Liverpool FC Team Talk, Gossip, Rumours 2019/2020

Gomez very ropey at the back at the moment

Henderson been getting into that position so often lately but he just can't score one

Klopp after lighting a fire under them at half time.

munstermagic11 wrote: »

To be fair, the coach saw what we saw, and made a huge change by bringing on Bobby.

Yes, but it doesn't mean that all the players are poor or all off the pace.

Always so much overreaction.

This is only their second game and is a prestigious friendly.

Pepp1989 wrote: »

Pulisic looks a good player. Would have been ideal depth for us. Would get plenty of game time.

Tonight is kinda showing we have no adequate replacements for Bobby and TAA.

Trent definatley, though I think Origi would have been an able replacement for Bob alright. Ox just left a total vacuum though. Still plenty of sharpness for him to find.

Already look so much better balanced now.

Turtyturd wrote: »

We could nick a half though.

I think we could even draw level if we get the right referee.

didnt see first half were they that poor??

patsy sally wrote: »

didnt see first half were they that poor??

Very poor.

we are being a slight bit casual with our passing now..... lets get the second goal first and then yis can start the flicks and ****...

Tangatagamadda Chaddabinga Bonga Bungo wrote: »

One big problem I have with PSG as a 'global brand' is they only get crowds of just over 40,000. I mean Paris is one of the biggest cities in Europe. And it has no split in support within the city like London or Madrid or Milan have. They really should be getting Barcelona level crowds considering where they are based.

That's the point I think though... they're not trying to be a global brand in the way liverpool are for instance - the football is secondary for them.. it's just a means to an end to get the name out there, like the way they've been trying to get rid of the Saint Germaine part of the name... they want to just be a brand of cool, associated with a cool city. The football business is far less important than the sense of celebrity and 'bling' and 'premium' around it. Blegh.

munstermagic11 wrote: »

Rubbish. This is a Cup worth winning. European teams take this seriously. It's silverware.

A lot of the players were well off the pace in the first half. Chelsea dominated from the 15mins onwards. Mid could get a kick, defense ropey, and we didn't offer much in attack.

It's great to get a trophy but quickly forgotten about if lost unlike the league in 14 or Champion's League last year or 2007.

It'll be nice to get a trophy but it's not a major one.

Also, many players are still building match fitness and sharpness at this stage of the season. It's normal.

Either way when opposition teams dominate for a period then players always say that players are off the pace , etc.

Feel sorry for Ox but Bobby offers so much more. If it wasn't so early in the season then Ox would have made a decent sub in the second half.