Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ana Kriegel - Boys A & B found guilty [Mod: Do NOT post identifying information]

1163164166168169247

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,989 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Neither of these backup your twisted logic.

    There is a difference between the perpetrator and the victim of bullying. Girls are more frequently the victims of bullying. Often the bullying is perpetrated by boys.

    One of those articles says that disabled children and children with special needs also reported much higher incidences of bullying than other pupils. I wonder does poster Eric Cartman think that means that other disabled children are also the bullies in those cases?

    "If a woman cannot stand in a public space and say, without fear of consequences, that men cannot be women, then women have no rights at all." Helen Joyce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,552 ✭✭✭OwlsZat


    I'm out of the schooling loop but technology could surely step in here. Have a public (amongst parents) bullying dashboard where there children receives points against for bullying positive points for being nice. Would be quick to motivate dysfunctional parents.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,552 ✭✭✭OwlsZat


    Alternatively, let a school issue 3 bullying violations against a student and it becomes a public order offense?

    Certainly think there is scope to intact a new law, I'd be surprised if Ana's family hadn't some strong views.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,507 ✭✭✭rodge123


    Damien360 wrote: »
    Kids don't fear the guards anymore. They would rise to them looking for an argument and a quick march to the courts for a payout if anyone touched them. It would be a mess. Enforcement would be impossible.

    Keep it in the school system. Allow schools to expel without recourse if the procedures are followed (similar to companies). A points system similar to your 3 strikes and your out. But principals would have to be held to account for not dealing with bullying when it is reported to them.

    Bullying goes much further than schools and companies have been successfully brought to court for failing to deal with reported bullying. Not sure if the fault is pointed at HR or the director of the company. Money fixes this (somewhat) but in a school it has to be a person's job that will be at stake as I don't believe money will fix it. The state would just payout but if a principals job is at stake over failure to act, then we might get on top of this.

    As an aside, I also believe the state pays too often with no consequences for the person in state employment that caused it. It is always the system at fault. HSE is the biggest example of this. That's why I think, until jobs are at stake, little will change. And I don't mean the ministers as that's a cop out.

    Yeah I agree with a lot of what you say there and job accountability.
    Only issue I see is that I imagine principles have a massive amount of things to juggle already without adding this responsibility on (I don’t work in eduction so unsure).
    Maybe additional money to hire bullying officers employed by dept of eduction.
    principle passes on info to them, they do the dirty work and give a report on case back to principle to make a decision.
    That also avoids teachers been abused or cars damaged as most of work done by external officer.
    For serious cases they principle also has to pass case details on standard Gardaí with parents permission.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    If AGS is involved, who knows what the reprisals for the Teacher/Principal woud be. Probably more than a can of paint on their door.


    Sorry, IMO - your suggestion is not a workable solution.

    The bully never has to know that the school was ever involved.
    The parent of the bullied child complains to the school. The school make discreet enquiries to see if there is in fact bullying. If there is then the school hand their “findings” to AGS who take it from there. I think that bullying should from now in come under the heading “anti social behavior” because that’s what it is.
    Arriving at the bully’s front door to discuss with his/her parents their child’s “anti social behavior” is a lot more serious.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Stop moaning ffs


    All missing the point.
    School has a zero tolerance policy. Every school. National policy. Government down.

    Anyone or any child breaking that. Off you go.

    This is that simple.

    Employers and companies have these policies already.

    Why not schools?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    A start would be nice.
    I am not sure how many children took their own lives down to bullying, but I remember a few years ago a few had happened quite close to each other including two sisters - Erin and Shanon Gallagher.
    At the time there were reports in the papers stating that bullying had been rising since 2005
    A few years later France launched a bullying hotline and a separate number for cyber bullying.
    After the death of Phoebe Prince in the U.S., Massachusetts introduced a state anti-bullying task force.
    For such a small country we have had a lot of deaths as a result of bullying and still not a lot being done. Almost nothing other than the independent bodies who have fund raisers for most of their cash.

    Something really needs to be done, not only does the bullying seem more vicious today, it is relentless. Because of the internet a bully can follow a person around and never give up. Demeaning them would only be a small part of it.

    How hard could it be to set up a number.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 93 ✭✭Orchids


    I think Catherine Murphy TD is a friend of Ana's family, I'd like to think she would try to get something done in relation to bullying which seemed to be so shocking in Ana's case & everyone seemed to know about it & yet nothing was done.
    RIP Beautiful Ana


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,242 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    Orchids wrote: »
    I think Catherine Murphy TD is a friend of Ana's family, I'd like to think she would try to get something done in relation to bullying which seemed to be so shocking in Ana's case & everyone seemed to know about it & yet nothing was done.
    RIP Beautiful Ana

    Knowing catherine Murphy she probably drove straight up to the house the day the boys were caught and wrote to the liffey champion saying she was doing a lot, just so she could milk it for years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,409 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    Knowing catherine Murphy she probably drove straight up to the house the day the boys were caught and wrote to the liffey champion saying she was doing a lot, just so she could milk it for years.

    Another post plucked from the air with nothing to back it up .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,242 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    iamwhoiam wrote: »
    Another post plucked from the air with nothing to back it up .

    In my opinion catherine murphy does nothing round the town and is just interested in keeping herself on the political career bandwagon. The other poster asserted without proof that catherine murphy is friends with the family , nobody asks. I post a tounge in cheek opinion about catherine murphy based on how I feel she represents the town and suddenly I have to have some sort of statistical backup to it..... :pac:

    come off it mate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,533 ✭✭✭✭Collie D


    Hardly the place to discuss opinions of the local TD


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,409 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    Orchids wrote: »
    I think Catherine Murphy TD is a friend of Ana's family, I'd like to think she would try to get something done in relation to bullying which seemed to be so shocking in Ana's case & everyone seemed to know about it & yet nothing was done.
    RIP Beautiful Ana

    She is , she had said so publicly .
    It would be fantastic if in Anas name an anti bullying policy could be put in place.
    I think a task force could be put in place and a school could call on them to step in if they need guidance and information


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,409 ✭✭✭✭iamwhoiam


    In my opinion catherine murphy does nothing round the town and is just interested in keeping herself on the political career bandwagon. The other poster asserted without proof that catherine murphy is friends with the family , nobody asks. I post a tounge in cheek opinion about catherine murphy based on how I feel she represents the town and suddenly I have to have some sort of statistical backup to it..... :pac:

    come off it mate.

    I am not your mate . I am an adult woman

    https://www.google.ie/amp/s/amp.independent.ie/irish-news/from-beaming-pink-princess-to-shy-teen-anas-life-in-pictures-38244392.html


    Ana had a big personality, according to Social Democrat TD Catherine Murphy, a family friend. The Kriegel home was "noisy" because Ana was in it, and her parents often talked about the foundations being undermined because of the noise, Catherine laughingly recalled on RTE's Prime Time last week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,759 ✭✭✭Damien360


    Suckit wrote: »
    A start would be nice.
    I am not sure how many children took their own lives down to bullying, but I remember a few years ago a few had happened quite close to each other including two sisters - Erin and Shanon Gallagher.
    At the time there were reports in the papers stating that bullying had been rising since 2005
    A few years later France launched a bullying hotline and a separate number for cyber bullying.
    After the death of Phoebe Prince in the U.S., Massachusetts introduced a state anti-bullying task force.
    For such a small country we have had a lot of deaths as a result of bullying and still not a lot being done. Almost nothing other than the independent bodies who have fund raisers for most of their cash.

    Something really needs to be done, not only does the bullying seem more vicious today, it is relentless. Because of the internet a bully can follow a person around and never give up. Demeaning them would only be a small part of it.

    How hard could it be to set up a number.

    I read this and thought of just googling the French anti bullying hotline. It exists primarily for companies but it would seem from some articles (see link of one good one below) say it is not really for schools and is pushed back to the school. Quite a lot of countries deal with workplace bullying but don't have anything for schools beyond pushing back to the school.

    The French set up a forum of 12 year olds to survey bullying issues and have an initiative with Facebook as a result but it is an awareness campaign only. A national day of 8th November is given to this awareness also. No actions that I can find although I am relying on google translate.

    We are great at setting up hotlines in this country but there is no follow up. It would be a pointless waste of money.

    Link below is decent for different approaches to bullying. Schools get a mention at the end of each country paragraph. Hopefully I get the syntax right for link.

    https://www.hcalawyers.com.au/blog/bullying-laws-around-the-world/amp/[url][/url]


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    Damien360 wrote: »
    I read this and thought of just googling the French anti bullying hotline. It exists primarily for companies but it would seem from some articles (see link of one good one below) say it is not really for schools and is pushed back to the school. Quite a lot of countries deal with workplace bullying but don't have anything for schools beyond pushing back to the school.
    I don't know for sure. I can only remember it vaguely.
    It is in my head, but I can't remember where I read it.

    I think this may be it - http://en.rfi.fr/general/20151029-France-unveils-bullying-hotline-students-clamp-down-harassment

    But whether or not they stuck to it I have no idea.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,759 ✭✭✭Damien360


    Suckit wrote: »
    I don't know for sure. I can only remember it vaguely.
    It is in my head, but I can't remember where I read it.

    I think this may be it - http://en.rfi.fr/general/20151029-France-unveils-bullying-hotline-students-clamp-down-harassment

    But whether or not they stuck to it I have no idea.

    I found that link when searching but that was just the result of the forum of 12 year olds. It encompasses companies and schools but has teeth against companies (also determines maximum damage of 32k) but nothing dealing with schools. Always back to the school and the parent boards (similar schools structure to here I think).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31 corpusvile


    strandroad wrote: »
    Do you not think that bullying is a separate (obviously very serious) issue here and not necessarily a direct cause of Ana's death or the killers' plans?

    I mean, even a "popular" (I hate this phrase!) 14 year old girl would still skip happily to meet a boy she had a crush on. Do you think that they picked Ana for her vulnerability, or rather because she was developed, pretty and met the stereotype of "Russian Anastasia" they saw on porn sites?

    Maybe was a combination of both, but I very strongly suspect that had they not have targeted Ana, they'd have targeted someone else anyway. I don't think bullying was necessarily a direct cause with these two specifically.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,810 ✭✭✭✭evolving_doors


    corpusvile wrote: »
    Maybe was a combination of both, but I very strongly suspect that had they not have targeted Ana, they'd have targeted someone else anyway. I don't think bullying was necessarily a direct cause with these two specifically.

    There's no doubt they exploited a vulnerable person though. So I don't think they might have been as ready to entrap someone with a strong network of friends.
    When people are marginalised then exploitation is more likely.

    It probably sounds strange but I doubt they would have picked on a popular kid. Reminds me of the Anabel nightclub murder, who got killed and who ended up doing the time... Both weren't the 'popular' kids.

    So maybe not a direct cause but definitely a contributing factor.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31 corpusvile


    It quite possibly did contribute but the nature & apparent pre-planning of this murder strongly intimates they primarily wanted to murder someone & again I do believe if it wasn't poor Ana it would have been someone else.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Stop moaning ffs


    Irish Daily Mail fined 25,000 euro for contempt of court during the Ana Kriégel trial. Editor, Sebastian Hamilton fined 4,500Euro - Mr J McDermott said directions Mr Hamilton had given in relation to court copy, were ignored by senior editorial staff but he as editor was responsible for this systems failure.

    Proper order.


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭political analyst


    Irish Daily Mail fined 25,000 euro for contempt of court during the Ana Kriégel trial. Editor, Sebastian Hamilton fined 4,500Euro - Mr J McDermott said directions Mr Hamilton had given in relation to court copy, were ignored by senior editorial staff but he as editor was responsible for this systems failure.

    Proper order.


    Why is an editor punished at all for an act that was not just unauthorised by him but which he instructed should not have been done? Is that not like saying it's the Garda Commissioner's fault that crimes were committed by a small number of gardaí?


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭political analyst


    There's no doubt they exploited a vulnerable person though. So I don't think they might have been as ready to entrap someone with a strong network of friends.
    When people are marginalised then exploitation is more likely.

    It probably sounds strange but I doubt they would have picked on a popular kid. Reminds me of the Anabel nightclub murder, who got killed and who ended up doing the time... Both weren't the 'popular' kids.

    So maybe not a direct cause but definitely a contributing factor.


    Actually, two were convicted on the charge of violent disorder, for which each of them served an 18-month sentence. One of the two was convicted on the charge of manslaughter but that conviction was quashed on appeal. The killing of Brian Murphy was a spur-of-the-moment crime, unlike Ana's murder.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,279 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Why is an editor punished at all for an act that was not just unauthorised by him but which he instructed should not have been done? Is that not like saying it's the Garda Commissioner's fault that crimes were committed by a small number of gardaí?

    because he is ultimately responsible for what gets published.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,412 ✭✭✭Road-Hog


    because he is ultimately responsible for what gets published.


    What offending article/material did his paper publish to merit the fine....?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    Road-Hog wrote: »
    What offending article/material did his paper publish to merit the fine....?

    Journalists employed by him, under his direction, answerable to him, went on the radio and broke the law.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭Emme


    Katherine Zappone's has suggested that children who commit serious crimes should receive counselling instead of being detained. I don't think it is appropriate in all cases. Some criminals should not be allowed in society no matter how young.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,810 ✭✭✭✭evolving_doors


    splinter65 wrote: »
    Journalists employed by him, under his direction, answerable to him, went on the radio and broke the law.

    I thought that it was because when the paper said the footage of the boys on the CCTV was the moment she was "being led to her death". It was implying that the boys were guilty while the trial was still taking place.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 7,691 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hannibal_Smith


    I thought that it was because when the paper said the footage of the boys on the CCTV was the moment she was "being led to her death". It was implying that the boys were guilty while the trial was still taking place.

    Was just about to say the same


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 32,956 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Emme wrote: »
    Katherine Zappone's has suggested that children who commit serious crimes should receive counselling instead of being detained. I don't think it is appropriate in all cases. Some criminals should not be allowed in society no matter how young.

    ''Instead of''. Why not ''as well as''?.

    Zappone is the type of person people talk about when they refer to liberals or the left in a mocking manner. She's far too soft. I'm not an advocate for death sentences by any means but at the same time punishment must be served.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement