Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Prince Andrew in jep?

Options
1…89111314…35

Comments

  • Options
    #302
    DrPhilG
    Registered Users Posts: 12,201 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    Found it, Monday December 2nd at 8:30, BBC 1.


  • Options
    #303
    IAMAMORON
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    DrPhilG wrote: »
    Not on the BBC as far as I can see.

    It is not advertised on BBCNI, but I checked listings, it is on. If you have satellite you should get it on the BBC general broadcast.

    https://www.radiotimes.com/tv/tv-listings/


  • Options
    #304
    Berserker5
    Closed Accounts Posts: 248 ✭✭Berserker5


    Emily Maitlis will drag every last detail out to leave no doubt he was lying

    Poetic justice


  • Options
    #305
    DrPhilG
    Registered Users Posts: 12,201 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    IAMAMORON wrote: »
    It is not advertised in BBCNI, but I checked listings, it is on. If you have satellite you should get it on the BBC general broadcast.

    https://www.radiotimes.com/tv/tv-listings/

    That's an episode about Chinese camps. The Virginia Roberts one is next Monday.

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10407993/virginia-roberts-bbc-andrew-epstein/


  • Options
    #306
    IAMAMORON
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    DrPhilG wrote: »
    That's an episode about Chinese camps. The Virginia Roberts one is next Monday.

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10407993/virginia-roberts-bbc-andrew-epstein/

    We will find out in 10 minutes, I am pretty sure it is on tonight.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #307
    podgeandrodge
    Registered Users Posts: 5,753 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    Sorry if asked already but long thread:

    1) In the Prince Andrew interview, he was asked had he recently met Ghislaine Maxwell, and he said that he had earlier this year. He was asked whether he had discussed Epstein, but said no, as it hadn't been in the news at the time.

    But given all the questions relating to whether the famous photo with him, the accuser, and Maxwell is fake or not, and given the fact that the photo has been in the public domain since 2011 I think, why would he say he thinks the photo might be fake, or doesn't recall being upstairs, when all he had to do was ask Maxwell earlier this year if she recalls the photo? (I know that if he had and she said yes, it wouldn't help him, but I am surprised the BBC interviewer didn't ask this specific question).


    2) If in Pizza express, which was a rare thing to do as he says himself, surely there are loads of ex. pizza express staff that will recall the day Prince Andrew strolled in with his kids. And presumably a few photos as well. Where are they?


  • Options
    #308
    IAMAMORON
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    It is not on. They are going for some anti-China propaganda instead.:rolleyes:

    Pity .


  • Options
    #309
    Reviews and Books Galore
    Closed Accounts Posts: 964 ✭✭✭Reviews and Books Galore


    Candie wrote: »
    Age of consent laws are lower in some countries but usually there are laws regarding the age gap, this is so teenagers having sex with each other are fine, but older adults having sex with teens is recognised as probably exploitative. Young adults are easy to manipulate by predators, which is what I'd describe a middle aged man or woman targeting teenagers for sex.

    You might feel that a person of 18 is over the age of consent and therefore there is nothing wrong with them having sex with a rich, more powerful, person in their 50's, but I don't agree. Sure it's not illegal, but the power and experience of the older person means the younger one is at an immediate disadvantage and is vulnerable to exploitation, usually without realising it.

    There is a universe of difference between two 16 year olds having sex, and a 16 year old in a sexual relationship with a person decades older where they are at a major disadvantage in terms of age, experience and wealth, and lacking the options those things confer on the other person.

    Noting those things doesn't make someone a prude or anti-sex.


    Towards the part in bold,you are being very condescending. And I am saying this as a man who has dated older women at that age.


  • Options
    #310
    DrPhilG
    Registered Users Posts: 12,201 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    IAMAMORON wrote: »
    It is not on. They are going for some anti-China propaganda instead.:rolleyes:

    Pity .

    Hate to say I told ya so...


  • Options
    #311
    IAMAMORON
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    podgeandrodge wrote: »
    Sorry if asked already but long thread:

    1) In the Prince Andrew interview, he was asked had he recently met Ghislaine Maxwell, and he said that he had earlier this year. He was asked whether he had discussed Epstein, but said no, as it hadn't been in the news at the time.

    But given all the questions relating to whether the famous photo with him, the accuser, and Maxwell is fake or not, and given the fact that the photo has been in the public domain since 2011 I think, why would he say he thinks the photo might be fake, or doesn't recall being upstairs, when all he had to do was ask Maxwell earlier this year if she recalls the photo? (I know that if he had and she said yes, it wouldn't help him, but I am surprised the BBC interviewer didn't ask this specific question).


    2) If in Pizza express, which was a rare thing to do as he says himself, surely there are loads of ex. pizza express staff that will recall the day Prince Andrew strolled in with his kids. And presumably a few photos as well. Where are they?

    I think everyone accepts at this stage that the BBC interview was a total "car crash" and he took a massive risk denying the encounter. His tack at the time was a flat denial, that has not worked.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #312
    IAMAMORON
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    DrPhilG wrote: »
    Hate to say I told ya so...

    Why are they waiting another week?


  • Options
    #313
    Berserker5
    Closed Accounts Posts: 248 ✭✭Berserker5


    IAMAMORON wrote: »
    Why are they waiting another week?

    Suspense


  • Options
    #314
    Berserker5
    Closed Accounts Posts: 248 ✭✭Berserker5


    21466776-7728077-Prince_Andrew_Duke_of_York_and_Sarah_Ferguson_Duchess_of_York_pi-a-30_1574792310315.jpg

    Virginia Roberts tweeting that Andrew should be in jail


  • Options
    #315
    sonofenoch
    Registered Users Posts: 2,137 ✭✭✭sonofenoch


    Couldn't find a celebrity death thing so why not here....anyway apparently rumours circulating the Queen is dead (is she a celebrity ?)

    https://twitter.com/Finty1888/status/1201240568338305030


  • Options
    #316
    tuxy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,983 ✭✭✭✭tuxy


    Sounds like something at least one person would post everyday on twitter. I'm fairly sure they would not delay such an announcement.


  • Options
    #317
    Conall Cernach
    Registered Users Posts: 1,927 ✭✭✭Conall Cernach


    tuxy wrote: »
    Sounds like something at least one person would post everyday on twitter. I'm fairly sure they would not delay such an announcement.
    Andrew is stopping it being released until he has Charlie, his sons and grandchildren in a minibus in a Parisian tunnel.


  • Options
    #318
    Quantum Erasure
    Registered Users Posts: 8,170 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    sonofenoch wrote: »
    Couldn't find a celebrity death thing so why not here....anyway apparently rumours circulating the Queen is dead (is she a celebrity ?)

    https://twitter.com/Finty1888/status/1201240568338305030

    apparently it was a Military drill, that someone thought was real

    https://www.devonlive.com/news/uk-world-news/royal-navy-admits-exercise-started-3613894?
    Royal Navy admits exercise started Queen is dead rumour wrote:
    Speaking to The News, a Royal Navy spokesman said: “We can confirm an internal exercise took place at Royal Naval Air Station Yeovilton in line with established contingency plans for recall of personnel.

    “These exercises are conducted on a regular basis and no significance should be drawn from the timing of the exercise.

    “While the exercise was conducted properly, we regret any misunderstanding this may have caused.”


  • Options
    #319
    Berserker5
    Closed Accounts Posts: 248 ✭✭Berserker5


    21466776-7728077-Prince_Andrew_Duke_of_York_and_Sarah_Ferguson_Duchess_of_York_pi-a-30_1574792310315.jpg

    Is there more to come from bbc


  • Options
    #320
    Quantum Erasure
    Registered Users Posts: 8,170 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    she's gotten old looking, since she left Black Eyed Peas


  • Options
    #321
    ILoveYourVibes
    Registered Users Posts: 15,176 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Berserker5 wrote: »
    21466776-7728077-Prince_Andrew_Duke_of_York_and_Sarah_Ferguson_Duchess_of_York_pi-a-30_1574792310315.jpg

    Is there more to come from bbc


    There has been a huge circling of the wagons by the Royals of late.

    I think the fact that a woman who tried to sell access to him for money is his last supporter says it all really. Horrible people.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #322
    Berserker5
    Closed Accounts Posts: 248 ✭✭Berserker5


    In the interview
    .The Duke tried to claim that his meetings with Epstein were of some national significance, that he was working for Britain's interest
    21466776-7728077-Prince_Andrew_Duke_of_York_and_Sarah_Ferguson_Duchess_of_York_pi-a-30_1574792310315.jpg


  • Options
    #323
    Quantum Erasure
    Registered Users Posts: 8,170 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    whats with the reposting of the picture though?


  • Options
    #324
    Berserker5
    Closed Accounts Posts: 248 ✭✭Berserker5


    Quantum Erasure wrote: »
    whats with the reposting of the picture though?

    Ever read a tabloid?


  • Options
    #325
    Quantum Erasure
    Registered Users Posts: 8,170 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    Berserker5 wrote: »
    Ever read a tabloid?

    not since the Sun did away with the tits on page 3, and even at that I'd hardly say i read them much...


  • Options
    #326
    dd973
    Registered Users Posts: 625 ✭✭✭dd973


    Don't you mean Prinz Andreas?


  • Options
    #327
    Muahahaha
    Registered Users Posts: 19,613 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Well the US prosecutors arent giving up, they still want to interview him and are now calling him out on his public statements that he would offer all help and co-operation to the Epstein investigation
    Prince Andrew has become embroiled in a war of words with US prosecutors investigating the disgraced financier and child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

    Lawyers for the Duke of York issued a statement on Monday accusing the American investigators of misleading the public and breaching their own confidentiality rules in their handling of the inquiry.

    Blackfords, the London-based criminal law specialists, alleged in a strongly worded two-page statement that the US Department of Justice (DoJ) had effectively rejected three offers of help volunteered by the prince this year.

    The firm noted that the DoJ had “advised us that the duke is not and has never been a ‘target’ of their criminal investigations into Epstein” and that they had instead sought his confidential, voluntary cooperation.

    Geoffrey Berman, the US attorney for the Southern District of New York, responded by publicly accusing Andrew of trying to “falsely portray himself to the public as eager and willing to co-operate” and said a request to schedule an interview had been repeatedly declined.
    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jun/08/prince-andrew-lawyers-accuse-us-doj-misleading-public-over-epstein-case


  • Options
    #328
    Muahahaha
    Registered Users Posts: 19,613 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Also quote from the BBC Royal Editor
    Speaking this morning, Witchell told BBC Breakfast that Andrew's 'specialist' lawyers would be 'attempting to control the process' by 'limiting the scope' of the US investigation.

    'I think we may reasonably assume that the US attorney wants a face to face meeting with Andrew here in the UK, in which he could ask him face to face an unlimited array of questions,' he said. 'Well now, we only have to think back to the Newsnight interview to see what happens when Andrew faces unlimited, untrammelled questions.

    'So I think it is reasonable to suppose that his specialist British lawyers are attempting to control the process. They may also be insisting - please send your questions in writing and we will respond.'

    Andrew resigned from 'public duties' in the wake of the Newsnight interview last November, in which he denied any wrongdoing but defended his friendship with Epstein as 'seriously beneficial'.


  • Options
    #329
    kowloon
    Registered Users Posts: 13,288 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    The US and UK should do a prisoner exchange; Prince Andrew for that cow that claimed diplomatic immunity after running over a kid.


  • Options
    #330
    4068ac1elhodqr
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,586 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    Their DailyMail are having a field day with this buffon, they'll happily run the story for the extra millions of paper sales.
    Must be some major embarrasment for the establishment all the same.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #331
    Quantum Erasure
    Registered Users Posts: 8,170 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    Quantum Erasure wrote: »
    she's gotten old looking, since she left Black Eyed Peas

    ever want to thank a post, only to discover that you couldn't because it was you who posted it, 6 months ago...


Advertisement