Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

WereWolf: A 10 player Vigilante game.

1111214161738

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,846 ✭✭✭✭Electric Nitwit


    Quick aside for the newbies, I found the wiki which explains a lot of terms

    https://boardsie-werewolf.fandom.com/wiki/Definitions


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,941 ✭✭✭osh


    Jesus. Presumably one of those is by the vig? I mean wolves don't get two munches do they?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,846 ✭✭✭✭Electric Nitwit


    osh wrote: »
    Jesus. Presumably one of those is by the vig? I mean wolves don't get two munches do they?

    That's what I assumed

    Both voted for Green&Red, but at this point I have no idea of I should read anything into that!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,897 ✭✭✭tusk


    Barney and Ted Dying actually helps me, because I was starting to feel like Barney was laying low.

    Ted had me worried earlier on.

    RIP lads.

    Village let's do some serious fleshing out today.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,846 ✭✭✭✭Electric Nitwit


    I wrote this last night, but I don't think this morning changes it...

    Baggly getting lynched made me so angry, I think I'm already too invested in this game!

    My initial thought was to blame Necro, because this exchange is why I voted Baggly:
    Baggly wrote: »
    If I die you are all silly. But I'll be vindicated and maybe then you will listen to my reads. So bad call but sure what can you do if people won't listen.
    Necro wrote: »
    What reads? You're literally calling people wolves with no reasoning??
    Baggly wrote: »
    That's very not true
    Baggly wrote: »
    And you making things up is the reason I gave for sussing you. He is a wolf. I promise.
    Necro wrote: »
    Wolf. Vig will shoot you if you survive the lynch, I'd put my house on that ;)
    Baggly wrote: »
    Well then lynch me and save a bullet

    I went back and saw these which pushed me further this way, I even started preparing a reply...

    Very first post, fairly innocuous but mentions Baggly
    Necro wrote: »
    Baggly, Barney I be watching you....
    But sticks at it
    Necro wrote: »
    It's probably Baggly and Barney tbf. Stank of wolf off them :D

    But then there was this...
    Necro wrote: »
    Like, the post of Baggly's is literally calling tusk a wolf right?

    I don't see how you could wolf read Baggly purely off that post alone

    Plus Baggly did just throw out accusations without much to back them up, I think Necro was dead right there. I don't understand why Baggly played that way. Rereading the thread I really feel like he brought it on himself

    So I'm off Necro again, but thought I'd post my logic anyway. Hi Necro, friends?

    So basically I feel like I was played, but I cannot work out who by or how and I hate this game! I trust none of you but suspect none of you. But I'm determined to pay much closer attention today. Yesterday I tried to follow my gut and my gut was a fool, it's time for serious Nitwit!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,392 ✭✭✭LadySkunk


    Yeah Osh one of those is the vig shot.

    Looking at the lynch results then at that it seems to not look good for Green&Red either way as they both voted for him so going after one of those as a wolf team.

    Which makes me think that could have been a set up? Wolves go for one of the two guys and then they come on today and throw shade on him or the other guy who voted not thinking they would be shot by the vig.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 57,205 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Ok so Barney dying means one of a few things:

    Either he was right about GnR and munched as a result

    OR

    The munch is to set up GnR.


    OR

    Barney got shot by the vigilante


    Sorry Baggly btw, genuinely thought you was wolfing it up :/


    My assumption is Ted was shot and Barney was munched but I could be way off on that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,846 ✭✭✭✭Electric Nitwit


    No!

    But here goes...

    1. Ted. Something doesn't feel right, started too confidently for a newbie I think. The first two posts feel coached to me...

    2. Barney
    Deep down the comment about breaking Clarabel's heart seems innocuous, but it's so cavalier early in a game I wonder if there's more to it

    I don't know why, but I don't think Tusk is a wolf. Even though I find the attitude to the accusations odd, with little denial or defence, I think maybe the group has gone lynch mob too early :P

    I had Ted and Barney on my #FFA1 so I'm crap at this game!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,392 ✭✭✭LadySkunk


    Clarabel I owe you an apology by the way! When I read back over everything I realised you didn’t have me first on your FFA, I was looking at the table you made and was on mobile so just saw my name up the top. My brain was frazzled trying to figure it out but on looking back I don’t think you’re wolfy


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,897 ✭✭✭tusk


    I had Ted and Barney on my #FFA1 so I'm crap at this game!

    Everyone is crap at this game. That's why we all hate it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,846 ✭✭✭✭Electric Nitwit


    LadySkunk wrote: »
    Yeah Osh one of those is the vig shot.

    Looking at the lynch results then at that it seems to not look good for Green&Red either way as they both voted for him so going after one of those as a wolf team.

    Which makes me think that could have been a set up? Wolves go for one of the two guys and then they come on today and throw shade on him or the other guy who voted not thinking they would be shot by the vig.

    That would be my initial read too, but it's not based on anything


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,897 ✭✭✭tusk


    LadySkunk wrote: »
    Clarabel I owe you an apology by the way! When I read back over everything I realised you didn’t have me first on your FFA, I was looking at the table you made and was on mobile so just saw my name up the top. My brain was frazzled trying to figure it out but on looking back I don’t think you’re wolfy

    Now that you've read back what are your thoughts?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,941 ✭✭✭osh


    Plus Baggly did just throw out accusations without much to back them up, I think Necro was dead right there. I don't understand why Baggly played that way. Rereading the thread I really feel like he brought it on himself

    Yeah, at least from my point of view, as he's an experienced player I expected Baggly to be able to have a bit more substance to his posts, accusations, FFA etc. That was the main reason I switched from Tusk to him, as the only thing I was really going on with Tusk was the opening declaration he made about the 4 first posters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,846 ✭✭✭✭Electric Nitwit


    So now we're...

    1. LadySkunk

    3. osh
    4. Necro
    5. Green&Red

    7. tusk

    9. Clarabel
    10. Electric Nitwit


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,897 ✭✭✭tusk


    So now we're...

    1. LadySkunk

    3. osh
    4. Necro
    5. Green&Red

    7. tusk

    9. Clarabel
    10. Electric Nitwit

    I really need to do some digging today, because honestly, i don't think I have any serious leads right now.

    Have to go do some work for an hour or so, but will be back on then. If anyone has any processes or tactics that they think could help, please surface them for us to work through as a team.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,941 ✭✭✭osh


    LadySkunk wrote: »
    Yeah Osh one of those is the vig shot.

    Looking at the lynch results then at that it seems to not look good for Green&Red either way as they both voted for him so going after one of those as a wolf team.

    Which makes me think that could have been a set up? Wolves go for one of the two guys and then they come on today and throw shade on him or the other guy who voted not thinking they would be shot by the vig.

    That's a good point actually. At least something to consider anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,392 ✭✭✭LadySkunk


    tusk wrote: »
    Now that you've read back what are your thoughts?

    Funnily enough Green&Red was the only one I made note of. It felt reading back that he was following others rather than having his own independent thoughts. I’m going to jump back and see what exactly it was so I can be as accurate as possible.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 57,205 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    I'm wondering why the votes fell of tusk last night tbh, for those who switched (I know osh has already said why)... why?

    Ted getting killed is interesting as I was wondering if he might be a wolf overnight tbh.

    At least our vig is still here I guess, danger here is that if we get it wrong tonight and vig mi****s again it's game over.

    I need to rethink things but before I do a re-read here's my current thoughts, from village to wolfy:

    Necro (obviously)
    EN
    Clarabel
    GnR
    osh
    Skunk
    tusk

    I think that's everyone.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 57,205 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    LadySkunk wrote:
    Funnily enough Green&Red was the only one I made note of. It felt reading back that he was following others rather than having his own independent thoughts. I’m going to jump back and see what exactly it was so I can be as accurate as possible.

    That's not entirely true tbf, he was the first to post an FFA iirc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,762 ✭✭✭✭Green&Red


    SKeith any chance we could find out who shot who? Might be useful to know who the wolves targetted

    Look they obviously both voted for me but theres five people who voted for Baggly, what does that tell us? We know f**k all about f**k all D0 is what that tells us

    Looking at the voting
    Baggly : tusk, Clarabel, osh, Electric Nitwit, Necro
    Clarabel : Green&Red, LadySkunk
    Green&Red : Barney92, Ted_YNWA
    tusk : Baggly

    I think there is at least one and probably two wolves in the Baggly voters


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,762 ✭✭✭✭Green&Red


    LadySkunk wrote: »
    Funnily enough Green&Red was the only one I made note of. It felt reading back that he was following others rather than having his own independent thoughts. I’m going to jump back and see what exactly it was so I can be as accurate as possible.

    Are you mistaking me for someone else? I had very few posts and was first to do my FFA


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,846 ✭✭✭✭Electric Nitwit


    Necro wrote: »
    I'm wondering why the votes fell of tusk last night tbh, for those who switched (I know osh has already said why)... why?

    I was never taken with the Tusk thing, felt like a minor slip, a fairly random accusation from Baggly and a snowballing effect.

    That, and the late argument between Baggly and you, led me to think Baggly. But obviously that was wrong

    Why did you tell Baggly the vigilante would shoot him if he wasn't lynched? Feels a little like a subtle attempt to say the vigilante into getting rid of him. He had been accusing you


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,941 ✭✭✭osh


    Green&Red wrote: »
    SKeith any chance we could find out who shot who? Might be useful to know who the wolves targetted

    Look they obviously both voted for me but theres five people who voted for Baggly, what does that tell us? We know f**k all about f**k all D0 is what that tells us

    Looking at the voting
    Baggly : tusk, Clarabel, osh, Electric Nitwit, Necro
    Clarabel : Green&Red, LadySkunk
    Green&Red : Barney92, Ted_YNWA
    tusk : Baggly

    I think there is at least one and probably two wolves in the Baggly voters

    Well surely there's certainly one wolf who voted for Baggly, given only yourself and skunk are still alive who didn't? From your point of view I mean.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 57,205 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Green&Red wrote:
    SKeith any chance we could find out who shot who? Might be useful to know who the wolves targetted

    Vig will know and that will help streamline their thinking anyways. Doubt there'll be full clarification on that point tbh.
    Green&Red wrote:
    I think there is at least one and probably two wolves in the Baggly voters

    So one or two in 5? Maybe. I know I'm good so that leaves tusk, EN, Clara and osh.

    I'm like pretty confident EN is town so you reckon there still might be two in Clara, osh and tusk?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,392 ✭✭✭LadySkunk


    Green&Red wrote: »
    Are you mistaking me for someone else? I had very few posts and was first to do my FFA

    Hahaha I actually think I read your FFA and then read it again and thought you were copying someone else’s thoughts :pac:

    I’m looking back but can’t find it, did someone else say about Tusk and Baggly being suspect. Tusk for being wolfy and Baggly for calling Tusk a wolf? I could have sworn it was Necro but he didn’t FFA Tusk. Just looking for clarification before I post again


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 57,205 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Why did you tell Baggly the vigilante would shoot him if he wasn't lynched? Feels a little like a subtle attempt to say the vigilante into getting rid of him. He had been accusing you

    :( I was trying to draw the kill but failed


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 57,205 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    LadySkunk wrote:
    I’m looking back but can’t find it, did someone else say about Tusk and Baggly being suspect. Tusk for being wolfy and Baggly for calling Tusk a wolf? I could have sworn it was Necro but he didn’t FFA Tusk. Just looking for clarification before I post again


    No Barney called GnR out on his FFA and I agreed the reasoning was a little conflicting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,941 ✭✭✭osh


    LadySkunk wrote: »
    Hahaha I actually think I read your FFA and then read it again and thought you were copying someone else’s thoughts :pac:

    I’m looking back but can’t find it, did someone else say about Tusk and Baggly being suspect. Tusk for being wolfy and Baggly for calling Tusk a wolf? I could have sworn it was Necro but he didn’t FFA Tusk. Just looking for clarification before I post again

    I think Necro said he didn't think it likely they were on the same team, could be mistaken.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,846 ✭✭✭✭Electric Nitwit


    Necro wrote: »
    :( I was trying to draw the kill but failed

    But why?
    Baggly was the only one really going at you, it is convenient for you he's gone


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,392 ✭✭✭LadySkunk


    Necro wrote: »
    No Barney called GnR out on his FFA and I agreed the reasoning was a little conflicting.

    Aww okay I must be thinking of that then! Which makes my only note invalid :o

    When I was looking back for that post though I noticed a couple of things I’d like to share with the group


Advertisement