Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Isaac Wunder

  • 04-10-2018 02:55PM
    #1
    marieholmfan
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,736 ✭✭✭


    Was he in fact a vexatious litigant or was he in the right?

    Given that the Sweepstakes was a long running criminal conspiracy and the established fact that Joe McGrath used his fortune to corrupt elements of the police can we be certain that the courts of the time were not similarly corrupt?


Comments

  • #2
    L1011
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,108 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Wunder's arguments were vexatious nonsense. That doesn't affect nor is affected by the other problems the Sweeps had


  • #3
    schemingbohemia
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,606 ✭✭✭schemingbohemia


    marieholmfan wrote: »
    Was he in fact a vexatious litigant or was he in the right?

    Given that the Sweepstakes was a long running criminal conspiracy and the established fact that Joe McGrath used his fortune to corrupt elements of the police can we be certain that the courts of the time were not similarly corrupt?

    Are you Gemma O'Doherty?


  • #4
    marieholmfan
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,736 ✭✭✭marieholmfan


    L1011 wrote: »
    Wunder's arguments were vexatious nonsense. That doesn't affect nor is affected by the other problems the Sweeps had
    Have you read the transcripts?


Advertisement
Advertisement