Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Brexit discussion thread X (Please read OP before posting)

1112113115117118316

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,759 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The reality is they have to prepared for any eventuality. They have been spotted with theodolites etc around the border here too.

    Waste of time. Any structure on either side of the border wouldn't last a day before being burnt out. And rightly so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,005 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    Thargor wrote: »
    Is he though? I mean everybodys talking about him like he's the sinister puppet master all of a sudden but no puppet master could have orchestrated this sh1tshow. Cameron calling the referendum, May throwing away her majority, the unbelievable aggressive stupidity of every single government minister of a G7 country for the last 3 years etc, you could not plan and execute something like this deliberately.


    Ian Dunt seems to describe the situation well with Cummings,

    https://twitter.com/IanDunt/status/1167343302955454464?s=20

    'Once upon a time this bloke made up a bunch of lies to win a yes/no referendum on the status quo, in the aftermath of a financial crash and austerity. A genius that does not make.'

    We will have to wait and see how this turns out for him but if he is out of a job in No.10 in a few months then what does that make him? On the other hand if the UK has left without a deal and he has orchestrated a Johnson majority election campaign, then he is some evil genius. I don't know though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,686 ✭✭✭Infini


    BarryD2 wrote: »
    Why? For the same reasons that we've all 'happily' emigrated to the UK for decades/ centuries. We speak the same language, whether we like it or not and we have broadly similar cultures. We understand each other better and the UK is closer.

    Generally happy to spend a week on holidays in France or Italy but no wish to start doing business there. Yes that's an insular attitude you may say but you know, we do live on an island. Better the divil you know etc etc.

    On top of all this, we are increasingly lectured about our carbon responsibilities, so it's make more sense to do business in Ire and UK, rather than the European & global shipping solutions that people champion here.

    Look to be honest the simple truth is that while it's more convenient and maybe more comfortable dealing with distrubuters and such in the UK the one core point to remember is this: Britain is less at fault rather it's British POLITICS that are to blame and unfortunately because of this your business partners will be left in a compromised position or risk being buried altogether by the idiocy of the conservatives and DUP.

    Unfortunately the reality is that if there's a crash out these businesses you deal with will be by no fault of their own be on the wrong side of the fence thanks to Boris and co ruining their country and the only realistic option at this point is start looking at alternatives rather than just simply pass costs on because what will happen is if your costs rise then other competitors or customers begin looking for alternatives and if they find someone cheaper thats when the trouble begins. Lets not forget that there's reports buisnesses are being too slow to adjust in part because till now noone knows if they (UK) have been serious about such a disastrous crash out.

    Remember when they crash out it's essentially all trade deals being invalidated all at once. This mean's immediate tariffs and customs charges being implimented that risks making your business nonviable so quickly that the reports of a hard border predicts some going under in 72 hours of Brexit. The real problem in all of this is that no matter how much we try to predict this there is no real world instance of an event of such stupidity happening we honestly cannot predict how much collateral damage this can cause because it's only when the little things begin colliding with one another and piling up that we see how damaging this will be.

    We might be neighbours with Britain but remember history, the worst of them have come out of the woodwork in the form of the toxic media rags of the Telegraph, Daily Mail, UK sun and Express, we have deliberate misinformation campaigns on social media polluting the narrative and we got the conservative party that's been poisoned by the likes of Mogg's and his European Troll Group and Boris being the opportunist he is. These people are the ignorant or utter arrogant kind who have no trouble in the past of thinking to strongarm Ireland into a position favourable to themselves.

    The reason we joined the EU all those years ago was to be able to diverse ourselves away from them and now we're in a position where we no longer have to accept that kind of carryon where unlike in the past where those running Britain could push Ireland around because they were bigger its now a case of if they intend to push such damage at us, now we can turn around and basically say "We don't have to put up with that, oh and by the way my 26 other friends over there aint impressed with your carry-on either".

    If they're intent on wrecking themselves we're not dependent on them we have a market of 26 other countries to draw help on if we need them, we're resourceful and can work around the problems but we don't have to be dragged down by Britain if they implode in their crowning moment of idiocy.


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 2,175 ✭✭✭ToBeFrank123


    Imreoir2 wrote: »
    We have a responsibility to protect the integrity of the single market, just like all the other members, tell the EU to go jump and we are destabelising the bedrock of our own economey and putting our place in the EU at risk.

    Yes so long as we appease our European superiors that is the main thing.

    Pleasing Angela is far more important than allowing our own people freely cross back and forth.

    Nonsense.

    Too many people willing to bend over backwards to please the EU. I for one am getting sick of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,888 ✭✭✭54and56


    Even with a hard brexit it will take months if not years for customs posts to get up and running.

    If the EU insists on us putting them up at the border we should just tell them to go jump.

    Impossible to fully police a border anyways.

    As a full EU member it's our duty to protect the Single Market at our border. The "EU" aren't forcing us to do that, we signed up to it and we'll do it because being part of the Single Market is central to our economy.

    If we can't or won't secure our own border to protect the Single Market we won't be in it for much longer.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    Yes so long as we appease our European superiors that is the main thing.

    Pleasing Angela is far more important than allowing our own people freely cross back and forth.

    Nonsense.

    Too many people willing to bend over backwards to please the EU. I for one am getting sick of it.

    I don't really care what you are getting sick of, our fundemental economic interests require that we remain in the EU. Like it or lump it, we are staying in the EU.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 251 ✭✭ath262


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    The brexit secretary ladies and gentlemen. The delusion is strong in this one.


    this guy is incredible, either disillusional, dim or not paying attention for the last 3 years - there will be no mini-deals, next step is agree the WA and discuss the future relationship OR UK is headed for a no deal-brexit


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 95,447 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Balanadan wrote: »
    Looks like the Brextremists are talking about Ireland leaving the EU and re-joining them. ****in' hell :D

    In Ireland we have transferable votes. So unlike the UK you don't waste your vote.

    There are hundreds of thousands of UK citizens living here entitled to vote any which way.

    The official Irexit candidate Hermann Kelly was editor of the Irish Catholic so should presumably have attracted some of the one third of voters who voted against the eight amendment.

    He was also a journalist on Irish and UK national papers so not an unknown.


    In the EU elections despite all the above he only got 2,441 first preference votes out of an electorate of 884,118.


    That's the mandate for Irexit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,686 ✭✭✭Infini


    Yes so long as we appease our European superiors that is the main thing.

    Pleasing Angela is far more important than allowing our own people freely cross back and forth.

    Nonsense.

    Too many people willing to bend over backwards to please the EU. I for one am getting sick of it.

    Better to work with those who at least will respect you and work fairly with you than be tied to a country with a democratic deficit run by idiots, ideologues and chancers who have no problem screwing Ireland over when they get the chance. Remember these are the ones who made statements like "Starving Ireland" till they get their own way (ignorant of the fact we produce more food than we need while they're FAR short of meeting their domestic demands!).

    If there's anything to be sick of it's hearing faulty arguments like "pleasing the EU" or "Pleasing Angela" with complete and utter ignorance of exactly HOW the EU works. It's essentially the "I dont like this because I dont like it" excuse, it's hollow reasoning, its emotive and it's empty of any factual reasoning as to WHY you don't like it. The EU has been vastly better to Ireland over the year's far better than Britain ever and it's better to be part of a union with those who value respect and reason over a "union" that's falling apart and being run by ignorance, stupidity, arrogance and incompetence.


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 2,175 ✭✭✭ToBeFrank123


    Imreoir2 wrote: »
    I don't really care what you are getting sick of, our fundemental economic interests require that we remain in the EU. Like it or lump it, we are staying in the EU.

    Where did I say leave the EU?

    Putting up border posts on the border, deal or no deal, would be idiotic and economic suicide for most of this country.

    Try suggesting putting a border between two German states and see how far you get....now-where.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    Where did I say leave the EU?

    Putting up border posts on the border, deal or no deal, would be idiotic and economic suicide for most of this country.

    Try suggesting putting a border between two German states and see how far you get....now-where.

    Putting up a border would be less than ideal, but far from economic suicide if you care to have a look at the actual economic data. Trade with NI is not a significant part of our economey. Trade is not the primary reason to avoid a border, peace is. In a no-deal scenario, we will be left with little choice by the UK other than to control the border. If the people of NI truely want there to be no border, then they will have to consider their options and ask if remaining in the UK is in ther interests.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,445 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    Where did I say leave the EU?

    Putting up border posts on the border, deal or no deal, would be idiotic and economic suicide for most of this country.

    Try suggesting putting a border between two German states and see how far you get....now-where.
    I'm not sure you are being genuine.
    We have to protect the Single Market, and it's regulations regarding food safety.
    If some chlorinated chicken or hormone injected beef enter this state via the NI border, and from here find it's way into Europe then we will be in some serious trouble. It could result in other EU countries not trusting Irish agri-produce and placing checks on our stuff, putting Irish products in the 'slow lane' and hurting our ability to export to our largest market - the EU.

    THAT is economic suicide.


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 2,175 ✭✭✭ToBeFrank123


    The idiocy knows no bounds.

    First you have people supporting a backstop that was never going to get through the House of Commons. It was right up there with believing in the toothfairy to believe it would get through.

    The backstop is pretty much dead.

    If the EU don't budge its a no deal and economic damage for Ireland. In that situation to put up border posts almost immediately as a few on here have advocated would kill the Irish ecocomy and send us into immiediate recession.

    But hey keep the idiocy going.

    And some responses on here prove to me its Angela and co who run this country, not Varadkar.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 95,447 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    VinLieger wrote: »
    Just cant help but think he has to be alienating the entire civil service with his draconian behaviour
    Not forgetting the US ambassador either.

    They are hamstringing their best assets.

    https://www.rte.ie/news/brexit/2018/0531/967284-border-poll/
    The Tánaiste said from his experience, the British civil service was arguably the best in the world, but that it needed political direction in terms of making progress on the very complex set of issues linked to Brexit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,785 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    The idiocy knows no bounds.

    First you have people supporting a backstop that was never going to get through the House of Commons. It was right up there with believing in the toothfairy to believe it would get through.

    The backstop is pretty much dead.

    If the EU don't budge its a no deal and economic damage for Ireland. In that situation to put up border posts almost immediately as a few on here have advocated would kill the Irish ecocomy and send us into immiediate recession.

    But hey keep the idiocy going.

    And some responses on here prove to me its Angela and co who run this country, not Varadkar.

    What do you propose?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,069 ✭✭✭boggerman1


    ath262 wrote: »
    this guy is incredible, either disillusional, dim or not paying attention for the last 3 years - there will be no mini-deals, next step is agree the WA and discuss the future relationship OR UK is headed for a no deal-brexit

    Are they all just swallowing the crap out of Cummings and spouting it in public.its like as if the past 3 yrs has never happened and the negotiations are just starting.kick them out @ Halloween or before if possible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    The idiocy knows no bounds.

    First you have people supporting a backstop that was never going to get through the House of Commons. It was right up there with believing in the toothfairy to believe it would get through.

    The backstop is pretty much dead.

    If the EU don't budge its a no deal and economic damage for Ireland. In that situation to put up border posts immiediately would kill the Irish ecocomy and send us into immiediate recession.

    But hey keep the idiocy going.

    And some responses on here prove to me its Angela and co who run this country, not Varadkar.

    All you are doing is spouting nonsence and calling other people idiots. A border will not do any significant damage to Irelands economey, trade with NI is peanuts compared to trade with the rest of the EU. Calling it "economic suicide" is simply wrong. It would not "kill the Irish economey", where are you getting your information from? It's still not something we want to do, but it is certainly something we could do if forced to do so by the UK.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,190 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The idiocy knows no bounds.

    First you have people supporting a backstop that was never going to get through the House of Commons. It was right up there with believing in the toothfairy to believe it would get through.

    The backstop is pretty much dead.

    If the EU don't budge its a no deal and economic damage for Ireland. In that situation to put up border posts almost immediately as a few on here have advocated would kill the Irish ecocomy and send us into immiediate recession.

    But hey keep the idiocy going.

    And some responses on here prove to me its Angela and co who run this country, not Varadkar.

    The backstop was proposed by the British Government. It wasn't something suggested externally

    What, precisely, are you proposing as an alternative?


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 2,175 ✭✭✭ToBeFrank123


    BluePlanet wrote: »
    I'm not sure you are being genuine.
    We have to protect the Single Market, and it's regulations regarding food safety.
    If some chlorinated chicken or hormone injected beef enter this state via the NI border, and from here find it's way into Europe then we will be in some serious trouble. It could result in other EU countries not trusting Irish agri-produce and placing checks on our stuff, putting Irish products in the 'slow lane' and hurting our ability to export to our largest market - the EU.

    THAT is economic suicide.

    Nope. We go toe to toe with the Germans for a change and tell them to cop on, that we're not dividing our country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,219 ✭✭✭Calina


    Yes so long as we appease our European superiors that is the main thing.

    Pleasing Angela is far more important than allowing our own people freely cross back and forth.

    Nonsense.

    Too many people willing to bend over backwards to please the EU. I for one am getting sick of it.

    It's not about aopeasing Angela. It is about protecting our economic success. I am sick of people like you suggesting we should just let the UK, which is mainly England tbh, stomp all over us.

    In Brussels we have a place at the table. In London at best we would be a doormat.


  • Advertisement
  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 2,175 ✭✭✭ToBeFrank123


    L1011 wrote: »
    The backstop was proposed by the British Government. It wasn't something suggested externally

    What, precisely, are you proposing as an alternative?

    Proposed by lame Duck Theresa May and with no mandate.

    Its amazing how few people understand why tge backstop was never going to get through the HOC.

    May could have proposed anything but unless it passed the HOC it was useless. But still people cling to the failed backstop.

    Its dead, move on.

    What alternative do you propose?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    Nope. We go toe to toe with the Germans for a change and tell them to cop on, that we're not dividing our country.

    In case it escaped your notice, our country is divided. The north eastern corner is under British rule, and that is not Germanys fault. Going toe to toe with the Germans for some reason does not resolve any of the issues Brexit creates. You don't seem to care that isolating ourselves from the single market would be massivly damaging to our economey, but it would. You have not proposed any workable alternatives, only made wildly innacurate claims and false assertions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    Proposed by lame Duck Theresa May and with no mandate.

    Its amazing how few people understand why tge backstop was never going to get through the HOC.

    May could have proposed anything but unless it passed the HOC it was useless. But still people cling to the failed backstop.

    Its dead, move on.

    What alternative do you propose?

    There is no workable alternative to the backstop that I am aware of, at least not as long as the UK maintains its red lines. Either the UK backs down or it is no-deal. Given that no-deal is akin to the UK being set on fire, I don't think it will be long before they come back to the table and adjust their attitude to the backstop.


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 2,175 ✭✭✭ToBeFrank123


    Imreoir2 wrote: »
    All you are doing is spouting nonsence and calling other people idiots. A border will not do any significant damage to Irelands economey, trade with NI is peanuts compared to trade with the rest of the EU. Calling it "economic suicide" is simply wrong. It would not "kill the Irish economey", where are you getting your information from? It's still not something we want to do, but it is certainly something we could do if forced to do so by the UK.

    Try telling that to people who commute across the border daily.

    Throwing your fellow Irish man under the bus, great solution.

    This mess is of the EU and UKs making. Leave them at it. But throwing up border posts and inconviencing our own people so we can please the EU is rash and foolish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,888 ✭✭✭54and56


    The idiocy knows no bounds.

    First you have people supporting a backstop that was never going to get through the House of Commons. It was right up there with believing in the toothfairy to believe it would get through.

    So why did the UK Govt propose it?
    If the EU don't budge its a no deal and economic damage for Ireland. In that situation to put up border posts almost immediately as a few on here have advocated would kill the Irish ecocomy and send us into immiediate recession.

    But hey keep the idiocy going.

    A deal was entered into between the UK Govt and the EU27. The UK haven't been able to deliver their end of the deal and are now throwing their toys out the pram like a spoilt child who orders a strawberry ice cream, gets a strawberry ice cream but then decides it wants a chocolate ice cream and starts screaming and shouting blaming everyone else that he doesn't want a strawberry ice cream and if someone doesn't give him a chocolate ice cream ASAP he's going to soil himself and sit in it for years.
    And some responses on here prove to me its Angela and co who run this country, not Varadkar.

    Sounds like the burden of proof standard you employ to arrive at your conclusions is kindergarten level.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,066 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Nope. We go toe to toe with the Germans for a change and tell them to cop on, that we're not dividing our country.

    The UK divided our country 100 years ago and are out to do it again.

    Maintaining our security in the single market is absolutely integral to a United Ireland ever happening and us being able to anywhere near afford it.


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 2,175 ✭✭✭ToBeFrank123


    54and56 wrote: »
    So why did the UK Govt propose it?



    A deal was entered into between the UK Govt and the EU27. The UK haven't been able to deliver their end of the deal and are now throwing their toys out the pram like a spoilt child who orders a strawberry ice cream, gets a strawberry ice cream but then decides it wants a chocolate ice cream and starts screaming and shouting blaming everyone else that he doesn't want a strawberry ice cream and if someone doesn't give him a chocolate ice cream ASAP he's going to soil himself and sit in it for years.



    Sounds like the burden of proof standard you employ to arrive at your conclusions is kindergarten level.

    The backstop is dead. It doesn't matter who proposed it. It was repeatedly voted down in the HOC including by Labour, Jeremy Corbyn and most of the opposition.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    Try telling that to people who commute across the border daily.

    Throwing your fellow Irish man under the bus, great solution.

    This mess is of the EU and UKs making. Leave them at it. But throwing up border posts and inconviencing our own people so we can please the EU is rash and foolish.

    Again, membership of the Single Market is a vital national interest, what part of that do you not get? Border posts annoying some people is not ideal, but it is not in the same league as wrecking the natioanl economey.

    Brexit is a mess of the UKs making, they did not need the EUs help to s**t the bed on that one.


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 2,175 ✭✭✭ToBeFrank123


    Imreoir2 wrote: »
    Again, membership of the Single Market is a vital national interest, what part of that do you not get? Border posts annoying some people is not ideal, but it is not in the same league as wrecking the natioanl economey.

    Brexit is a mess of the UKs making, they did not need the EUs help to s**t the bed on that one.

    Let the EU and UK sort it out. Their problem.

    They will eventually.

    They won't if we offer to put up border posts.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    The backstop is dead. It doesn't matter who proposed it. It was repeatedly voted down in the HOC including by Labour, Jeremy Corbyn and most of the opposition.

    So what? The HOC can vote to make the sky pink if they like, it does not have the power to alter reality and the reality is that the UK needs a deal and a deal will include the backstop. They can vote against it all they like, but eventually they will have to grit their teeth and bear it or watch their economey and probably their country fall apart.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement