Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 2018/2019 Part Two

1235236238240241331

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,638 ✭✭✭✭bangkok


    Fair enough.

    I disagree with you completely.

    It may be a flawed stat, but it can also be a good indicator.

    I don't know why people would chose to totally ignore it as a stat - it can be indicative of general play, and strengths/weakness to be worked on.

    Does it take into account how clear cut a chance it is or how good the player is that has that chance?

    For example a good chance for lukaku may be a sitter for ronaldo, or a half chance for fellaini would be a goal for martial


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49,319 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    bangkok wrote: »
    Does it take into account how clear cut a chance it is or how good the player is that has that chance?

    For example a good chance for lukaku may be a sitter for ronaldo, or a half chance for fellaini would be a goal for martial

    Takes into account the context of the situation but not the player. The goal is to normalise conversion rates, so to further manipulate it according to the player would be incorrect.

    If Ronaldo will score lower percentage chances than other players then his ratio of goals to xg will refleck that. That's the point.

    If it took into acciunt the player then arguable everyone would eventually normalise to a 1:1 ratio or ear enough, which would be of no indication to anyone.

    Edit: also LOL at calling it nonsense and then asking how it works.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,638 ✭✭✭✭bangkok


    Takes into account the context of the situation but not the player. The goal is to normalise conversion rates, so to further manipulate it according to the player would be incorrect.

    If Ronaldo will score lower percentage chances than other players then his ratio of goals to xg will refleck that. That's the point.

    If it took into acciunt the player then arguable everyone would eventually normalise to a 1:1 ratio or ear enough, which would be of no indication to anyone.

    Edit: also LOL at calling it nonsense and then asking how it works.

    I still think its a nonsense stat after i seen dalots name on the list


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49,319 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    bangkok wrote: »
    I still think its a nonsense stat after i seen dalots name on the list

    FFS. What a stupid effing reason that is.

    That is not an issue with the stat, its an issue with the person who used it. Ffs.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 19,456 Mod ✭✭✭✭Trigger


    FFS. What a stupid effing reason that is.

    That is not an issue with the stat, its an issue with the person who used it. Ffs.

    It's an issue for Bangkok because those players are higher up the list than his beloved Pogba, it's the only reason why he is rubbishing it


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,507 ✭✭✭clubberlang12


    So is Pogba not getting into the box because he can't be arsed or because the tactical instruction to the side has generally been more conservative in that respect? Is Pogba ignoring the instructions to get further forward cause he doesn't want to be involved in that area of the play, or are we not set up for those runs to the be the case?

    Was Lampard give the same instructions as Pogba is, but either ignored them to go further forward or pogba is ignoring them and staying further back?

    Maybe if Pogba had Makalele and Essien behind him he would be freer (and willing?) to attack more? Maybe Matic and Herrera/Fellaini have not offered the same platform as those two.

    It could be Pogba, it could be tactics. I would say tactics, cause I can't imagine him not wanting to be involved around the box more, but I guess others will say different.

    I would be of the opinion, that it is Pogba and not tactics dictating him not getting forward into the box. Similar to it being Pogba, not tactics, who seems to lose possession and then throwing his hands in the air, not reacting to losing the ball in the first place thus letting the play run on 10/15 yards before reacting. The same Pogba who seems reluctant to put in a defensive shift needed a lot of the time, which is why i don't put credence in the idea that he thinks 2 midfielders behind him aren't solid enough for him to venture further forward. How many do we need behind him for that then!!!
    Some of it is because of his playing style......he likes to ping forward balls trying to create chances, so he can get caught further behind the run of play. Again, as i said earlier, nothing wrong with that and we have benefited from him doing it, but sometimes i would like to see him just give the ball a bit quicker and shorter and increase his off the ball movement towards the box. We have seen in games, notably against City, where he can get in and and on the end of chances.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,638 ✭✭✭✭bangkok


    astradave wrote: »
    It's an issue for Bangkok because those players are higher up the list than his beloved Pogba, it's the only reason why he is rubbishing it

    And yet pogba is the only man utd player nominated for the uefa team of the year shorlist for this year


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    bangkok wrote: »
    And yet pogba is the only man utd player nominated for the uefa team of the year shorlist for this year

    dflct.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,587 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    bangkok wrote: »
    And yet pogba is the only man utd player nominated for the uefa team of the year shorlist for this year

    I'm surprised you haven't mentioned he was put in MNF combined 11 for next Sunday.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,638 ✭✭✭✭bangkok


    TitianGerm wrote: »
    I'm surprised you haven't mentioned he was put in MNF combined 11 for next Sunday.

    :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,946 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Dalot actually makes sense ahead of Pogba given how dangerous his crosses were.

    But I suppose Dalot will suprise a lot of people but obviously not too much lest he overshadow our true ☆


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49,319 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Dalot actually makes sense ahead of Pogba given how dangerous his crosses were.

    But I suppose Dalot will suprise a lot of people but obviously not too much lest he overshadow our true ☆

    I think Dalot being included in the original point was stupid on the basis he had basically only played 1 game, vs a rubbish side - so his 'average' xAssists is base on a skewed sample size.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,638 ✭✭✭✭bangkok


    I think Dalot being included in the original point was stupid on the basis he had basically only played 1 game, vs a rubbish side - so his 'average' xAssists is base on a skewed sample size.

    Thats why i was saying it was a nonsense stat.

    Fred and other players were on it as well


  • Posts: 14,734 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think Dalot being included in the original point was stupid on the basis he had basically only played 1 game, vs a rubbish side - so his 'average' xAssists is base on a skewed sample size.

    its 3 apperances and 196 minutes now tbf it is a small enough sample size but I just included everyone who was above pogba, I was just providing some information without any discussion so I wanted to be provide all the information.

    No need to get insulting over the inclusion it's easy dismiss him for sample size reasons if you like, but its funny the Pogba apologists will focus on one thing and ignore all the others above him who have decent or comparable sample sizes


  • Posts: 14,734 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'll throw up the top 6 from other teams with a 450 minute sample size

    City

    Silva
    Sterling
    Jesus
    Gundagun
    Sane
    B.silva

    Chelsea

    Hazard
    Giroud
    Willain
    Barkely
    Pedro
    Azpilcuetta

    Arseanal

    Kolansic
    Ozil
    Iwobi
    Ramsey
    Aubayeang
    Mkihtarian

    Hardly any surprises there in that lot, Maybe kolansic although again he'd will drop the more games he plays most likely

    If people want to call it a nonsense stat than go right ahead but you get the more creatice players and players you'd expect to be on a list of expected assists from other clubs, but Pogba our supposed creative messiah is well down the list at United


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,638 ✭✭✭✭bangkok


    I'll throw up the top 6 from other teams with a 450 minute sample size

    City

    Silva
    Sterling
    Jesus
    Gundagun
    Sane
    B.silva

    Chelsea

    Hazard
    Giroud
    Willain
    Barkely
    Pedro
    Azpilcuetta

    Arseanal

    Kolansic
    Ozil
    Iwobi
    Ramsey
    Aubayeang
    Mkihtarian

    Hardly any surprises there in that lot, Maybe kolansic although again he'd will drop the more games he plays most likely

    If people want to call it a nonsense stat than go right ahead but you get the more creatice players and players you'd expect to be on a list of expected assists from other clubs, but Pogba our supposed creative messiah is well down the list at United

    What about actual assists and goals scored, attempts on goal?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,583 ✭✭✭VW 1


    bangkok wrote: »
    What about actual assists and goals scored, attempts on goal?

    If you're in a position to rubbish what people put up without knowing what the stats even mean or what they include, then at least have the decency to put up some stats or figures yourself.

    Have you ever contributed to a debate other than to tell people they are wrong and you are right just because of your own opinion?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,779 ✭✭✭✭jayo26


    VW 1 wrote: »
    If you're in a position to rubbish what people put up without knowing what the stats even mean or what they include, then at least have the decency to put up some stats or figures yourself.

    Have you ever contributed to a debate other than to tell people they are wrong and you are right just because of your own opinion?

    QONVIyz.gif


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,638 ✭✭✭✭bangkok


    VW 1 wrote: »
    If you're in a position to rubbish what people put up without knowing what the stats even mean or what they include, then at least have the decency to put up some stats or figures yourself.

    Have you ever contributed to a debate other than to tell people they are wrong and you are right just because of your own opinion?

    https://www.whoscored.com/Teams/32/Show/England-Manchester-United

    I only posted that link the other day showing how pogba was our highest rated player overall this season

    http://www2.squawka.com/players/paul-pogba/stats#total-chances-created#manchester-united-(current)#english-barclays-premier-league#8#season-2017/2018#819#all-matches#1-38#type

    One from last season, only mata created more chances than pogba last season


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,369 ✭✭✭Rossi IRL


    Reckon we will see

    Romero

    Valencia Bailly Rojo Young

    Fred Pereira Pogba

    Mata Lingard

    Greenwood

    https://twitter.com/utdxtra/status/1072509452115472389?s=19


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49,319 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    bangkok wrote: »
    Thats why i was saying it was a nonsense stat.

    Fred and other players were on it as well

    That doesn't make it a nonsense stat. The makes the use of it stupid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 49,319 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Rossi IRL wrote: »
    Reckon we will see

    Romero

    Valencia Bailly Rojo Young

    Fred Pereira Pogba

    Mata Lingard

    Greenwood
    Don't see any way in hell that Greenwood starts that match. On the bench, maybe. On as a sub? would be surprised. Starting. No way, imo.

    Lukaku into that side, imo. Dropped last two matches, Jose wants a response from him. Start vs Valencia and 'earn' the start vs Liverpool.

    Also, if that is the midfield three that starts.... I'd be very interested to see how they do. Some very good passers and a lot of technical skill.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,369 ✭✭✭Rossi IRL


    Don't see any way in hell that Greenwood starts that match. On the bench, maybe. On as a sub? would be surprised. Starting. No way, imo.

    Lukaku into that side, imo. Dropped last two matches, Jose wants a response from him. Start vs Valencia and 'earn' the start vs Liverpool.

    Also, if that is the midfield three that starts.... I'd be very interested to see how they do. Some very good passers and a lot of technical skill.


    Yep could see Lukaku start, although I'd rather see him not. Can't see Rashford playing though I reckon he should be rested before the weekend.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,625 ✭✭✭✭yabadabado


    Greenwood, not a hope.

    Be good if Jose did give a few youngsters and lesser used players some minutes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,785 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    I'm like this idea of Alternative table.

    We can now confirm United have 24 league titles. 2006, 2010, 2012(remember them back then?) and 2018.

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,369 ✭✭✭Rossi IRL


    yabadabado wrote: »
    Greenwood, not a hope.

    Be good if Jose did give a few youngsters and lesser used players some minutes.

    Yep Jose just confirmed he is only brought as backup, probably won't even see him on the bench.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,002 ✭✭✭beno619


    So apparently Smalling has been playing with a fractured foot since the Young Boys game. Fair play to him.


  • Posts: 14,734 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That doesn't make it a nonsense stat. The makes the use of it stupid.

    I'm not sure what your failing to grasp Mitch, I didn't use the stat originally at all merely posted all the information on thread, you and Bangkok got caught up in the Dalot part of it, I didn't comment on it until today


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,638 ✭✭✭✭bangkok


    beno619 wrote: »
    So apparently Smalling has been playing with a fractured foot since the Young Boys game. Fair play to him.

    So thats the reason he cant pass the ball straight!

    :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,277 ✭✭✭✭How Soon Is Now


    Haven't seen much of this Koulibaily fella looking at him now though he's a beast! Very commanding as well looks a very good defender.

    Were linked to him but no way Napoli letting him go in there right mind for anything less then 100mil.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement