gotcha


  • #2949
    Plumbthedepths
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    splinter65 wrote: »
    How do you know that her parents were the last to see her alive?

    How do you know they weren't?
    No evidence to counter either opinion.


  • #2950
    Cereal_Killer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26 ✭Cereal_Killer


    splinter65 wrote: »
    How do you know that her parents were the last to see her alive?

    There is nobody else known to have seen her.


  • #2951
    limnam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,345 ✭✭✭limnam


    dark crystal wrote: »
    The McCanns were visited by social services in the UK, who clearly felt their parenting was of a sufficient enough standard that the twins were deemed to be in no danger whatsoever.

    Perhaps their training and standards are not up to those sitting in judgement of the parents on this thread...some of whom would have preferred the twins be placed in foster care for real, true atonement for their parents sins.


    *shurg* I guess you know more than Tulsa.


  • Advertisement
  • #2952
    splinter65
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    Plumbthedepths wrote: »
    What have I claimed to know differently? What level of nonsense have you descended to?
    You asked specific questions of a poster here who unless they work for UK child services or the Portuguese authorities cannot possibly answer.

    If the poster, either you or any other poster, claims the McCanns were neglectful, criminally neglectful, then you must have some theory as to why authorities neither in Portugal or in the UK saw fit to remove the twins or charge them? No?


  • #2953
    Plumbthedepths
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    dark crystal wrote: »
    You asked why the poster wasn't addressing his questions the UK social services and I replied with the relevant reply that they had been addressed by the UK social services.

    Why bother posting open ended questions if you don't like the replies you get from them? Seems to be a common theme emerging...

    I didn't pose the questions yet it's me you linked in your reply. Surely it would make sense to address the author of
    the questions in your response?


  • #2954
    splinter65
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    limnam wrote: »
    *shurg* I guess you know more than Tulsa.

    Tulsa is in Oklahoma in the US. Why would Tulsa have anything to do with this?


  • #2955
    Cereal_Killer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26 ✭Cereal_Killer


    splinter65 wrote: »
    If the poster, either you or any other poster, claims the McCanns were neglectful, criminally neglectful, then you must have some theory as to why authorities neither in Portugal or in the UK saw fit to remove the twins or charge them? No?

    You can be sure if that was shardin and the baybee, from the flats on holiday in Santa ponza, the remaining children would have been removed from her care.


  • #2956
    Plumbthedepths
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    splinter65 wrote: »
    If the poster, either you or any other poster, claims the McCanns were neglectful, criminally neglectful, then you must have some theory as to why authorities neither in Portugal or in the UK saw fit to remove the twins or charge them? No?

    Portuguese authorities claim they did not prosecute out of compassion. They believed leaving ones children alone was a cultural trait of the English.


  • #2957
    splinter65
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    Cereal_Killer wrote: »
    There is nobody else known to have seen her.

    But that means that the question of who was the last person to see Madeleine alive remains unanswered. Why did you say it was the parents?


  • #2958
    splinter65
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    Plumbthedepths wrote: »
    Portuguese authorities claim they did not prosecute out of compassion. They believed leaving ones children alone was a cultural trait of the English.

    That explains Portugal. How do you explain the UK?


  • #2959
    Plumbthedepths
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    splinter65 wrote: »
    Tulsa is in Oklahoma in the US. Why would Tulsa have anything to do with this?

    What would a thread be without the fall back of Grammar Nazism?
    It is clearly obvious the poster meant Tusla.


  • #2960
    happyoutscan
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,638 ✭✭✭happyoutscan


    Cereal_Killer wrote: »
    You can be sure if that was shardin and the baybee, from the flats on holiday in Santa ponza, the remaining children would have been removed from her care.

    Welcome back Hal.


  • #2961
    Cereal_Killer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26 ✭Cereal_Killer


    splinter65 wrote: »
    That explains Portugal. How do you explain the UK?

    Outside their jurisdiction? Obviously?


  • Advertisement
  • #2962
    Cereal_Killer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26 ✭Cereal_Killer


    happyoutscan wrote: »
    Welcome back Hal.
    If you have a problem with my posts, I suggest you report them. Hopefully your theories on Madeline are better than your attempt at Guess Who?


  • #2963
    Plumbthedepths
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    splinter65 wrote: »
    That explains Portugal. How do you explain the UK?

    No idea what UK law is , prehaps leaving your kids while you go on the vino is not a crime there.


  • #2964
    splinter65
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    Cereal_Killer wrote: »
    You can be sure if that was shardin and the baybee, from the flats on holiday in Santa ponza, the remaining children would have been removed from her care.

    Can you post a link please to a peer reviewed report stating that the neglected children will only be removed from low income parents, and neglected children of high earners are not removed. Thanks.


  • #2965
    splinter65
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    Plumbthedepths wrote: »
    No idea what UK law is , prehaps leaving your kids while you go on the vino is not a crime there.

    Yes maybe it is. Or maybe after SS investigated the McCanns they came to the conclusion that the children were not in any danger but that you, having never met them and knowing absolutely nothing about them, consider that you know better.


  • #2966
    splinter65
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    Plumbthedepths wrote: »
    What would a thread be without the fall back of Grammar Nazism?
    It is clearly obvious the poster meant Tusla.

    I’m at a loss though to know what TUSLA has to do with it either. That poster must know that they have no jurisdiction in the UK. Hence the confusion.


  • #2967
    Cereal_Killer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26 ✭Cereal_Killer


    splinter65 wrote: »
    Yes maybe it is. Or maybe after SS investigated the McCanns they came to the conclusion that the children were not in any danger but that you, having never met them and knowing absolutely nothing about them, consider that you know better.

    The Portuguese police interviewed both at length and declared them suspects?


  • #2968
    splinter65
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    Cereal_Killer wrote: »
    The Portuguese police interviewed both at length and declared them suspects?

    What’s that got to do with this? Did they charge them with neglect? Did they take the twins into care ? If not, why not?


  • #2969
    Plumbthedepths
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    splinter65 wrote: »
    I’m at a loss though to know what TUSLA has to do with it either. That poster must know that they have no jurisdiction in the UK. Hence the confusion.

    My grammar nazi comment is response to your behaviour, it adds nothing and does you no service. Why do it?


  • #2970
    Plumbthedepths
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    splinter65 wrote: »
    Yes maybe it is. Or maybe after SS investigated the McCanns they came to the conclusion that the children were not in any danger but that you, having never met them and knowing absolutely nothing about them, consider that you know better.

    I know by their behaviour and the absence of one of their children I would not consider them attentive parents. That's my opinion.


  • Advertisement
  • #2971
    dark crystal
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,962 ✭✭✭✭dark crystal


    limnam wrote: »
    *shurg* I guess you know more than Tulsa.

    Er, I didn't interview them, UK social services did. What have Tusla got to do with a couple living in the UK? :confused:


Advertisement